Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease: A Nationwide, Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer therapy frequently induce immune-related adverse effects (IRAEs). Therefore, most patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases have been excluded from clinical trials of ICIs. This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICIs in patients with preexisting autoimmune disease and cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 to January 2018 via 3 French national networks of experts in oncology and autoimmunity. Adults with preexisting autoimmune disease who were receiving ICIs were assessed for the occurrence of flare of preexisting autoimmune disease, other IRAEs, and cancer response.

RESULTS

The study included 112 patients who were followed up for a median of 8 months. The most frequent preexisting autoimmune diseases were psoriasis (n = 31), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 20), and inflammatory bowel disease (n = 14). Twenty-four patients (22%) were receiving immunosuppressive therapy at ICI initiation. Autoimmune disease flare and/or other IRAE(s) occurred in 79 patients (71%), including flare of preexisting autoimmune disease in 53 patients (47%) and/or other IRAE(s) in 47 patients (42%), with a need for immunosuppressive therapy in 48 patients (43%) and permanent discontinuation of ICI in 24 patients (21%). The median progression-free survival was shorter in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy at ICI initiation (3.8 months versus 12 months; P = 0.006), confirmed by multivariable analysis. The median progression-free survival was shorter in patients who experienced a flare of preexisting autoimmune disease or other IRAE, with a trend toward better survival in the subgroup without immunosuppressant use or ICI discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that flares or IRAEs occur frequently but are mostly manageable without ICI discontinuation in patients with a preexisting autoimmune disease. Immunosuppressive therapy at baseline is associated with poorer outcomes.

Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab As First-Line, Single-Drug Therapy for Patients With Unresectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas

PURPOSE

To evaluate first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy efficacy and safety in patients with unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCCs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients, predominantly men, with their CSSCs' immunohistochemically determined programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status determined (tumor proportion score threshold, 1%), received pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the 39-patient primary cohort's objective response rate at week 15 (ORR_W15). Secondary objectives were best ORR, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), safety, ORR according to PD-L1 status and health-related quality of life using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) score. An 18-patient expansion cohort, recruited to power the study to evaluate the ORR_W15 difference between PD-L1+ and PD-L1- patients, was assessed for ORR, disease control rate, and safety, but not survival.

RESULTS

Median age of all patients was 79 years. The primary cohort's ORR_W15 was 41% (95% CI, 26% to 58%), including 13 partial and 3 complete responses. Best responses were 8 partial and 8 complete responses. At a median follow-up of 22.4 months, respective median PFS, DOR, and OS were 6.7 months, not reached, and 25.3 months, respectively. Pembrolizumab-related adverse events affected 71% of the patients, and 4 (7%) were grade ≥ 3. One death was related to rapid CSCC progression; another resulted from a fatal second aggressive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed 15 weeks postinclusion. ORR_W15 for the entire population was 42%; it was significantly higher for PD-L1+ patients (55%) versus PD-L1- patients (17%; P = .02). Responders' W15 total FACT-G score had improved (P = .025) compared with nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy exhibited promising anti-CSCC activity, with durable responses and manageable safety. PD-L1 positivity appears to be predictive of pembrolizumab efficacy.

Cetuximab-induced acne

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab is a member of a new family of antineoplastic agents that inhibit epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). These molecules may induce acneiform eruptions. In this study, we aimed at evaluating (a) the characteristics of acne and (b) whether these acneiform eruptions could be improved by classical anti-acne treatments.

METHODS

All patients treated with cetuximab in a single institution from October 2003 to May 2004 were prospectively evaluated. The presence of acne, its severity, need for a treatment and response to this treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

13 patients were included: 11 (85%) developed acneiform eruptions after a mean interval of 10 days. It was severe in 4/13 (31%). Comedones were never found and acne involved nonclassical sites in 3/11. Antibiotic treatment was given to 4 and local treatment to 2 patients: it was always efficient.

CONCLUSION

Cetuximab-induced acne is frequent, differs from classical acne and may be treated effectively with classical modalities.

Treatment of Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides With Twice-Weekly Applications of Mechlorethamine and Topical Corticosteroids

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a therapeutic regimen of twice-weekly applications of mechlorethamine hydrochloride and betamethasone dipropionate cream is effective in the treatment of early-stage mycosis fungoides while increasing cutaneous tolerance.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized study conducted from November 1999 to November 2002.

SETTING

Eleven university or hospital dermatology departments in France.

PATIENTS

Sixty-four consecutive patients with newly diagnosed early-stage mycosis fungoides (stage IA, n = 33; stage IB, n = 26; stage IIA, n = 5).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were treated with twice-weekly applications of a 0.02% aqueous solution of mechlorethamine followed by an application of betamethasone cream during a 6-month period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was the rate of complete response during the treatment. Secondary end points were mean delay to achieve complete response, rate of severe cutaneous reactions of intolerance, and rate of relapse after achieving complete response.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (58%) had a complete response after a mean +/- SD treatment duration of 3.6 +/- 2.5 months: 20 (61%) of 33 patients with stage IA disease, 15 (58%) of 26 patients with stage IB disease, and 2 (40%) of 5 patients with stage IIA disease. Eighteen patients (28%) developed severe cutaneous reactions of intolerance that necessitated treatment discontinuation. Relapse was observed in 17 patients (46%) after a mean +/- SD time of 7.7 +/- 6.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen of twice-weekly applications of mechlorethamine and betamethasone cream is an effective treatment for early-stage mycosis fungoides. The decreased frequency of applications provides an advantage to the patient by being easy to use with limited adverse effects.

Impact of radiotherapy administered simultaneously with systemic treatment in patients with melanoma brain metastases within MelBase, a French multicentric prospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) are historically associated with poor prognosis. Radiation therapy is conventionally associated with a high local control rate. Development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has improved overall survival (OS) and intracranial response rate, but about 50% of patients failed to respond to these novel therapies. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of combined radiotherapy (cRT) on overall survival in a large multicenter real-life prospective cohort of patients with MBM treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical data from 262 patients with MBM were collected via MelBase, a French multicentric biobank prospectively enrolling unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Two groups were defined: patients receiving cRT (cRT group) or not receiving cRT (no-cRT group). Primary end-point was OS. Propensity score weighting was used to correct for indication bias.

RESULTS

Among the 262 patients, 93 (35%) received cRT (cRT group). The patients were treated with immunotherapy in 69% and 60% and with targeted therapy in 31% and 40% of the cRT and no-cRT groups, respectively. With a median follow-up of 6.9 months, median OS was 16.8 months and 6.9 months in the cRT and no-cRT groups, respectively. After propensity score weighting, cRT was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio = 0.6, 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.8; p=0.007). Median OS after ponderation was 15.3 months and 6.2 months in the cRT and no-cRT groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that cRT may be associated with a significant decrease of 40% in the risk of death in patients with MBM treated with systemic therapy.

The contribution of large genomic deletions at the CDKN2A locus to the burden of familial melanoma

Mutations in two genes encoding cell cycle regulatory proteins have been shown to cause familial cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). About 20% of melanoma-prone families bear a point mutation in the CDKN2A locus at 9p21, which encodes two unrelated proteins, p16^INK4a and p14^ARF. Rare mutations in CDK4 have also been linked to the disease. Although the CDKN2A gene has been shown to be the major melanoma predisposing gene, there remains a significant proportion of melanoma kindreds linked to 9p21 in which germline mutations of CDKN2A have not been identified through direct exon sequencing. The purpose of this study was to assess the contribution of large rearrangements in CDKN2A to the disease in melanoma-prone families using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. We examined 214 patients from independent pedigrees with at least two CMM cases. All had been tested for CDKN2A and CDK4 point mutation, and 47 were found positive. Among the remaining 167 negative patients, one carried a novel genomic deletion of CDKN2A exon 2. Overall, genomic deletions represented 2.1% of total mutations in this series (1 of 48), confirming that they explain a very small proportion of CMM susceptibility. In addition, we excluded a new gene on 9p21, KLHL9, as being a major CMM gene.

Risk of irAEs in patients with autoimmune diseases treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors for stage III or IV melanoma: results from a matched case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (pAID) treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for stage III or IV melanoma.

METHODS

Case-control study performed on a French multicentric prospective cohort of patients with melanoma, matched for irAE risk factors and oncological staging. Risk of irAE was assessed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

110 patients with pAID were included and matched with 330 controls, from March 2013 to October 2020. Over a median follow-up period of 7.2 months for cases and 6.9 months for controls, the ORs of developing all-grade and grade ≥3 irAEs among cases compared with controls were 1.91 (95% CI (1.56 to 2.27)) and 1.44 (95% CI (1.08 to 1.82)), respectively. Patients with pAID had an increased risk of multiple irAEs (OR 1.46, 95% CI (1.15 to 2.67)) and a shorter time to irAE onset. In contrast, there were no difference in irAE-related mortality nor in the rate of treatment discontinuation, and a landmark analysis revealed a better survival at 24 months among cases (p=0.02). Thirty per cent of cases experienced a pAID flare during follow-up, and baseline immunosuppression did not prevent irAE occurrence. Last, we report associations between the pAID clinical subsets and organ-specific irAEs.

CONCLUSION

In our study, patients with pAID were at greater risk of all-grade, severe and multiple irAEs, yet had a better 24-month survival than controls. Thus, patients with pAID should be eligible for ICI therapy but benefit from a close monitoring for irAE occurrence, especially during the first months of therapy.

Pembrolizumab as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC): Phase 2 results from CARSKIN

9547

Background: Cemiplimab, a PD-1-axis blocking agent, has recently been approved for unresectable cSCCs. We report results of the CARSKIN study evaluating pembrolizumab in the first-line setting. Methods: Chemotherapy naive patients (pts) with unresectable cSCCs, either locally or regionally advanced or metastatic, and ECOG PS ≤1 were accrued to this multi-institutional phase II trial to assess tumor response rate (RR) and safety of pembrolizumab administered IV (200 mg Q3W) for a period up to 24 months (mo). Baseline PD-L1 expression was centrally assessed on tumor. The primary endpoint was the RR at 15 weeks (wks) per RECIST v1.1 (independent review). A Simon two-stage design was used. Results: From 03/2017 to 01/2018, 39 pts (79% males, median age 79 years) were enrolled. Disease was local (18%), regional (62%) or metastatic (21%); 38% of pts were PS 0. The median number of infusions was 8. The median follow-up was 10.2 mo; 15 pts are still on pembrolizumab. Thirty-four pts were evaluable for tumor response, and 39 for toxicity. The RR at 15 wks was 38.5 % (95% CI: 24–55%) in the ITT population corresponding to 2 CR and 13 PR. The best responses were 3 CR and 12 PR. The DCR was 51% (20/39 including 5 SD) at 15 wks. The median PFS was 8.4 mo and the median OS was not reached. No responder has progressed to date including 2 pts who discontinued pembrolizumab for 6 to 12 mo. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 67% of pts, including 8% with severe TRAEs (1 gr 3 cholestasis, 1 gr 3 colitis and 1 death due to recurrence of a non-related head and neck cancer) and 10% who discontinued because of a TRAE. Centrally assessed baseline PD-L1 expression was positive in 77% of patients (1% tumor staining threshold), but it failed to predict response at 15 wks with a median PD-L1 expression of 10% in responders and non-responders at 15 wks (P = .55). Conclusions: In this series of 39 elderly pts with unresectable cSCCs, the safety profile was consistent with previous pembrolizumab studies. First-line pembrolizumab provided robust antitumor activity regardless of PD-L1 expression levels. Clinical trial information: NCT02883556.

Papular and annular fixed urticarial eruption: a characteristic skin manifestation in patients with relapsing polychondritis

BACKGROUND

Skin manifestations of relapsing polychondritis (RP) are usually nonspecific.

OBJECTIVE

We report a series of patients with RP who presented with annular skin lesions.

METHODS

The clinical and histologic features and follow-up data of patients with RP and an annular urticarial eruption were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Ten patients (9 male, 1 female) (mean age 63.7 years) were included. All patients had tense, fixed, urticarial papules with an annular configuration predominantly located on the upper part of the trunk. Skin lesions occurred before the chondritis in 7 of 10 cases with a mean delay of 23 ± 13 months. Histologic examination consistently showed a lymphocytic vasculitis with no leukocytoclastic vasculitis, even when biopsies were repeated during the evolution (n = 7). Hematologic abnormalities were found in all cases. A myelodysplastic syndrome was found in 4 patients. Oral corticosteroids were effective in all cases, although skin lesions recurred during the decrease of corticosteroid doses in 4 cases. Five patients died during the evolution.

LIMITATION

Retrospective case series design is a limitation.

CONCLUSION

Annular and papular fixed urticarial eruption may represent a characteristic skin manifestation of RP. It is frequently associated with hematologic abnormalities and may auger a poor prognosis.

Association of Time From Primary Diagnosis to First Distant Relapse of Metastatic Melanoma With Progression of Disease and Survival

Importance

The prognosis of advanced melanoma has been greatly improved by new therapeutic agents and clinicians rely on dynamic signals to drive their therapeutic choices. Although the kinetics of metastatic disease seem to be correlated with survival, progression of the localized disease is not predictable.

Objective

To assess whether progression of metastatic disease is associated with the time to the first distant recurrence of melanoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was conducted from March 1, 2013, to September 1, 2017, among 638 adults with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma within the French multicentric prospective cohort MelBase. Patients treated with first-line immunotherapies, targeted therapies, or chemotherapy were included. Patients with unknown primary or de novo metastatic melanoma were not included. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2013, to December 1, 2017.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The date of primary excision and time to first distant recurrence, progression-free survival, and overall survival were collected. Cox proportional hazards regression models were planned to assess the association between time to first distant recurrence and progression-free survival or overall survival, which was evaluated in terms of hazard ratio (HR). Time to recurrence was analyzed both as a continuous and categorical variable (<12 months, 12-24 months, and >24 months).

Results

A total of 638 patients (272 women and 366 men; median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 52-73 years]) were included in the study. The median time from primary excision to first distant recurrence was 25 months (interquartile range, 12-55 months). There was no evidence of association of the time to recurrence with progression-free survival, both when analyzed as a continuous variable (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01) or after categorization (12-24 months: HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-1.02; >24 months: HR, 0.62; 95% CI; 0.47-1.01). There was no evidence of association of the time to recurrence with overall survival, both when analyzed as a continuous variable (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.02) or after categorization (12-24 months: HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.07; >24 months: HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-1.03). Those results remained nonsignificant after stratification by treatment.

Conclusions and Relevance

In the MelBase cohort, time to recurrence of metastatic melanoma appears not to be associated with progression-free survival or overall survival.

Long-term immune-related adverse events under PD-1 inhibitors: a multicenter prospective cohort study (MELBASE)

10057

Background: PD-1 inhibitors (anti-PD1) are frequently associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAE). Since melanoma patients included in clinical trials were frequently treated during two years, data on IRAE occurring after 2 years of treatment are lacking. This study aimed to describe IRAE in melanoma patients treated with anti-PD1 for longer than 2 years in a real-life setting. Methods: Patients were screened from MelBase, a French multicentric biobank dedicated to the prospective follow-up of unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. All patients who received anti-PD1 for at least 2 years between January 2013 and November 2019 were included. Among them, patients who experienced IRAE and long-term IRAE defined as IRAE occurring after 2 years of anti-PD1 were identified. Results: Among 1849 patients with advanced melanoma included in Melbase, 119 patients received anti-PD1 monotherapy during at least 2 years, from January 2013 to November 2019, with a median follow-up of 41.7 months (25.2-57.5). Patients characteristics at treatment initiation were: male gender (61%), mean age of 63 years old, past history of autoimmune disease (11%), BRAF WT (72%), AJCC stage IV (84%), brain metastases (22%), ECOG 0-1 (88%) and normal LDH (56%). Patients were treated with Nivolumab (n = 53) or Pembrolizumab (n = 66). IRAE occurred in 99 patients (83%) with a median time of 13.3 months (0-53.9), including severe IRAE (grade 3 or 4) in 30 patients (30%). Long-term IRAE, mostly grades 1-2, occurred in 52 patients (43%). Long-term IRAE led to 5 hospitalizations (4%) of which 4 were grades 3-4. Among patients with long-term IRAE, 45 patients (87%) previously experienced IRAE within the first 2 years of anti-PD1 and 29 patients (56%) experienced multiple IRAE. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that long-term IRAE are frequent especially in patients who already experienced IRAE within the first two years of treatment. These data should be taken into account to establish formal recommendations on the duration of anti-PD1 therapy.

Tolerance and Effectiveness of Targeted Therapies in Aged Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

Simple Summary

A majority of melanoma occurs in people over 65 years. BRAF and MEK inhibitors are standard of care for BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma. The aim of the study was to explore tolerability of targeted therapy in a cohort of patients extracted from a biobank. Patients treated by BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors were included in two groups (<65 or >65 years) and analyzed for tolerance and efficacy. The cohort included 353 patients: 231 < 65 years and 122 > 65. A total of 80% had at least one adverse effect mainly skin, general, and gastrointestinal disorders. No statistical difference was observed for severe adverse events, adverse events grades, dose modifications, and interruptions in the two groups. Median overall survival was 20.3 and 16.3 months, respectively. This study shows that tolerance of targeted therapy is as good in older patients as in younger with a similar efficacy. There is no argument against using these treatments in elderly people.

Abstract

Purpose: Melanoma’s incidence is increasing, and elderly people could be significantly impacted since the majority occurs in people over 65 years of age. Combined BRAF and MEK targeted therapies (TT) are current standard regimen for BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma (MM). Except for subgroups of pivotal trials, little data are available for TT in this population. Materials and Methods: Outcomes were explored in real life patients from MelBase, a French multicentric biobank dedicated to the prospective follow-up of unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Patients treated by BRAF TT and/or MEK TT combined or not, were included from 2013 to 2017 in 2 groups: group 1 ≤ 65-year-old (yo), group 2 > 65 yo, analyzed for tolerance and efficacy. Results: 353 patients were included: 231 in group 1, 122 in group 2. Median follow-up was 12 months (M). Median time of treatment was 6.9 M. A total of 80% had at least one Adverse Effect (AE). Most frequent AE (all grades) were mainly skin and subcutaneous, general, and gastrointestinal disorders. A total of 31% of AE were grade 3–4: 28% in group 1 and 39% in group 2 (p = 0.05). No differences were observed in all AE grades proportion, dose modifications, interruptions, and discontinuations. For each group, median overall survival was 20.3 M (CI 95%: 15.5–27.9) and 16.3 M (CI: 14.5–26.9), respectively (p = 0.8). Median progression free survival was 7.8 M (6.4–9.9) and 7.7 M (CI: 5.8–11.3) (p = 0.4). Objective response rate was 59% and 50% (p = 0.6). Conclusion: This study on a large multicentric cohort is the first to assess that TT is well tolerated in elderly BRAF-mutated patients such as in patients younger than 65. Efficacy was similar between groups with outcomes reaching those from pivotal studies. There is thus no argument against using TT in elderly people, although an onco-geriatric opinion is welcome for the most vulnerable.

Does body mass index really predict the response to systemic therapies in metastatic melanoma: A multicenter study from the MelBase French National Cohort?

10031

Background: Obesity is an established risk factor for several cancers and higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with poor prognosis. These data are still debated in melanoma. Furthermore, recently the concept of “obesity paradox” has emerged. In a large cohort published by McQuade JL et al, higher BMI was associated with better survival in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) especially for those treated with targeted therapy (TT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We studied the association between BMI and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with MM treated with systemic therapies. Methods: This study was conducted from the prospective MelBase cohort (NCT02828202). Patients with MM treated with first-line ICI, TT, or CT were included. BMI was categorized by WHO criteria. Underweight patients were excluded. The co-primary outcomes were the associations between BMI and PFS or OS, stratified by treatment, sex and age. Multivariate analyses were performed. Results: A total of 1214 patients were analyzed. The majority of them were treated with ICI, followed by TT. Obese patients represented 22% of cohort (Table). Median follow-up was 13.5 months. The patients who were overweight or obese did not have different PFS (p = 0.88) or OS (p = 0.25) than patients with normal BMI. Stratifying this cohort by treatment received, age, sex and others parameters (such as LDH, number of metastatic site) did not revealed any difference. Multivariate analysis did not change the results. Conclusions: BMI was not associated with clinical outcomes in our cohort, especially in ICI and TT groups. Thus, we did not confirm the results presented by McQuade Jl et al. with a cohort quite similar in term of size. Because BMI is too simplistic and then an imperfect measure of body composition, the published data are not reproducible. We caution the oncologists, about BMI as valuable predictive marker of survival for melanoma patients. [Table: see text]

Late-onset adverse events under anti-PD1 therapy in melanoma patients: an observational study from MELBASE, a nationwide prospective cohort

The purpose was to evaluate late-onset AEs in melanoma patients treated with anti-PD1 administered at least 2 years in a real-life setting. Patients were screened from MelBase (NCT02828202), a French multicentric biobank dedicated to the prospective follow-up of unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. 119 patients who received anti-PD1 during at least 2 years from January 2013 to November 2019 were included. Median follow-up was 41.7 months (25.2-57.5). Patients received nivolumab (n=53) or pembrolizumab (n=66). AEs occurred in 99 patients (83%) with a median time of 13.3 months (0-53.9), including severe AEs (grade 3 or 4) in 30 patients (30%). Late-onset AEs, mostly grade 1-2, occurred in 51 (43%) patients and led to 5 (4%) hospitalizations of which 4 were severe. Factors associated with late-onset AEs in multivariate analysis were early-onset AEs (within the first two years of treatment) and treatment duration (p=0,02 and p=0,03 respectively). Our data demonstrate the possibility of late-onset AEs occurring after 2 years of anti-PD1 therapy. Late-onset AEs appear frequent and mostly mild or moderate. Early-onset AEs and prolonged anti-PD1 treatment may increase the risk of late-onset AEs.

Differential gradients of efficacy of immunotherapy according to the sun-exposure pattern of the site of occurrence of primary melanoma: A multicenter prospective cohort study (MELBASE)

e21545

Background: The tumor mutational burden (TMB) is usually high in Cutaneous melanomas owing to ultraviolet radiation-induced oncogenesis. While a high TMB is a predictive biomarker of response to PD-1 inhibitors, it may be associated with the rise of resistant clones to targeted therapy over time. We hypothesized that the response pattern to immunotherapy and targeted therapy in advanced melanoma may vary depending on the sun-exposure profile of the site of primary melanoma. Methods: Patients were screened from MelBase, a French multicenter biobank dedicated to the prospective follow-up of unresectable stage III/IV melanoma. Within Melbase, all patients with a known cutaneous primary melanoma who received a first-line systemic treatment by immunotherapy or combined targeted therapy between January 2013 and November 2019 were included. Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS ) and overall survival (OS). Results: 973 patients received either anti PD-1 monotherapy (n=466), anti CTLA-4 monotherapy (n=143), a combination of both (n=118), dabrafenib plus trametinib (n=187) or vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (n=59). Patients’ characteristics at treatment initiation were: male gender (62%), median age of 62 years old, BRAF WT (58%), AJCC stage IV (84%), brain metastases (18%), ECOG 0-1 (84%) and normal LDH (52%). Median follow-up was 15.5 months. The primary melanoma was located on chronically sun-exposed skin in 175 patients (G1: head neck), on intermittently sun-exposed skin in 615 patients (G2: trunk, arms, legs), and on sun-protected areas in 65 patients (G3: palms, soles, nails). Median PFS was significantly higher in G1 under anti PD-1 treatment (8,7 months vs 3,3 and 3,4 months for G2 and G3, respectively) (p=0.011), (19,2 months vs 8,1 and 6 months for G2 and G1) (p=0. although it is worthwhile to note that the number of G3 patients treated with targeted therapy was relatively low (n=8). PFS did not significantly differ between all groups under ipilimumab. Similarly, median OS was significantly higher in G1 receiving first-line anti PD-1 treatment (45,6 months vs 31,6 and 21,4 months for G2 and G3) (p=0.04), while OS was higher in G3 under targeted therapy (21,1 months vs 16,3 and 19,5 months for G2 and G1) (p=0.97). Conclusions: Our study suggests that first-line immunotherapy with anti PD-1 is particularly recommended for melanomas originating from chronically sun-exposed areas. On the other hand, melanomas originating from sun-protected areas may benefit more from first-line targeted therapy when possible (presence of BRAF mutation), but this finding needs to be confirmed by further research.

Role of time to switch from ipilimumab to anti-PD1 in anti-PD1 efficacy within the French national cohort, MelBase

9551

Background: With increasing armamentarium in advanced melanoma management, the impact of various strategies remains to be determined including the importance of time to switch from one treatment to another. We report the impact of time to IPI/APD non-planned switch on APD efficacy in real life patients within MelBase (MB). Methods: MB is a French multicentric biobank dedicated to the prospective follow-up (FU) of unresectable stage III or IV melanoma with 1102 patients included since March 2013. Data were collected (Sept.2016) and analyzed (demography, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, multivariate analysis, safety). Results: 71 patients were treated with IPI/APD sequence. 72% received 4 IPI injections. The median time to switch was 1.7 months (0.36-3). The characteristics at the initiation of APD are: mean age 64 yrs, PS 0-1 80%, elevated LDH 34%, BRAF WT 90%, brain metastasis 25%, ≥ 3 metastatic organ sites (MOS) 49%, median FU 11.9 months, OS 20 months (95%CI:12.6-NR), PFS 3.5 months (95%CI:2.9-6.2). The best overall response was 25%, disease control rate was 54% with a low toxicity profile (17% grade 3/4). In a multivariable analysis, longer time to switch was significantly associated with better OS (adjusted HR 0.38 per 1 more month, 95%CI:0.14-0.93), as well as ECOG 0-1 (aHR 3.11, 95%CI:0.99-9.72) and LDH < ULN (aHR 3.32, 95%CI:1.26-8.75). In addition, the association of time to switch with OS vary significantly according to the number of MOS ( < 3 MOS aHR 0.25, 95%CI:0.10-0.62; ≥3 MOS aHR 0.99 95%CI:0.41-2.39) and AJCC stage (M0/1a/1b aHR 0.06, 95%CI:0.01-0.43 ; M1c aHR 0.77, 95%CI:0.39-1.54). Conclusions: In patients who failed IPI treatment, longer survival after APD was associated to time to switch only in patients with favorable baseline factors. Such results are probably more related to the slow kinetics of the disease than to the delay itself. Our results are different from Blank et al.(ESMO 2016) who tested a planned switch, immediately after 2 IPI perfusions, and showed overall response rate close to IPI+APD association. We are currently conducting a similar study on the reverse sequence (APD/IPI) and the role on IPI efficacy.

Machine learning models to predict the response to anti-cancer therapy in metastatic melanoma patients

e14071

Background: Machine learning methods are new artificial intelligence tools with promising applications in healthcare. We developed and validated 4 machine learning models to predict the response to immunotherapy and targeted therapy in stage IIIc or IV melanoma patients. Methods: This work was conducted on data from 10 centers participating in the French network for Research and Clinical Investigation on Melanoma (RIC-Mel), launched in 2012. Thus, 935 patients, corresponding to 1978 systemic treatments have been extracted from RIC-Mel database. The following data were considered: age, sex, Breslow, melanoma type, ulceration, spontaneous regression, mitotic index, number of invaded lymph nodes, extracapsular extension, mutational status, melanoma stage, number of metastasis sites, lines of treatments, and time between first melanoma excision and metastatic relapse. Treatment response: complete response, partial response, stable disease, defined as class 1 and progressive disease as class 2. We split this cohort/database into a training set (80%) and test set (20%). The algorithm performances were evaluated on the test set by the percentage of treatments correctly classified in class 1 or 2. Four machine learning algorithms (linear model, random forest, XGBoost and LightGBM) were compared in terms of performance and interpretation for both types of treatments. Results: The accuracies of the best models for immunotherapy (LightGBM) and targeted therapy (random forest) were respectively 66% and 65%. The most significant variables for building the models were respectively: stage (IIIc or IV), response to previous treatments lines, age, number of metastasis sites and time between first melanoma excision and metastatic relapse. Conclusions: We present here the first machine learning models to predict the response to immunotherapy and targeted therapy in stage IIIc or IV melanoma patients. The most predictive variables are coherent with the literature. Future development will include data from 18FDG-PET/CT imaging and other predictive markers recently identified, as circulating DNA to improve the models performance.

Impact of systemic therapies in metastatic melanoma of unknown primary: A study from MELBASE, a French multicentric prospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes of advanced melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) in the era of novel therapies have been scarcely studied.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of systemic treatments in patients with advanced MUP compared to patients with stage-matched melanoma of known cutaneous primary (cMKP).

METHODS

Based on the nationwide MelBase prospective database, this study included advanced melanoma patients treated from March 2013 to June 2021 with first-line immunotherapies, targeted therapies, or chemotherapy. Co-primary outcomes were progression-free survival and overall survival. Secondary outcome was treatment-related toxicities. Multivariate and propensity score analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1882 patients, 265 (14.1%) had advanced MUP. Patients with advanced MUP displayed more often unfavorable initial prognostic factors than those with cMKP. Progression-free and overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups (P = .73 and P = .93, respectively), as well as treatment-related toxicity rate and severity, regardless of treatment type.

LIMITATIONS

No record of standard diagnostic criteria of MUP used in the participating centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with MUP had less favorable baseline prognostic factors, they benefited from the novel therapies as much as those with cMKP. They should be managed according to similar strategies.

Differential gradients of immunotherapy vs targeted therapy efficacy according to the sun-exposure pattern of the site of occurrence of primary melanoma: a multicenter prospective cohort study (MelBase)

Background

The tumor mutational burden (TMB) is high in melanomas owing to UV-induced oncogenesis. While a high TMB is a predictive biomarker of response to PD-1 inhibitors, it may be associated with the rise of resistant clones to targeted therapy over time. We hypothesized that survivals may depend on both the sun-exposure profile of the site of primary melanoma and the type of systemic treatment.

Patients and methods

Patients were screened from MelBase, a multicenter biobank dedicated to the prospective follow-up of stage III/IV melanoma. All patients with a known cutaneous primary melanoma who received a 1st-line systemic treatment by immunotherapy or targeted therapy were included (2013-2019). Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

973 patients received either anti PD-1(n=466), anti CTLA-4(n=143), a combination of both (n=118), or targeted therapies (n=246). Patients' characteristics at treatment initiation were: male (62%), median age of 62, AJCC stage IV (84%). Median follow-up was 15.5 months. The primary melanoma was located on chronically sun-exposed skin in 202 patients (G1: head neck), on intermittently sun-exposed skin in 699 patients (G2: trunk, arms, legs), and on sun-protected areas in 72 patients (G3: palms, soles). Median PFS was significantly higher in G1 under anti PD-1 treatment (8.7 months vs 3.3 and 3.4 months for G2 and G3, respectively) (p=0.011). PFS did not significantly differ in other groups. Similarly, median OS was significantly higher in G1 receiving 1st line anti PD-1 treatment (45.6 months vs 31.6 and 21.4 months for G2 and G3) (p=0.04), as opposed to 1st line targeted therapy (19.5 months vs 16.3 and 21.1 months for G1, G2 and G3 respectively).

Conclusion

Our study confirms that immunotherapy with anti PD-1 is particularly recommended for melanomas originating from chronically sun-exposed areas, but this finding needs to be confirmed by further research.

Micro- and macro-metastatic disease kinetics: Results from the French cohort Melbase

9538

Background: In the past decade, the prognosis of advanced melanoma has been greatly improved by new therapeutic agents such as immune and targeted therapies, which are now being evaluated as adjuvant therapies. Although the kinetic of metastatic disease is correlated to patient survival, the unfolding of the dormant disease remains hardly predictable and data from the literature on the topic is controversial (Karakousis, Francken). We hypothesized that the course of the advanced disease could be predicted from time to distant recurrence. Methods: Melbase is a French multicentric cohort dedicated to the prospective follow-up of adults with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Date of primary excision, time to recurrence, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 298 patients treated in first line by immune therapies (IT, n = 148), targeted therapies (TT, n = 68) or within clinical trials (n = 73) were collected on September 5th, 2016. Patients with unknown primary or de novo metastatic melanoma were not included. Time to distant recurrence was analyzed as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable ( < 12 months; 12 to 24 months; ≥ 24 months). Results: Patients’ characteristics at baseline are: mean age 62 years, PS 0-1 84%, elevated LDH 32%, BRAF mutated 39%, brain metastases 18%. Time to recurrence studied as a continuous variable was not correlated to PFS (HR = 0.96; 95%CI: 0.85-1.07) or OS (HR = 0.89; 95%CI: 0.77-1.03). These results remained insignificant after stratification upon treatment or even when time to recurrence was analyzed as a categorized variable. Conclusions: Our data showed no correlation between the time from primary to distant recurrence and PFS or OS in patients treated with TT or IT. Therefore, kinetics of advanced disease cannot be predicted by the history of dormant disease. Dormancy and metastasis proliferation are thus probably driven by different molecular and cellular mechanisms.

Methods of nivolumab administration in advanced melanoma: A comparison of patients' clinical outcomes treated with flat dose or weight-adjusted dose, a multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab obtained approval in advanced melanoma (AM) with weight-adjusted dose (WAD) administration (3 mg/kg/2 weeks). In 2018, the dosage regimen was changed to flat dose (FD) administration (240 mg/2 weeks or 480 mg/4 weeks) based on a modeling study, without clinical data.

METHODS

AM patients have been prospectively included in the French national multicenter MelBase database since 2013. First-line patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy were included in the WAD or FD groups of this study. The primary end point was the incidence of grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Secondary end points were incidence of any grade irAEs, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance groups on their baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2022, 348 patients were included: 160 in the WAD and 188 in the FD groups. In the FD group, 45% and 27% of patients weighed <75 kg and >85 kg, respectively. Grade ≥3 and any grade irAEs rates were 13.1% versus 11.7% (p = .8) and 63.1% versus 67.0% (p = .5) in the WAD and FD groups, respectively. After weighting, median PFS was 3.1 and 3.7 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.07), and median OS was 24.8 and 37.0 months (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.01) in the WAD and FD groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the incidence of severe irAEs and in median PFS between AM patients treated by WAD or FD nivolumab. The median OS between patient groups did not reach statistical significance.