A phase III randomized trial of adding topical nitroglycerin to first-line chemotherapy for advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the Australasian lung cancer trials group NITRO trial

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether the substantial benefits of topical nitroglycerin with first-line, platinum-based, doublet chemotherapy in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) seen in a phase II trial could be corroborated in a rigorous, multicenter, phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients starting one of five, prespecified, platinum-based doublets as first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC were randomly allocated treatment with or without nitroglycerin 25 mg patches for 2 days before, the day of, and 2 days after, each chemotherapy infusion. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point.

RESULTS

Accrual was stopped after the first interim analysis of 270 events. Chemotherapy was predominantly with carboplatin and gemcitabine (79%) or carboplatin and paclitaxel (18%). The final analysis included 345 events in 372 participants with a median follow-up of 33 months. Topical nitroglycerin had no demonstrable effect on PFS [median 5.0 versus 4.8 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.32, P = 0.55], overall survival (median 11.0 versus 10.3 months, HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.24, P = 0.94), or objective tumor response (31% versus 30%, relative risk = 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.29, P = 0.81). Headache, hypotension, syncope, diarrhea, dizziness, and anorexia were more frequent in those allocated nitroglycerin.

CONCLUSION

The addition of topical nitroglycerin to carboplatin-based, doublet chemotherapy in NSCLC had no demonstrable benefit and should not be used or pursued further.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12608000588392.

Optimal management of nausea and vomiting in clinical oncology

The exact mechanisms involved in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are not known. Therapies are largely empiric. There is no completely effective single agent or even combination-agent regimen. This paper identifies important factors in selecting antiemetic therapy, particularly the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy and the fact that antiemetic drugs have differing sites of action. Regarding acute emesis, great strides have been made in the 1980s. Anticipatory and delayed symptoms remain a challenge and are a focus of this article. A key in the timing of pharmacologic intervention is pinpointed in each of these situations.

Phase II study of diglycoaldehyde in malignant melanomas and soft tissue sarcomas

A phase II study of diglycoaldehyde was conducted in 42 patients with malignant melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma. All patients received diglycoaldehyde at a dose of 2 g/m2 iv over 6 hours daily for 3 days. This was repeated every 28 days. Major toxic effects included phlebitis and azotemia, requiring dialysis in one patient. Of the 42 patients, 38 were evaluable for response. One objective response occurred in a patient with malignant melanoma. Diglycoaldehyde at this dose and schedule appears to have no role in the management of malignant melanoma or soft tissue sarcoma.