Correction to: One Plus One Equals Two-will that do? A trial protocol for a Swedish multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate a clinical practice to reduce severe perineal trauma

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

One Plus One Equals Two-will that do? A trial protocol for a Swedish multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate a clinical practice to reduce severe perineal trauma {1}

Background

Severe perineal trauma sustained during childbirth is a serious complication since it can lead to both short- and long-term consequences for women. Some of the methods used to prevent perineal injuries have been evaluated in clinical trials, but there are still gaps in the evidence. A new clinical practice has been introduced, adopted by more than half of the maternity wards in Sweden with the aim of reducing severe perineal trauma. This procedure involves two midwives assisting the woman during the second stage of labour.

Methods/design

In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 2946 women will be randomised to be assisted by one or two midwives during the second stage of labour. Women age 18–47, who plan for their first vaginal birth, with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, will be asked to participate when admitted to the maternity ward. Five maternity wards comprising 19,500 births/year in different parts of Sweden will participate in this study. The sample size is powered to demonstrate a 50% reduction (from 4.1–2.0%) in primary outcome, which is the prevalence of severe perineal trauma (3rd and 4th degree). Secondary outcomes will include maternal and neonatal outcomes, women’s experiences, midwives’ experiences of the intervention, incontinence, and pelvic floor symptoms. The primary analysis is intention to treat. Questionnaires will be sent to the women at 1 month and 1 year after the birth to assess women’s experiences, pain, incontinence, pelvic floor symptoms, sexual function, and mental health.

Discussion

It is important for care during labour and birth to be evidence based. There is a strong desire among midwives to reduce the risk of severe perineal trauma. This may lead to new strategies and practices being implemented into practice without scientific evidence. The intervention might have negative side effects or unintended consequences. On the other hand, there is a possibility of the intervention improving care for women.

Trial registration {2a}

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03770962. Registered on 10 December 2018

Meropenem-clavulanate has high in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

With the relentless increase in multidrug- and extensively-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB), new treatment strategies are necessary. Favorable results have been reported by combining a β-lactam antibiotic and a β-lactamase inhibitor. The β-lactamase encoded by the blaC gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is the major mechanism of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics (e.g., penicillin). Meropenem, a β-lactam antibiotic of the carbapenem group, is a relatively weak substrate for the β-lactamase of MTB. The β-lactamase inhibitor clavulanate irreversibly inactivates the β-lactamase encoded by the blaC gene, thus making the combination of meropenem and clavulanate an interesting treatment alternative for MTB. However, very few isolates of MTB have been tested for this drug combination and few clinical reports exist. Thus, the present study investigates the in vitro activity of meropenem-clavulanate for drug-resistant MTB isolates, including MDR/XDR-TB.

METHODS

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution of meropenem-clavulanate was determined using Middlebrook 7H10, including MDR and XDR strains of MTB (n=68). Meropenem was prepared in a stock solution with a final concentration range of 0.002-512mg/L. Clavulanate was added at a fixed concentration of 64mg/L, to avoid a decline of the β-lactamase to insufficient levels during the experiment. All isolates were evaluated after three weeks of growth. The pan-susceptible strain H37Rv was used as a control.

RESULTS

There was a Gaussian MIC-distribution between 0.125 and 2mg/L of meropenem-clavulanate (expressed as the concentration of meropenem), but four isolates had very high MIC levels (16 and 32mg/L), which is likely to be out of reach in clinical doses (Fig. 1). The susceptibility of the isolates to meropenem-clavulanate was not correlated to the level of resistance to first- or second-line anti-tuberculous drugs. The MIC of the pan-susceptible control strain H37Rv was 1mg/L of meropenem, when combined with clavulanate.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that meropenem-clavulanate has low MICs against MTB in vitro, including MDR and XDR-TB isolates. Meropenem has good tissue penetration and low protein-binding, but requires an intravenous access and is relatively expensive. Meropenem-clavulanate may be a treatment option in selected cases of MDR/XDR-TB, although further clinical studies are warranted.