Exploring QRS Area beyond Patient Selection in CRT-Can It Guide Left Ventricular Lead Placement?

Vectorcardiographic QRS area is a promising tool for patient selection and implantation guidance in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Research has mainly focused on the role of QRS area in patient selection for CRT. Recently, QRS area has been proposed as a tool to guide left ventricular lead placement in CRT. Theoretically, vector-based electrical information of ventricular fusion pacing, calculated from the basic 12-lead ECG, can give real-time insight into the extent of resynchronization at any LV lead position, as well as any selected electrode on the LV lead. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the background of vectorcardiographic QRS area and its potential in optimizing LV lead location in order to optimize the benefits of CRT.

Repurposing catheter ablation work-up to detect expiratory airflow limitation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

In atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, presence of expiratory airflow limitation may negatively impact treatment outcomes. AF patients are not routinely screened for expiratory airflow limitation, but existing examinations can help identify at-risk individuals. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of repurposing existing assessments from the pre-ablation work-up to identify and understand the characteristics of affected patients.

Methods

We screened 110 consecutive AF patients scheduled for catheter ablation with handheld spirometry. Routine pre-ablation work-up included cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), transthoracic echocardiography and polygraphy. CCTA was analyzed qualitatively for emphysema and airway abnormalities. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of expiratory airflow limitation.

Results

We found that 25 % of patients had expiratory airflow limitation, which was undiagnosed in 86 % of these patients. These patients were more likely to have pulmonary abnormalities on CCTA, including emphysema (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.12-15.1, p < 0.05) and bronchial wall thickening (OR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.0-6.5, p < 0.05). The absence of pulmonary abnormalities on CCTA accurately distinguished patients with normal lung function from those with airflow limitation (negative predictive value: 85 %). Echocardiography and polygraphy did not contribute significantly to identifying airflow limitation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, routine pre-ablation CCTA can detect pulmonary abnormalities in AF patients with airflow limitation, guiding further pulmonary assessment. Future studies should investigate its impact on ablation procedure success.

A failed catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with more advanced remodeling and reduced efficacy of further thoracoscopic ablation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Recent observations suggest that patients with a previous failed catheter ablation have an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after subsequent thoracoscopic AF ablation. We assessed the risk of AF recurrence in patients with a previous failed catheter ablation undergoing thoracoscopic ablation.

METHODS

We included patients from 3 medical centers. To correct for potential heterogeneity, we performed propensity matching to compare AF freedom (freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia> 30 s during 1-year follow-up). Left atrial appendage tissue was analyzed for collagen distribution.

RESULTS

A total of 705 patients were included, and 183 had a previous failed catheter ablation. These patients had fewer risk factors for AF recurrence than ablation naïve controls: smaller indexed left atrial volume (40.9± 12.5 vs 43.0±12.5 mL/m², P=.048), less congestive heart failure (1.5% vs 8.9%, P=.001), and less persistent AF (52.2% vs 60.3%, P=.067). However, AF history duration was longer in patients with a previous failed catheter ablation (6.5 [4-10.5] vs 4 [2-8] years; P<.001). In propensity matched analysis, patients with a failed catheter ablation were at a 68% higher AF recurrence risk (OR, 1.68; 95%CI, 1.20-2.15; P=.034). AF freedom was 61.1% in patients with a previous failed catheter ablation vs 72.5% in ablation naïve matched controls. On histology of the left atrial appendage (n=198), patients with a failed catheter ablation had a higher density of collagen fibers.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a prior failed catheter ablation had fewer risk factors for AF recurrence but more frequently had AF recurrence after thoracoscopic AF ablation than ablation naïve patients. This may in part be explained by more progressed, subclinical, atrial fibrosis formation.

The great deceiver: a case series of 'double fire' atrioventricular nodal response

Background

The 'double fire' (DF) atrioventricular (AV) nodal response is a rare mechanism of two ventricular electrical activations following a single atrial beat due to dual AV node physiology. DF AV nodal response is often misdiagnosed and may lead to unnecessary invasive procedures.

Case summary

We describe a series of three cases with distinct clinical manifestations of DF AV nodal response: Patient 1 remained symptomatic after slow pathway modification for common AV nodal re-entry tachycardia. Patient 2 was misdiagnosed as having junctional bigeminy and developed heart failure with reduced left ventricle ejection fraction. Patient 3 was misdiagnosed as having atrial fibrillation (AF) and underwent two pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures, without clinical improvement. All patients underwent an electrophysiological study (EPS) during which DF AV nodal response was confirmed and treated with radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway. All patients were afterwards relieved from their symptoms.

Discussion and conclusion

DF AV nodal response is a rare electrophysiological phenomenon which can be clinically misinterpreted as other common arrhythmias, such as premature junctional bigeminy or AF and can contribute to tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy. Typical electrocardiogram- and EPS-derived findings can be indicative for DF AV nodal response. DF AV nodal response can be easily and effectively treated by slow pathway ablation.

Comparison of the relation of the ESC 2021 and ESC 2013 definitions of left bundle branch block with clinical and echocardiographic outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate the impact of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline changes in left bundle branch block (LBBB) definition on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patient selection and outcomes.

METHODS

The MUG (Maastricht, Utrecht, Groningen) registry, consisting of consecutive patients implanted with a CRT device between 2001 and 2015 was studied. For this study, patients with baseline sinus rhythm and QRS duration ≥ 130ms were eligible. Patients were classified according to ESC 2013 and 2021 guideline LBBB definitions and QRS duration. Endpoints were heart transplantation, LVAD implantation or mortality (HTx/LVAD/mortality) and echocardiographic response (LVESV reduction ≥15%).

RESULTS

The analyses included 1.202, typical CRT patients. The ESC 2021 definition resulted in considerably less LBBB diagnoses compared to the 2013 definition (31.6% vs. 80.9%, respectively). Applying the 2013 definition resulted in significant separation of the Kaplan-Meier curves of HTx/LVAD/mortality (p < .0001). A significantly higher echocardiographic response rate was found in the LBBB compared to the non-LBBB group using the 2013 definition. These differences in HTx/LVAD/mortality and echocardiographic response were not found when applying the 2021 definition.

CONCLUSION

The ESC 2021 LBBB definition leads to a considerably lower percentage of patients with baseline LBBB then the ESC 2013 definition. This does not lead to better differentiation of CRT responders, nor does this lead to a stronger association with clinical outcomes after CRT. In fact, stratification according to the 2021 definition is not associated with a difference in clinical or echocardiographic outcome, implying that the guideline changes may negatively influence CRT implantation practice with a weakened recommendation in patients that will benefit from CRT.

Conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: State of the art, current controversies, and future perspectives

Biventricular pacing (BVP) is the established treatment to perform cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, BVP is an unnatural pacing modality still conditioned by the high percentage of non-responders and coronary sinus anatomy. Conduction system pacing (CSP)-His bundle pacing (HBP) and Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP)- upcomes as the physiological alternative to BVP in the quest for the optimal CRT. CSP showed promising results in terms of better electro-mechanical ventricular synchronization compared to BVP. However, only a few randomized control trials are currently available, and technical challenges, along with the lack of information on long-term clinical outcomes, limit the establishment of a primary role for CSP over conventional BVP in CRT candidates. This review provides a comprehensive literature revision of potential applications of CSP for CRT in diverse clinical scenarios, underlining the current controversies and prospects of this technique.

Prevalence and determinants of atrial fibrillation progression in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) often progresses from paroxysmal AF (PAF) to more permanent forms. To improve personalised medicine, we aim to develop a new AF progression risk prediction model in patients with PAF.

METHODS

In this interim-analysis of the Reappraisal of AF: Interaction Between HyperCoagulability, Electrical Remodelling, and Vascular Destabilisation in the Progression of AF study, patients with PAF undergoing extensive phenotyping at baseline and continuous rhythm monitoring during follow-up of ≥1 year were analysed. AF progression was defined as (1) progression to persistent or permanent AF or (2) progression of PAF with >3% burden increase. Multivariable analysis was done to identify predictors of AF progression.

RESULTS

Mean age was 65 (58-71) years, 179 (43%) were female. Follow-up was 2.2 (1.6-2.8) years, 51 of 417 patients (5.5%/year) showed AF progression. Multivariable analysis identified, PR interval, impaired left atrial function, mitral valve regurgitation and waist circumference to be associated with AF progression. Adding blood biomarkers improved the model (C-statistic from 0.709 to 0.830) and showed male sex, lower levels of factor XIIa:C1-esterase inhibitor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and higher levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and peptidoglycan recognition protein 1 were associated with AF progression.

CONCLUSION

In patients with PAF, AF progression occurred in 5.5%/year. Predictors for progression included markers for atrial remodelling, sex, mitral valve regurgitation, waist circumference and biomarkers associated with coagulation, inflammation, cardiomyocyte stretch and atherosclerosis. These prediction models may help to determine risk of AF progression and treatment targets, but validation is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02726698.

Physiology of Left Ventricular Septal Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Following the recognition of the adverse effects of right ventricular pacing, alternative permanent pacing strategies aiming to maintain a synchronous ventricular contraction have been sought. The quest for the optimal pacing site has recently led to several promising and rapidly emerging new pacing strategies, such as left ventricular septal pacing and left bundle branch pacing. In both animal and human studies, these pacing strategies seem to maintain electrical and mechanical activation of the left ventricle to a (near)physiologic level. However, more studies on the long-term effects of both strategies are needed.

High-rate atrial pacing to reduce left-sided filling pressures: a combined computational and clinical pilot study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO- ZonMw, VIDI grant 016.176.340 to J.L.) and the Dutch Heart Foundation (ERA-CVD JTC2018 grant 2018T094; Dr. Dekker Program grant 2015T082 to J.L.)

Background

In heart failure patients, interventions to reduce elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure improve symptoms and reduce the risk of hospitalization. In this combined computational-clinical study, we explore high-rate atrial pacing as an alternative intervention to reduce LV filling pressure.

Methods

First, the theoretical basis was explored in a computational model of reduced LV compliance and various fixed atrioventricular delays. Second, an explorative clinical study was conducted in 19 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with sinus rhythm at the beginning of the procedure. Prior to the PVI, atrial pacing rate was gradually increased from resting heart rate to Wenckebach point with 10bpm increments. LA pressure was continuously monitored with a fluid-filled transseptal catheter.

Results

Computational modelling demonstrated a parabolic relationship between atrial pacing rate and LA pressure depending on atrioventricular delay (Figure A). In patients (Figure B), intermediately increased rates (60bpm[60-70], median[IQR], to 90bpm[73-100], respectively) reduced LA pressure from 16.0mmHg[14.0-20.5] to 14.0mmHg[10.8-16.8]. Highly increased rates (130bpm[120-140]) significantly increased LA pressure to 26.0mmHg[21.5-27.8].

Conclusions

Both the model simulations and the subsequent clinical pilot study support the hypothesis that high-rate atrial pacing can reduce left-sided filling pressure. However, inter-patient variability of response to high-rate pacing was observed, to which simulations identified atrioventricular conduction to be a potential source.

Impact of the ESC 2021 guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy left bundle branch block definition on CRT patient selection and survival

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

The recently published ESC 2021 guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) underwent significant changes compared to the ESC 2013 guidelines regarding the definition of left bundle branch block (LBBB) by adding notching or slurring in 2 adjacent leads as a prerequisite. The level of recommendation for CRT depends on diagnosing LBBB or non-LBBB. These changes may have a significant impact on patient selection for CRT, as fewer patients may be diagnosed with LBBB and may therefore get a lower level of recommendation for CRT.

Purpose

In this study we investigated the impact of these changes in LBBB definition on patient selection and heart transplantation/left ventricular assist device (LVAD) free survival.

Methods

A large multicenter CRT database, consisting of consecutive patients implanted with a CRT device between 2001 and 2015 in 3 university hospitals in the Netherlands, was used for this study. Patient selection, device implantation, lead positioning and follow-up were according to then prevailing guidelines and local protocols. For this study, patients were selected with baseline sinus rhythm, QRS duration &gt;130ms, and without right ventricular pacing. Patients were stratified according to ESC 2013 and ESC 2021 guideline definitions on LBBB.

Results

The current analyses included 1.202 CRT patients. 66% of patients were male with an age of 66±11 years. Heart failure etiology was ischemic in 49% of patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction of 25% and baseline NYHA class II-III in 93% of patients. There is a considerable difference in LBBB diagnoses when stratifying patients according to ESC 2013 and ESC 2021 guideline definitions as especially the number of LBBB patients is reduced from 80.9% to 31.6% (Figure 1). Heart transplantation/LVAD free survival analyses when stratifying according to ESC 2013 LBBB definition showed significant separation of the curves (p&lt;0.0001) (Figure 2). Furthermore, there was a significant difference between the wide (QRS&gt;150ms) LBBB and wide non-LBBB subgroup concerning heart transplantation/LVAD free survival (p&lt;0.0001). In contrast, there was no significant separation of the curves when stratifying according to ESC 2021 LBBB definition (Figure 2).

Conclusion

The changes made in LBBB definition in the ESC 2021 CRT guidelines lead to a difference in stratification of LBBB and non-LBBB. The ESC 2013 LBBB definition, however, seems to be better in predicting heart transplantation/LVAD free survival after CRT.

Left Ventricular Lead Placement Guided by Reduction in QRS Area

Background: Reduction in QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with improved long-term clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the reduction in QRS area is associated with hemodynamic improvement by pacing different LV sites and can be used to guide LV lead placement. Methods: Patients with a class Ia/IIa CRT indication were prospectively included from three hospitals. Acute hemodynamic response was assessed as the relative change in maximum rate of rise of left ventricular (LV) pressure (%∆LVdP/dt_max). Change in QRS area (∆QRS area), in QRS duration (∆QRS duration), and %∆LVdP/dt_max were studied in relation to different LV pacing locations within a patient. Results: Data from 52 patients paced at 188 different LV pacing sites were investigated. Lateral LV pacing resulted in a larger %∆LVdP/dt_max than anterior or posterior pacing (p = 0.0007). A similar trend was found for ∆QRS area (p = 0.001) but not for ∆QRS duration (p = 0.23). Pacing from the proximal electrode pair resulted in a larger %∆LVdP/dt_max (p = 0.004), and ∆QRS area (p = 0.003) but not ∆QRS duration (p = 0.77). Within patients, correlation between ∆QRS area and %∆LVdP/dt_max was 0.76 (median, IQR 0.35; 0,89). Conclusion: Within patients, ∆QRS area is associated with %∆LVdP/dt_max at different LV pacing locations. Therefore, QRS area, which is an easily, noninvasively obtainable and objective parameter, may be useful to guide LV lead placement in CRT.

Physiology and Practicality of Left Ventricular Septal Pacing

Left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) have been introduced to maintain or correct interventricular and intraventricular (dys)synchrony. LVSP is hypothesised to produce a fairly physiological sequence of activation, since in the left ventricle (LV) the working myocardium is activated first at the LV endocardium in the low septal and anterior free-wall regions. Animal studies as well as patient studies have demonstrated that LV function is maintained during LVSP at levels comparable to sinus rhythm with normal conduction. Left ventricular activation is more synchronous during LBBP than LVSP, but LBBP produces a higher level of intraventricular dyssynchrony compared to LVSP. While LVSP is fairly straightforward to perform, targeting the left bundle branch area may be more challenging. Long-term effects of LVSP and LBBP are yet to be determined. This review focuses on the physiology and practicality of LVSP and provides a guide for permanent LVSP implantation.

Pacing therapy for atrioventricular dromotropathy: a combined computational-experimental-clinical study

AIMS

Investigate haemodynamic effects, and their mechanisms, of restoring atrioventricular (AV)-coupling using pacemaker therapy in normal and failing hearts in a combined computational-experimental-clinical study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Computer simulations were performed in the CircAdapt model of the normal and failing human heart and circulation. Experiments were performed in a porcine model of AV dromotropathy. In a proof-of-principle clinical study, left ventricular (LV) pressure and volume were measured in 22 heart failure (HF) patients (LV ejection fraction <35%) with prolonged PR interval (>230 ms) and narrow or non-left bundle branch block QRS complex. Computer simulations and animal studies in normal hearts showed that restoring of AV-coupling with unchanged ventricular activation sequence significantly increased LV filling, mean arterial pressure, and cardiac output by 10-15%. In computer simulations of failing hearts and in HF patients, reducing PR interval by biventricular (BiV) pacing (patients: from 300 ± 61 to 137 ± 30 ms) resulted in significant increases in LV stroke volume and stroke work (patients: 34 ± 40% and 26 ± 31%, respectively). However, worsening of ventricular dyssynchrony by using right ventricular (RV) pacing abrogated the benefit of restoring AV-coupling. In model simulations, animals and patients, the increase of LV filling and associated improvement of LV pump function coincided with both larger mitral inflow (E- and A-wave area) and reduction of diastolic mitral regurgitation.

CONCLUSION

Restoration of AV-coupling by BiV pacing in normal and failing hearts with prolonged AV conduction leads to considerable haemodynamic improvement. These results indicate that BiV or physiological pacing, but not RV pacing, may improve cardiac function in patients with HF and prolonged PR interval.

Electrical characteristics of deep septal vs. left bundle branch (area) pacing

Background/Introduction

Recent studies have described transvenous left bundle branch (LBB) pacing as a new conduction system pacing strategy. However, information on effect of pacing depth within the septum and the additional effect of LBB capture is unknown.

Purpose

To investigate the relation of electrocardographic characteristics with transseptal LV lead implantation depth and LBB capture.

Methods

20 consecutive patients referred for pacemaker implantation were enrolled. The right atrial (RA) lead was positioned according to routine practice. The LV septal pacing lead (Medtronic 3830) was transvenously positioned against the right side of the interventricular septum and advanced in small steps of 1–2mm towards the left side of the septum. At each depth in the septum 12-lead ECG's were recorded during pacing, from which vectorcardiograms (VCG) were calculated. QRS duration and QRS area were measured, the latter being the integral of the QRSarea in X, Y and Z directions. Successful LBB capture was defined as paced right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology, stable and short stimulus to LV activation time (LVAT; R in V5) and recorded LBB potential.

Differences were compared among pacing conditions using repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons procedure applied to pairwise comparisons. Statistical significance was assumed at p&lt;0.05.

Results

LV septal lead implantation was successful in all patients. Left bundle branch capture was achieved in 10/20 patients (50%). Post-procedural LV pacing threshold, impedance and sensing was 0.7±0.1 V at 0.5 ms pulse width, 658±5 Ω and 13±10 mV, respectively. Compared to intrinsic rhythm, QRS duration was significantly increased by both RV septum (RVS; 124±5 vs. 161±3 ms) and LV septum pacing (LVS; 142±3 ms).

QRS area increased significantly during RVS pacing as compared to intrinsic rhythm but decreased when moving from RVS to LVS to values close to intrinsic rhythm (panel A & B). LVS-pacing derived QRS area was significantly lower in patients with LBB capture (36±6 mV*ms) compared to patients without LBB capture (deep septal pacing; 46±12 mV*ms).

The reduction in QRS area between RVS and LVS pacing coincided with normalization of the QRS vector in the transverse plane (panel C), which is characterized electrocardiographically by predominantly negative-to-positive inversion of the QRS complex in the precordial leads (V1-V3).

Conclusions

Compared to RV septal pacing, LV septal pacing restores ventricular electrical synchrony, as determined by QRS area, and normalizes the activation vector in the transverse plane to a level comparable to intrinsic rhythm. Differences in resynchronization between left bundle branch pacing and deep septal pacing are small.

LBBAP restores ventricular synchrony

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Novel bradycardia pacing strategies

The adverse effects of ventricular dyssynchrony induced by right ventricular (RV) pacing has led to alternative pacing strategies, such as biventricular, His bundle (HBP), LV septal (LVSP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). Given the overlap, LVSP and LBBP are also collectively referred to as left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). Although among these alternative pacing sites HBP is theoretically the ideal strategy as it maintains a physiological ventricular activation, its application requires more skills and is associated with the most complications. LBBAP, where the ventricular pacing lead is advanced through the interventricular septum to its left side, creates ventricular activation that is only slightly more dyssynchronous. Preliminary studies have shown that LBBAP is feasible, safe and encounters less limitations than HBP. Further studies are needed to differentiate between LVSP and LBBP with regard to acute functional and long-term clinical outcome.

A minimally invasive all-in-one approach for patients with left anterior descending artery disease and atrial fibrillation

The efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting have been previously reported. Herein, we describe the successful combination of both procedures in a high-risk patient with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal AF and a proximal left main stenosis. This innovative procedure offers patients an all-in-one, truly minimally invasive approach to treat AF and left anterior descending artery disease. Based on our initial experience, the procedure is safe and feasible.

Vascular Calcification and not Arrhythmia in Idiopathic Atrial Fibrillation Associates with Sex Differences in Diabetic Microvascular Injury miRNA Profiles

BACKGROUND

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in patients without concomitant cardiovascular pathophysiological disease, is called idiopathic Atrial Fibrillation (iAF). Nonetheless, iAF patients have often times subclinical coronary (micro) vascular dysfunction and, particularly in women, a higher prevalence of subsequent cardiovascular comorbidities. Previously, we identified a plasma miRNA association with diabetes and microvascular injury in Diabetic Nephropathy (DN) patients. Therefore, in this study we assessed whether plasma levels of these diabetic, microvascular injury associated miRNAs reflect microvascular integrity in iAF patients, associated with the presence of paroxysmal arrhythmia or instead are determined by concealed coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Circulating levels of a pre-selected set of diabetic, (micro) vascular injury associated miRNAs, were measured in 59 iAF patients compared to 176 Sinus Rhythm (SR) controls. Furthermore, the presence of coronary artery and aortic calcification in each patient was assessed using Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA).

RESULTS

Paroxysmal arrhythmia in iAF patients did not result in significant miRNA expression profile differences in iAF patients compared to SR controls. Nonetheless, coronary artery calcification (CAC) was associated with higher levels of miRNAs-103, -125a-5p, -221 and -223 in men. In women, CAC was associated with higher plasma levels of miRNA-27a and miRNA-126 and correlated with Agatston scores. Within the total population, ascending Aortic Calcification (AsAC) patients displayed increased plasma levels of miRNA-221, while women, in particular, demonstrated a Descending Aorta Calcification (DAC) associated increase in miRNA-212 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic microvascular injury associated miRNAs in iAF are associated with subclinical coronary artery disease in a sex-specific way and confirm the notion that biological sex identifies iAF subgroups that may require dedicated clinical care.

Acute cardioversion vs a wait-and-see approach for recent-onset symptomatic atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: Rationale and design of the randomized ACWAS trial

BACKGROUND

Current standard of care for patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in the emergency department aims at urgent restoration of sinus rhythm, although paroxysmal AF is a condition that resolves spontaneously within 24 hours in more than 70% of the cases. A wait-and-see approach with rate-control medication only and when needed cardioversion within 48 hours of onset of symptoms is hypothesized to be noninferior, safe, and cost-effective as compared with current standard of care and to lead to a higher quality of life.

DESIGN

The ACWAS trial (NCT02248753) is an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, 2-arm noninferiority trial that compares a wait-and-see approach to the standard of care. Consenting adults with recent-onset symptomatic AF in the emergency department without urgent need for cardioversion are eligible for participation. A total of 437 patients will be randomized to either standard care (pharmacologic or electrical cardioversion) or the wait-and-see approach, consisting of symptom reduction through rate control medication until spontaneous conversion is achieved, with the possibility of cardioversion within 48 hours after onset of symptoms. Primary end point is the presence of sinus rhythm on 12-lead electrocardiogram at 4 weeks; main secondary outcomes are adverse events, total medical and societal costs, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACWAS trial aims at providing evidence for the use of a wait-and-see approach for patients with recent-onset symptomatic AF in the emergency department.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder: a critical review of therapeutic perspectives

OBJECTIVE

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic disabling disease with profound implications for social functioning. Thirty per cent of all patients with OCD show insufficient improvement with state-of-the-art treatment. Conventional treatment and alternative treatment options for this population were investigated.

METHOD

A selective review of the relevant scientific literature on OCD treatment and treatment resistance was conducted.

RESULTS

In addition to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and cognitive-behavioural therapy, alternative monotherapies, SRI augmentation strategies with a variety of drugs and electroconvulsive therapy have shown results in individual cases, but no conclusive evidence has been found in placebo-controlled trials. While studies investigating neurosurgery for refractory OCD show positive results, most of these studies have methodological shortcomings.

CONCLUSION

Novel approaches currently under investigation that have shown promising effects for treatment-resistant OCD include SRI augmentation with atypical antipsychotics and chronic deep brain stimulation, a new surgical technique. Placebo-controlled trials for both treatment options will be needed to confirm preliminary findings.

"Danger is lurking everywhere". the relation between anxiety and threat perception abnormalities in normal children

The present study examined the relation between anxiety and depression and threat perception abnormalities. Children were exposed to stories describing social situations. Some of the stories were ambiguous (i.e., these stories contained information that could be interpreted as threatening) whereas other stories were non-threatening (i.e., these stories contained no obvious trace of threat). From children's responses to the stories, several threat perception indices were derived. Children's level of anxiety and depression were assessed by means of self-report questionnaires. Results indicated that high levels of anxiety were accompanied by a high frequency of threat perception, high ratings of threat, a high frequency of threatening interpretations, high levels of negative feelings and cognitions, and an early detection of threat. Interestingly, significant associations between anxiety and threat perception abnormalities were not only observed in response to ambiguous stories but also in relation to non-threatening scenarios. Furthermore, depression was also connected with threat perception distortions. Even when controlling for anxiety levels, depression remained significantly related to threat frequency, threat ratings, and threat thresholds.