1
|
Andres R, Hernandez A, Fernandez A, Comin A, Nuño A, Aguirre E, Arevalo E, Millastre E, Alvarez I, Verdun J, Lao J, Murillo L, Galan N, Bueso P, Puertolas T, Hagen C, Inglada-Perez L, Anton A. P158 PONDx Aragon: First spanish prospective study evaluating the impact of the 21-gene test on real praxis for N1 patients after RxPONDER results. Breast 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(23)00275-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
|
2
|
Wang B, Yao J, Yao X, Lao J, Liu D, Chen C, Lu Y. [Swertiamarin alleviates diabetic peripheral neuropathy in rats by suppressing NOXS/ ROS/NLRP3 signal pathway]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2021; 41:937-941. [PMID: 34238748 PMCID: PMC8267977 DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.06.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To observe the therapeutic effect of swertiamarin on diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in rats and explore the molecular mechanism in light of the NOXS/ROS/NLRP3 signal pathway. OBJECTIVE Thirty-two SD rats were randomly divided into control group, DPN model group (treated with saline), swertiamarin (5 mg/kg) treatment group and NOXS inhibitor (10 mL/kg DPI) treatment group. Rat models of DPN were established in the latter 3 groups by intraperitoneal injections of STZ, and the treatments were administered on days 1, 7 and 14 after modeling. Tactile hypersensitivity of the rats was evaluated 30 min after the treatment. The expressions of NOXS, ROS, NLRP3 and inflammatory factors in the spinal cord tissue were detected using ELISA, and the protein expressions of NOXS, ROS, and NLRP3 were also detected with Western blotting. OBJECTIVE Compared with those in the control group, the rats in DPN group showed significant hyperalgesia (P < 0.001), increased expressions of TNF-α (P < 0.001) and IL-6 (P < 0.001), decreased expressions of TGF-β (P < 0.001), and increased expressions of NOXS/ROS/NLRP3 signal pathway (P < 0.001). Compared with those in DPN model group, the rats with swertiamarin treatment showed improved hyperalgesia (P < 0.001), decreased expressions of TNF-α (P=0.03) and IL-6 (P=0.002), increased expressions of TGF-β (P=0.04), and decreased expressions of NOXS (P < 0.001), ROS (P < 0.001) and NLRP3 (P=0.002). Treatment with swertiamarin and the NOXS inhibitor produced similar effects on the expressions of the inflammatory factors in the rat models (P>0.05). OBJECTIVE DPN effectively relieves hyperalgesia in rat models of DPN by restoring the balance in the expressions of the inflammatory factors by suppressing NOXs/ROS/NLRP3 signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510130, China
| | - J Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - X Yao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510130, China
| | - J Lao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510130, China
| | - D Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510130, China
| | - C Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510130, China
| | - Y Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510130, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu M, Lao J, Wang H, Xu Z, Li J, Wen L, Yin Z, Luo C, Peng H. Electrochemical Determination of Tyrosine Using Graphene and Gold Nanoparticle Composite Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. RUSS J ELECTROCHEM+ 2021. [DOI: 10.1134/s1023193520110063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
4
|
Troncho CE, Burgos AM, Aguilera CG, Pascual MC, Aznar VN, Bonel AC, Lao J, Carreras RI. PH-0524: “TEACHH” model. Our experience in handling. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00546-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
5
|
Papinutto M, Lao J, Lalanne D, Caldara R. Watchers do not follow the eye movements of Walkers. Vision Res 2020; 176:130-140. [PMID: 32882595 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Eye movements are a functional signature of how the visual system effectively decodes and adapts to the environment. However, scientific knowledge in eye movements mostly arises from studies conducted in laboratories, with well-controlled stimuli presented in constrained unnatural settings. Only a few studies have attempted to directly compare and assess whether eye movement data acquired in the real world generalize with those in laboratory settings, with same visual inputs. However, none of these studies controlled for both the auditory signals typical of real-world settings and the top-down task effects across conditions, leaving this question unresolved. To minimize this inherent gap across conditions, we compared the eye movements recorded from observers during ecological spatial navigation in the wild (the Walkers) with those recorded in laboratory (the Watchers) on the same visual and auditory inputs, with both groups performing the very same active cognitive task. We derived robust data-driven statistical saliency and motion maps. The Walkers and Watchers differed in terms of eye movement characteristics: fixation number and duration, saccade amplitude. The Watchers relied significantly more on saliency and motion than the Walkers. Interestingly, both groups exhibited similar fixation patterns towards social agents and objects. Altogether, our data show that eye movements patterns obtained in laboratory do not fully generalize to real world, even when task and auditory information is controlled. These observations invite to caution when generalizing the eye movements obtained in laboratory with those of ecological spatial navigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Papinutto
- Eye and Brain Mapping Laboratory (iBMLab), Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland; Human-IST Institute, Department of Informatics, University of Fribourg, Switzerland.
| | - J Lao
- Eye and Brain Mapping Laboratory (iBMLab), Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - D Lalanne
- Human-IST Institute, Department of Informatics, University of Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - R Caldara
- Eye and Brain Mapping Laboratory (iBMLab), Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martínez-Trufero J, de Lobera AR, Lao J, Puértolas T, Artal-Cortés A, Zorrilla M, Alonso V, Pazo R, Valero MI, Ríos-Mitchell MJ, Calderero V, Herrero A, Antón A. Serum Markers and Prognosis in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Tumori 2019; 91:522-30. [PMID: 16457152 DOI: 10.1177/030089160509100613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) represents a heterogeneous subgroup of breast cancer with an often dismal outcome. Identifying prognostic factors has acquired great significance for the selection of optimal treatment in individual patients. Methods Between January 1993 and December 1997, 103 patients were treated in our institution with multimodality treatment consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy; tamoxifen was added in hormone receptor-positive cases. In the search for prognostic factors well-established parameters (clinical, pathological and treatment-related) as well as new features with potential value (c-erbB-2, baseline serum levels of CA 15.3 and CEA) were included in the univariate and multivariate analysis. Results At a median follow-up of 92 months (range, 8-130), the estimated five-year cancer-specific overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 71.34% and 57.7%, respectively. Among the 22 different variables studied, only 10 were significantly correlated with OS and DFS. In multivariate analysis five retained independent prognostic value for both OS and DFS: tumor grade, serum markers, features of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node status. With cutoff values of 35 U/mL for CA 15.3 and 5 ng/mL for CEA, the probability of five-year OS (Cox hazard ratio 3.91, P = 0.0009) and DFS (Cox hazard ratio 2.40, P = 0.02) decreased from 78% to 52% and from 68% to 47%, respectively, when at least one of these markers was abnormal. Conclusions Baseline serum levels of CEA and CA 15.3 emerged from this study as strong independent predictors of outcome in LABC, whose value adds to other established prognostic factors such as postoperative nodal status, IBC, histological grade and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Martínez-Trufero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, C/Isabel la Católica 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blancas I, Fontanillas M, Conde V, Lao J, Martínez E, Sotelo MJ, Jaen A, Bayo JL, Carabantes F, Illarramendi JJ, Gordon MM, Cruz J, García-Palomo A, Mendiola C, Pérez-Ruiz E, Bofill JS, Baena-Cañada JM, Jáñez NM, Esquerdo G, Ruiz-Borrego M. Correction to: Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:1631-1632. [DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1956-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
8
|
Blancas I, Fontanillas M, Conde V, Lao J, Martínez E, Sotelo MJ, Jaen A, Bayo JL, Carabantes F, Illarramendi JJ, Gordon MM, Cruz J, García-Palomo A, Mendiola C, Pérez-Ruiz E, Bofill JS, Baena-Cañada JM, Jáñez NM, Esquerdo G, Ruiz-Borrego M. Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 20:862-869. [PMID: 29178019 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1797-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to describe the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had disease progression after receiving anti-estrogen therapy in clinical practice, getting real-world data. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in Spain. Postmenopausal women with locally advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer who received treatment with fulvestrant 500 mg after progression with a previous anti-estrogen therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), and safety profile. RESULTS A total of 263 women were evaluated (median age, 65.8 years). At a median follow-up of 21.5 months, median PFS and OS were 10.6 and 43.2 months, respectively. PFS according to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and ≥ 4th lines were 11.5, 10.6, 9.9, and 8.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0245). PFS in patients with visceral involvement was 10 months vs 10.6 months in patients without visceral involvement (p = 0.6604), 9.6 months in patients with high Ki67 vs 10 months in patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.7224), and 10.2 months in HER2+ patients vs 10.3 months in HER2- patients (p = 0.6809). The CBR was 56.5% and the DoCB was 18.4 months. The most frequently adverse events were injection site pain (10.3%) and musculoskeletal disorders (7.6%). CONCLUSIONS Fulvestrant 500 mg administered in clinical practice was shown to be effective (PFS, 10.6 months; CBR, 56.5%) and well tolerated, in accordance with previous trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Blancas
- Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario, C/Dr. Oloriz, 16, 18012, Granada, Spain.
| | - M Fontanillas
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, illarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Conde
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas, S/N, 18014, Granada, Spain
| | - J Lao
- Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - E Martínez
- Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Av. del Dr. Clarà, 19, 12002, Castelló de la Plana, Spain
| | - M J Sotelo
- Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, C/del Profesor Martín Lagos, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Jaen
- Hospital de Jaén, Avda. del Ejército Español, nº 10, 23007, Jaén, Spain
| | - J L Bayo
- Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Ronda Exterior Norte s/n, 21005, Huelva, Spain
| | - F Carabantes
- Hospital Universitario Carlos Haya, Av. de Carlos Haya, s/n, 29010, Málaga, Spain
| | - J J Illarramendi
- Complejo Universitario Hospital de Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea, 3, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M M Gordon
- Hospital de Jerez, Ronda de Circunvalación s/n, 11407, Cádiz, Spain
| | - J Cruz
- Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Carretera de Ofra, s/n, 38320, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - A García-Palomo
- Complejo Universitario Asistencial de León, C/Altos de Nava, s/n, León, Spain
| | - C Mendiola
- Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba, s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Pérez-Ruiz
- Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovia A-7, Km 187, 29603, Marbella, Spain
| | - J S Bofill
- Hospital Nuestra Señora De Valme, Av. de Bellavista, s/n, 41014, Seville, Spain
| | - J M Baena-Cañada
- Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Av. Ana de Viya, 21, 11009, Cádiz, Spain
| | - N M Jáñez
- Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. de Colmenar Viejo, km. 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Esquerdo
- Clínica Benidorm, Av. Alfonso Puchades, 03501, Benidorm, Spain
| | - M Ruiz-Borrego
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Av. Manuel Siurot, s/n, 41013, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moreno F, Martínez-Jañez N, Garau I, Guerra JA, Alarcón J, Bermejo B, Gonzalez-Cortijo L, Bueno C, Lao J, Bezares S, Rosell L, Blanch A, Caballero R, Carrasco E, Rojo F, Martín M, O'Connor M, Hernando A, Albanell J. Abstract OT3-02-07: A phase II study to compare fulvestrant (F) 500mg plus placebo versus (vs) F 500mg plus palbociclib (P) as first line treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer (BC) sensitive to endocrine therapy (ET). “The FLIPPER study” (GEICAM/2014-12). Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-ot3-02-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Delaying/overcoming resistance to ET in HR-positive HER2-negative BC patients (pts) is a major need to futhrt improve safe and efficacious treatment options. F is a selective estrogen receptor (ER) downregulator currently indicated for the treatment of HR-positive metastatic BC in postmenopausal women with disease progression following anti-estrogen therapy. In FIRST trial F 500mg improved median time to progression (TTP) over anastrozole (23.4 vs 13.1 months, respectively) in untreated metastatic BC. P is a selective reversible inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6. FDA granted its accelerated approval based on progression-free survival (PFS) in combination with letrozole for postmenopausal women with ER-positive and HER2-negative advanced BC as initial ET (PALOMA-1). In another study, after progression to ET, P in combination with F resulted in longer PFS than F alone (PALOMA-3).
The high median TTP achieved with F alone (FIRST) coupled with the significant benefit of adding P to F (PALOMA-3) suggest that F 500mg in combination with P in the first-line setting may significantly improve long-term disease control.
Trial Design:This is an international, randomized, double-blind, multicentre phase II study comparing F 500mg in combination with P vs F 500mg plus placebo as first line therapy in postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic BC who have received ≥5 years of adjuvant ET for early disease and remained disease free for >12 months following its completion or have “de novo” metastatic disease. HR and HER2 status will be based on central testing on the most recent tumour biopsy. Patients will be randomized 1:1. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of both treatment arms in terms of PFS at 1 year according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 by investigator assessment. As secondary efficacy objectives,PFS, Objective Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Overall Survival (OS), and 1-year and 2-year survival probabilities, have been considered. Other secondary objectives include the comparison of safety, tolerability and health-related quality of life between the treatment arms. As exploratory objectives, the identification of promising biomarkers related with response to study therapy and primary/acquired drug resistance. Pts will be stratified by the site of disease (visceral vs non-visceral) and disease presentation at study entry (recurrent disease vs metastatic “de novo”). With a sample size of 190 pts, the analysis would have 80% power to detect a difference between both treatment arms, assuming PFS proportions of 0.545 and 0.695, respectively. This study is sponsored by GEICAM and Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly ICORG) is also participating. Recruitment started in February 2016 with 14 pts included. Analysis of the primary endpoint is planned for Q1 2018. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02690480.
Citation Format: Moreno F, Martínez-Jañez N, Garau I, Guerra JA, Alarcón J, Bermejo B, Gonzalez-Cortijo L, Bueno C, Lao J, Bezares S, Rosell L, Blanch A, Caballero R, Carrasco E, Rojo F, Martín M, O'Connor M, Hernando A, Albanell J. A phase II study to compare fulvestrant (F) 500mg plus placebo versus (vs) F 500mg plus palbociclib (P) as first line treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer (BC) sensitive to endocrine therapy (ET). “The FLIPPER study” (GEICAM/2014-12) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Moreno
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - N Martínez-Jañez
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Garau
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - JA Guerra
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Alarcón
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Bermejo
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Gonzalez-Cortijo
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Bueno
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Lao
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Bezares
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Rosell
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Blanch
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Caballero
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Carrasco
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Rojo
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Martín
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M O'Connor
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Hernando
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Albanell
- Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Llátzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Son Espasses, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Madrid, Spain; Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ICORG (Cancer Trials Ireland), Ireland; Hospital del Mar - IMAS, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ortega V, Lao J, Garau I, Afonso N, Calvo L, Fernández Y, Martinez-Garcia M, Blanco E, Zamora P, García M, Illarramendi J, Rodríguez C, Aguirre E, Pérez J, Castan JC, Llombart-Cussac A. MERIBEL study: Single-agent eribulin as first-line therapy for taxane-resistant HER2[-] metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw365.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Ayala F, Feijoo M, Martinez N, Florián Gericó J, Gomez A, Sánchez Rovira P, Jimenez VP, Bueno C, Carabantes F, Delgado I, Galve Calvo E, Garcia Saenz JA, Lao J, Pérez-Carrión R, Salinas P, Rodriguez Moral M, Valero Arbizu M. Toxicity of prolonged treatment with eribulin (E) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients: Results of the EXTER study. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e11528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Juan Lao
- Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
López-Tarruella S, Escudero MJ, Martín M, Jara C, Guerrero Á, Lluch A, Santaballa A, Martínez del Prado P, Lao J, Alba E, Fernández A, Andrés R, Llombart A, Batista N, Porras I, López-Vega JM, Adrover E, Calvo L, Pollán M, Carrasco E. Abstract P2-13-17: Impact on survival of primary tumor resection in women with de novo metastatic breast cancer. The GEICAM Alamo I-III breast cancer registry (1990-2001). Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-p2-13-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Retrospective data from institutional series and population-based databases have suggested a potential benefit of the primary tumor (PT) surgery in de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts). Recently reported prospective data from 2 randomized trials and a multicenter registry questioned the real role of the local approach in the modern individualized systemic treatment era. Methods: The ALAMO (A) is a retrospective analysis of pts diagnosed with BC between 1990 and 2001 across 56 GEICAM hospitals in Spain. Patterns of BC presentation (tumor and host characteristics), treatment and survival were recorded in 3 cohorts, AI (1990-93, 4529 pts, closed by 2000), AII (1994-97, 10453 pts, closed by 2003) and AIII (1998-2001, 10675 pts, closed by 2007). MBC pts at first diagnosis excluding those without complete information about their PT surgery were included. Descriptive, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were carried out. Results: 5.5% (N=1415) of the ALAMO database pts were initially diagnosed with MBC, 1331 fulfilled the present analysis criteria (327 from AI, 619 from AII and 385 from AIII). Median age was 63.1 years (range: 21.6-96.0), 51.8% had single-organ metastasis, and their distribution according to the predominant site of disease was skin/soft tissue (16.2%), bone (33.7%), and visceral (48.4%). Surgery of the PT was done in 44.5% (N=592) of pts (512 with radical procedures, 46 with palliative procedures and 34 unknown); besides, 427 pts underwent axillary dissection. Initial local treatment was the choice for 380 pts (358 surgery and 22 radiotherapy), 722 received initial systemic therapy (480 chemotherapy, 214 endocrine treatment and 28 both), 29 received best supportive care and for 200 pts the treatment sequence could not be established. Pts in the surgery (S) group were younger (19.5% vs 11.8% were <44 years-old in the S vs non-S group respectively), with oligometastatic disease (61.9% vs 43.9% with single-organ involvement in the S vs non-S group respectively) and with different sites of disease (40.2% vs 54.3% with visceral and 39% vs 29.8% with bone metastasis in the S vs non-S group respectively). With a median follow-up of 1.9 years, the 5-yr overall survival (OS) was 25.4% in the entire de novo MBC population, with a median OS of 3.3 yrs in the S-group vs 1.9 yrs in the non-S-group (HR 1.69, p<0.0001). Subgroup analyses showed a benefit of PT surgery in OS regardless the number of metastasis and site of disease, but didn't show this benefit analyzing pts according to BC subtypes. The multi-adjusted HR for surgery was 1.38 (p=0.037). The multivariate Cox regression analysis model included the site of disease (p=0.028), the histopathologic grade (p=0.019) and the hormone receptor status (p=0.007). Discussion: The Alamo data line up with previously reported population-based registries, which highlight the better survival outcome of de novo MBC pts undergoing PT surgery. However, the consideration of the biological heterogeneity of BC has changed the landscape of systemic treatment. Only well designed randomized controlled trials will have the power to discriminate between a consistent bias and a real biologic effect of the PT surgery.
Citation Format: Sara López-Tarruella, María José Escudero, Miguel Martín, Carlos Jara, Ángel Guerrero, Ana Lluch, Ana Santaballa, Purificación Martínez del Prado, Juan Lao, Emilio Alba, Antonio Fernández, Raquel Andrés, Antonio Llombart, Norberto Batista, Ignacio Porras, José Manuel López-Vega, Encarna Adrover, Lourdes Calvo, Marina Pollán, Eva Carrasco. Impact on survival of primary tumor resection in women with de novo metastatic breast cancer. The GEICAM Alamo I-III breast cancer registry (1990-2001) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-17.
Collapse
|
13
|
Gámez-Pozo A, Pérez Carrión RM, Manso L, Crespo C, Mendiola C, López-Vacas R, Berges-Soria J, López IÁ, Margeli M, Calero JLB, Farre XG, Santaballa A, Ciruelos EM, Afonso R, Lao J, Catalán G, Gallego JVÁ, López JM, Bofill FJS, Borrego MR, Espinosa E, Vara JAF, Zamora P. The Long-HER study: clinical and molecular analysis of patients with HER2+ advanced breast cancer who become long-term survivors with trastuzumab-based therapy. PLoS One 2014; 9:e109611. [PMID: 25330188 PMCID: PMC4203741 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Accepted: 09/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Trastuzumab improves survival outcomes in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. The Long-Her study was designed to identify clinical and molecular markers that could differentiate long-term survivors from patients having early progression after trastuzumab treatment. Methods Data were collected from women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab that experienced a response or stable disease during at least 3 years. Patients having a progression in the first year of therapy with trastuzumab were used as a control. Genes related with trastuzumab resistance were identified and investigated for network and gene functional interrelation. Models predicting poor response to trastuzumab were constructed and evaluated. Finally, a mutational status analysis of selected genes was performed in HER2 positive breast cancer samples. Results 103 patients were registered in the Long-HER study, of whom 71 had obtained a durable complete response. Median age was 58 years. Metastatic disease was diagnosed after a median of 24.7 months since primary diagnosis. Metastases were present in the liver (25%), lungs (25%), bones (23%) and soft tissues (23%), with 20% of patients having multiple locations of metastases. Median duration of response was 55 months. The molecular analysis included 35 patients from the group with complete response and 18 patients in a control poor-response group. Absence of trastuzumab as part of adjuvant therapy was the only clinical factor associated with long-term survival. Gene ontology analysis demonstrated that PI3K pathway was associated with poor response to trastuzumab-based therapy: tumours in the control group usually had four or five alterations in this pathway, whereas tumours in the Long-HER group had two alterations at most. Conclusions Trastuzumab may provide a substantial long-term survival benefit in a selected group of patients. Whole genome expression analysis comparing long-term survivors vs. a control group predicted early progression after trastuzumab-based therapy. Multiple alterations in genes related to the PI3K-mTOR pathway seem to be required to confer resistance to this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Gámez-Pozo
- Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular (INGEMM) – IdiPAZ, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Luis Manso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Crespo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cesar Mendiola
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocío López-Vacas
- Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular (INGEMM) – IdiPAZ, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julia Berges-Soria
- Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular (INGEMM) – IdiPAZ, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Álvarez López
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastián, Pais Vasco, Spain
| | - Mireia Margeli
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Ana Santaballa
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Eva M. Ciruelos
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ruth Afonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Juan Lao
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Gustavo Catalán
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - José Miramón López
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Juan A. Fresno Vara
- Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular (INGEMM) – IdiPAZ, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Zamora
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Blancas I, Fontanillas M, Conde Herrero V, Lao J, Martinez de Dueñas E, Sotelo Lezama M, JaÉn-Morago A, Bayo J, Carabantes F, Illaramendi J, Gordón M, Ruiz-Borrego M, Cruz J, García-Palomo A, Mendiola C, Perez-Ruiz E, Cañada JB, Martínez N, Esquerdo G, Bofill JS. Assessment of Treatment Response with Fulvestrant (F) 500 Mg in Standard Clinical Practice Through a Retrospective Study: Nct01509625. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu329.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
15
|
Lao J, Vizioli L, Muckli L, Caldara R. Decoding culture from the human primary visual cortex. J Vis 2014. [DOI: 10.1167/14.10.1093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
16
|
Lao J, Lacroix J, Nohra J, Naaman N, Sautier JM, Jallot E. Chemical imaging of the reconstruction of new bone and trace elements inside bioactive glass scaffoldsin vivo: a multimodal and quantitative micro-ion beam analysis. SURF INTERFACE ANAL 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/sia.5375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J. Lao
- Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal; CNRS/IN2P3, Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire; BP 80026 63171 Aubière Cedex France
| | - J. Lacroix
- Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal; CNRS/IN2P3, Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire; BP 80026 63171 Aubière Cedex France
| | - J. Nohra
- INSERM; U872, Eq.5, Laboratoire de Physiopathologie Orale et Moléculaire; Paris F-75006 France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers; Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UMR S 872; Paris F-75006 France
- Université Paris Diderot; Paris 7, UFR d'Odontologie; Paris France
- Department of Periodontology, Laboratory of Calcified Tissue, School of Medical Dentistry; Saint-Joseph University; Beirut Lebanon
| | - N. Naaman
- Department of Periodontology, Laboratory of Calcified Tissue, School of Medical Dentistry; Saint-Joseph University; Beirut Lebanon
| | - J.-M. Sautier
- INSERM; U872, Eq.5, Laboratoire de Physiopathologie Orale et Moléculaire; Paris F-75006 France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers; Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UMR S 872; Paris F-75006 France
- Université Paris Diderot; Paris 7, UFR d'Odontologie; Paris France
| | - E. Jallot
- Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal; CNRS/IN2P3, Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire; BP 80026 63171 Aubière Cedex France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu Y, Lao J, Miellet S, Kuhn G, Caldara R. iMap Motion: Validating a Novel Method for Statistical Fixation Mapping of Temporal Eye Movement Data. J Vis 2013. [DOI: 10.1167/13.9.796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
18
|
|
19
|
Lao J, He L, Caldara R. Microsaccades Boost Face Identification. J Vis 2013. [DOI: 10.1167/13.9.1344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
20
|
|
21
|
Ruiz-Borrego M, Garcia Saenz JÁ, Hornedo J, Manso L, Calvo I, Lao J, González-Martín A, Feijoo M, Florián Gericó J, Morales S, Illarramendi JJ, Jimenez VP, Sánchez-Jiménez J, Rodriguez CA, Sánchez-Rovira P, Ayala F, Alvarez I, Virizuela JA, Lopez R, Rodríguez-Villanueva J. EUFORIA study (Eribulin Use for the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Observational, Retrospective Analysis): Initial experience with eribulin in daily clinical practice in Spain. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e12015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e12015 Background: Spanish MoH authorized eribulin in 04/2011 for use in patients as per license. Pending reimbursement, public hospitals used it through a national compassionate use program. After 1 year, we analyzed the pre-specified patient selection criteria and eribulin efficacy and safety results in a representative sample to confirm whether real world use matched the data from the pivotal phase III study. Methods: An observational, retrospective analysis was proposed to the top 20 hospitals by eribulin use, with at least 3 candidate patients who had/could have received ≥3 cycles of treatment by 03/2012. Patient and disease characteristics, as well as efficacy and safety parameters were obtained. Patient´s data were collected until September 2012. Living patients able to respond at the time of the study signed an informed consent. Study was approved by ethics committees. Results: Out of 112 screened ABC patients in 19 participating hospitals, 104 were enrolled. Median age was 56.6 years and 66% were post-menopausal. Visceral disease occurred in 2/3 of patients. ECOG status was ≤1 in 75,4% of patients. Estrogen receptor expression was found in 64.4% of tumors; 15.4% overexpressed HER2. 49% of patients received 1-5 treatment lines for ABC before eribulin. Mean eribulin treatment duration was 3 months (4,7 cycles). Disease control rate was 48.8% (1.1% CR, 22.1% PR, 25.6% SD). By 09/2012, 64,4% patients were still alive and median PFS was 97 days (95% IC: 81-129). 78.8% of patients reported ≥1 adverse events, being asthenia, neutropenia, anemia, alopecia, nauseas, and mucositis the most frequent ones (≥10%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in ≤5% of patients. Conclusions: The favorable efficacy and safety profile of eribulin observed in this observational study is consistent with the pivotal phase III study (EMBRACE) and confirms its position for the treatment of ABC. Pre reimbursement usage has been restricted to later lines but use per the licensed indication in 3L is expected to yield additional clinical benefit. A confirmatory observational study (EUFORIA-2) is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Luis Manso
- Medical Oncology Department. Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Calvo
- Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Lao
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Serafin Morales
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Francisco Ayala
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, UMU, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | - Rafael Lopez
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lao J, Madani J, Puértolas T, Álvarez M, Hernández A, Pazo-Cid R, Artal Á, Antón Torres A. Liposomal Doxorubicin in the treatment of breast cancer patients: a review. J Drug Deliv 2013; 2013:456409. [PMID: 23634302 PMCID: PMC3619536 DOI: 10.1155/2013/456409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2012] [Accepted: 02/10/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Drug delivery systems can provide enhanced efficacy and/or reduced toxicity for anticancer agents. Liposome drug delivery systems are able to modify the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of cytostatic agents, increasing the concentration of the drug released to neoplastic tissue and reducing the exposure of normal tissue. Anthracyclines are a key drug in the treatment of both metastatic and early breast cancer, but one of their major limitations is cardiotoxicity. One of the strategies designed to minimize this side effect is liposome encapsulation. Liposomal anthracyclines have achieved highly efficient drug encapsulation and they have proven to be effective and with reduced cardiotoxicity, as a single agent or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of either anthracyclines-treated or naïve metastatic breast cancer patients. Of particular interest is the use of the combination of liposomal anthracyclines and trastuzumab in patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. In this paper, we discuss the different studies on liposomal doxorubicin in metastatic and early breast cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Lao
- Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragón Institute of Health Sciences, Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 1, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Julia Madani
- Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragón Institute of Health Sciences, Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 1, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Teresa Puértolas
- Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragón Institute of Health Sciences, Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 1, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - María Álvarez
- Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Alba Hernández
- Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Roberto Pazo-Cid
- Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragón Institute of Health Sciences, Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 1, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Ángel Artal
- Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragón Institute of Health Sciences, Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 1, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Antonio Antón Torres
- Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragón Institute of Health Sciences, Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 1, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the electrophysiological results obtained after employing the posterior approach for spinal accessory nerve-suprascapular nerve (SAN-SSN) transfer, and to compare this with the traditional anterior approach. SAN-SSN transfer was performed in 74 patients with brachial plexus injury. The posterior approach was used in 35 patients and the anterior approach was used in 39 patients. Electrophysiological examination was conducted and analyzed postoperatively. There was no significant difference between approaches in the time it took for the infraspinatus to show low-incidence motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) and an incomplete interference pattern. In addition, the final ratio of patients that showed regeneration potential of the infraspinatus was not significantly different between the approaches. Furthermore, latency and wave amplitude showed a linear regression with post-operative time in the posterior approach group. In the posterior approach group, the final abduction of the shoulder was positively correlated with the amplitude. The posterior approach for SAN-SSN is an effective potential alternative technique that may be appropriate for some clinical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Rui
- Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu Y, Lao J, Gao K, Gu Y, Xin Z. Outcome of nerve transfers for traumatic complete brachial plexus avulsion: results of 28 patients by DASH and NRS questionnaires. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37:413-21. [PMID: 22067298 DOI: 10.1177/1753193411425330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients who suffered complete brachial plexus avulsion before and after nerve transfers by assessing upper extremity function and pain using the DASH and NRS questionnaires. Patients who underwent nerve transfers improved their DASH and NRS scores compared with before surgery. Although individually there was no correlation with improved scores, the triple combination of rehabilitation exercises, electrical stimulation therapy and neurotrophic drugs postoperatively correlated positively with improved functional outcomes. This study suggested a positive effect of the passage of time and nerve transfers in total brachial plexus avulsions from patients' self assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Liu
- Department of Hand Surgery, Shanghai Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lopez-Vega JM, Calvo EG, Plazaola A, Morales S, Hernando B, Gomez RMS, Alvarez I, Anton A, Illarramendi JJ, De Juan A, Martinez P, Lahuerta A, Llombart Cussac A, Garcia Gonzalez M, Lao J, Boni V, Puertolas T, Sherer S, Sabariz L, Garcia-Foncillas J. Activation of angiogenic pathway in the prediction of pathologic response to bevacizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.10595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10595 Background: To evaluate potential biomarkers of pathological response to bevacizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in untreated breast cancers (BC) patients recruited in a phase II, multicenter clinical trial. Methods: Patients received a single infusion of bevacizumab (15 mg/ kg) (C1) 3 weeks prior to the beginning of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) consisting in 4 cycles of docetaxel (60 mg/mq), doxorubicin (50 mg/mq) and bevacizumab (15 mg/ kg) every 21 days (C2-C5) following by surgery. Biomarker expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (Ki67, CD31, CD31/Ki67, VEGFR2, pVEGFR2 [Y951]) before and after bevacizumab infusion (C1). Gene expression was analyzed using Affimetrix Human Gene ST 1.0. Results: This analysis was performed on 73 patients (49 yr, range 29-70). Twenty (27%) patients obtained best response (G4-G5) whether 50 (68%) were considered as no responder (G1-G2-G3). Response was associated with negative estrogen receptors expression (p=0.02) and high Ki67 basal and after C1 expression (p=0.009 and p=0.01). Six (54%) of the triple negative tumors were responders (p=0.05). Interestingly, change in pVEGFR2 [Y951] staining induced by bevacizumab administration was found significantly associated with response (p=0.0). Decrease in the phosphorilation status of VEGFR2 (Y951) >70% yielded a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area of 0.681 (95% CI: 0.536 - 0.825) with 84% sensitivity and 95% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values for this marker were 60% and 64%, respectively. The change in phosphorilation status of VEGFR2p remains a significant predictor biomarker of response in multivariate analysis (OR=0.9, IC%95 0.96-0.99, p=0.04) after adjusting for clinical-pathological characteristics. Conclusions: These findings suggest the role of the phosphorilation status of VEGFR2 as predictive biomarkers of pathological response to bevacizumab in neoadjuvant setting in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Serafin Morales
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Anton
- Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Ana De Juan
- Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Juan Lao
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Teresa Puertolas
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Garcia-Foncillas J, Martinez P, Lahuerta A, Llombart Cussac A, Garcia Gonzalez M, Gomez RMS, Alvarez I, Anton A, Illarramendi JJ, De Juan A, Calvo EG, Plazaola A, Morales S, Hernando B, Lao J, Boni V, Puertolas T, Sherer S, Palacios G, Lopez-Vega JM. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus 18F-misonidazol-PET/CT to predict pathologic response in bevacizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.10512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10512 Background: To investigate the role of DCE-MRI versus 18F-Misonidazole (FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET/CT) in the prediction of pathological response to bevacizumab-based neodajuvant therapy. Methods: 73 chemotherapy naïve, stage II and III breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) were enrolled in a phase II, single-arm, multicenter, open-label and prospective clinical trial. Pts received single infusion of bevacizumab (15 mg/ kg) (C1) 3 weeks prior to the beginning of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) consisting of 4 cycles of docetaxel (60 mg/mq), doxorubicin (50 mg/mq) and bevacizumab (15 mg/ kg) every 21 days (C2-C5), followed by surgery. Tumor proliferation, hypoxia and perfusion were evaluated respectively using 18F-Fluorothymidine (FLT) and 18F-Misonidazole (FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET/CT) and dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance (DCE-MR). Serial imaging studies were performed in parallel at several time points including baseline (BL) and 14-21 days after bevacizumab alone (C1). Results: After only one administration of bev, tumor proliferation and perfusion assessed using FLT-PET and DCE-MRI significantly decrease (-26% and -46%, p<0.001) but these changes were not found to be associated with final response. Most important, changes in tumor hypoxia induced by bevacizumab was significantly associated with pathological response (p= 0.004) and was an independent predictor of response in multivariate analysis (RR=0.95, IC 95% 0.92-0.99, p=0.02). Decrease in FMISO uptake >10% yielded a ROC curve area of 0.7 (95% CI: 0.56 - 0.85) with high specificity (94%). Conclusions: Our findings suggest a significant value of early changes in tumor hypoxia assessed by FMISO-PET as a biomarker of pathological response in bevacizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesus Garcia-Foncillas
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Antonio Anton
- Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Ana De Juan
- Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | - Serafin Morales
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Juan Lao
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Teresa Puertolas
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Soulié J, Lao J, Jallot E, Nedelec JM. Influence of mesostructuration on the reactivity of bioactive glasses in biological medium: a PIXE-RBS study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1039/c2jm30880k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
28
|
Zamora P, Pérez-Carrión R, Manso L, Crespo C, Mendiola C, Alvarez-López I, Margeli M, Bayo-Calero JL, González-Farre X, Santaballa A, Ciruelos EM, Afonso R, Lao J, Catalán G, Alvarez-Gallego JV, Miramón-López J, Salvador-Bofill FJ, Ruiz-Borrego M. P5-14-22: Prospective Observational Study To Describe the Clinicopathological and Biological Characteristics and the Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Who Experienced Complete or Partial Remission or Disease Stabilization during at Least 3 Years. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p5-14-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Trastuzumab has shown an improvement in survival outcomes among patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Identification of pathological, clinical factors and tumor genetic profile that may predict long-term remission has become a key-issue. We aimed to describe the clinicopathological and biological characteristics of MBC patients who experienced complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) during at least 3 years and their management in routine clinical practice.
Methods: Multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study. Data were collected from women with HER2+ MBC treated with a trastuzumab-based regimen who maintained a partial or complete remission or disease stabilization beyond 3 years. The interim results from the first 65 patients evaluated are presented.
Results: Median age: 59 (52-70) years. Metastatic disease was diagnosed after a median of 23.5 (1.6−48.8) months since primary tumor diagnosis. The predominant tumor type was ductal carcinoma (89.2%) and 47% showed histological grade III. Mean tumor size: 3.6±2.2cm (anatomical pathology), 5.1±2.8cm (imaging studies). Hormonal status: Progesterone receptor positive 46% and estrogen receptor positive 43%. Most common metastatic sites: lung (23%), liver (17%) and bone (14%). Overexpression of HER2 was assessed by IHC in 97% of patients, of whom 94% were HER2+ (3+) and 17% had FISH+ HER2 status. Tumor was positive for p53 and Ki67 in 23% and 41.5%, respectively. Surgery was performed on 83% of patients, of which 73% underwent radical mastectomy; 96% had their axillary nodes removed. Surgery of metastases was performed on 7.8%. First line chemotherapy was received by 91% with the most frequent schemes being paclitaxel (24%), vinorelbine (15%) and paclitaxel/carboplatine (14%). First line hormonal therapy and radiotherapy was used in 45% and 12%, respectively. All patients received first line trastuzumab, administered on a weekly schedule in 51%. Trastuzumab was used in combination in most of patients (89.2%) with a median number of cycles of 18 (7.0−41.5) and during a median of 53.3±25 months. 66% of patients achieved a CR, 21% PR and 13% had SD. Median time since trastuzumab was initiated to CR, PR or SD was 5 (4-7) months. Median duration of CR, PR or SD was 56 (44.5−78.0) months. Trastuzumab was maintained beyond CR, PR or SD in 99% during a median of 46.5 (35-67) months. 75% of patients continue on treatment with trastuzumab. Only 2 patients discontinued trastuzumab due to toxicity. At the time of the analysis, 19% had progressed, 57% were alive and free of disease and among patients on treatment (93%), 54% were on trastuzumab. Cardiac toxicity was the most common toxicity (36%) among those suffering at least one (22%).
Conclusions: The preliminary findings support that trastuzumab provides a substantial long-term survival benefit with a manageable safety profile in HER2+ MBC patients. This study adds to the evidence that there may be benefit in continuing trastuzumab after achieving remission or disease stabilization. Final results will be presented in the forthcoming congress.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Zamora
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - R Pérez-Carrión
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - L Manso
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - C Crespo
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - C Mendiola
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - I Alvarez-López
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - M Margeli
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - JL Bayo-Calero
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - X González-Farre
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - A Santaballa
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - EM Ciruelos
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - R Afonso
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - J Lao
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - G Catalán
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - JV Alvarez-Gallego
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - J Miramón-López
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - FJ Salvador-Bofill
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - M Ruiz-Borrego
- 1Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quirón, Madrid, Spain; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Son Llàtzer, Mallorca, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain; Hospital Serranía de Ronda, Ronda, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vizioli L, Smith F, Lao J, Muckli L, Caldara R. Neural face coding is shaped by race. J Vis 2011. [DOI: 10.1167/11.11.623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
30
|
Lao J, Miellet S, Vizioli L, Fusco R, Caldara R. Eyes like it, brain likes it: Tracking the neural tuning of cultural diversity in eye movements for faces. J Vis 2011. [DOI: 10.1167/11.11.628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
31
|
Llombart-Cussac A, Ruiz A, Antón A, Barnadas A, Antolín S, Alés-Martínez JE, Alvarez I, Andrés R, García Saenz JA, Lao J, Carrasco E, Cámara C, Casas I, Martín M. Exemestane versus anastrozole as front-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: final results from the Spanish Breast Cancer Group 2001-03 phase 2 randomized trial. Cancer 2011; 118:241-7. [PMID: 21717449 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2010] [Revised: 04/15/2011] [Accepted: 04/25/2011] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several aromatase inhibitor studies have reported variations in the inhibitory potency of these agents that could lead to differences in clinical outcomes. In the current study, the authors formally evaluated the activity of anastrozole and exemestane in postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive, advanced breast cancer. METHODS Postmenopausal women who had measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and had not received previous endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive either oral exemestane 25 mg daily or oral anastrozole 1 mg daily until they had disease progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included the clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival, and safety. Crossover to the other aromatase inhibitor was permitted at the time of disease progression; ORR, CBR, and TTP after second-line treatment also were explored. RESULTS In total, 103 patients were enrolled. The median patient age was 71.6 years, 52.4% of patients had visceral disease, and 75.8% of patients had ≥ 2 disease sites. Half of the patients had received previous tamoxifen, and 60% had received previous chemotherapy. The efficacy observed in the exemestane and anastrozole groups was an ORR of 36.2% and 46%, respectively; a CBR of 59.6% and 68%, respectively, and a TTP of 6.1 months and 12.1 months, respectively. At progression, 28 patients crossed over to the other aromatase inhibitor, including 16 patients who switched to exemestane (CBR, 43.7%; TTP, 4.4 months) and 12 patients who switched to anastrozole (CBR, 8.3%; TTP, 2 months). Both drugs were generally well tolerated, and no study drug-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS In this phase 2 randomized trial, no significant differences in clinical activity were observed in favor of exemestane to justify a superiority phase 3 trial design in the first-line setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Llombart-Cussac
- Medical Oncology Service, Biomedical Research Institute, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Boni V, Dominguez I, Garcia Velloso MJ, Lopez-Vega JM, Martinez P, Plazaola A, Hernando B, Llombart Cussac A, Lao J, Gomez RMS, Alvarez I, Illarramendi JJ, Calvo EG, Morales Murillo S, Puertolas T, Pina LJ, Bernedo E, Palacios G, Scherer SJ, Garcia-Foncillas J. Bevacizumab changes in patients with naïve, stage II-III breast cancer assessed by 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 18F-fluorotymidine PET-CT. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.2529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
33
|
Antón A, Barnadas A, Florián J, Ribelles N, Lomas M, Lao J, González-Quintás A, Margelí M, Paules AB, Gayo J, Ramos M. Biweekly vinorelbine and tegafur/uracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: GEICAM 2000–02 phase II study. Clin Transl Oncol 2011; 13:281-6. [DOI: 10.1007/s12094-011-0654-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
34
|
|
35
|
Isaac J, Nohra J, Lao J, Jallot E, Nedelec JM, Berdal A, Sautier JM, Sautier JM. Effects of strontium-doped bioactive glass on the differentiation of cultured osteogenic cells. Eur Cell Mater 2011; 21:130-43. [PMID: 21305476 DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v021a11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
There is accumulating evidence that strontium-containing biomaterials have positive effects on bone tissue repair. We investigated the in vitro effect of a new Sr-doped bioactive glass manufactured by the sol-gel method on osteoblast viability and differentiation. Osteoblasts isolated from foetal mouse calvaria were cultured in the presence of bioactive glass particles; particles were undoped (B75) or Sr-doped with 1 wt.% (B75-Sr1) and 5 wt.% (B75-Sr5). Morphological analysis was carried out by contrast-phase microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cell viability was evaluated by the MTS assay at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. At 24 h, day 6 and day 12, osteoblast differentiation was evaluated by assaying alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, osteocalcin (OC) secretion and gene expression of various bone markers, using Real-Time-PCR. Alizarin Red staining and ALP histoenzymatic localisation were performed on day 12. Microscopic observations and MTS showed an absence of cytotoxicity in the three investigated bioactive glasses. B75-Sr5 particles in cell cultures, in comparison with those of B75 and B75-Sr1, resulted in a significant up-regulation of Runx2, Osterix, Dlx5, collagen I, ALP, bone sialoprotein (BSP) and OC mRNA levels on day 12, which was associated with an increase of ALP activity on day 6 and OC secretion on day 12. In conclusion, osteoblast differentiation of foetal mouse calvarial cells was enhanced in the presence of bioactive glass particles containing 5 wt.% strontium. Thus, B75-Sr5 may represent a promising bone-grafting material for bone regeneration procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Isaac
- Laboratoire de Physiopathologie Orale et Moléculaire, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, UMRS 872, Equipe 5, 15-21 Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, F-75270 Paris Cedex 06, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Antón A, Ruiz A, Plazaola A, Calvo L, Seguí M, Santaballa A, Muñoz M, Sánchez P, Miguel A, Carrasco E, Lao J, Camps J, Alfaro J, Antolín S, Cámara M. Phase II clinical trial of liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate and docetaxel, associated with trastuzumab, as neoadjuvant treatment in stages II and IIIA HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients. GEICAM 2003-03 study. Ann Oncol 2011; 22:74-79. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
37
|
|
38
|
Jallot E, Lao J, John L, Soulié J, Moretto P, Nedelec JM. Imaging physicochemical reactions occurring at the pore surface in binary bioactive glass foams by micro ion beam analysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2010; 2:1737-1742. [PMID: 20527821 DOI: 10.1021/am1002316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
In this work, the physicochemical reactions occurring at the surface of bioactive sol-gel derived 3D glass scaffolds via a complete PIXE characterization were studied. 3D glass foams in the SiO(2)-CaO system were prepared by sol-gel route. Samples of glass scaffolds were soaked in biological fluids for periods up to 2 days. The surface changes were characterized using particle induced X-ray emission (PIXE) associated to Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS), which are efficient methods to perform quantitative chemical maps. Elemental maps of major and trace elements at the glass/biological fluids interface were obtained at the micrometer scale for every interaction time. Results revealed interconnected macropores and physicochemical reactions occurring at the surface of pores. The micro-PIXE-RBS characterization of the pores/biological fluids interface shows the glass dissolution and the rapid formation of a Ca rich layer with the presence of phosphorus that came from biological fluids. After 2 days, a calcium phosphate-rich layer containing magnesium is formed at the surface of the glass scaffolds. We demonstrate that quantities of phosphorus provided only by the biological medium have a significant impact on the development and the formation of the phosphocalcic layer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Jallot
- Clermont Universite, Universite Blaise Pascal, CNRS/IN2P3, Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Anton A, Lluch A, Casado A, Provencio M, Muñoz M, Lao J, Bermejo B, Paules AB, Gayo J, Martin M. Phase I study of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2010; 30:2255-2261. [PMID: 20651377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine the recommended doses of oral vinorelbine (VN) and capecitabine (C) in metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighteen patients with metastatic breast cancer received oral VN (on days 1 and 8) and C (on days 1 to 14) every three weeks at one of four dose levels: I) 60 mg/m(2) and 1650 mg/m(2)/day; II) 70 mg/m(2) and 1650 mg/m(2)/day; III) 70 mg/m(2) and 2000 mg/m(2)/day; IV) 80 mg/m(2) and 2000 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. The primary endpoint was to determine the recommended doses for the combination of oral VN and C in metastatic breast cancer. Secondary endpoints include evaluating response rate, safety profile and whether or not VN dosage escalation was required. RESULTS Severe neutropenia occurred in 28% of patients; and severe anaemia and leucopenia were observed in one patient each (6%). One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Non-hematological toxicities were rare. The response rate was 28% (95% CI: 10-54) in the intention-to-treat population. CONCLUSION The recommended dose is 80 mg/m(2) of oral VN on days 1 and 8, and 2000 mg/m(2)/day of C from days 1 to 14 in three weekly cycles. A phase II study with this schedule is currently under way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Anton
- Medical Oncology Service, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Avda. Isabel La Católica 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Pazo Cid RA, Esquerdo G, Puertolas T, Calderero V, Gil I, Lao J, Millastre E, Alvarez-Alejandro M, Madani J, Anton A. Bevacizumab (BVZ) as second-line treatment after sorafenib (SFB) progression in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e14619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
41
|
Lanzuela M, Pazo Cid RA, Lao J, Fuentes J, Sarria L, Horndler C, Ubieto MA, Puertolas T, Calderero V, Anton A. Early response evaluation of sorafenib (SFB) therapy: Use of computed fluorodeoxiglucose positron emission tomography (PET-CT) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e14567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
42
|
Fong T, Shearman L, Stribling D, Shu J, Lao J, Huang CR, Xiao J, Shen CP, Tyszkiewicz J, Strack A, DeMaula C, Hubert MF, Galijatovic-Idrizbegovic A, Owen R, Huber A, Lanning C. Pharmacological efficacy and safety profile of taranabant in preclinical species. Drug Dev Res 2009. [DOI: 10.1002/ddr.20311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
43
|
Antón A, Ruiz A, Seguí M, Calvo L, Muñoz M, Lao J, Sancho F, Fernández L. Phase I clinical trial of liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate and docetaxel, associated with trastuzumab, as neo-adjuvant treatment in stages II and IIIA, HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients. GEICAM 2003-03 study. Ann Oncol 2009; 20:454-459. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
|
44
|
Lao J, Nedelec JM, Jallot E. New strontium-based bioactive glasses: physicochemical reactivity and delivering capability of biologically active dissolution products. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009. [DOI: 10.1039/b822214b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
45
|
Anton A, Lluch A, Casado A, Provencio M, Muñoz M, Lao J, Bermejo B, Paules AB, Gayo J, Martin M. Phase I-II study of oral vinorelbine (NVBO ) and capecitabine (X) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Results of the phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.1105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
46
|
Lao J, Nedelec JM, Moretto P, Jallot E. Micro-ion beam analysis of physico-chemical reactions at the interface between sol–gel derived glass particles in the SiO2CaO system and biological fluids. SURF INTERFACE ANAL 2008. [DOI: 10.1002/sia.2700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
47
|
Antón A, Ruiz A, Seguí MA, Calvo L, Muñoz M, Lao J, Vázquez C, Fernández L. Phase I/II study of a 3 weekly liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin/docetaxel/pegfligrastrim in combination with weekly trastuzumab as primary treatment in HER2 positive (HER2+) early stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients (pt). GEICAM 2003–03 study. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.11032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
11032 Background: The liposome-encapsulated form of doxorubicin (Myocet™) (M) seems to be safe in terms of cardiotoxicity in combination with standard doses of trastuzumab (H) and paclitaxel in BC. This phase I/II study of M, H, docetaxel (T) and pegfligrastrim (N) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination, and define the MTD, in order to examine the selected regimen in a phase II trial. Methods: Cohorts of 3 HER2+ (FISH+) ESBC pt were treated at fixed dose of N (6 mg) and H (2 mg/kg/week). M and T were administered at the following dose levels (DL) (mg/m2): DL0, 60/75; DL-1, 55/75; DL-2, 50/70; DL-3, 50/65; DL-4, 50/60. The MTD was defined as >1/6 pt in any cohort experiencing a predefined dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle (cy) 1 or 2. LVEF was assessed at baseline and every 2 cy. Results: Nineteen pt have been enrolled in phase I; all are evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. Median age was 45. Twelve pt (63%) were premenopausal. Median tumour size was 45 mm (20–80); 13 (68%) and 6 pt (32%) presented with stage II and IIIA BC respectively. Six (32%) of tumours were G3. DLT were G3 diarrhoea, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infection, and G4 asthenia. Three additional pt were treated at DL-4 for confirmation of the recommended dose; none of them had a DLT. One pt (DL-2) experienced asymptomatic, reversible LVEF decrease to 49%. All pt have been assessed for pathological response: 6 (32%) and 5 pt (26%) achieved one pCR and one pPR in breast, defined as Miller and Payne score of 5 and 4, respectively. Conclusions: Concomitant administration of M plus THN is highly active regimen with manageable toxicity in pt with HER2+ ESBC tumours. DL-4 has been selected as the DL for the ongoing phase II study with an enrolment target of 59 pt. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Antón
- Hospital U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain; Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A. Ruiz
- Hospital U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain; Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M. A. Seguí
- Hospital U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain; Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L. Calvo
- Hospital U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain; Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M. Muñoz
- Hospital U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain; Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J. Lao
- Hospital U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain; Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C. Vázquez
- Hospital U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain; Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L. Fernández
- Hospital U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain; Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kuvibidila SR, Sandoval M, Lao J, Velez M, Yu L, Ode D, Gardner R, Lane G, Warrier RP. Plasma zinc levels inversely correlate with vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 concentration in children with sickle cell disease. J Natl Med Assoc 2006; 98:1263-72. [PMID: 16916123 PMCID: PMC2569542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Zinc deficiency has been implicated in impaired cell-mediated immunity of children with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, its influence on the expression of vascular cell-adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) on endothelial cells, a protein involved in vasoocclusion, has not been previously investigated. We therefore measured (soluble) sVCAM-1 and zinc in 76 SCD children and 96 non-SCD children, mean age 7.73 years and 11.24 years, respectively. Although mean zinc levels of both groups were within the normal range (approximately 14.5 micromol/l), 14.5 % of SCD and 11% of non-SCD children (without inflammation) had levels below normal (10.7 micromol/L). Mean sVCAM-1 concentrations of SCD children (837 microg/l) were significantly higher than those of controls (627 microg/l) (p < 0.001). Differences persisted after taking into account age, hemoglobin phenotype, and inflammation (alpha-l acid glycoprotein >l g/l and C-reactive protein >10 mg/I). sVCAM-1 negatively correlated with serum (r = -0.444) and red blood cells zinc (r = -0.242, p < 0.05) but not with acute-phase proteins. Mean sVCAM-1 tended to be higher in SCD children with than in those without a history of a health problem (infection, pain crisis or were transfused; not significant). Data suggest that zinc may modulate the clinical status of SCD children through VCAM-1 expression, and zinc supplementation may be beneficial in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solo R Kuvibidila
- Department of Pediatrics, Divisions of Research, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 200 Henry Clay, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Salud A, Alonso V, Lambea J, Valencia J, Mira M, Polo S, Escudero P, Sierra E, Lao J. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal carcinoma: Preliminary results. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.13543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
13543 Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has shown to improve local control and sphincter preservation with decreased acute toxicity compared with postoperative treatment in locally advanced rectal carcinoma. The primary endpoint of this phase II trial was pathologic tumor response. Secondary endpoints were sphincter preservation and toxicity. Methods: Inclusion criteria: rectal adenocarcinoma <12 cms from anal verge, clinical stage T3–4 and/or N+, adequate renal, hematological and liver function. Planned sample for this trial was 43 patients. Treatment scheme: pelvic radiotherapy (50.4 Gy/28 fractions) and chemotherapy: Capecitabine 825 mg/m2/12 hours on days 1–5 + Oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 every week (weeks 1–6). Surgery with TME was performed between 6–8 weeks after the end of the treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered after surgery according each center criteria. Results: 37 patients have been recruited between February and December 2005. 26 male/11 female. Median age 70 years (range 38–79). Clinical stage (determined by EUS+CT or RMI): cT2 1p/cT3 33p/cT4 3p/cN+ 27p. Tumor location (from anal verge): ≤ 5 cm in 15p, >5 cm in 22p. Surgery (performed in 26 patients) consisted of low anterior resection in 13p and abdominal-perineal resection in 13p. Tumor downstaging was observed in 17p (65%), 20 (77%) had negative lymph nodes, including 6p with complete pathological response (23%) and four with only microfoci of tumor remaining (15%). Main adverse effects (NCI-CTC): diarrhea G3–4 19%, sensitive peripheral neurotoxicity G1 38%, skin G2 11%, nausea/vomiting G2 11%, fatigue/malaise G3 4%, neutropenia G3 7%. Conclusions: Preliminary results show that preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin is a well tolerated regimen for locally advanced operable rectal cancer leading to a high probability of tumor downstaging. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Salud
- University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain; Clinica Quirón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - V. Alonso
- University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain; Clinica Quirón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - J. Lambea
- University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain; Clinica Quirón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - J. Valencia
- University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain; Clinica Quirón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - M. Mira
- University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain; Clinica Quirón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - S. Polo
- University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain; Clinica Quirón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - P. Escudero
- University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain; Clinica Quirón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - E. Sierra
- University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain; Clinica Quirón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - J. Lao
- University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain; Clinica Quirón, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Alonso V, Salud A, Escudero P, Bueso P, Mira M, Valencia J, Polo S, Ruiz de Lobera A, Lao J, Lastra R. Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced operable rectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2005. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.3542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- V. Alonso
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| | - A. Salud
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| | - P. Escudero
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| | - P. Bueso
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| | - M. Mira
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| | - J. Valencia
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| | - S. Polo
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| | - A. Ruiz de Lobera
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| | - J. Lao
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| | - R. Lastra
- Hosp Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Hosp Clinico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Hosp de Barbastro, Barbastro, Spain
| |
Collapse
|