Assessing the potential of nematode metabarcoding for benthic monitoring of offshore oil platforms

Environmental DNA metabarcoding is gaining momentum as a time and cost-effective tool for biomonitoring and environmental impact assessment. Yet, its use as a replacement for the conventional marine benthic monitoring based on morphological analysis of macrofauna is still challenging. Here we propose to study the meiofauna, which is much better represented in sediment DNA samples. We focus on nematodes, which are the most numerous and diverse group of meiofauna. Our aim is to assess the potential of nematode metabarcoding to monitor impacts associated with offshore oil platform activities. To achieve this goal, we used nematode-optimized marker (18S V1V2-Nema) and universal eukaryotic marker (18S V9) region to analyse 252 sediment DNA samples collected near three offshore oil platforms in the North Sea. For both markers, we analysed changes in alpha and beta diversity in relation to distance from the platforms and environmental variables. We also defined three impact classes based on selected environmental variables that are associated with oil extraction activities and used random forest classifiers to compare the predictive performance of both datasets. Our results show that alpha- and beta-diversity of nematodes varies with the increasing distance from the platforms. The variables directly related to platform activity, such as Ba and THC, strongly influence the nematode community. The nematode metabarcoding data provide more robust predictive models than eukaryotic data. Furthermore, the nematode community appears more stable in time and space, as illustrated by the overlap of nematode datasets obtained from the same platform three years apart. A significative negative correlation between distance and Shannon diversity also advocates for higher performance of the V1V2-Nema over the V9. Overall, these results suggest that the sensitivity of nematodes is higher compared to the eukaryotic community. Hence, nematode metabarcoding has the potential to become an effective tool for benthic monitoring in marine environment.

Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding (parallel sequencing of DNA/RNA for identification of whole communities within a targeted group) is revolutionizing the field of aquatic biomonitoring. To date, most metabarcoding studies aiming to assess the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems have focused on water eDNA and macroinvertebrate bulk samples. However, the eDNA metabarcoding has also been applied to soft sediment samples, mainly for assessing microbial or meiofaunal biota. Compared to classical methodologies based on manual sorting and morphological identification of benthic taxa, eDNA metabarcoding offers potentially important advantages for assessing the environmental quality of sediments. The methods and protocols utilized for sediment eDNA metabarcoding can vary considerably among studies, and standardization efforts are needed to improve their robustness, comparability and use within regulatory frameworks. Here, we review the available information on eDNA metabarcoding applied to sediment samples, with a focus on sampling, preservation, and DNA extraction steps. We discuss challenges specific to sediment eDNA analysis, including the variety of different sources and states of eDNA and its persistence in the sediment. This paper aims to identify good-practice strategies and facilitate method harmonization for routine use of sediment eDNA in future benthic monitoring.

Expanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring

Bioindication has become an indispensable part of water quality monitoring in most countries of the world, with the presence and abundance of bioindicator taxa, mostly multicellular eukaryotes, used for biotic indices. In contrast, microbes (bacteria, archaea and protists) are seldom used as bioindicators in routine assessments, although they have been recognized for their importance in environmental processes. Recently, the use of molecular methods has revealed unexpected diversity within known functional groups and novel metabolic pathways that are particularly important in energy and nutrient cycling. In various habitats, microbial communities respond to eutrophication, metals, and natural or anthropogenic organic pollutants through changes in diversity and function. In this review, we evaluated the common trends in these changes, documenting that they have value as bioindicators and can be used not only for monitoring but also for improving our understanding of the major processes in lotic and lentic environments. Current knowledge provides a solid foundation for exploiting microbial taxa, community structures and diversity, as well as functional genes, in novel monitoring programs. These microbial community measures can also be combined into biotic indices, improving the resolution of individual bioindicators. Here, we assess particular molecular approaches complemented by advanced bioinformatic analysis, as these are the most promising with respect to detailed bioindication value. We conclude that microbial community dynamics are a missing link important for our understanding of rapid changes in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, and should be addressed in the future environmental monitoring of freshwater ecosystems.