An Analysis of Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Metastatic Urinary Tract Tumors to Identify Predictors of Response

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To identify selection criteria linked to outcomes in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastatic tumors of the urinary tract (UT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Single institution retrospective analysis of SBRT treated patients for oligometastatic/progressive UT tumors from 2006-2022. Charts were queried for M1 status at diagnosis or during disease course, treatment details (surgery, SBRT, systemic therapy), metabolic status (diabetes [DM], BMI) and outcomes. A linear quadratic formula was used to calculate the biologically effective dose (BED) using an α/β of 10 for tumor. Descriptive statistics portrayed the cohort, and analyses were done at patient and site level. Time-to-event analyses, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from SBRT, were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used for univariable (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) to identify predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were treated at 44 metastatic sites, including: bone (25%), node (36.4%), lung (20.5%), soft tissue (13.6%) and liver (4.5%). Most were male (74.3%) with a median age of 70 (range: 51-89), without DM (60%) having a median BMI of 29.8, and ECOG <2 (97.1%) at time of SBRT. Six (17.1%) patients were M1 at diagnosis. Of the 29 non-M1 patients, 86.2% received definitive local therapy (LT), 58.6% had at least T3/N+ disease, 75.8% received systemic therapy with a median of 2 agents (range: 1-6) prior to SBRT. Sixteen (45.7%) received immunotherapy (IO) with most receiving this before (75%) and after (56.2%) SBRT. Six patients had positive PD-L1 status (n = 10). The median RT dose, fractionation and BED was 40 Gy (range: 14-46), 5 fractions, and 72 (range: 28-132), respectively. At a median follow-up of 34.8, the median OS was 18.4 m (range: 9.3-27.4) with a 2-year OS of 35.9%. At patient level, 62.8% recurred after SBRT. The median PFS after SBRT was 5.3 m (range: 1.8-8.7) with a 2-yr PFS of 29.3%. Patient-level PFS was improved with LT (6.7 vs 1.4 m; p = 0.001) and DM (NR vs 2.9 m; p = 0.015), whereas improved OS was related with LT (18.9 vs 6.6 m; p = 0.03), DM (p = 0.04), ECOG (p = 0.004), and no relapse after SBRT (NR vs 9.8 m; p <0.001). Exposure to < 3 systemic agents prior to SBRT portended better PFS (6.7 vs 2.6 m; p = 0.04) without any impact by IO. At site level, 20.4% of sites had local relapse with 4 being the first event. Site was related with PFS (p = 0.009) with order of increased relapse risk being liver > bone > soft tissue > node > lung. No dosimetric feature was related with recurrence risk. On MVA, both DM (p = 0.02) and LT (p = 0.002) were predictive for PFS. Only recurrence after SBRT predicted for OS on MVA (HR: 6.7, 95% CI: 1.4-31; p = 0.014). In the IO subset, median PFS was 5.3 m and OS was 9.4 m, with no difference seen with IO-SBRT sequence or PDL1 status.

CONCLUSION

Optimized selection criteria for metastasis-directed therapy in patients with UT tumors is unclear, notably with IO. Future studies may benefit by assessing circulating tumor markers prior to SBRT.

Oncogeriatric Developments

Cancer is a disease of aging and is rapidly becoming the number one cause of mortality in older people. Over their lifetime, one in two men and one in three women will develop a cancer, with half of the risk being beyond the age of seventy. Therefore, cancer is a problem frequently encountered by geriatricians. In this article, we review a few recent progresses that will be of interest to the geriatric community. First, we now have robust evidence that a comprehensive geriatric assessment and management change outcomes in older cancer patients, notably allowing decreased treatment toxicity, better treatment completion, and increased functional outcomes. In gastrointestinal cancers and breast cancer, several recent studies have addressed when treatment intensity can be decreased, and when it cannot. New treatments for acute myeloid leukemia are finally beginning to improve outcomes for older patients and such patients should be referred to oncologists for management. In prostate cancer, new imaging techniques (e.g., PSMA scan) and treatment options can allow better treatment targeting and spare some hormonal and chemotherapy toxicity. Finally, we review recent public policy efforts to address the epidemiologic wave of cancer in older patients on a global scale.

Patient-reported outcomes in immunotherapy for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Data about patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are sparse. Our exploratory study evaluated PROs in patients with HNSCC starting treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy with cetuximab.

METHODS

Patients were recruited prior to receipt of their first checkpoint inhibitor therapy infusion. Participants completed measures of checkpoint inhibitor toxicities and quality of life (QOL) at on-treatment clinic visits.

RESULTS

Among patients treated with checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (n = 48) or combination therapy (n = 38) toxicity increased over time (p < 0.05), while overall QOL improved from baseline to 12 weeks, with stable or declining QOL thereafter (p < 0.05). There were no group differences in change in toxicity index or QOL. Toxicity index scores were significantly higher in the combination group at 18-20 weeks and 6 months post-initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (p < 0.05). There were no significant group differences at baseline, the 6-8 week (p = 0.13) or 3-month (p = 0.09) evaluations. The combination group reported better emotional well-being at baseline than the monotherapy group (p = 0.04), There were no other group differences QOL at baseline or later timepoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing patient-reported toxicity, checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy were associated with similar transient improvements, then worsening, of QOL in patients with HNSCC.

Phase II multi-institutional clinical trial result of concurrent cetuximab and nivolumab in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

A phase II multi-institutional clinical trial was conducted to determine overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with a combination of cetuximab and nivolumab.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with R/M HNSCC were treated with cetuximab 500 mg/m2 IV Day (D) -14 as a lead-in followed by cetuximab 500 mg/m2 IV and nivolumab 240 mg IV on D1 and D15 of each 28-D cycle. Expression of p16 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in archived tumors were determined. Tumor-tissue-modified human papillomavirus (TTMV) DNA was quantified in plasma.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were enrolled, and 88 patients were evaluable for OS with a median follow-up of 15.9 months. Median OS in the 45 patients who had prior therapy for R/M HNSCC (Cohort A) was 11.4 months, with a 1-year OS 50% (90% CI, 0.43-0.57). Median OS in the 43 patients who had no prior therapy (Cohort B) was 20.2 months, with a 1-year OS 66% (90% CI, 0.59-0.71). In the combined cohorts, the p16-negative immunostaining was associated with higher response rate (RR, p=0.02) but did not impact survival while higher PD-L1 combined positive score was associated with higher RR (p=0.03) and longer OS (log-rank p=0.04). In the p16-positive patients, median (log-rank p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of cetuximab and nivolumab is effective in patients with both previously treated and untreated R/M HNSCC and warrants further evaluation.

The impact of age on outcome in phase III NRG Oncology/RTOG trials of radiotherapy (XRT) +/- systemic therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To examine the role age plays in the treatment and prognosis of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treated definitively with radiation alone or combined modality therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of three NRG/RTOG trials examining either radiation alone or combined radiation and systemic therapy for LAHNC. The effect of age (≥70 yrs.) on cause-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 2688 patients were analyzed, of whom 309 patients (11.5%) were ≥ 70. For all studies combined, the hazard ratio (HR) for CSS for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 was 1.33 (95%CI: 1.14-1.55, p < 0.001). For OS, the HR for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 for all studies combined was 1.55 (95% CI 1.35-1.77, p < 0.001). After adjustment for all covariates, age ≥ 70 was associated with worse OS regardless of adjustment for smoking and p16 status. The survival difference was more pronounced in those receiving combined radiation and systemic therapy. Hematologic and renal toxicities were increased in combined modality trials in patients ≥70 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients age ≥ 70 with LAHNC were underrepresented in these clinical trials. Their CSS and OS proved inferior to patients <70 years old.

Abstract 5751: Patient-reported toxicities in head and neck cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (i.e. nivolumab, pembrolizumab) are FDA-approved agents used in the treatment of various head and neck malignancies. While much is known about clinician-rated adverse clinical events of these immunotherapies from clinical trials, less is known about patient-reported toxicities. The goal of the current study was to describe patient-reported toxicities in patients receiving ICIs for head and neck cancer.

Methods: Patients with head and neck cancer were recruited as part of a larger study on quality of life on ICIs. Prior to initiation of ICIs, participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and a measure of symptomatic toxicities of ICIs developed based on input form providers, patients, and caregivers. Patients completed follow-up symptom assessments every 6-8 weeks until cancer progression. Severity of each symptom over the past 7 days was rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 = “not at all,” 4 = “very much”). A score of 3 or 4 was considered moderate to severe symptomatology.

Results: There were 45 patients (22% female; M age = 62), who completed a least 2 symptom assessments before cancer progression. The five most common moderate to severe symptoms at baseline were fatigue (27%), changes in taste (18%), insomnia (16%), coughing (11%), and muscle aches (9%). At the assessment before cancer progression, the five most common moderate to severe symptoms were fatigue (38%), insomnia (24%), rash (13%), cough (13%), and numbness in hands and feet (13%). From the baseline assessment to the last symptom assessment preceding progression, most patients reported worsening skin dryness (49%), skin sensitivity (46%), weakness in arms of legs (46%), and itching (42%). Most patients also reported worsening fatigue (49%), although a large subset reported improvements in fatigue (36%).

Conclusion: Results indicate that fatigue and insomnia are the most common and severe patient-reported toxicities of ICIs for head and neck cancer. These preliminary findings warrant larger future studies with longer follow-up to better understand changes in patient-reported toxicities in this population.

Citation Format: Brian W. James, Aasha I. Hoogland, Nathaly Irizarry-Arroyo, Jameel Muzaffar, Kedar Kirtane, Julie A. Kish, Heather S. Jim, Christine H. Chung. Patient-reported toxicities in head and neck cancer patients treated with immunotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5751.

Using Big Data in oncology to prospectively impact clinical patient care: A proof of concept study

OBJECTIVE

Big Data is widely seen as a major opportunity for progress in the practice of personalized medicine, attracting the attention from medical societies and presidential teams alike as it offers a unique opportunity to enlarge the base of evidence, especially for older patients underrepresented in clinical trials. This study prospectively assessed the real-time availability of clinical cases in the Health & Research Informatics Total Cancer Care™ (TCC) database matching community patients with cancer, and the impact of such a consultation on treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged 70 and older seen at the Lynn Cancer Institute (LCI) with a documented malignancy were eligible. Geriatric screening information and the oncologist's pre-consultation treatment plan were sent to Moffitt. A search for similar patients was done in TCC and additional information retrieved from Electronic Medical Records. A report summarizing the data was sent and the utility of such a consultation was assessed per email after the treatment decision.

RESULTS

Thirty one patients were included. The geriatric screening was positive in 87.1% (27) of them. The oncogeriatric consultation took on average 2.2 working days. It influenced treatment in 38.7% (12), and modified it in 19.4% (6). The consultation was perceived as "somewhat" to "very useful" in 83.9% (26).

CONCLUSION

This study establishes a proof of concept of the feasibility of real time use of Big Data for clinical practice. The geriatric screening and the consultation report influenced treatment in 38.7% of cases and modified it in 19.4%, which compares very well with oncogeriatric literature. Additional steps are needed to render it financially and clinically viable.

Patient choice for high-volume center radiation impacts head and neck cancer outcome

Background

Studies suggest treatment outcomes may vary between high (HVC)‐ and low‐volume centers (LVC). Radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) requires weeks of treatment, the inconvenience of which may influence a patient's choice for treatment location. We hypothesized that receipt of RT for HNC at a HVC would influence outcomes compared to patients evaluated at a HVC, but who chose to receive RT at a LVC.

Methods

From 1998 to 2011, 1930 HNC patients were evaluated at a HVC and then treated with RT at either a HVC or LVC. Time‐to‐event outcomes and treatment factors were compared.

Results

Median follow‐up was 34 months. RT was delivered at a HVC for 1368 (71%) patients and at a LVC in 562 (29%). Patients were more likely to choose HVC‐RT if they resided in the HVC's county or required definitive RT (all P < 0.001). HVC‐RT was associated with a significant improvement in 3‐year LRC (84% vs 68%), DFS (68% vs 48%), and OS (72% vs 57%) (all P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis (MVA), HVC‐RT independently predicted for improved LRC, DFS, and OS (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In patients evaluated at a HVC, the choice of RT location was primarily influenced by their residing distance from the HVC. HVC‐RT was associated with improvements in LRC, DFS, and OS in HNC. As treatment planning and delivery are technically demanding in HNC, the choice to undergo treatment at a HVC may result in more optimal delivered dose, RT duration, and outcome.

Antitumor Activity of Nivolumab in Recurrent and Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An International, Multicenter Study of the Mayo Clinic Phase 2 Consortium (NCI-9742)

Purpose This multinational study evaluated the antitumor activity of nivolumab in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Tumor and plasma-based biomarkers were investigated in an exploratory analysis. Patients and Methods Patients with multiply pretreated recurrent or metastatic NPC were treated with nivolumab until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) and secondary end points included survival and toxicity. The expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and human leukocyte antigens A and B in archived tumors and plasma clearance of Epstein-Barr virus DNA were correlated with ORR and survival. Results A total of 44 patients were evaluated and the overall ORR was 20.5% (complete response, n = 1; partial response, n = 8). Nine patients received nivolumab for > 12 months (20%). The 1-year overall survival rate was 59% (95% CI, 44.3% to 78.5%) and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 19.3% (95% CI, 10.1% to 37.2%). There was no statistical correlation between ORR and the biomarkers; however, a descriptive analysis showed that the proportion of patients who responded was higher among those with PD-L1 positive tumors (> 1% expression) than those with PD-L1-negative tumors. The loss of expression of one or both human leukocyte antigen class 1 proteins was associated with better PFS than when both proteins were expressed (1-year PFS, 30.9% v 5.6%; log-rank P = .01). There was no association between survival and PD-L1 expression or plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA clearance. There was no unexpected toxicity to nivolumab. Conclusion Nivolumab has promising activity in NPC and the 1-year overall survival rate compares favorably with historic data in similar populations. Additional evaluation in a randomized setting is warranted. The biomarker results were hypothesis generating and validation in larger cohorts is needed.

The Older Adult With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Knowledge Gaps and Future Direction in Assessment and Treatment

Older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) pose unique treatment and supportive care challenges to oncologists and other cancer care providers. The majority of patients with HNSCC present with locoregionally advanced disease, for which combined-modality treatment integrating chemotherapy and radiation therapy is often necessary to maximize tumor control. However, applying these approaches to an older population with concomitant comorbidities and a higher risk of functional impairments remains challenging and is exacerbated by the paucity of studies involving older adults. The purpose of this article is to identify knowledge gaps in the evaluation and management of older adults with HNSCC-particularly those undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy-and their caregivers through a review of the literature conducted by clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. The findings highlight the importance of a geriatric assessment and the therapeutic paradigms and challenges relevant to this population. Furthermore, we identify the need for additional research and interventions related to key supportive care issues that arise during and after treatment in older adults with locoregionally advanced HNSCC. On the basis of our findings, we prioritize these issues to guide future patient-oriented research endeavors to address these knowledge gaps and thus better serve this growing patient population.

Increased acute mortality with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in patients ≥70years

PURPOSE

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for many sites of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (LAHNC). However, on meta-analysis, the addition of chemotherapy did not improve survival for patients >70years. We hypothesized that elderly patients treated with CRT would have increased toxicity without similar improvements in survival.

METHODS

A single-institution, IRB-approved retrospective study took place from 2005 to 2012 including 369 patients treated with CRT for LAHNC. Multivariate models for death at 3months and death over time were developed using logistic regression and Cox modeling, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients ≥70years were treated less often with concurrent cisplatin dosed every 3weeks (25.5% vs. 71.4%, respectively) and more often with weekly carboplatin (31.9% vs. 3.4%) than patients <70years (n=322; p<0.001). Patients ≥70years experienced increased toxicity during treatment with more frequently hospitalizations (36.2% vs. 21.1%; p=0.02) and a lower rate of PEG removal at last follow-up or death (77.1% vs. 92.9%; p=0.004). A higher proportion of patients ≥70years died within 3months (12.8% vs. 2.8%; p=0.001) following CRT. Patients ≥70 had an increased risk of death at 3months following CRT (odds ratio 5.19, 95% CI 1.64-16.41; p=0.005) and worse survival over time (hazard ratio 2.30, 95% CI 1.34-3.93; p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≥70years were more often treated with less toxic chemotherapy, yet experienced higher rates of hospitalization during treatment and increased rates of acute mortality following CRT. The efficacy of chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients should be evaluated in a prospective setting.

Postoperative concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Despite resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region (SCCHN) often recur. Because adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation reduces recurrence among high-risk mucosal SCCHN, we sought to understand its efficacy among high-risk cutaneous SCCHN.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with cutaneous SCCHN who underwent adjuvant radiation or concurrent chemoradiation. Patients must have had stage III/IV with high-risk features, including metastatic involvement of ≥2 lymph nodes, positive margins, or extracapsular invasion.

RESULTS

There were 61 patients: 27 (44%) received adjuvant radiation and 34 (56%) received adjuvant chemoradiation. The median recurrence-free survivals were 15.4 and 40.3 months, respectively. Adjuvant chemoradiation significantly decreased the risk of recurrence or death in a multivariable analysis: hazard ratio (HR) 0.31 (p = .01). However, a difference in overall survival was not found.

CONCLUSION

For high-risk cutaneous SCCHN, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with a better recurrence-free survival than adjuvant radiation alone.

A phase I, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of panobinostat, an HDAC inhibitor, combined with erlotinib in patients with advanced aerodigestive tract tumors

PURPOSE

Panobinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, enhances antiproliferative activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines when combined with erlotinib. We evaluated this combination in patients with advanced NSCLC and head and neck cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eligible patients were enrolled in a 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of twice weekly panobinostat plus daily erlotinib at four planned dose levels (DL). Pharmacokinetics, blood, fat pad biopsies (FPB) for histone acetylation, and paired pre and posttherapy tumor biopsies for checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) expression were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 42 enrolled patients, 33 were evaluable for efficacy. Dose-limiting toxicities were prolonged-QTc and nausea at DL3. Adverse events included fatigue and nausea (grades 1-3), and rash and anorexia (grades 1-2). Disease control rates were 54% for NSCLC (n = 26) and 43% for head and neck cancer (n = 7). Of 7 patients with NSCLC with EGF receptor (EGFR) mutations, 3 had partial response, 3 had stable disease, and 1 progressed. For EGFR-mutant versus EGFR wild-type patients, progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.7 versus 1.9 months (P = 0.43) and overall survival was 41 (estimated) versus 5.2 months (P = 0.39). Erlotinib pharmacokinetics was not significantly affected. Correlative studies confirmed panobinostat's pharmacodynamic effect in blood, FPB, and tumor samples. Low CHK1 expression levels correlated with PFS (P = 0.006) and response (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We determined MTD at 30 mg (panobinostat) and 100 mg (erlotinib). Further studies are needed to further explore the benefits of HDAC inhibitors in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, investigate FPB as a potential surrogate source for biomarker investigations, and validate CHK1's predictive role.

Long-term follow-up of the RTOG 9501/intergroup phase III trial: postoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Previous analysis of this Intergroup trial demonstrated that with a median follow-up among surviving patients of 45.9 months, the concurrent postoperative administration of cisplatin and radiation therapy improved local-regional control and disease-free survival of patients who had high-risk resectable head-and-neck carcinomas. With a minimum of 10 years of follow-up potentially now available for all patients, these results are updated here to examine long-term outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 410 analyzable patients who had high-risk resected head-and-neck cancers were prospectively randomized to receive either radiation therapy (RT: 60 Gy in 6 weeks) or identical RT plus cisplatin, 100 mg/m(2)i.v. on days 1, 22, and 43 (RT + CT).

RESULTS

At 10 years, the local-regional failure rates were 28.8% vs 22.3% (P=.10), disease-free survival was 19.1% vs 20.1% (P=.25), and overall survival was 27.0% vs 29.1% (P=.31) for patients treated by RT vs RT + CT, respectively. In the unplanned subset analysis limited to patients who had microscopically involved resection margins and/or extracapsular spread of disease, local-regional failure occurred in 33.1% vs 21.0% (P=.02), disease-free survival was 12.3% vs 18.4% (P=.05), and overall survival was 19.6% vs 27.1% (P=.07), respectively.

CONCLUSION

At a median follow-up of 9.4 years for surviving patients, no significant differences in outcome were observed in the analysis of all randomized eligible patients. However, analysis of the subgroup of patients who had either microscopically involved resection margins and/or extracapsular spread of disease showed improved local-regional control and disease-free survival with concurrent administration of chemotherapy. The remaining subgroup of patients who were enrolled only because they had tumor in 2 or more lymph nodes did not benefit from the addition of CT to RT.

Effect of prophylactic fluconazole on oral mucositis and candidiasis during radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for carcinoma of the head and neck can result in high rates of candidiasis and mucositis. Prophylactic fluconazole (FCZ) has been shown to reduce the incidence of candidiasis. We report our outcomes of patients with head-and-neck cancer undergoing CRT treated prophylactically with FCZ.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An institutional review board-approved database of head-and-neck cancer patients treated with RT or CRT was reviewed to identify patients treated between 2004 and 2009 who received at least 50 Gy to approximately two-thirds of the oral cavity or oropharynx mucosa. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: the usual care group and the prophylaxis group. The primary endpoints were the incidence of mucositis and candidiasis.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients were eligible for analysis: 72 patients in the prophylactic group and 109 patients in the usual care group. Patient characteristics and radiation dose were comparable between groups. RT alone was given in 28 patients (16%). Mucositis data were available in 161 (89%) patients. Grade 2 or higher mucositis was seen in 131 (81%) patients. Prophylactic FCZ had significantly decreased grade 2 or higher mucositis. In the usual care group and prophylaxis group patients, 83 of 93 patients (89.3%) and 48 of 68 patients (70.6%), respectively, developed grade 2 or higher mucositis (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic administration of FCZ twice weekly during CRT for head-and-neck cancer reduces incidence of mucositis and thrush.

A phase II study of cisplatin preceded by a 12-h continuous infusion of concurrent hydroxyurea and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) for adult patients with malignant gliomas (Southwest Oncology Group S9149)

Inhibition of DNA excision repair can modulate resistance to cisplatin. Cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) and hydroxyurea (HU), in combination, inhibit the excision-repair system and removal of platinum-DNA adducts. Marked cytotoxic synergy had been demonstrated in vitro at clinically achievable levels. The three-drug regimen was found to be feasible in clinical pilot studies. A Phase II study in patients with relapsed or progressive anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was performed in the Southwest Oncology Group. The primary end point was 6 month survival, historically about 42%. A loading dose of HU 1,260 mg/m2 IV over 1 h was followed by Ara-C 1,200 mg/m2 plus HU 5,040 mg/m2 IV over 12 h, followed by cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV over 1 h. A total of 76 patients were registered. The GBM stratum registered 56 patients in a two-stage accrual. Among 51 eligible GBM patients, the 6-month survival probability was 41% (95% CI 28-55%), and median overall survival was 5 months (95% CI 4-6 months). The 6-month progression-free survival probability was 25% (95% CI 14-37%), and median progression-free survival was 2 months (95% CI 2-4 months). One patient achieved a partial response (2%, 95% CI 0-10%), 13 patients had stable disease (25%, 95% CI 14-39%). Twenty-two patients progressed, and 14 were not assessable for response. The AA stratum was closed early after 20 patients due to slow accrual. Among 19 eligible patients, the 6-month survival probability was 58% (95% CI 36-80%), and median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI 7-14 months). The 6-month progression-free survival probability was 26% (95% CI 6-46%), and median progression-free survival was 3 months (95% CI 2-5 months). No responses were seen. Six patients (32%) had stable disease (95% CI 13-57%), 11 progressed, and 2 were not assessable for response. Of the 70 patients evaluable for toxicity, two died of infection. Twenty-three patients (33%) experienced Grade 4 toxicities, primarily hematological. Cisplatin combined with HU and Ara-C did not improve the 6 month survival rate in patients with relapsed or progressive AA or GBM. Significantly more hematological toxicity was seen than expected from cisplatin alone. Although benefit might be possible in a more platinum-sensitive tumor type, further clinical trials with this regimen for patients with glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma are not justified.

Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of resection and postoperative radiotherapy, high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck frequently recurs in the original tumor bed. We tested the hypothesis that concurrent postoperative administration of cisplatin and radiotherapy would improve the rate of local and regional control.

METHODS

Between September 9, 1995, and April 28, 2000, 459 patients were enrolled. After undergoing total resection of all visible and palpable disease, 231 patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (60 to 66 Gy in 30 to 33 fractions over a period of 6 to 6.6 weeks) and 228 patients to receive the identical treatment plus concurrent cisplatin (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously on days 1, 22, and 43).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 45.9 months, the rate of local and regional control was significantly higher in the combined-therapy group than in the group given radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio for local or regional recurrence, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.91; P=0.01). The estimated two-year rate of local and regional control was 82 percent in the combined-therapy group, as compared with 72 percent in the radiotherapy group. Disease-free survival was significantly longer in the combined-therapy group than in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease or death, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04), but overall survival was not (hazard ratio for death, 0.84; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.09; P=0.19). The incidence of acute adverse effects of grade 3 or greater was 34 percent in the radiotherapy group and 77 percent in the combined-therapy group (P<0.001). Four patients who received combined therapy died as a direct result of the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Among high-risk patients with resected head and neck cancer, concurrent postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly improve the rates of local and regional control and disease-free survival. However, the combined treatment is associated with a substantial increase in adverse effects.

An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The Head and Neck Intergroup conducted a phase III randomized trial to test the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiation in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned between arm A (the control), single daily fractionated radiation (70 Gy at 2 Gy/d); arm B, identical radiation therapy with concurrent bolus cisplatin, given on days 1, 22, and 43; and arm C, a split course of single daily fractionated radiation and three cycles of concurrent infusional fluorouracil and bolus cisplatin chemotherapy, 30 Gy given with the first cycle and 30 to 40 Gy given with the third cycle. Surgical resection was encouraged if possible after the second chemotherapy cycle on arm C and, if necessary, as salvage therapy on all three treatment arms. Survival data were compared between each experimental arm and the control arm using a one-sided log-rank test.

RESULTS

Between 1992 and 1999, 295 patients were entered on this trial. This did not meet the accrual goal of 362 patients and resulted in premature study closure. Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurred in 52% of patients enrolled in arm A, compared with 89% enrolled in arm B (P <.0001) and 77% enrolled in arm C (P <.001). With a median follow-up of 41 months, the 3-year projected overall survival for patients enrolled in arm A is 23%, compared with 37% for arm B (P =.014) and 27% for arm C (P = not significant).

CONCLUSION

The addition of concurrent high-dose, single-agent cisplatin to conventional single daily fractionated radiation significantly improves survival, although it also increases toxicity. The loss of efficacy resulting from split-course radiation was not offset by either multiagent chemotherapy or the possibility of midcourse surgery.

The treatment challenge of hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Both the demographics and treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) are changing. Patients are younger and healthier, with fewer comorbidities. The "no treatment until symptoms" approach is disappearing. Chemotherapy is increasingly being utilized.

METHODS

The authors review the steps involved in hormone management before chemotherapy is considered. The roles for chemotherapy in current clinical trials are examined.

RESULTS

Effective hormonal management of the prostate cancer patient incorporates an understanding of the stages of hormone sensitivity and prescribing additional interventions beyond simple castration. Once hormone refractoriness is established, the combination of mitoxantrone and prednisone has become a standard chemotherapeutic approach. New agents such as docetaxel are being tested in phase III trials against mitoxantrone plus prednisone.

CONCLUSIONS

HRPC is now regarded as a chemotherapy-sensitive tumor. The goals of chemotherapy in HRPC are to decrease PSA level and improve quality of life. New agents and combinations are needed to improve survival.

Neoadjuvant androgen ablation in localized carcinoma of the prostate

BACKGROUND

An increased awareness of prostate cancer has led to a rise in the detection of this disease at a clinically localized stage at presentation. This article discusses the role of neoadjuvant hormonal ablation at this earlier stage to decrease tumor bulk and thus enhance survival.

METHODS

Outcomes from each primary modality for localized treatment of prostate cancer with and without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) are reviewed.

RESULTS

Survival benefit using NAAD has not yet been demonstrated from prostatectomy. Long-term hormonal deprivation provides an improved time to progression and has decreased distant metastatic and biochemical failure for poor-risk patients undergoing external-beam radiation. The toxicities of brachytherapy can be decreased with NAAD.

CONCLUSIONS

NAAD with radical prostatectomy is considered to be investigational. The duration of NAAD needs to be delineated for poor-prognosis patients who are treated with external-beam radiation therapy, but the approach improves the local toxicity of brachytherapy.

Feasibility trial of postoperative radiotherapy and cisplatin followed by three courses of 5-FU and cisplatin in patients with resected head and neck cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

Appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy for resected head and neck cancer patients has yet to be defined. Multiple trials have noted trends toward improved disease-free survival and local control. The Southwest Oncology Group undertook a feasibility trial of postoperative cisplatin and radiotherapy followed by three cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil.

METHODS

Patients with resected stage III or IV head and neck cancer received cisplatin, 100 mg/m2, on days 1, 22, and 43 of radiotherapy. This therapy was followed by three cycles of cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 or last tolerated dose, and 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2, on days 1 to 4 every 21 days.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients from 22 institutions were registered; 68 were evaluable. Sixty-eight patients received radiotherapy. Only 25 of 68 patients (36.7%) were able to complete all six cycles of chemotherapy. Forty-three of 68 patients (63%) completed all three cycles with radiotherapy. Toxicities were tolerable. One toxic death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

It is not feasible to deliver six cycles of chemotherapy postoperatively in the sequence described. Compliance issues need further exploration to define effective adjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck patients.

Continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for advanced/recurrent transitional cell cancer of the bladder: a Southwest Oncology Group trial

Significant toxicities result from the use of MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplatin) for advanced/ recurrent transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (ARTCCB). An alternative regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin was evaluated by Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG). Thirty-eight patients with ARTCCB were treated with continuous infusion 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/days 1-5 and cisplatin 100 mg/day 1, on a every-21-days schedule. There were two complete responses (CR) and eight partial responses (PR) among 36 eligible patients, for an overall response rate of 28% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14-45%]. Median duration of response was 6 months, and median duration of survival was 9 months. No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 4 leukopenia occurred in 5 patients. Other toxicities were mild. Only two documented infections occurred in 5 patients with neutropenia. The response rate of 28% is better than that achieved with cisplatin alone and not dissimilar to the range of response for MVAC. Toxicities were less and tolerable. This regimen will need further evaluation.

Ondansetron for nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and tolerability of ondansetron 8 mg twice daily for 3 days with placebo in preventing nausea and vomiting in 81 patients receiving cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. The first dose of study drug was administered 30 minutes before the initiation of chemotherapy. Patients received a rescue antiemetic if the investigator deemed it necessary or if the patient experienced more than two emetic episodes during the 3-day study. Sixty-one percent of patients treated with ondansetron compared with 6% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001) had no emetic episodes during the 3-day study. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was 24 hours 18 minutes in the ondansetron group compared with 8 hours 1 minute in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 78% of patients in the ondansetron group and 29% of patients in the placebo group completed the study with no need for rescue therapy. Clinical laboratory and adverse-event profiles were similar between groups. The most common adverse event was headache, occurring in 23% of ondansetron patients and 24% of placebo patients. This study is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to demonstrate that ondansetron 8 mg twice daily is effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. The twice-daily regimen may encourage patient compliance and may be more cost-effective than regimens that need to be given three times daily.

Evaluation of low dose continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced and recurrent renal cell carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group Study

BACKGROUND

The response rate of metastatic renal cell cancer to cytotoxic therapy over the last 10 years has been 5.6%. Low dose continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has demonstrated efficacy in other cytotoxic refractory tumors, such as pancreas, colorectal, and recurrent breast. The Southwest Oncology Group undertook a Phase II trial of low dose, continuous 5-FU in metastatic renal cell cancer.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients were entered in the study to receive 300 mg 5-FU/m2/day for 7 days via a central venous catheter and external programmable pump. The pump was refilled every 7 days. Pyridoxine (50 mg, orally) was administered prophylactically three times a day.

RESULTS

A response of 5.2% (one complete response [CR] and two partial responses [PRs]) was achieved. The overall survival was 12 months. The duration of the CR is more than 30 months. Both PRs lasted 6 months. No survival advantage was noted with either prior nephrectomy or biologic therapy. The majority of toxicities were Grade 2: anemia, anorexia, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and stomatitis. No toxic deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Low dose, continuous 5-FU demonstrated minimal activity in metastatic renal cancer.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis

PURPOSE

This study compares the efficacy and safety of ondansetron alone with that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design. Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran, Cerenex Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg for three doses every 4 hours beginning 30 minutes before cisplatin administration either alone or in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg administered 45 minutes before cisplatin. Cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2) was administered as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes (EEs), adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration.

RESULTS

A total of 275 patients were enrolled. Of these, 245 were assessable for efficacy. Patients who received ondansetron plus dexamethasone had a higher complete antiemetic response rate (61% v 46%, P = .02) and less nausea (posttreatment visual analog scale mean 18.2 v 32.8, P < .001) than did those who received ondansetron alone. The time to the first EE was longer for patients in the group that received ondansetron plus dexamethasone (P = .005). Headache (12%), diarrhea (2%), and abdominal colic (1%) were the most common antiemetic-related adverse events reported. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

IV ondansetron in combination with dexamethasone is safe and more effective than ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin.

Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting

PURPOSE

This study compares the efficacy and safety of two single-dose regimens with the approved three-dose regimen of ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter study was a stratified, randomized, double-blind, and parallel group design. Chemotherapy-naive inpatients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg times three doses, every 4 hours or a single 8-mg or 32-mg dose followed by two saline doses that began 30 minutes before cisplatin administration. Cisplatin (high-dose > or = 100 mg/m2 or medium-dose 50 to 70 mg/m2) was given as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration.

RESULTS

A total of 699 patients (359 high-dose, 340 medium-dose) were enrolled. Of these, 618 were assessable for efficacy (15 ineligible, 66 protocol deviations). The 32-mg dose was superior to the 8-mg single dose with regard to total number of emetic episodes (high-dose, P = .015; medium-dose, P < .001), complete response (no emetic episodes: high-dose, 48% v 35%; P = .048; medium-dose, 73% v 50%; P = .001) and failure rate (> 5 emetic episodes, withdrawn or rescued: high-dose, 20% v 34%; P = .018; medium-dose, 9% v 23%; P = .005). The 32-mg single dose was also superior to the 0.15 mg/kg times three dose regimen with regard to total number of emetic episodes (medium-dose, P = .033) and failure rate (high-dose, 20% v 36%; P = .009; medium-dose, 9% v 22%; P = .011). Ondansetron was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was headache. An approximate 10-fold increase in the incidence of clinically significant transaminase elevations was observed in the high-dose versus medium-dose cisplatin strata (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 6.5% v 0.7%; serum alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 5.0% v 0.3%).

CONCLUSION

A 32-mg single dose of ondansetron is more effective than a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective as the standard regimen of 0.15 mg/kg times three doses in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.

Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU) and carboplatin plus 5-FU versus single-agent methotrexate (MTX) in patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. The primary objective was to compare separately the response rates of each combination regimen to standard weekly MTX.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred seventy-seven patients diagnosed with SCC of the head and neck were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 21 days; (2) carboplatin 300 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 28 days; and (3) MTX 40 mg/m2 IV given weekly.

RESULTS

All three treatment regimens were well tolerated. However, both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were significantly greater with cisplatin plus 5-FU compared with MTX (P = .001). Toxicity from carboplatin plus 5-FU was intermediate compared with the other regimens. The complete and partial response rates were 32% for cisplatin plus 5-FU, 21% for carboplatin plus 5-FU, and 10% for MTX. The comparison of cisplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was statistically significant (P less than .001), and the comparison of carboplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was of borderline statistical significance (P = .05). Median response durations and median survival times were similar for all three treatment groups. Logistic regression models showed that only treatment assigned was associated significantly with response (P = .001). Cox proportional hazards models indicated that only performance status was associated significantly with survival (P less than .01).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that combination chemotherapy resulted in improved response rates but was associated with an increased toxicity and no improvement in overall survival. Therefore, new treatments that may alter the course of disease in recurrent head and neck cancer patients still need to be identified.

The incidence and significance of thromboembolic complications in patients with high-grade gliomas

Coagulation system abnormalities in patients with malignancy ranges from asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities to overt clinical manifestations. To determine the incidence and significance of clinically manifest thromboembolic phenomena in patients with high-grade gliomas, the records were analyzed of 77 patients that presented between January 1985 and June 1988. Fifteen patients (19%) had clinically manifest deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary emboli during the course of their disease. All these patients were ambulatory before and at the time of diagnosis of the event. The thromboembolic episodes occurred at the time of initial management of the primary tumor while there was documented clinical improvement in the functional status of the patient or at the time of progression of the disease. One patient died as a result of a pulmonary embolism; in two others, an embolism was a significant contributor to the patient's death. Anticoagulation resulted in complications in two of eight patients treated. Thromboembolic events occur with high frequency in patients with high-grade gliomas and contribute to the high morbidity and mortality seen in these patients. The optimum approach to screening and the treatment of these events has not been determined.

Phase II evaluation of amonafide in renal cell carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study

Twenty four patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated in a phase II trial with amonafide 300-450 mg/m2/day on days 1-5 every 21 days. There were no responders, 6 patients had stable disease, 14 experienced progressive disease and 4 were assumed to be non-responders as no evaluation was performed. There were no fatal toxicities although 8 patients had grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, 1 patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea in 1 patient, grade 3 myopathy in 1 patient, severe nausea and vomiting in 1 patient and a facial rash, possibly a hypersensitivity reaction, in 1 patient. The median survival is 7.5 months. At this dosage and schedule, there is no evidence that amonafide has meaningful anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

The Wayne State University experience with adjuvant chemotherapy of head and neck cancer

Because of the poor results of standard therapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, chemotherapy is increasingly used to improve the outcome of these patients. In resectable disease, chemotherapy is being investigated before definitive treatments, after surgery, concurrent with postoperative radiotherapy, after radiotherapy, and for possible laryngeal salvage. In unresectable cancers, chemotherapy before, concurrent with, and following radiotherapy is being investigated.

Evaluation of fludarabine phosphate in malignant melanoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study

Twenty-seven evaluable patients with advanced malignant melanoma received fludarabine phosphate in a daily x 5 injection. Initial dosing was based on the presence of previous radiation therapy. There was no response seen in these patients despite appropriate dose escalation. Myelosuppression occurred without significant sequelae.

The role of infection in the morbidity and mortality of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing multimodality therapy

Cancer of the head and neck is a common cancer worldwide. The majority of patients present with locally advanced disease. Recently a great deal of improvement has been made in multimodality therapy of this disease, warranting more careful consideration of factors affecting quality of life, disease course, and treatment. Infection is clearly a factor. Analysis of 662 hospital admissions of 169 head and neck cancer patients was performed. A definite infection was documented in 86 febrile episodes, pneumonia contributed to 40%, bacteremia to 13%, skin and soft tissue infection to 12%, and tracheobronchitis to 10%. Among the evaluated risk factors, foreign bodies, specifically intravenous (IV) cannulae and gastrostomy tubes, race, performance status, alcohol intake, and nutritional status were statistically significant variables that predicted for or were associated with infection. Infection contributed to 44% of the deaths.

Phase II evaluation of 4'deoxydoxorubicin in advanced renal cell carcinoma

4'Deoxydoxorubicin was evaluated in patients with advanced renal carcinoma. Only one partial remission was noted, and no significant cardiac toxicity was seen on serial evaluation of ejection fractions. Appropriate dose escalations were performed.

Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary localized to the neck. Advantages of an aggressive treatment

Treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of an unknown primary localized to the neck is still controversial, particularly regarding advanced disease. We reviewed 41 such patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT) (n = 25) or with combined modality treatment including chemotherapy (CH) (n = 16). The male to female ratio was 28 to 13, and the median age was 58 years (range, 32 to 94 years). There were 27 (66%) patients with poorly differentiated SCC and 8 with moderately differentiated or well-differentiated cancer. Twenty-three (56%) patients had N3 disease, 16 (39%) had N2, and 2 had N1. The majority of N3 patients have been treated with CH and RT (n = 12) or with RT alone (n = 9). The combined CH-RT was well tolerated, with no life-threatening toxicity. The complete response (CR) to CH-RT was 81% (11 patients have no evidence of disease [NED] currently). The median survival time of this group was 37+ months. Of the 25 patients who had surgery and/or RT as their first planned treatment, 7 (28%) have NED currently. The median survival time of this group was 24 months. Patients with N3 disease who received CH had a higher CR rate and a longer survival time as compared with those treated with surgery and/or RT, despite a higher (N3) stage of disease. These findings warrant further investigation in randomized cooperative studies.

Cellular DNA content parameters in untreated and recurrent squamous cell cancers of the head and neck

The presence and degree of DNA aneuploidy as measured by the DNA index (DI) and the S phase fraction (SPF) were determined by flow cytometry in 294 specimens from 237 patients with untreated and recurrent squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN). A descriptive analysis was performed in which the specimen DNA parameters were correlated with stage, size of primary, degree of lymph node involvement, morphological grade, and treatment status of the corresponding patients. Approximately 70% of the previously untreated specimens contained DNA aneuploid populations (DI greater than 1.10) and three quarters had SPF that were above 15%. There was a strong, direct association between DI and SPF (P less than 0.001). There was no correlation of the presence or degree of DNA aneuploidy with the stage of the tumor or the size of the primary or conventional morphological grade of the tumor. Specimens from patients with recurrent tumors and untreated patients with N3 lymph nodes had significantly lower rates of DNA aneuploidy and mean DI. Serial determinations of DNA aneuploidy in patients with SCCHN undergoing cytotoxic therapy are ongoing and may prove useful in the identification and understanding of resistance and response in this tumor.

The correlation of specific variables of tumor differentiation with response rate and survival in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with induction chemotherapy

The authors have reported previously that conventionally defined grades of tumor morphology do not correlate with tumor response or survival in advanced squamous cell cancers of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with cisplatinum combination induction therapy. This lack of correlation may be the result of the imprecision and subjectiveness of the conventional grade determination. To examine this possibility, response and survival were correlated with individual parameters of morphologic differentiation in 136 patients with advanced, untreated SCCHN. A multi-variable analysis of degree of keratinization, number of mitotic figures per high powered field, degree of nuclear differentiation, presence of vascular invasion, intensity of inflammatory response, and invasion pattern of the cancer was performed. The grade of each variable was weighted by assigning a score from 1 to 4, with 1 representing the most differentiated and 4 the least. The cumulative score of each specimen was tallied and assigned to one of three groups, less than 12, 12 to 18, and greater than 18, analogous to the conventional grades of well, moderately, and poorly differentiated, respectively. No correlation between the grade of individual morphologic variables and response to chemotherapy was demonstrated, or between tumor response and cumulative score groups. There was no correlation of the grade of individual morphologic variables or cumulative score groups with survival. Only the survival of patients achieving a complete response to chemotherapy was correlated with the cumulative score groups: 2-year survivals of 84%, 70%, and 46% for less than 12, 12 to 18, and greater than 18, respectively. Multi-parameter analysis of individual features of tumor differentiation is not superior to conventional morphologic analysis in predicting response to chemotherapy or survival in patients with advanced SCCHN.

The clinical syndrome of 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity

5-fluorouracil (FUra) is one of the most frequently used drugs in cancer treatment, particularly in combination with other agents. Its activity when administered as an infusion rather than a bolus has led to a renewed and increased use. A cardiotoxicity that mimics ischemia has been associated with the administration of FUra in cancer patients. This cardiotoxicity may manifest itself as: (a) dysrythmias with and without cardiorespiratory symptoms (b) ECG changes with and without cardiorespiratory symptoms (c) cardiorespiratory symptoms with and without ECG changes (d) acute myocardial infarct; symptoms and ECG changes (e) ventricular dysfunction (f) cardiogenic shock and (g) sudden death. Several case studies which illustrate the cardiotoxic sequelae that may be associated with the use of this drug are discussed. The incidence, contributing factors, risk factors and mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are undetermined. No appropriate recommendations for monitoring patients or for predicting those patients that will develop such toxicity while receiving FUra can be made at present. Prospective studies to determine the true incidence, spectrum and mechanisms causing this syndrome are ongoing and required for its understanding and prevention.

Evaluation of high-dose cisplatin and 5-FU infusion as initial therapy in advanced head and neck cancer

The combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion in head and neck cancer patients produces an overall response rate of 90% for advanced disease and 70% for recurrent disease. Whether or not escalating the platinum dose in combination with other agents, as has been done with refractory ovarian and testicular patients, would improve the response rates in patients with advanced head and neck cancer has not been evaluated. We undertook a study to determine the most efficacious dose of cisplatin that could be administered with 5-FU infusion in head and neck cancer patients. Eleven patients entered the study. Initial dose of cisplatin was 40 mg/m2 (in hypertonic saline) on days 1-5 plus 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1-5 as a continuous infusion. Subsequent cisplatin doses were adjusted for the main toxicity, which was myelosuppression. The safest tolerable dose was 30 mg/m2 for 5 days. Overall response was 90% [45% complete response (CR) (5/11) plus 45% (5/11) partial response (PR)] which is comparable to that seen with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and 5-FU in a 120-h infusion. Although patient numbers are small, there was no appreciable difference in response rate with higher dose cisplatin and there was a significant increase in serious toxicity.

Chemotherapy for paranasal sinus carcinoma. A 10-year experience at Wayne State University

The role of chemotherapy in the management of patients with cancer of the paranasal sinus has not been defined. An analysis of 24 evaluable patients treated with chemotherapy as part of their overall therapy was performed. There were 16 male patients and eight female patients. Sixteen patients were previously untreated and eight had recurrent disease after surgery and/or radiotherapy. Six of the previously untreated patients had metastatic disease on presentation (four central nervous system (CNS) and two lung), and four recurrent patients had CNS involvement. The majority of patients (78%) had squamous cell carcinoma. The chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin (CDDP), vincristine (VCR), and bleomycin (COB), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and CDDP, or 5-FU/CDDP and methotrexate (MTX). All patients had computed tomography (CT) measurable disease. Previously untreated patients underwent surgery and/or radiotherapy postchemotherapy. The overall response rate to chemotherapy for previously untreated patients was 82% (complete response [CR] 44%, partial response [PR] 38%) and for recurrent patients 88% (CR 38%, PR 50%). Predominant toxicities were nausea, vomiting, myelosuppression, mucositis, and renal impairment. The median survival of the previously untreated patients, based on response to chemotherapy, was as follows: CR 21+ months (range, 10+ to 81 months), PR 13.5 months (range, 2 to 21 months), and no response (NR) 3 months (range, 1 to 7 months). The median survival of patients with recurrent disease was as follows: CR 16 months, PR 13.5 months, and NR 5 months. We conclude that patients with paranasal cancers are responsive to CDDP-containing combinations. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in previously untreated, locally advanced patients needs to be demonstrated by future randomized trials.

Proto-chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer

Induction (proto) chemotherapy consisting of 3 courses of cisplatin and 120-hour 5-fluorouracil infusion was administered to 88 patients who had locally advanced, previously untreated head and neck cancer. The majority (81%) of these patients were classified as stage IV, and 17% had second primary carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. An overall response rate of 94% was observed, with a 54% incidence of complete clinical response. The toxicity of the chemotherapy was judged acceptable, and no life-threatening or fatal drug-related side effects occurred. Twenty-four percent of the patients failed to comply with recommended standard treatment. In patients achieving a complete clinical response, 47% refused recommended surgery. Any response less than a complete clinical response to induction chemotherapy was not associated with any survival advantage. We conclude that future research efforts should be directed toward the identification of chemotherapeutic regimins that maximize the incidence of complete clinical response. In addition, any large-scale chemotherapy trial in patients with resectable disease should avoid the use of an induction sequence to minimize compliance problems with standard treatment.

A randomized trial of cisplatin (CACP) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and CACP + 5-FU bolus for recurrent and advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

One of the most active chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment of advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer is cisplatin (CACP) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion with a response rate of 90% in advanced, previously untreated patients and 70% in patients with recurrent disease. Forty-four patients from two Wayne State University-affiliated hospitals were entered into a randomized trial of CACP (100 mg/m2) day 1 and 24-hour infusion of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2) days 1 through 4 versus CACP (100 mg/m2) day 1 and bolus 5-FU (600 mg/m2) day 1 and day 8. Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for three induction courses. Response for the infusion arm was 72% (4/18 complete response [CR] + 9/18 partial response [PR]). Response for the bolus arm was 20% (2/20 CR + 2/20 PR). The difference in response was statistically significant by chi-square analysis (P less than 0.01). Seventy percent of the patients on the bolus arm experienced leukopenia with several episodes of grades 3 and 4 leukopenia. In addition, 50% of the patients on the bolus arm experienced thrombocytopenia. Stomatitis was more frequent on the infusion arm but it was mild and reversible. The complete responders on either arm have a median survival of 120+ weeks; partial responders, 30 weeks. Cisplatin + 5-FU infusion produces a superior response as initial chemotherapy for three courses compared with CACP and 5-FU bolus.

Superior clinical response and survival rates with initial bolus of cisplatin and 120 hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil before definitive therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer

One hundred ninety-one patients were treated by one of three cisplatin-containing multidrug protocols. The initial 77 patients received two courses of cisplatin and vincristine plus bleomycin. The next 26 patients received two courses of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, and the final 88 patients were placed on a three course 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin protocol. Overall response rates were similar for each of the three protocols. The complete response rate, however, was much better (54 percent) for three course 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus cisplatin vincristine, and bleomycin (29 percent) and two course 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (19 percent). Survival curves were also better for the three course 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin segment of this nonrandomized pilot study.

Aclacinomycin. Phase II evaluation in advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck

Aclacinomycin-A was evaluated in a phase II trial for advanced head and neck cancer. A weekly infusion of 65 mg/m2 was used. Eighteen patients were entered. Fifteen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. One was evaluable for toxicity only and two died before completion of a full course of therapy. One patient without previous chemotherapy achieved a PR in a neck node for a short time. Six patients had stable disease with a median to progression of 6 weeks. Major toxicity encountered was bone marrow suppression. Aclacinomycin-A appears to have no activity in squamous cancer of the head and neck.

Correlation between response to cisplatinum-combination chemotherapy and subsequent radiotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced squamous cell cancers of the head and neck

Induction chemotherapy, followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy was utilized in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. During these trials, the authors observed that response to chemotherapy predicts further response to subsequent radiotherapy. This study was comprised of 57 patients with 60 separate neoplasms who demonstrated less than complete response (partial or no response) to initial treatment with a combination chemotherapy containing cisplatin. Subsequently radiotherapy, either 5000 rad preoperatively or 6600 rad as definitive therapy, was employed. Forty-one of the 42 tumors with initial partial response to chemotherapy also responded to radiotherapy (97.6%). Only one of the 18 tumors that initially failed to respond to chemotherapy subsequently responded to radiotherapy (5.5%). This observation suggests that patients with head and neck cancer sensitive to initial chemotherapy share parameters that are also radiation sensitive.

Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil infusion in patients with recurrent and disseminated epidermoid cancer of the head and neck

The combination of cisplatin and 96-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was evaluated in 30 patients with recurrent (local and regional) and disseminated histologically proven epidermoid cancer of the head and neck who failed surgery and radiotherapy. Cisplatin 100 mg/M2 intravenous (IV) bolus was given on day 1 with hydration and mannitol diuresis; 5-FU 1000 mg/M2 per day for 96-hour infusion was started immediately after cisplatin on day 1. All patients had measurable lesions. Eight (27%) patients achieved complete response (CR), and 13 (43%) had partial response (PR). Overall response rate was 70% (8 of 30 CR and 13 of 30 PR). Response rate in patients with recurrent local and regional disease was 89% (17/19) with median survival of 32 weeks, while response in patients with disseminated disease was 36% (4/11) with median survival of 24 weeks. Patients with good performance status (PS) (greater than or equal to 70%) had a response rate of 79% (19/24), while those with poor PS (less than 70%) had a response rate of 33% (2/6). Seven patients with recurrent disease who had a response to this chemotherapy went to further salvage surgical procedures. It is concluded that the combination of cisplatin and 5-FU is very effective and well tolerated in these patients, and leads to further salvage in some patients with improved longevity and quality of life.