Marizomib for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). The proteasome has long been considered a promising therapeutic target because of its role as a central biological hub in tumor cells. Marizomib is a novel pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood brain barrier.

METHODS

EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label phase 3 superiority trial. Key eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed glioblastoma, age > 18 years and Karnofsky performance status > 70. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving marizomib in addition to TMZ/RT→TMZ with patients receiving only standard treatment in the whole population, and in the subgroup of patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors.

RESULTS

The trial was opened at 82 institutions in Europe, Canada and the US. A total of 749 patients (99.9% of planned 750) were randomized. OS was not different between the standard and the marizomib arm (median 17 vs 16.5 months; HR=1.04; p=0.64). PFS was not statistically different either (median 6.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR=0.97; p=0.67). In patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors, OS was also not different between standard therapy and marizomib (median 14.5 vs 15.1 months, HR=1.13; p=0.27). More CTCAE grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in the marizomib arm than in the standard arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding marizomib to standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy resulted in more toxicity, but did not improve OS or PFS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter: An international randomized phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150-200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS.

RESULTS

A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589.

CTNI-21. TROTABRESIB (CC-90010) IN COMBINATION WITH CONCOMITANT TEMOZOLOMIDE PLUS RADIOTHERAPY AND ADJUVANT TEMOZOLOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: UPDATED RESULTS FROM A PHASE 1B/2 STUDY

Trotabresib, a novel bromodomain and extraterminal protein inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity and blood–brain barrier penetration in patients with high-grade gliomas, and enhanced the antiproliferative effects of temozolomide in preclinical models. CC-90010-GBM-002 (NCT04324840) is a phase 1b/2 study investigating the addition of trotabresib to standard-of-care (SOC) concomitant temozolomide plus radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide, followed by maintenance trotabresib, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The design of the dose escalation (part A) has been described previously (Vieito M, et al. SNO 2021. Abstract CTNI-51). Primary objectives of part A were to establish the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of trotabresib. In part A, addition of trotabresib to SOC was safe and well tolerated in the concomitant (N = 14) and adjuvant (N = 18) cohorts; the most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia (7/14 and 9/18 patients, respectively). The RP2D for trotabresib was 30 mg/day 4 days on/24 days off in both settings. At data cutoff (February 20, 2022), median duration of treatment was 34 weeks (concomitant cohort) and 33 weeks (adjuvant cohort); progression-free survival data are not yet mature. Trotabresib plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were consistent with monotherapy. At last follow-up, 6 and 5 patients remained on treatment in the concomitant and adjuvant dose-escalation cohorts, respectively, including 1 patient in cycle 20 with ongoing complete response. The ongoing randomized phase 2 dose expansion (part B; planned N = 162) is comparing concomitant trotabresib at the RP2D + SOC followed by adjuvant trotabresib at the RP2D + SOC, followed by maintenance trotabresib 45 mg/day 4 days on/24 days off, versus SOC alone in patients with newly diagnosed IDH–wild-type glioblastoma. Key objectives are to compare progression-free and overall survival, safety, and tolerability. Longer follow-up from part A and the first disclosure of data from part B will be presented.

Trotabresib (CC90010) in combination with adjuvant temozolomide or concomitant temozolomide plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Background

Standard-of-care treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM), consisting of surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ), has improved outcomes compared with RT alone; however, prognosis remains poor. Trotabresib, a novel bromodomain and extraterminal inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with high-grade gliomas.

Methods

In this phase Ib, dose-escalation study (NCT04324840), we investigated trotabresib 15, 30, and 45 mg combined with TMZ in the adjuvant setting and trotabresib 15 and 30 mg combined with TMZ+RT in the concomitant setting in patients with ndGBM. Primary endpoints were to determine safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of trotabresib. Secondary endpoints were assessment of preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Pharmacodynamics were investigated as an exploratory endpoint.

Results

The adjuvant and concomitant cohorts enrolled 18 and 14 patients, respectively. Trotabresib in combination with TMZ or TMZ+RT was well tolerated; most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate. Trotabresib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both settings were consistent with previous data for trotabresib monotherapy. The RP2D of trotabresib was selected as 30 mg 4 days on/24 days off in both settings. At last follow-up, 5 (28%) and 6 (43%) patients remain on treatment in the adjuvant and concomitant settings, respectively, with 1 patient in the adjuvant cohort achieving complete response.

Conclusions

Trotabresib combined with TMZ in the adjuvant setting and with TMZ+RT in the concomitant setting was safe and well tolerated in patients with ndGBM, with encouraging treatment durations. Trotabresib 30 mg was established as the RP2D in both settings.

CTNI-16. TROTABRESIB (CC-90010, BMS-986378), A REVERSIBLE, POTENT ORAL BROMODOMAIN AND EXTRATERMINAL INHIBITOR (BETi) IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS: A PHASE 1 OPEN-LABEL ‘WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY’ STUDY

Trotabresib is a potent, reversible oral BETi with antitumor activity in patients with advanced malignancies (Moreno et al. ESMO 2020. Abstract 5270). The CC-90010-GBM-001 study (NCT04047303) enrolled patients with progressive or recurrent astrocytoma or recurrent glioblastoma scheduled for salvage resection. Patients were treated with trotabresib 30 mg daily for 4 days before surgery, then trotabresib 45 mg daily 4 days on/24 days off after recovery. Primary objectives were trotabresib tumor tissue concentration and plasma pharmacokinetics (PK). Secondary and exploratory objectives included safety, antitumor activity, cerebrospinal fluid concentration, and pharmacodynamics (PD). Twenty patients were enrolled; blood PK, blood PD, and tumor PD data were available for 14, 12, and 11 patients, respectively. Geometric mean peak trotabresib plasma concentration on day 4 was 1.92 μM; median time to peak concentration was 1.5 hours. At the time of resection, geometric mean trotabresib concentrations in plasma and brain tumor tissue were 1.01 and 0.68 μM, respectively. Blood CCR1 mRNA was reduced ≥ 50% from baseline after dose 4. Blood HEXIM1 mRNA increased at 72–96 hours following first dose, and at the time of surgery the percentage increase was related to plasma trotabresib concentration. Tumor HEXIM1 RNA increased in 10 of 11 patients. Eighteen patients (90%) had ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Nine patients (45%) had grade 3/4 TRAEs, most frequently thrombocytopenia (5 patients [25%]). Only 1 patient had serious TRAEs (hemiparesis and lethargy). Two patients died of intracranial hemorrhage unrelated to study drug. Of 16 patients evaluable for antitumor response, 7 had stable disease per RANO criteria, with 3 ongoing beyond data cutoff at cycles 4–11. Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.4–3.3). Overall, trotabresib showed good tumor tissue penetration, with PD signals of response, and was well tolerated. A study of trotabresib + temozolomide in first-line glioblastoma is ongoing (NCT04324840).

CTNI-51. ADJUVANT TROTABRESIB, A REVERSIBLE POTENT BROMODOMAIN AND EXTRATERMINAL INHIBITOR, PLUS TEMOZOLOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: INTERIM RESULTS FROM A PHASE 1B DOSE-FINDING STUDY

Trotabresib (CC-90010) demonstrated antitumor activity as monotherapy in patients with advanced malignancies (Moreno et al. ESMO 2020. Abstract 5270) and enhanced the antiproliferative effects of temozolomide in preclinical studies. CC-90010-GBM-002 (NCT04324840) is a phase 1B dose-finding study investigating standard-of-care temozolomide + radiotherapy followed by adjuvant trotabresib + temozolomide or concomitant trotabresib + temozolomide + radiotherapy followed by adjuvant trotabresib + temozolomide, post-resection, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. We present interim results for adjuvant trotabresib + temozolomide. Patients received trotabresib 15, 30, or 45 mg daily (4 days on/24 days off) + temozolomide administered per label for 6 cycles, followed by trotabresib 45 mg monotherapy daily (4 days on/24 days off). Primary objectives are to establish the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of trotabresib. Preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics are also being investigated. Of 13 patients enrolled, 5, 6, and 2 received trotabresib 15, 30, and 45 mg, respectively, plus temozolomide. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 2, 4, and 1 patients receiving trotabresib 15, 30, and 45 mg, respectively. MTD and RP2D are not yet reached; dose limiting toxicity (grade 4 thrombocytopenia) was reported in 1 patient in the 30-mg group. Of 10 evaluable patients, 1 had complete response and 7 had stable disease per RANO criteria. Trotabresib exposure increased proportionally with dose. Day 4 time to peak trotabresib concentration was 0.5–2.0 hours; mean terminal half life was 60–70 hours. Day 4 blood CCR1 RNA 2–4 hours post-dose was downregulated below baseline in the 15-mg group and ≥ 50% in the 30-mg group. Adjuvant trotabresib + temozolomide appears well tolerated, with promising preliminary efficacy. Treatment was ongoing at data cutoff in 9 patients in the adjuvant cohort; enrollment is continuing in the adjuvant and concomitant therapy dose-escalation cohorts.

Trabectedin for recurrent WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma: a randomized phase 2 study of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group (EORTC-1320-BTG)

BACKGROUND

No systemic treatment has been established for meningioma progressing after local therapies.

METHODS

This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study included adult patients with recurrent WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma. Patients were 2:1 randomly assigned to intravenous trabectedin (1.5 mg/m 2 every three weeks) or local standard of care (LOC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints comprised overall survival (OS), objective radiological response, safety, quality of life (QoL) assessment using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires, and we performed tissue-based exploratory molecular analyses.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were randomized (n=29 in LOC, n=61 in trabectedin arm). With 71 events, median PFS was 4.17 months in the LOC and 2.43 months in the trabectedin arm (hazard ratio [HR]=1.42; 80% CI, 1.00-2.03; p=0.294) with a PFS-6 rate of 29.1% (95% CI, 11.9%-48.8%) and 21.1% (95% CI, 11.3%-32.9%), respectively. Median OS was 10.61 months in the LOC and 11.37 months in the trabectedin arm (HR=0.98; 95% CI, 0.54-1.76; p=0.94). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 44.4% patients in the LOC and 59% of patients in the trabectedin arm. Enrolled patients had impeded global QoL and overall functionality and high fatigue before initiation of systemic therapy. DNA methylation class, performance status, presence of a relevant co-morbidity, steroid use, and right hemisphere involvement at baseline were independently associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Trabectedin did not improve PFS and OS and was associated with higher toxicity than LOC treatment in patients with non-benign meningioma. Tumour DNA methylation class is an independent prognostic factor for OS.

INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma

Background

Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) is a tumor-specific antibody–drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. We investigated Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide or as a single agent in a randomized controlled phase II trial in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

Methods

Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR amplified glioblastoma at first recurrence after chemo-irradiation with temozolomide. Patients were randomized to either Depatux-M 1.25 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or this treatment combined with temozolomide 150–200 mg/m² day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or either lomustine or temozolomide. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival.

Results

Two hundred sixty patients were randomized. In the primary efficacy analysis with 199 events (median follow-up 15.0 mo), the hazard ratio (HR) for the combination arm compared with the control arm was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50, 1.02; P = 0.062). The efficacy of Depatux-M monotherapy was comparable to that of the control arm (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.48; P = 0.83). The most frequent toxicity in Depatux-M treated patients was a reversible corneal epitheliopathy, occurring as grades 3–4 adverse events in 25–30% of patients. In the long-term follow-up analysis with median follow-up of 28.7 months, the HR for the comparison of the combination arm versus the control arm was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.48, 0.93).

Conclusion

This trial suggests a possible role for the use of Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide in EGFR amplified recurrent glioblastoma, especially in patients relapsing well after the end of first-line adjuvant temozolomide treatment. (NCT02343406)

Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Does programmed cell death 1 immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab improve overall survival compared with bevacizumab treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma?

Findings

In this randomized phase 3 clinical trial of 369 patients diagnosed with recurrent glioblastoma treated with nivolumab, an improved survival benefit was not observed in patients who received nivolumab compared with bevacizumab-treated control patients.

Meaning

Additional research is needed; nivolumab monotherapy did not improve overall survival compared with bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. A study of nivolumab in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter is ongoing.

Importance

Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade has shown benefits in many cancer types. To our knowledge, data from a randomized phase 3 clinical trial evaluating a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy for glioblastoma have not been reported.

Objective

To determine whether single-agent PD-1 blockade with nivolumab improves survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma compared with bevacizumab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this open-label, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial, 439 patients with glioblastoma at first recurrence following standard radiation and temozolomide therapy were enrolled, and 369 were randomized. Patients were enrolled between September 2014 and May 2015. The median follow-up was 9.5 months at data cutoff of January 20, 2017. The study included 57 multicenter, multinational clinical sites.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or death.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 369 patients were randomized to nivolumab (n = 184) or bevacizumab (n = 185). The MGMT promoter was methylated in 23.4% (43/184; nivolumab) and 22.7% (42/185; bevacizumab), unmethylated in 32.1% (59/184; nivolumab) and 36.2% (67/185; bevacizumab), and not reported in remaining patients. At median follow-up of 9.5 months, median OS (mOS) was comparable between groups: nivolumab, 9.8 months (95% CI, 8.2-11.8); bevacizumab, 10.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-11.8); HR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.83-1.30); P = .76. The 12-month OS was 42% in both groups. The objective response rate was higher with bevacizumab (23.1%; 95% CI, 16.7%-30.5%) vs nivolumab (7.8%; 95% CI, 4.1%-13.3%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar between groups (nivolumab, 33/182 [18.1%]; bevacizumab, 25/165 [15.2%]), with no unexpected neurological TRAEs or deaths due to TRAEs.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although the primary end point was not met in this randomized clinical trial, mOS was comparable between nivolumab and bevacizumab in the overall patient population with recurrent glioblastoma. The safety profile of nivolumab in patients with glioblastoma was consistent with that in other tumor types.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02017717

Recent advances in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for urothelial bladder cancer: What to expect in the near future

Urothelial bladder cancer (UC) is the most common malignancy involving the urinary system and represents a significant health problem. Immunotherapy has been used for decades for UC with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) set as the standard of care for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has completely transformed the treatment landscape of bladder cancer enabling to expand the treatment strategies. Novel ICIs have successfully shown improved outcomes on metastatic disease to such an extent that the standard of care paradigm has changed leading to the development of different trials with the aim of determining whether ICIs may have a role in early disease. The localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) scenario remains challenging since the recurrence rate continues to be high despite all therapeutic efforts. This article will review the current experience of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting of UC, the clinical trials landscape and finally, an insight of what to expect in the immediate and mid-term future.

Defining EGFR amplification status for clinical trial inclusion

Background

Precision medicine trials targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in glioblastoma patients require selection for EGFR-amplified tumors. However, there is currently no gold standard in determining the amplification status of EGFR or variant III (EGFRvIII) expression. Here, we aimed to determine which technique and which cutoffs are suitable to determine EGFR amplification status.

Methods

We compared fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and real-time quantitative (RT-q)PCR data from patients screened for trial inclusion into the Intellance 2 clinical trial, with data from a panel-based next generation sequencing (NGS) platform (both DNA and RNA).

Results

By using data from >1000 samples, we show that at least 50% of EGFR amplified nuclei should be present to define EGFR gene amplification by FISH. Gene amplification (as determined by FISH) correlates with EGFR expression levels (as determined by RT-qPCR) with receiver operating characteristics analysis showing an area under the curve of up to 0.902. EGFR expression as assessed by RT-qPCR therefore may function as a surrogate marker for EGFR amplification. Our NGS data show that EGFR copy numbers can strongly vary between tumors, with levels ranging from 2 to more than 100 copies per cell. Levels exceeding 5 gene copies can be used to define EGFR-amplification by NGS; below this level, FISH detects very few (if any) EGFR amplified nuclei and none of the samples express EGFRvIII.

Conclusion

Our data from central laboratories and diagnostic sequencing facilities, using material from patients eligible for clinical trial inclusion, help define the optimal cutoff for various techniques to determine EGFR amplification for diagnostic purposes.

Lurbinectedin (LUR) in combination with Irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Updated results from a phase Ib-II trial

3514

Background: LUR is a novel agent that exerts antitumor activity through inhibition of trans-activated transcription and modulation of tumor microenvironment. Preclinical synergism/additivity in combination with IRI has been reported, thus prompting the conduct of this clinical trial. Methods: Phase Ib-II trial to evaluate escalating doses of LUR on Day (D) 1 plus a fixed dose of IRI 75 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 every 3 weeks (q3w) in pts with advanced solid tumors (+/- G-CSF, if dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] were neutropenia). Starting dose was LUR 1.0 m/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2. Results: 77 pts have been treated to date at 5 dose levels, 51 of them at the recommended dose (RD). Baseline characteristics of all 77 pts were: 48% females, 68% ECOG PS=1; median age 57 years (range, 19-75 years); median of 2 prior lines (range, 0−4 lines). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was LUR 2.4 mg/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2 with G-CSF, and the RD was LUR 2.0 mg/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2 with G-CSF. DLTs in Cycle 1 occurred in 2/3 evaluable pts at the MTD and 3/13 evaluable pts at the RD, and comprised omission of IRI D8 infusion due to grade (G) 3/4 neutropenia (n=3 pts) or G2-4 thrombocytopenia (n=2). At the RD (n=51), common G1/2 non-hematological toxicities were nausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia and neuropathy. G3 non-hematological toxicities (diarrhea 10%, fatigue 10%) and G3/4 hematological abnormalities (neutropenia 49%, thrombocytopenia 10%) were transient. Conclusions: The combination of LUR and IRI had acceptable tolerance, with no unexpected toxicities. Transient myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The RD is LUR 2.0 mg/m2 on D1 + IRI 75 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 q3w with G-CSF. Antitumor activity was observed at the RD in SCLC pts, as well as in endometrial carcinoma pts. Hints of activity were also observed in STS pts. Updated results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02611024 . [Table: see text]

Phase I study of CC-90010, a reversible, oral BET inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors and relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that regulate expression of genes involved in oncogenesis. CC-90010 is a novel, oral, reversible, small-molecule BET inhibitor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CC-90010-ST-001 (NCT03220347; 2015-004371-79) is a phase I dose-escalation and expansion study of CC-90010 in patients with advanced or unresectable solid tumors and relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We report results from the dose escalation phase, which explored 11 dose levels and four dosing schedules, two weekly (2 days on/5 days off; 3 days on/4 days off), one biweekly (3 days on/11 days off), and one monthly (4 days on/24 days off). The primary objectives were to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and schedule. Secondary objectives were to evaluate signals of early antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 69 patients, 67 with solid tumors and two with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The median age was 57 years (range, 21-80) and the median number of prior regimens was four (range, 1-9). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mostly mild and manageable; grade 3/4 TRAEs reported in more than two patients were thrombocytopenia (13%), anemia, and fatigue (4% each). Six patients had dose-limiting toxicities. MTDs were 15 mg (2 days on/5 days off), 30 mg (3 days on/11 days off), and 45 mg (4 days on/24 days off). The RP2D and schedule selected for expansion was 45 mg (4 days on/24 days off). As of 8 October 2019, one patient with grade 2 astrocytoma achieved a complete response, one patient with endometrial carcinoma had a partial response, and six patients had prolonged stable disease ≥11 months.

CONCLUSIONS

CC-90010 is well tolerated, with single-agent activity in patients with heavily pretreated, advanced solid tumors.

EGFR mutations are associated with response to depatux-m in combination with temozolomide and result in a receptor that is hypersensitive to ligand

Background

The randomized phase II INTELLANCE-2/EORTC_1410 trial on EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastomas showed a trend towards improved overall survival when patients were treated with depatux-m plus temozolomide compared with the control arm of alkylating chemotherapy only. We here performed translational research on material derived from this clinical trial to identify patients that benefit from this treatment.

Methods

Targeted DNA-sequencing and whole transcriptome analysis was performed on clinical trial samples. High-throughput, high-content imaging analysis was done to understand the molecular mechanism underlying the survival benefit.

Results

We first define the tumor genomic landscape in this well-annotated patient population. We find that tumors harboring EGFR single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) have improved outcome in the depatux-m + TMZ combination arm. Such SNVs are common to the extracellular domain of the receptor and functionally result in a receptor that is hypersensitive to low-affinity EGFR ligands. These hypersensitizing SNVs and the ligand-independent EGFRvIII variant are inversely correlated, indicating two distinct modes of evolution to increase EGFR signaling in glioblastomas. Ligand hypersensitivity can explain the therapeutic efficacy of depatux-m as increased ligand-induced activation will result in increased exposure of the epitope to the antibody-drug conjugate. We also identified tumors harboring mutations sensitive to "classical" EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, providing a potential alternative treatment strategy.

Conclusions

These data can help guide treatment for recurrent glioblastoma patients and increase our understanding into the molecular mechanisms underlying EGFR signaling in these tumors.

Interim analysis of a phase II study of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in patients with pediatric solid tumors in adulthood (GETHI021)

2613

Background: Solid pediatric tumors that appear in adulthood are a heterogeneous group characterized by a low incidence, lack of standard therapeutic options and reduced survival. We have designed the first phase II clinical trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab in this setting, Here, we present the results of the first cohort with 30 evaluable patients. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, single arm Phase II study conducted in 15 centers of the Spanish Group for Rare Cancer (GETHI). We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in adult patients ( 18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic childhood malignancies that have progressed or are not candidates to standard therapy. Treatment consisted on nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV q2w + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV q6w for 6 months or until progression/unacceptable toxicity, for a maximum of 24 months. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. We used a Simon optimal two-stage design, with a first stage including first 30 evaluable patients. Results: 20 patients were male and median age was 43 (range 20-75). Most frequent histologies were medulloblastoma (4) neuroblastoma (4) and Ewing family tumors (3). 90% had received prior systemic therapy with 37% presenting progressive disease as best response. Median previous treatment lines were 3 (range 1-9). 27 patients were PS0-1, and 3 PS2. 6 patients have been treated for ≥6 months . Only one discontinued for adverse events. With a median follow up of 4,3 months (range 0,4-11,3), 1 patient has achieved a deep partial response (PR) (3,6%), 10 stable disease (SD) (35,7%) and 17 progressive disease (PD) (60,7%). 2 patients died before radiologic evaluation. Clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) was 39,3%. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 1,8 months (95% CI 1,3-2,3), with a 3-months-PFS of 32,7% and 6-months-PFS of 20%. Median overall survival (OS) was 6,8 months (95% CI 3,3-10,2). 12 (40%) patients presented adverse events (AE) of any grade and 6 (20%) experienced a grade AE deemed as possibly related to treatment. Conclusions: The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab showed significant clinical benefit in this population with little therapeutic options. One case of metastatic esthesioneuroblastoma, achieved a dramatic tumor response and represents the first patient with this extremely rare histology treated with immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: EudraCT 2016-003946-99.

Perfusion MRI grading diffuse gliomas: Impact of permeability parameters on molecular biomarkers and survival

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Our objectives were: (1) compare dynamic susceptibility-weighted (DSC) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) permeability parameters, (2) evaluate diagnostic accuracy of DSC and DCE discriminating high- and low-grade tumors, (3) analyze relationship of permeability parameters with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and (4) assess differences in high-grade tumors classified according to molecular biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

49 patients with histologically proved diffuse gliomas underwent DSC and DCE imaging. Parametric maps of cerebral blood volume (CBV), CBV-leakage corrected, volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans), fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space (EES) (Ve), fractional blood plasma volume (Vp) and rate constant between EES and blood plasma (Kep) were calculated. High-grade gliomas were also classified according to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) and O6-methylguanine-dna-methyltransferase promoter methylation (MGMT) status.

RESULTS

There is correlation between parameters leakage, Ktrans and Vp. ROC curve analysis showed significance in both Ktrans and Ve for glioma grading. Threshold value of 0.075 for Ve generated the best combination of sensitivity (80%) and specificity (75%) in tumor gradation. Leakage was the only permeability parameter related to OS (P=0.006) and PFS (0.012); with prolonged survival for leakage values lower than 1.2. IDH-mutated high-grade tumors showed lower leakage and Ktrans values. High-grade tumors with loss of ATRX presented lower leakage and Vp values.

CONCLUSIONS

Both DSC and DCE permeability parameters serve as non-invasive method for glioma grading. Leakage was the unique permeability parameter related to survival and the best discriminating high-grade gliomas classified according to IDH and ATRX status.

Leakage decrease detected by dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI predicts survival in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In glioblastoma, tumor progression appears to be triggered by expression of VEGF, a regulator of blood vessel permeability. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits angiogenesis by clearing circulating VEGF, resulting in a decline in the contrast-enhancing tumor, which does not always correlate with treatment response. Our objectives were: (1) to evaluate whether changes in DSC perfusion MRI-derived leakage could predict survival in recurrent glioblastoma, and (2) to estimate whether leakage at baseline was related to treatment outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed DSC perfusion MRI in 24 recurrent glioblastomas treated with bevacizumab as second line chemotherapy. Leakage at baseline and changes in maximum leakage between baseline and the first follow-up after treatment were selected for quantitative analysis. Survival univariate analysis was made constructing survival curves using Kaplan-Meier method and comparing subgroups by log rank probability test.

RESULTS

Leakage reduction at 8 weeks after initiation of bevacizumab treatment had a significant influence on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Median OS and PFS were 2.4 and 2.8 months longer for patients with leakage reduction at the first follow-up. Higher leakage at baseline was associated with leakage reduction after treatment. Odds ratio of treatment response was 9 for patients with maximum leakage at baseline >5.

CONCLUSIONS

Leakage decrease may predict OS and PFS in recurrent glioblastomas treated with bevacizumab. Leakage reduction postulates as a potential biomarker for treatment response evaluation. Leakage at baseline seems to predict response to treatment, but was not independently associated with survival.

A prognostic model based on preoperative MRI predicts overall survival in patients with diffuse gliomas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Diffuse gliomas are classified as grades II-IV on the basis of histologic features, with prognosis determined mainly by clinical factors and histologic grade supported by molecular markers. Our aim was to evaluate, in patients with diffuse gliomas, the relationship of relative CBV and ADC values to overall survival. In addition, we also propose a prognostic model based on preoperative MR imaging findings that predicts survival independent of histopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the preoperative diffusion and perfusion MR imaging in 126 histologically confirmed diffuse gliomas. Median relative CBV and ADC values were selected for quantitative analysis. Survival univariate analysis was made by constructing survival curves by using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparing subgroups by log-rank probability tests. A Cox regression model was made for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 126 diffuse gliomas (median follow-up of 14.5 months). ADC and relative CBV values had a significant influence on overall survival. Median overall survival for patients with ADC < 0.799 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s was <1 year. Multivariate analysis revealed that patient age, relative CBV, and ADC values were associated with survival independent of pathology. The preoperative model provides greater ability to predict survival than that obtained by histologic grade alone.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values had a better correlation with overall survival than relative CBV values. A preoperative prognostic model based on patient age, relative CBV, and ADC values predicted overall survival of patients with diffuse gliomas independent of pathology. This preoperative model provides a more accurate predictor of survival than histologic grade alone.

Clinical value of PET/CT's SUV max at baseline, early follow-up, and end of treatment reevaluation as a prognostic factor in small cell lung cancer patients with extended disease

e18558

Background: Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) have been staged by the two-stage system. This system defines limited disease (LD) when is confined to ipsilateral hemithorax that can be encompassed within tolerable radiation field; extended disease (ED) is defined as the disease extending outside the hemithorax. The IASLC recommended that TNM staging should be used in SCLC including clinical trials. However these systems have shown poor correlation between clinical findings and the pathological results. Objectives: Evaluate prognostic factors as age, ECOG and PET CT’s SUV max at base line, early follow up and end of treatment reevaluation; and their correlation with Overall survival (OS) and Progression free survival (PFS). Methods: Prospectively were recruited patients with histologically confirmed SCLC and ED and were evaluated with basal PET CT, early follow up (PET CT after 2 cycles of Platinum based chemotherapy) and end of treatment assessment with a PET CT after 6 cycles. Comprehensive database including clinical data were collected as age, ECOG, site of metastases, type of treatment and outcome. 23 patients were recruited from January 2010 to June 2012 and the follow up made until January 15th 2013. The Cox correlation test was used. Results: Median age 66,5 years (range 52-80) the OS was 7,9 months (CI 95% 6.7-9.1) and the PFS was 5,3 months (CI 95% 4,5-6,2). The baseline ECOG was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p= <0,0001) and PSF (p= 0,008). Age was not prognostic in our data. SUV max at baseline was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p= 0,001) and PFS (p= 0,009). For early follow up were evaluated 14 patients and for end of treatment reevaluation were assessed 9 patients. Differences between SUV max at baseline and early follow up or with end of treatment reevaluation were not predictive for PFS or OS. Conclusions: In our study the ECOG and basal PET CT SUV max are independent prognosis factors with consistent correlation with OS and PFS. The early follow up and end of treatment reevaluation with PET CT did not predict outcome in our patients. Further studies should be considered to test the value of follow up with PET CT.

Bevacizumab in combination with TMZ in patients with recurrent GBM: Final OS and PFS analysis

2087

Background: BEV provides a consistent clinical benefit in the treatment of relapsing GBM in terms of a delayed progression and increased median overall survival compared to historical controls. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profile of the combination of BEV with dose dense TMZ, reporting the final results of PFS, OS and the toxicity experienced. Methods: A phase II multicenter, national, open-label study in pts diagnosed of recurrent GBM treated with BEV 10 mg/kg day q2w and TMZ 150 mg/m2 days 1-7 and 15-21 q28d d until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or medical decision, as first line of treatment all pts received radiotherapy and at least 3 cycles of adjuvant TMZ. This study evaluates efficacy by PFS as primary endpoint and as secondary endpoints: OS, RR based on the adapted MacDonald criteria and toxicity profile (NCI CTC v3.0). Results: From June 10 to July 11, 32 evaluable pts were recruited in 8 sites. The baseline characteristics were as follows: 17 males and 15 females, median age 57.5 y (29-74), ECOG PS 0: 25%, PS 1: 50% and PS 2: 25%, 44% patients had gross total resection, 50% had subtotal resection and 6% biopsy only, MGMT promotor was methylated in 12 pts, unmeth in 6 pts and missing in 14 pts. The median number of TMZ or BEV cycles administered across all patients was 4 (TMZ range 1-9 and BEV range 1-25) The median PFS was 4.4 m [IC 95% (3.7 – 5.6)]. The 6m-PFS probability was 29.25%. The median OS (75% events) was 7.5 m[IC 95% (5.98 – 9.11)]. No significant association with MGMT status was found in terms of OS or PFS. BEV related AEs have been reported in 56.2% of the population being most of them mild or moderate. Grade 3-4 most frequent toxicity: lymphopenia 31% and fatigue 12.5%. Six of 32 pts were long term survivors, in this population the median PFS was 9.8 m [IC 95% (8.2 – 24.4)] and median OS (50% events) was 15.9 m [IC 95 %( 9.2 – NA)], no differences in baseline characteristics were identified in comparison with total population. The median number of TMZ cycles administered was 4 and median BEV cycles were 9. Conclusions: Although the combination don’t met the previous reported activity of BEV, 19% of patients had longer survivals which suggest the need to identify patients that benefit for this treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT01115491.

The role of pharmacogenomics in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Pharmacogenomics is the study of how variation in the genetic background affects an individual's response to a specific drug and/or its metabolism. Using knowledge about the genes which produce the enzymes that metabolize a specific drug, a physician may decide to raise or lower the dose, or even change to a different drug. Targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors has led to a substantial improvement in the standard of care for patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although few studies have identified biomarkers that predict the response of targeted drugs in the treatment of metastatic RCC, some associations have been found. Several studies have identified genetic polymorphisms with implications in the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of TKIs and mTOR inhibitors and which are associated with a prolonged progression-free survival and/or overall survival in patients with metastatic RCC. Among the genes of interest, we should consider IL8, FGFR2, VEGFA, FLT4, and NR1I2. In this review, we discuss single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with outcome and toxicity following targeted therapies and provide recommendations for future trials to facilitate the use of SNPs in personalized therapy for this disease.

The added value of apparent diffusion coefficient to cerebral blood volume in the preoperative grading of diffuse gliomas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In cerebral gliomas, rCBV correlates with tumor grade and histologic findings of vascular proliferation. Moreover, ADC assesses water diffusivity and is inversely correlated with tumor grade. In the present work, we have studied whether combined rCBV and ADC values improve the diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging in the preoperative grading of gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-two patients with histopathologically confirmed diffuse gliomas underwent DWI and DSC. Mean rCBV and ADC values were compared among the tumor groups with the Student t test or ANOVA. ROC analysis was used to determine rCBV and ADC threshold values for glioma grading.

RESULTS

rCBV had significantly different values between grade II and IV gliomas and between grade III and IV tumors, but there were no significant differences between grade II and III gliomas (P > .05). Grade II and III tumors also did not differ when astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, and oligoastrocytomas were considered separately. ADC values were significantly different for all 3 grades. The ADC threshold value of 1.185 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s and the rCBV cutoff value of 1.74 could be used with high sensitivity in the characterization of high-grade gliomas. The area under the ROC curve for the maximum rCBV and minimum ADC was 0.72 and 0.75, respectively. The combination of rCBV and ADC values increased the area under the ROC curve to 0.83.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC measurements are better than rCBV values for distinguishing the grades of gliomas. The combination of minimum ADC and maximum rCBV improves the diagnostic accuracy of glioma grading.

The role of RANK-ligand inhibition in cancer: the story of denosumab

The diagnosis of bone metastases is an event with certain consequences for the patient. They often mean pain and can also mean pathological fractures, hypercalcemia, and spinal cord compression, all synonymous with a diminished quality of life and often also hospitalization. Since the advent of the intravenous bisphosphonates, things began to look a bit brighter for patients with bone metastases-bone destruction was kept at bay a little longer. The next generation of bone metastasis treatments is well on its way in clinical development, and among them, the most advanced drug is denosumab. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits osteoclast maturation, activation, and function by binding to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, with the final result being a reduced rate of bone resorption. In this review, we give an overview of relevant preclinical and clinical data regarding the use of denosumab in patients with solid tumors in general and prostate cancer in particular.

Oxcarbazepine monotherapy in carbamazepine-unresponsive trigeminal neuralgia

The objective of this prospective open-label study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) unresponsive to treatment with the standard antiepileptic drug, carbamazepine. Thirty-five patients with idiopathic TN, who underwent treatment with oxcarbazepine monotherapy for at least 12 weeks, were studied. Pain was assessed using mean pain frequency, responder rate, pain-free patients and clinical global impression. The mean maintenance dose was 773.7 mg/day. There was a significant decrease in the mean of the main scores following 12 weeks of treatment (p<0.05) compared with baseline. Oxcarbazepine was effective from the first month of treatment. There was a significant reduction in pain frequency, leading to improvements in patient satisfaction. In general, oxcarbazepine was well tolerated. Oxcarbazepine appears to be an important alternative therapeutic approach for patients affected by TN. This study adds to the existing literature arriving at the same findings.