1
|
Bayle A, Chaltiel D, Latino N, Rouleau E, Peters S, Galotti M, Bricalli G, Besse B, Giuliani R, Bonastre J. Reply to the Letter to the Editor regarding 'Overcoming Barriers in Biomarker Testing' J. García-Foncillas et al. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:829-830. [PMID: 38851588 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.05.545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
|
2
|
Rousseau A, Michiels S, Simon-Tillaux N, Lolivier A, Bonastre J, Planchard D, Barlesi F, Remon J, Lavaud P, Aldea M, Frelaut M, Le Pechoux C, Botticella A, Levy A, Gazzah A, Foulon S, Besse B. Impact of pembrolizumab treatment duration on overall survival and prognostic factors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 43:100970. [PMID: 39040528 PMCID: PMC11262181 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Background The efficacy of front-line pembrolizumab has been established in studies that limit treatment duration to 2 years, but decision to stop pembrolizumab after 2 years is often at physician's discretion. ATHENA is a retrospective cohort study using a comprehensive administrative database aimed firstly at exploring the optimal duration of pembrolizumab and secondly real-life prognosis factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Using the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS), we identified patients with incident lung cancer in France from 2015 to 2022. Treatments and patients' characteristics were extracted or inferred from hospital, outpatient care, pharmacy delivery reports. The duration's hazard ratio (HR) was estimated with Cox model weighted by inverse of propensity score to account for confounding. Prognostics factors in first line population were identified with Cox model selected by a LASSO procedure. Findings 391,106 patients with lung cancer were identified, of whom 43,359 received up-front pembrolizumab for an advanced disease. There were 67% (29,040/43,359) of male and the median age at diagnosis was 65 years old. After a median follow-up time of 25.9 months (min-max, [0-97.6]), the median overall survival (OS) after pembrolizumab initiation in first line was 15.7 [CI 95, 15.3-16.0] months. In multivariable analysis, several covariables were independently associated with worse OS, including male sex with chemo-immunotherapy, age, hospital category, high deprivation index, inpatient hospitalization for first pembrolizumab, and history of diabetes, diuretic, beta blocker, painkiller prescription. At landmark time of 29 months after pembrolizumab initiation, continuation beyond 2 years was not associated with better OS than a fixed 2-year treatment, HR = 0.97 [0.75-1.26] p = 0.95. Interpretation This study supports the notion that stopping pembrolizumab after 2 years could be safe for patients with advanced NSCLC. However, because observational studies are prone to confounding and selection bias, causality cannot be affirmed. Funding This study did not receive any specific grant.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mosele MF, Westphalen CB, Stenzinger A, Barlesi F, Bayle A, Bièche I, Bonastre J, Castro E, Dienstmann R, Krämer A, Czarnecka AM, Meric-Bernstam F, Michiels S, Miller R, Normanno N, Reis-Filho J, Remon J, Robson M, Rouleau E, Scarpa A, Serrano C, Mateo J, André F. Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with advanced cancer in 2024: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:588-606. [PMID: 38834388 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advancements in the field of precision medicine have prompted the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Precision Medicine Working Group to update the recommendations for the use of tumour next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with advanced cancers in routine practice. METHODS The group discussed the clinical impact of tumour NGS in guiding treatment decision using the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) considering cost-effectiveness and accessibility. RESULTS As for 2020 recommendations, ESMO recommends running tumour NGS in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and ovarian cancer. Moreover, it is recommended to carry out tumour NGS in clinical research centres and under specific circumstances discussed with patients. In this updated report, the consensus within the group has led to an expansion of the recommendations to encompass patients with advanced breast cancer and rare tumours such as gastrointestinal stromal tumours, sarcoma, thyroid cancer, and cancer of unknown primary. Finally, ESMO recommends carrying out tumour NGS to detect tumour-agnostic alterations in patients with metastatic cancers where access to matched therapies is available. CONCLUSION Tumour NGS is increasingly expanding its scope and application within oncology with the aim of enhancing the efficacy of precision medicine for patients with cancer.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lueza B, Aupérin A, Rigaud C, Gross TG, Pillon M, Delgado RF, Uyttebroeck A, Amos Burke GA, Zsíros J, Csóka M, Simonin M, Patte C, Minard-Colin V, Bonastre J. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial: rituximab in children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:307-317. [PMID: 37058173 PMCID: PMC10858928 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01581-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The randomized controlled trial Inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 showed overall survival (OS) benefit and event-free survival (EFS) benefit with the addition of rituximab to standard Lymphomes Malins B (LMB) chemotherapy in children and adolescents with high-risk, mature B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Our aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of rituximab-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the French setting. METHODS We used a decision-analytic semi-Markov model with four health states and 1-month cycles. Resource use was prospectively collected in the Inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial (NCT01516580). Transition probabilities were assessed from patient-level data from the trial (n = 328). In the base case analysis, direct medical costs from the French National Insurance Scheme and life-years (LYs) were computed in both arms over a 3-year time horizon. Incremental net monetary benefit and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were computed through a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and several sensitivity analyses on key assumptions were also conducted, including one exploratory analysis with quality-adjusted life years as the health outcome. RESULTS OS and EFS benefits shown in the Inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial translated into the model by rituximab-chemotherapy being the most effective and also the least expensive strategy over the chemotherapy strategy. The mean difference in LYs between arms was 0.13 [95% CI 0.02; 0.25], and the mean cost difference € - 3 710 [95% CI € - 17,877; € 10,525] in favor of rituximab-chemotherapy group. For a € 50,000 per LY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of the rituximab-chemotherapy strategy being cost-effective was 91.1%. All sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION Adding rituximab to LMB chemotherapy in children and adolescents with high-risk mature B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is highly cost-effective in France. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01516580.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bayle A, Marino P, Baffert S, Margier J, Bonastre J. [Cost of high-throughput sequencing (NGS) technologies: Literature review and insights]. Bull Cancer 2024; 111:190-198. [PMID: 37852801 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Although high-throughput sequencing technologies (Next-Generation Sequencing [NGS]) are revolutionizing medicine, the estimation of their production cost for pricing/tariffication by health systems raises methodological questions. The objective of this review of cost studies of high-throughput sequencing techniques is to draw lessons for producing robust cost estimates of these techniques. We analyzed, using an eleven item analysis framework, micro-costing studies of high-throughput sequencing technologies (n=17), including two studies conducted in the French context. The factors of variability between the studies that we identified were temporality (early evaluation of the innovation vs. evaluation of a mature technology), the choice of cost evaluation method (scope, micro- vs. gross-costing technique), the choice of production steps observed and the transposability of these studies. The lessons we have learned are that it is necessary to have a comprehensive vision of the sequencing production process by integrating all the steps from the collection of the biological sample to the delivery of the result to the clinician. It is also important to distinguish between what refers to the local context and what refers to the general context, by favouring the use of mixed methods to calculate costs. Finally, sensitivity analyses and periodic re-estimation of the costs of the techniques must be carried out in order to be able to revise the tariffs according to changes linked to the diffusion of the technology and to competition between reagent suppliers.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lebret T, Bonastre J, Fraslin A, Neuzillet Y, Droupy S, Rebillard X, Vordos D, Guy L, Villers A, Schneider M, Coloby P, Lacoste J, Méjean A, Lacoste J, Descotes JL, Eschwege P, Loison G, Blanché H, Mariani O, Ghaleh B, Mangin A, Sirab N, Groussard K, Radvanyi F, Allory Y, Benhamou S. Cohort profile: COBLAnCE: a French prospective cohort to study prognostic and predictive factors in bladder cancer and to generate real-world data on treatment patterns, resource use and quality of life. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075942. [PMID: 38128940 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Bladder cancer is a complex disease with a wide range of outcomes. Clinicopathological factors only partially explain the variability between patients in prognosis and treatment response. There is a need for large cohorts collecting extensive data and biological samples to: (1) investigate gene-environment interactions, pathological/molecular classification and biomarker discovery; and (2) describe treatment patterns, outcomes, resource use and quality of life in a real-world setting. PARTICIPANTS COBLAnCE (COhort to study BLAdder CancEr) is a French national prospective cohort of patients with bladder cancer recruited between 2012 and 2018 and followed for 6 years. Data on patient and tumour characteristics, treatments, outcomes and biological samples are collected at enrolment and during the follow-up. FINDINGS TO DATE We describe the cohort at enrolment according to baseline surgery and tumour type. In total, 1800 patients were included: 1114 patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and 76 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) had transurethral resection of a bladder tumour without cystectomy, and 610 patients with NMIBC or MIBC underwent cystectomy. Most patients had a solitary lesion (56.3%) without basement membrane invasion (71.7% of Ta and/or Tis). Half of the patients with cystectomy were stage ≤T2 and 60% had non-continent diversion. Surgery included local (n=298) or super-extended lymph node dissections (n=11) and prostate removal (n=492). Among women, 16.5% underwent cystectomy and 81.4% anterior pelvectomy. FUTURE PLANS COBLAnCE will be used for long-term studies of bladder cancer with focus on clinicopathological factors and molecular markers. It will lead to a much-needed improvement in the understanding of the disease. The cohort provides valuable real-world data, enabling researchers to study various research questions, assess routine medical practices and guide medical decision-making.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bayle A, Bonastre J, Chaltiel D, Latino N, Rouleau E, Peters S, Galotti M, Bricalli G, Besse B, Giuliani R. ESMO study on the availability and accessibility of biomolecular technologies in oncology in Europe. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:934-945. [PMID: 37406812 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Access to biomolecular technologies has become an essential requirement to ensure optimal and timely treatment of patients with cancer. This study sought to provide a comprehensive overview of the availability and accessibility of biomolecular technologies to patients, the status of their use and prescription, barriers to access, and potential economic issues related to cost and reimbursement. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 201 field reporters from 48 European countries submitted data through an electronic survey tool between July and December 2021. The survey methodology mirrored that from previous ESMO studies addressing the availability and accessibility of antineoplastic medicines, in Europe and worldwide. The preliminary data were posted on the ESMO website for open peer-review, and amendments were incorporated into the final report. RESULTS Overall, basic single-gene techniques are widely available, whereas access to advanced biomolecular technologies, including large next-generation sequencing panels and complete genomic profiles, is highly heterogeneous. In most countries, advanced biomolecular technologies remain largely inaccessible in clinical practice, are limited to clinical trials or basic research, and associated with progressively increasing cost as the technique becomes more advanced. Differences also exist regarding national sequencing initiatives or molecular tumour boards. The most important barriers to multiple versus single-gene sequencing techniques are the reimbursement of the test (59% versus 24%), and the availability of a suitable medicine, either through reimbursement of treatment (48% versus 30%), off-label treatment (52% versus 35%), or clinical trial enrolment (53% versus 39%). CONCLUSIONS Cost and availability of both treatment and test are the two main factors limiting patients' access to advanced biomolecular technologies and as a consequence to innovative anticancer strategies. In the era of precision medicine, tackling the accessibility to biomolecular technologies is a key step to reduce inequalities to transformative cancer care.
Collapse
|
8
|
Karimi M, Mendez-Pineda S, Blanché H, Boland A, Besse C, Deleuze JF, Meng XY, Sirab N, Groussard K, Lebret T, Bonastre J, Allory Y, Radvanyi F, Benhamou S, Michiels S. A Case-Only Genome-Wide Interaction Study of Smoking and Bladder Cancer Risk: Results from the COBLAnCE Cohort. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4218. [PMID: 37686494 PMCID: PMC10487226 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is the 6th most common cancer worldwide, with tobacco smoking considered as its main risk factor. Accumulating evidence has found associations between genetic variants and the risk of BC. Candidate gene-environment interaction studies have suggested interactions between cigarette smoking and NAT2/GSTM1 gene variants. Our objective was to perform a genome-wide association case-only study using the French national prospective COBLAnCE cohort (COhort to study BLAdder CancEr), focusing on smoking behavior. The COBLAnCE cohort comprises 1800 BC patients enrolled between 2012 and 2018. Peripheral blood samples collected at enrolment were genotyped using the Illumina Global Screening Array with a Multi-Disease drop-in panel. Genotyping data (9,719,614 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)) of 1674, 1283, and 1342 patients were analyzed for smoking status, average tobacco consumption, and age at smoking initiation, respectively. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted adjusting for gender, age, and genetic principal components. The results suggest new candidate loci (4q22.1, 12p13.1, 16p13.3) interacting with smoking behavior for the risk of BC. Our results need to be validated in other case-control or cohort studies.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bergerot CD, Bonastre J. Health-related Quality of Life and Cost Effectiveness of Treatment: Components to Be Included in Clinical Decision-making. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:349-350. [PMID: 37032172 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
|
10
|
Le Corroller AG, Bonastre J. Patient-reported measures: how useful in health economics? THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:1-4. [PMID: 36346476 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01524-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
|
11
|
Or Z, Rococco E, Touré M, Bonastre J. Impact of Competition Versus Centralisation of Hospital Care on Process Quality: A Multilevel Analysis of Breast Cancer Surgery in France. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:459-469. [PMID: 33008262 PMCID: PMC9309946 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implications of competition among hospitals on care quality have been the subject of considerable debate. On one hand, economic theory suggests that when prices are regulated, quality will be increased in competitive markets. On the other hand, hospital mergers have been justified by the need to exploit cost advantages, and by evidence that hospital volume and care quality are related. METHODS Based on patient-level data from two years (2005 and 2012) we track changes in market competition and treatment patterns in breast cancer surgery. We focus on technology adoption as a proxy of process quality and examine the likelihood of offering two innovative surgical procedures: immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), after mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). We use an index of competition based on a multinomial logit model of hospital choice which is not subject to endogeneity bias, and estimate its impact on the propensity to receive IBR and SLNB by means of multilevel models taking into account both observable patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS The likelihood of receiving these procedures is significantly higher in hospitals located in more competitive markets. Yet, hospital volume remains a significant indicator of quality, therefore benefits of competition appear to be sensitive to the estimates of the impact of volume on care process. In France, the centralisation policy, with minimum activity thresholds, have contributed to improving breast cancer treatment between 2005 and 2012. CONCLUSION Finding the right balance between costs and benefits of market competition versus concentration of hospital care supply is complex. We find that close to monopolistic markets do not encourage innovation and quality in cancer treatment, but highly competitive markets where many hospitals have very low activity volumes are also problematic because hospital quality is positively linked to patient volume.
Collapse
|
12
|
Di Meglio A, Martin E, Crane TE, Charles C, Barbier A, Raynard B, Mangin A, Tredan O, Bouleuc C, Cottu PH, Vanlemmens L, Segura-Djezzar C, Lesur A, Pistilli B, Joly F, Ginsbourger T, Coquet B, Pauporte I, Jacob G, Sirven A, Bonastre J, Ligibel JA, Michiels S, Vaz-Luis I. A phase III randomized trial of weight loss to reduce cancer-related fatigue among overweight and obese breast cancer patients: MEDEA Study design. Trials 2022; 23:193. [PMID: 35246219 PMCID: PMC8896231 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06090-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Elevated body mass index (BMI) represents a risk factor for cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Weight loss interventions are feasible and safe in cancer survivors, leading to improved cardio-metabolic and quality of life (QOL) outcomes and modulating inflammatory biomarkers. Randomized data are lacking showing that a lifestyle intervention aimed at weight loss, combining improved diet, exercise, and motivational counseling, reduces CRF. Motivating to Exercise and Diet, and Educating to healthy behaviors After breast cancer (MEDEA) is a multi-center, randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of weight loss on CRF in overweight or obese survivors of breast cancer. Herein, we described the MEDEA methodology. Methods Patients (N = 220) with stage I–III breast cancer and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, within 12 months of primary treatment, and able to walk ≥ 400 m are eligible to enroll. Participants are randomized 1:1 to health education alone vs. a personalized telephone-based weight loss intervention plus health education. Both arms receive a health education program focusing on healthy living. Patients in the intervention arm are paired with an individual lifestyle coach, who delivers the intervention through 24 semi-structured telephone calls over 1 year. Intervention goals include weight loss ≥ 10% of baseline, caloric restriction of 500–1000 Kcal/day, and increased physical activity (PA) to 150 (initial phase) and 225–300 min/week (maintenance phase). The intervention is based on the social cognitive theory and is adapted from the Breast Cancer Weight Loss trial (BWEL, A011401). The primary endpoint is the difference in self-reported CRF (EORTC QLQ-C30) between arms. Secondary endpoints include the following: QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30, -BR45, -FA12), anxiety, and depression (HADS); weight and BMI, dietary habits and quality, PA, and sleep; health care costs (hospital-admissions, all-drug consumption, sick leaves) and cost-effectiveness (cost per quality-adjusted life-year); and patient motivation and satisfaction. The primary analysis of MEDEA will compare self-reported CRF at 12 months post-randomization between arms, with 80.0% power (two-sided α = 0.05) to detect a standardized effect size of 0.40. Discussion MEDEA will test the impact of a weight loss intervention on CRF among overweight or obese BC survivors, potentially providing additional management strategies and contributing to establish weight loss support as a new standard of clinical care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04304924
Collapse
|
13
|
Bardet A, Fraslin AM, Marghadi J, Borget I, Faron M, Honoré C, Delaloge S, Albiges L, Planchard D, Ducreux M, Hadoux J, Colomba E, Robert C, Bouhir S, Massard C, Micol JB, Ter-Minassian L, Michiels S, Auperin A, Barlesi F, Bonastre J. Impact of COVID-19 on healthcare organisation and cancer outcomes. Eur J Cancer 2021; 153:123-132. [PMID: 34153714 PMCID: PMC8213441 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in the management of patients with cancer and delays in treatment delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic may impact the use of hospital resources and cancer mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patient flows, patient pathways and use of hospital resources during the pandemic were simulated using a discrete event simulation model and patient-level data from a large French comprehensive cancer centre's discharge database, considering two scenarios of delays: massive return of patients from November 2020 (early-return) or March 2021 (late-return). Expected additional cancer deaths at 5 years and mortality rate were estimated using individual hazard ratios based on literature. RESULTS The number of patients requiring hospital care during the simulation period was 13,000. In both scenarios, 6-8% of patients were estimated to present a delay of >2 months. The overall additional cancer deaths at 5 years were estimated at 88 in early-return and 145 in late-return scenario, with increased additional deaths estimated for sarcomas, gynaecological, liver, head and neck, breast cancer and acute leukaemia. This represents a relative additional cancer mortality rate at 5 years of 4.4 and 6.8% for patients expected in year 2020, 0.5 and 1.3% in 2021 and 0.5 and 0.5% in 2022 for each scenario, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Pandemic-related diagnostic and treatment delays in patients with cancer are expected to impact patient survival. In the perspective of recurrent pandemics or alternative events requiring an intensive use of limited hospital resources, patients should be informed not to postpone care, and medical resources for patients with cancer should be sanctuarised.
Collapse
|
14
|
Bayle A, Droin N, Besse B, Zou Z, Boursin Y, Rissel S, Solary E, Lacroix L, Rouleau E, Borget I, Bonastre J. Whole exome sequencing in molecular diagnostics of cancer decreases over time: evidence from a cost analysis in the French setting. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2021; 22:855-864. [PMID: 33765190 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01293-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although high-throughput sequencing is revolutionising medicine, data on the actual cost of whole exome sequencing (WES) applications are needed. We aimed at assessing the cost of WES at a French cancer institute in 2015 and 2018. METHODS Actual costs of WES application in oncology research were determined using both micro-costing and gross-costing for the years 2015 and 2018, before and after the acquisition of a new sequencer. The entire workflow process of a WES test was tracked, and the number and unit price of each resource were identified at the most detailed level, from library preparation to bioinformatics analyses. In addition, we conducted an ad hoc analysis of the bioinformatics storage costs of data issued from WES analyses. RESULTS The cost of WES has decreased substantially, from €1921 per sample (i.e. cost of €3842 per patient) in 2015 to €804 per sample (i.e. cost of €1,608 per patient) in 2018, representing a decrease of 58%. In the meantime, the cost of bioinformatics storage has increased from €19,836 to €200,711. CONCLUSION This study suggests that WES cost has decreased significantly in recent years. WES has become affordable, even though clinical utility and efficiency still need to be confirmed.
Collapse
|
15
|
Fraslin A, Bardet A, Marghadi J, Borget I, Matthieu F, Auperin A, Michiels S, Bonastre J. Un modèle de micro-simulation à événements discrets pour estimer les impacts de l’épidémie de COVID-19 sur l’organisation des soins et la mortalité par cancer. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2021. [PMCID: PMC8138911 DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2021.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
16
|
de Kerangal Q, Kapso R, Morinière S, Laure B, Bonastre J, Moya-Plana A. Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus selective neck dissection in patients with early oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cost analysis. JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2021; 123:372-376. [PMID: 34000437 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been proved to be as efficient as selective neck dissection (SND) for the treatment of occult metastases in T1-T2cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The aim of our study was to assess and compare the cost of these two surgical procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective cost analysis includes consecutive patients treated between 2012 and 2017 in two French hospitals either by SLNB or SND. Hospital cost (hospital stay for initial surgery and re-hospitalizations over a period of 60 days after the initial surgery), the length of hospital stay for the initial surgery and the perioperative management were described and compared between the two techniques. The propensity score regression adjustment method was used to address selection bias. RESULTS Ninety-four patients underwent SLNB procedure and seventy-seven patients underwent SND. The length of hospital stay for initial surgery was lower in SLNB group: 5.8 days (SD: 3.8) versus 9.2 days (SD: 5) in the SND group. Hospital costs were lower in SLNB group: €7 489 (standard deviation: €3 691) versus €8 886 (standard deviation: €4 381) but this difference was not significant after propensity score regression adjustment. The rate of complication, the delay of full oral feeding and postoperative drainage were lower in SLNB group. CONCLUSION SLNB in T1-T2cN0 OSCC is less invasive than SND with fewer complications, a shorter length of hospital stay and favorable perioperative management. This study shows that this technique could be also less expensive than SND.
Collapse
|
17
|
Marguet S, Adenis A, Delaine-Clisant S, Penel N, Bonastre J. Cost-Utility Analysis of Continuation Versus Discontinuation of First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Squamous-Cell Esophageal Cancer: Economic Evaluation Alongside the E-DIS Trial. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:676-682. [PMID: 33933236 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Continuous chemotherapy has been used to treat patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (mESCC), despite weak evidence supporting a clinical benefit, associated side effects for the patients, and unjustified medical costs. In the French setting, we conducted a cost-utility analysis alongside the randomized E-DIS trial (NCT01248299), which compared first-line fluorouracil/platinum-based chemotherapy continuation (CT-CONT) to CT discontinuation (CT-DISC) in progressive-free patients after an initial 6-week treatment phase. METHODS A partitioned survival analysis was performed using patient-level data collected during the trial for survival outcomes, quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), and medical costs. The mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and medical costs were estimated over an 18-month period to assess the incremental net monetary benefit and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Uncertainty was handled using the nonparametric bootstrap and univariate analysis. Sixty-seven patients with mESCC were randomized and included in the cost-utility analysis. RESULTS On average, CT-CONT slightly decreased the number of QALYs (-0.038) and increased the cost per patient (+ €1177). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50 000/QALY, the incremental net monetary benefit was negative (-€3077 [95% confidence interval: -6564; 4359]), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -30 958€/QALY (CT-CONT dominated). The probability of the CT-CONT treatment option being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50 000/QALY, compared to CT-DISC, was 29%. CONCLUSIONS CT-DISC may be considered as an alternative therapeutic option to CT-CONT in patients with mESCC who have stable disease after an initial chemotherapy treatment phase. A continuous chemotherapy could indeed reduce the number of QALYs because of the disutility associated with the continuous treatment.
Collapse
|
18
|
Le Cesne A, Blay JY, Cupissol D, Italiano A, Delcambre C, Penel N, Isambert N, Chevreau C, Bompas E, Bertucci F, Chaigneau L, Piperno-Neumann S, Salas S, Rios M, Guillemet C, Bay JO, Ray-Coquard I, Haddag L, Bonastre J, Kapso R, Fraslin A, Bouvet N, Mir O, Foulon S. A randomized phase III trial comparing trabectedin to best supportive care in patients with pre-treated soft tissue sarcoma: T-SAR, a French Sarcoma Group trial. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1034-1044. [PMID: 33932507 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The French Sarcoma Group assessed the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) of trabectedin versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study included adults with STS who progressed after 1-3 prior treatment lines. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive trabectedin 1.5 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or BSC, stratified into L-STS (liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma) and non-L-STS groups (other histotypes). Patients from the BSC arm were allowed to cross over to trabectedin at progression. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) confirmed by blinded central review and analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS Between 26 January 2015 and 5 November 2015, 103 heavily pre-treated patients (60.2% with L-STS) from 16 French centers were allocated to receive trabectedin (n = 52) or BSC (n = 51). Median PFS was 3.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.9 months] in the trabectedin arm versus 1.5 months (0.9-2.6 months) in the BSC arm (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.64, P < 0.001) with benefits observed across almost all analyzed subgroups, but particularly in patients with L-STS (5.1 versus 1.4 months, P = 0.0001). Seven patients (13.7%) in the trabectedin arm (all with L-STS) achieved a partial response, while no objective responses were observed in the BSC arm (P = 0.004). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44.2% of patients), leukopenia (34.6%), and transaminase increase (32.7%). Health-related 30-item core European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire evidenced no statistical differences between the arms for any domain and at any time point. After progression, 91.8% of patients crossed over from BSC to trabectedin. CONCLUSION Trabectedin demonstrates superior disease control to BSC without impairing QoL in patients with recurrent STS of multiple histologies, with greater impact in patients with L-STS.
Collapse
|
19
|
Di Meglio A, Martin E, Michiels S, Charles C, Crane TE, Barbier A, Raynard B, Mangin A, Tredan O, Cottu PH, Vanlemmens L, Segura-Djezzar C, Lesur A, Pistilli B, Joly F, Ginsbourger T, Coquet B, Jacob G, Sirven A, Bonastre J, Ligibel JA, Vaz-Luis I. Abstract OT-38-01: MEDEA: A randomized trial of weight loss to reduce cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among overweight and obese breast cancer (BC) patients. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ot-38-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Rationale: Overweight and obesity are highly prevalent among BC patients and are linked to poorer prognosis and worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Weight loss interventions, based on caloric restriction, increased physical activity (PA) and behavioral counselling, are safe and feasible among BC survivors and hold the promise to improve BC-specific outcomes. MEDEA: Motivating to Exercise and Diet, and Educating to healthy behaviors After breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04304924) will evaluate the impact of weight loss on CRF.
Trial design: French multi-center 1:1 randomized controlled trial comparing a 12-month personalized, telephone-based weight loss program + health education intervention vs health education alone in overweight or obese BC patients.
Endpoints and measures: Primary endpoint: difference in self-reported CRF 12 months post-randomization between arms, measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 CRF subscale. Secondary endpoints: 1) PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30, -B45, -FA12), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale); 2) weight and body mass index (BMI), diet habits and quality, PA, sleep; 3) cost-effectiveness (number and length of hospital-admissions, all-drug consumption, number and duration of sick leaves). Accelerometer data will be collected to track PA and sleep measures. Qualitative analyses will evaluate patient motivation and satisfaction.
Main eligibility criteria: stage I-II-III BC, primary BC treatment completed within the prior 12 months (definitive surgery, adjuvant chemo-, and/or radio-therapy, if administered), BMI ≥25 kg/m2, ability to walk at least 400 meters at any pace, ECOG PS 0-1, not participating in another weight loss, dietary or PA intervention clinical trial.
Intervention and Control arms: The intervention and health education program are adapted from the BWEL: Breast Cancer WEight Loss study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02750826; PI Ligibel JA). The behavior change program is based on the Social Cognitive Theory. Patients in the intervention arm are paired with an individual lifestyle coach, who delivers the intervention through 24 semi-structured telephone calls of 30-60 minutes, supplemented by a detailed participant workbook and scheduled as follows: 1) intensive phase (weeks 1-12), 12 weekly calls; 2) consolidation phase (weeks 13-24), 6 bi-weekly calls; 3) maintenance phase (weeks 25-52), 1 monthly call. Coaches were hired and trained specifically for MEDEA, they are located at a centralized call center and receive support from coordinating nutrition, PA, and behavioral experts. Regular meetings with study team and investigators assure standardized delivery of the intervention and troubleshooting. Intervention goals include weight loss ≥10% of baseline weight, caloric restriction of 500-1000 Kcal/day, increased PA to 150 minutes/week in the initial phase and 225-300 minutes/week in the maintenance phase. Toolbox solutions are offered to tailor the intervention and meet the needs of specific ethnic, socioeconomic or other patient populations with difficulties in achieving intervention goals. All participants in both arms receive a health education program focusing on healthy living.
Accrual: MEDEA will enroll 220 patients overall. Recruitment started in June 2020.
Statistical considerations: The primary analysis of MEDEA will compare the primary endpoint of CRF scores at the 12-month post-randomization time point between arms. The study has 90.0% power at two-sided α=0.05 to detect a standardized effect size of 0.40 (sample size inflated for drop outs). For interpreting the clinical significance of effects, 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviation effects will be considered as small, moderate, and large (Cohen, 1988). All other measures, time points and analyses will be considered secondary or exploratory.
Citation Format: Antonio Di Meglio, Elise Martin, Stefan Michiels, Cecile Charles, Tracy E. Crane, Aude Barbier, Bruno Raynard, Anthony Mangin, Olivier Tredan, Paul H. Cottu, Laurence Vanlemmens, Carine Segura-Djezzar, Anne Lesur, Barbara Pistilli, Florence Joly, Thomas Ginsbourger, Bernadette Coquet, Guillemette Jacob, Aude Sirven, Julia Bonastre, Jennifer A. Ligibel, Ines Vaz-Luis. MEDEA: A randomized trial of weight loss to reduce cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among overweight and obese breast cancer (BC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-38-01.
Collapse
|
20
|
Mosele F, Remon J, Mateo J, Westphalen CB, Barlesi F, Lolkema MP, Normanno N, Scarpa A, Robson M, Meric-Bernstam F, Wagle N, Stenzinger A, Bonastre J, Bayle A, Michiels S, Bièche I, Rouleau E, Jezdic S, Douillard JY, Reis-Filho JS, Dienstmann R, André F. Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1491-1505. [PMID: 32853681 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 680] [Impact Index Per Article: 136.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows sequencing of a high number of nucleotides in a short time frame at an affordable cost. While this technology has been widely implemented, there are no recommendations from scientific societies about its use in oncology practice. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) is proposing three levels of recommendations for the use of NGS. Based on the current evidence, ESMO recommends routine use of NGS on tumour samples in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prostate cancers, ovarian cancers and cholangiocarcinoma. In these tumours, large multigene panels could be used if they add acceptable extra cost compared with small panels. In colon cancers, NGS could be an alternative to PCR. In addition, based on the KN158 trial and considering that patients with endometrial and small-cell lung cancers should have broad access to anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) antibodies, it is recommended to test tumour mutational burden (TMB) in cervical cancers, well- and moderately-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, salivary cancers, thyroid cancers and vulvar cancers, as TMB-high predicted response to pembrolizumab in these cancers. Outside the indications of multigene panels, and considering that the use of large panels of genes could lead to few clinically meaningful responders, ESMO acknowledges that a patient and a doctor could decide together to order a large panel of genes, pending no extra cost for the public health care system and if the patient is informed about the low likelihood of benefit. ESMO recommends that the use of off-label drugs matched to genomics is done only if an access programme and a procedure of decision has been developed at the national or regional level. Finally, ESMO recommends that clinical research centres develop multigene sequencing as a tool to screen patients eligible for clinical trials and to accelerate drug development, and prospectively capture the data that could further inform how to optimise the use of this technology.
Collapse
|
21
|
Legoupil C, Debieuvre D, Marabelle A, Michiels S, Kapso R, Besse B, Bonastre J. A microsimulation model to assess the economic impact of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6:00174-2019. [PMID: 32337213 PMCID: PMC7167209 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00174-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Immunotherapy has become the standard of care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to quantify the economic impact, in France, of anti-PD-1 therapy for NSCLC. Methods We used patient-level data from the national ESCAP-2011-CPHG cohort study to estimate time to treatment failure and mean cost per patient for the four label indications approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for NSCLC in May 2018. To compute the budget impact, we used a microsimulation model to estimate the target populations of anti-PD-1 therapy over a 3-year period, which were combined with the annual cost of treatment. Results Overall, 11 839 patients with NSCLC were estimated to be eligible for anti-PD-1 therapy 3 years after the introduction of anti-PD-1 therapies. The mean annual cost per patient in the control group ranged from €2671 (95% CI €2149–3194) to €6412 (95% CI €5920–6903) across the four indications. The mean annual cost of treatment for the four EMA-approved indications of anti-PD-1 therapy was estimated to be €48.7 million in the control group and at €421.8 million in the immunotherapy group. The overall budget impact in 2019 is expected to amount to €373.1 million. In the sensitivity analysis, flat doses and treatment effect had the greatest influence on the budget impact. Conclusion Anti-PD-1 agents for NSCLC treatment are associated with a substantial economic burden. Anti-PD-1 agents for NSCLC treatment are associated with a substantial economic burdenhttp://bit.ly/2SDXZw0
Collapse
|
22
|
Orts F, Bonastre J, Fernández J, Cases F. Effect of chloride on the one step electrochemical treatment of an industrial textile wastewater with tin dioxide anodes. The case of trichromy procion HEXL. CHEMOSPHERE 2020; 245:125396. [PMID: 31784183 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The resulting solutions from the cotton fabrics dyeing using the trichromy Procion HEXL, with NaCl as electrolyte, were electrochemically treated. These dyes have two azo groups as chromophores and two monochlorotriazinic groups as reactive groups in their structure. The combined oxidation/reduction at 125 mA cm-2 in a filter-press cell without compartment separation was carried out using an anode of Ti/SnO2-Sb-Pt and a cathode of stainless steel. This procedure has been effective in previous experiments using sulphate as electrolyte. A significant decrease in total organic carbon (TOC), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and total nitrogen (TN) was obtained. Moreover, the process took place efficiently. The average oxidation state (AOS) and the carbon oxidation state (COS) data confirmed the presence of stable oxidized intermediates in the electrolysed solution. The chromatography and the UV-Visible spectrophotometry assays indicated that full decolourisation is obtained at a loaded charge of around 0.81 Ah L-1 which is associated with an electrical energy per order (EEO) of 1.20 kWh m-3.
Collapse
|
23
|
Lafuma A, Cotté FE, Le Tourneau C, Emery C, Gaudin AF, Torreton E, Gourmelen J, Bonastre J. Economic burden of chemotherapy-treated recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in France: real-world data from the permanent sample of national health insurance beneficiaries. J Med Econ 2019; 22:698-705. [PMID: 30895832 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1594837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Aims: Overall survival (OS) of patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is extremely poor. New therapeutic options emerge but need to establish their economic value. The objective was to describe the direct and related costs of R/M SCCHN in France. Materials and methods: We selected all adult patients treated with chemotherapy for R/M SCCHN between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2014 from the permanent sample of the French national health insurance database (EGB). Data were analyzed from the index date (first chemotherapy) until patients' death or 31 December 2015. "Treatment period" and "end-of-life" (EoL) (from last chemotherapy until death) were distinguished. Costs included all hospitalizations for SCCHN and ambulatory care. Costs of hospitalized and non-hospitalized adverse events (AEs) were estimated. Results: Among 267 patients identified, 85% were men, 44% had metastases at the index date and the mean age was 62.0 years (±9.9). The most common tumor location was oropharynx (29%) but 39% of patients had multiple locations. Median OS was 9.3 (95% CI: 7.9-11.8) months for the overall population. The average total direct cost per patient was €49,954, broken down into €32,908 (95% CI: 29,525-36,290) for hospitalizations and €17,047 (14,941-19,152) for ambulatory care. Main cost drivers were drug acquisition and administration (€14,538) during the treatment period (209 days on average) and palliative care (€3,750) during the EoL period (125 days). Regarding related costs, around 12% of patients received disability pensions (€1,397 per patient [624-2,171]) and sick leave payments (€1,592 [888-2,297]). "Metabolism and nutrition disorders" and "Infections and infestations" were the most expensive hospitalized AEs (€1,513 and €1,180 per patient, respectively). Febrile neutropenia was the most expensive non-hospitalized AE (€766 per patient). Conclusions: This analysis of real-world data confirms the poor prognosis of patients with R/M SCCHN and provides cost data for future economic evaluations.
Collapse
|
24
|
Foulon S, Cony-Makhoul P, Guerci-Bresler A, Delord M, Solary E, Monnereau A, Bonastre J, Tubert-Bitter P. Prévalence de la leucémie myéloïde chronique en 2014 en France à partir des données du Système national des données de santé. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2019.03.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
25
|
Bayle A, Besse B, Annereau M, Bonastre J. Switch to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) fixed-dose regimen: What is the economic impact? Eur J Cancer 2019; 113:28-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|