Prognostic value of FFRCT in patients with stable chest pain – a 3-year follow-up of the ADVANCE-DK registry

Introduction

The short-term safety of using coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) to guide downstream testing after CTA is well documented. Whether the prognostic information provided by FFRCT can be extended to sustained follow-up and to patients with a high degree of coronary artery calcification (CAC) is unknown.

Purpose

To evaluate the association between FFRCT and clinical outcomes in new onset stable symptomatic patients with coronary stenosis up to 3 years after CTA index testing.

Methods

Multicenter 3-year follow-up study of 900 patients from the Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry at three Danish sites, the “ADVANCE-DK Registry”. All patients had at least one ≥30% coronary stenosis by CTA and underwent subsequent core laboratory FFRCT analysis by HeartFlow. The criterium for an abnormal FFRCT test result was an FFRCT value ≤0.80 (2 cm distal to stenosis). High CAC was defined as a CAC score ≥400. The primary endpoint (PE) was a composite of all-cause death and spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI). The secondary endpoint (SE) was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and spontaneous MI. Events were adjudicated by an independent clinical committee.

Results

Patient characteristics are given in Table 1. Coronary stenosis ≥50% was present in 750 (83%) patients. In total 36 patients suffered a PE (all-cause death, n=24; MI, n=12) and 22 an SE (CV death, n=10; MI, n=12). An abnormal vs a normal FFRCT test result was associated with an increased risk of the PE and of the SE both overall and in patients with high CAC; PE (all), 6.6% vs 2.1%, relative risk (RR): 3.1; 95% CI: 1.6–6.3, p<0.001, SE (all), 5.0% vs 0.6%, RR: 8.7; 95% CI: non assessable, p<0.001, PE (high CAC), 9.0% vs 2.2%, RR: 4.1; 85% CI: 1.4–11.8, p=0.001, and SE (high CAC), 6.6% vs 0.5%, RR: 12.0; 95% CI: non assessable, p=0.01, respectively, Figure 1. The observed increased risk in patients with an abnormal vs a normal FFRCT test result persisted after adjustment for degree of stenosis by CCTA (< / ≥50%) and amount of CAC (< / ≥400): PE, adjusted RR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2–5.2, p=0.02, and SE, adjusted RR: 8.0; 95% CI: 2.1–30.2, p=0.002.

Conclusion

Patients with stable chest pain, stenosis by CTA and a normal FFRCT test result have a low risk of adverse outcomes during 3 years of follow-up. An abnormal FFRCT identifies patients at increased risk of death or spontaneous MI. These associations are consistent in patients with high levels of CAC.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

FFRCT and recurrent symptoms in patients with stable chest pain

Introduction

The major benefit of coronary revascularization when compared with optimal medical treatment (OMT) in patients with stable chest pain (CP) relates to improvement of symptoms and reduction of reinterventions. Non-invasive methods are warranted to discriminate between patients at low and high risk of recurrent CP for subsequent guidance of antianginal treatment (invasive or OMT).

Purpose

To evaluate the association between coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT), recurrent CP and quality of life (QOL) in patients with new onset stable CP and stenosis by CTA.

Methods

Multicenter cohort 3-year follow-up sub-study of 769 patients from the Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry at three Danish sites, the “ADVANCE-DK Registry”. All patients had at least one ≥30% coronary stenosis by CTA and underwent subsequent core laboratory FFRCT analysis by HeartFlow. An abnormal FFRCT was defined as the lowest in vessel FFRCT value ≤0.80. Patients were classified according to completeness of revascularization by FFRCT: 1) completely revascularized (CR-FFRCT), all coronary arteries with an abnormal FFRCT test result revascularized; 2) incompletely revascularized (IR-FFRCT), ≥1 coronary artery with an abnormal FFRCT test result not revascularized. All patients completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), the EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and graded (0–100) overall health using the EQ VAS scale at 3-year follow-up. Recurrent CP was defined as CP within the last 4 weeks prior to this follow-up.

Results

Patient characteristics are given in Table 1. At follow-up 23% patients reported recurrent CP. An abnormal vs a normal FFRCT increased the risk of recurrent CP, 27% vs 15%, RR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.31–2.52, p<0.001. Amongst patients with abnormal FFRCT, revascularization (+/−) was associated to a numerical, but not statistical significantly, reduced risk of recurrent CP, 23% vs 30%, RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56–1.03, p=0.07. IR-FFRCT vs CR-FFRCT had a higher risk for recurrent CP, 31% vs 13%, RR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.48–3.68, p<0.001, whilst no difference was observed for CR-FFRCT vs normal FFRCT, 13% vs 15%, RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.54–1.54, p=0.74. IR-FFRCT vs CR-FFRCT or normal FFRCT, had lower SAQ-7, EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS scores, Table 1, all p<0.005. Scores for three selected SAQ-7 domains are shown in Figure 1. Use of antianginal medicine was higher in IR-FFRCT compared to CR-FFRCT and normal FFRCT, mean ± SD: 1.2±0.05 vs 1.0±0.04, p=0.02.

Conclusion

An abnormal FFRCT identifies patients with an increased risk of recurrent CP up to 3 years after index testing. Completeness of revascularization by FFRCT reclassifies patients with abnormal FFRCT into groups with low and high risk for recurrent CP and impaired QOL.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

The effect of vitamin K2 supplementation on coronary artery disease in a randomized multicenter trial

Background

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) and especially progression in CAC is a strong predictor of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiovascular mortality [1]. Observational studies suggest a protective role of vitamin K2 in the development of CAC [2]. Measurement of CAC score in Agatston Units (AU) is common practice, while novel software as AutoPlaque introduces new opportunities to measure coronary plaques [3].

Purpose

The aim of this double-blinded randomized multicenter trial is to investigate if vitamin K2 supplementation can reduce the progression of CAC in a population without known coronary disease.

Methods

AVADEC is a multicenter trial investigating 389 participants randomized to vitamin K2 (720 μg/day) and vitamin D (25 μg/day) versus placebo with a 2-year follow-up from 2018–2019 [4]. The primary endpoint of AVADEC is change in aortic valve calcification. In this substudy, we examined the progression of CAC in participants with no prior coronary disease (no myocardial infarction and/or revascularization) at baseline. Secondary, the change in CAC was evaluated in two prespecified subgroups (low-risk: CAC score <400 AU and high-risk: CAC ≥400 AU at baseline). Non-contrast CT-scans were performed at baseline, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Contrast CT-scans were performed at baseline and 24 months. CAC score was measured with established software and expressed in Agatston Units (AU). On contrast CT-scans, quantitative coronary plaque composition evaluations were performed by using Autoplaque. Moreover, events (AMI, revascularization and all cause death) were assessed.

Results

304 participants (male, mean age 71 years) with no prior coronary disease were identified. The intervention and placebo groups were similar in all traditional cardiovascular risk factors except familial predisposition for cardiovascular disease (14.4% vs. 6.7%, p=0.046). We found progression of CAC in both the intervention and placebo group from baseline to 24 month follow-up (203 AU vs. 254 AU, p=0.089) (Figure 1). The patients with CAC score <400 AU at baseline were equal in progression (77 AU vs. 81 AU, p=0.846). In patients with CAC score ≥400, the progression of CAC was significantly lower in the intervention group (288 AU vs. 380 AU, p=0.047). Yet, preliminary analyses of contrast CT-scans in 180 participants showed no difference in the progression of non-calcified plaque volume (10 mm3 vs. 37 mm3, p=0.276). In addition, the number of events was significantly lower in participants receiving vitamin K2 and D (1.9% vs. 6.7%, p=0.048).

Conclusion

Patients with no prior coronary disease randomized to vitamin K2 supplementation had a non-significant reduction in CAC development over a 2-year follow-up period. High-risk patients with CAC ≥400 AU had a significantly lower progression of CAC. Additionally, vitamin K2 supplementation significantly reduced the risk of AMI, revascularization and all-cause death.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Danish Cardiovascular Academy (2/3) and the Region of Southern Denmark (1/3).

Completeness of revascularization by FFRCT and prognosis in stable chest pain

Introduction

Major randomized trials of patients with stable chest pain (CP) demonstrated no prognostic benefits of coronary revascularization over optimal medical treatment (OMT). However, in a recent large-scale study, completeness of revascularization was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI).

Purpose

To evaluate the association between completeness of revascularization relative to the result of coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) and 3-year prognosis in patients with new onset stable CP and coronary stenosis.

Methods

Multicenter cohort 3-year follow-up sub-study of 900 patients from the Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry at three Danish sites, the “ADVANCE-DK Registry”. All patients had at least one ≥30% coronary stenosis by CTA and underwent subsequent core laboratory FFRCT analysis by HeartFlow. The FFRCT result was abnormal when ≤0.80 (2 cm distal to stenosis). Patients were classified according to completeness of revascularization by FFRCT: 1) completely revascularized (CR-FFRCT), all coronary arteries with an abnormal FFRCT test result revascularized; 2) incompletely revascularized (IR-FFRCT), ≥1 coronary artery with an abnormal FFRCT test result not revascularized. The primary endpoint (PE) was a composite of all-cause death and spontaneous MI. The secondary endpoint (SE) was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and spontaneous MI.

Results

Patient characteristics are given in Table 1. In total 36 (4.0%) patients suffered a PE (all-cause death, n=24; MI, n=12) and 22 (2.4%) an SE (CV death, n=10; MI, n=12). Overall, an abnormal vs a normal FFRCT test result was associated with an increased risk of both the PE, 6.6% vs 2.1%, relative risk (RR): 3.1; 95% CI: 1.6–6.3, p<0.001 and of the SE, 5.0% vs 0.6%, RR: 8.7; 95% CI: non assessable, p<0.001. In patients with abnormal FFRCT, revascularization vs no revascularization did not reduce the risk of the PE or the SE (data not shown). Patients with IR-FFRCT vs CR-FFRCT had a numerical, but not statistical significantly, increased risk of the PE, 8.6% vs 4.2%, RR: 2.14; 95% CI: 0.87–5.26, p=0.10), and an increased risk of the SE, 7.1% vs 2.4%, RR: 3.13; 95% CI: 1.02–9.63, p=0.04, Figure 1. In CR-FFRCT versus normal FFRCT no difference in the risk of the PE or the SE was observed, Figure 1. Univariate sensitivity analyses performed in the IR-FFRCT group did not reveal any differences in the risk of the PE or the SE after adjustment for neither statin therapy at follow-up (−/+), baseline risk variables (< / ≥3), amount of CAC (< / ≥400), degree of stenosis by CTA (< / ≥50%) nor referral to ICA (−/+).

Conclusion

In symptomatic patients with coronary stenosis by CTA, incomplete revascularization determined by FFRCT is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to complete revascularization.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

456Risk of arterial calcification by conventional vitamin K antagonist treatment

Background

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the most frequently prescribed oral anticoagulants worldwide although new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have become an important alternative. VKA inhibits Vitamin K1 necessary to produce coagulation factors but also Vitamin K2, which is essential in the activation of matrix-Gla protein, thought to be a strong local inhibitor of arterial calcifications.

Purpose

The aim was to investigate, whether VKA treatment is associated with coronary artery calcification (CAC) in a population with no prior cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Methods

We collected data on cardiovascular risk factors and CAC scores from cardiac CT scans performed as part of clinical examinations (n=9,672) or research studies (n=14,166) in the period 2007–2017. Data on use of VKA and NOAC was obtained from the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database. The association between VKA treatment duration and categorized CAC score was investigated by ordered logistic regression while adjusting for covariates. The independent variables included in the model were: age, gender, smoking, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and/or statin treatment, family history of CVD, estimated glomerular filtration rate, VKA treatment duration and NOAC treatment duration. The categorisation of CAC was: 0, 1–99, 100–399 and ≥400 AU, corresponding to no, mild, moderate and severe atherosclerotic plaque burden, respectively.

Results

The final study population consisted of 17,254 participants (median 67 years old, 75% males) with no prior CVD, of which 1,748 (10%) and 1,144 (7%) had been treated with VKA or NOAC, respectively. A longer duration of VKA treatment was associated with higher CAC categories (Figure). For each cumulative year of VKA treatment, the odds of being in a higher CAC category, i.e. having more severe atherosclerosis, increased (odds ratio (OR)=1.032, 95% CI 1.009–1.057). All traditional cardiovascular risk factors were also associated with CAC. In contrast, NOAC treatment duration was not associated with CAC category (OR=1.004, 95% CI 0.937–1.075). In a sensitivity analysis of patients without statin treatment (n=12,143), the association between VKA treatment and CAC category remained unchanged. There was no significant interaction between VKA treatment duration and age on CAC category.

Conclusion

Adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, VKA treatment – in contrast to NOAC - is associated with more severe CAC. Additional studies are required to clarify the clinical importance of this association in terms of hard cardiovascular endpoints.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Novo Nordisk Foundation and Independent Research Fund Denmark