1
|
Brigante L, Coxon K, Fernandez Turienzo C, Sandall J. "She was there all the time". A qualitative study exploring how women at higher risk for preterm birth experience midwifery continuity of care. Women Birth 2023:S1871-5192(23)00016-1. [PMID: 36682950 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM There is a paucity of research on experiences and views of women at higher risk of preterm birth of midwifery continuity of care. BACKGROUND Midwifery continuity of care (MCoC) has been associated with improved maternal outcomes and with lower levels of preterm births and stillbirths. The majority of MCoC studies have focused on women without risk factors and little has been published on women with obstetric complexities. The aim of this study is to explore the views and experiences of women identified as a higher risk of preterm birth who have had continuity of care from midwives. DESIGN Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews with 16 women identified as at increased risk of preterm birth and experienced continuity of midwifery care across pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. Care had been provided by the pilot intervention group for the pilot study of midwifery practice in preterm birth including women's experiences (POPPIE) trial. FINDINGS Women valued continuity of midwifery care across the care pathway and described the reassurance provided by having 24 h a day, seven days a week access to known midwives. Consistency of care, advocacy and accessibility to the team were described as the main factors contributing to their feelings of safety and control. KEY CONCLUSIONS Recognising that known midwives were 'there all the time' made women feel listened to and actively involved in clinical decision making, which contributed to women feeling less stressed and anxious during their pregnancy, birth and early parenthood. When developing MCoC models for women with obstetric complexities: access, advocacy and time should be embedded to ensure women can build trusting relationships and reduce anxiety levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Brigante
- Department of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; The Royal College of Midwives, London, United Kingdom.
| | - K Coxon
- School of Education, Midwifery and Social Work. Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education. Kingston University, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Fernandez Turienzo
- Department of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Sandall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Relph S, Vieira MC, Copas A, Coxon K, Alagna A, Briley A, Johnson M, Page L, Peebles D, Shennan A, Thilaganathan B, Marlow N, Lees C, Lawlor DA, Khalil A, Sandall J, Pasupathy D, Healey A. Improving antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age fetus: economic evaluation of Growth Assessment Protocol. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:620-631. [PMID: 35797108 PMCID: PMC9828078 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP), as implemented in the DESiGN trial, is cost-effective in terms of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate, when compared with standard care. METHODS This was an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis undertaken from the perspective of a UK National Health Service hospital provider. Thirteen maternity units from England, UK, were recruited to the DESiGN (DEtection of Small for GestatioNal age fetus) trial, a cluster randomized controlled trial. Singleton, non-anomalous pregnancies which delivered after 24 + 0 gestational weeks between November 2015 and February 2019 were analyzed. Probabilistic decision modeling using clinical trial data was undertaken. The main outcomes of the study were the expected incremental cost, the additional number of SGA neonates identified antenatally and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (cost per additional SGA neonate identified) of implementing GAP. Secondary analysis focused on the ICER per infant quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS The expected incremental cost (including hospital care and implementation costs) of GAP over standard care was £34 559 per 1000 births, with a 68% probability that implementation of GAP would be associated with increased costs to sustain program delivery. GAP identified an additional 1.77 SGA neonates per 1000 births (55% probability of it being more clinically effective). The ICER for GAP was £19 525 per additional SGA neonate identified, with a 44% probability that GAP would both increase cost and identify more SGA neonates compared with standard care. The probability of GAP being the dominant clinical strategy was low (11%). The expected incremental cost per infant QALY gained ranged from £68 242 to £545 940, depending on assumptions regarding the QALY value of detection of SGA. CONCLUSION The economic case for replacing standard care with GAP is weak based on the analysis reported in our study. However, this conclusion should be viewed taking into account that cost-effectiveness analyses are always limited by the assumptions made. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Relph
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - M. C. Vieira
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical SciencesSão PauloBrazil
| | - A. Copas
- Centre for Pragmatic Global Health TrialsInstitute for Global Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - K. Coxon
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and EducationKingston and St George's UniversityLondonUK
| | - A. Alagna
- The Guy's & St Thomas' CharityLondonUK
| | - A. Briley
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Caring Futures InstituteCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
| | - M. Johnson
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - L. Page
- West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - D. Peebles
- UCL Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - A. Shennan
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - B. Thilaganathan
- Fetal Medicine UnitSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Molecular & Clinical Sciences Research InstituteSt George's, University of LondonLondonUK
| | - N. Marlow
- UCL Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - C. Lees
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - D. A. Lawlor
- Population Health ScienceBristol Medical School, University of BristolBristolUK
- Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research CentreBristolUK
| | - A. Khalil
- Fetal Medicine UnitSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Molecular & Clinical Sciences Research InstituteSt George's, University of LondonLondonUK
| | - J. Sandall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - D. Pasupathy
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - A. Healey
- Department of Health Service and Population ResearchDavid Goldberg Centre, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fernandez Turienzo C, Bick D, Bollard M, Brigante L, Briley A, Coxon K, Cross P, Healey A, Mehta M, Melaugh A, Moulla J, Seed PT, Shennan AH, Singh C, Tribe RM, Sandall J. POPPIE: protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial of continuity of midwifery care for women at increased risk of preterm birth. Trials 2019; 20:271. [PMID: 31088505 PMCID: PMC6518651 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3352-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High rates of preterm births remain a UK public health concern. Preterm birth is a major determinant of adverse infant and longer-term outcomes, including survival, quality of life, psychosocial effects on the family and health care costs. We aim to test whether a model of care combining continuity of midwife care with rapid referral to a specialist obstetric clinic throughout pregnancy, intrapartum and the postpartum period is feasible and improves experience and outcomes for women at increased risk of preterm birth. Methods This pilot, hybrid, type 2 randomised controlled implementation trial will recruit 350 pregnant women at increased risk of preterm birth to a midwifery continuity of care intervention or standard care. The intervention will be provided from recruitment (antenatal), labour, birth and the postnatal period, in hospital and community settings and in collaboration with specialist obstetric clinic care, when required. Standard care will be the current maternity care provision by NHS midwives and obstetricians at the study site. Participants will be followed up until 6–8 weeks postpartum. The composite primary outcome is the appropriate initiation of any specified interventions related to the prevention and/or management of preterm labour and birth. Secondary outcomes are related to: recruitment and attrition rates; implementation; acceptability to women, health care professionals and stakeholders; health in pregnancy and other complications; intrapartum outcomes; maternal and neonatal postnatal outcomes; psycho-social health; quality of care; women’s experiences and health economic analysis. The trial has 80% power to detect a 15% increase in the rate of appropriate interventions (40 to 55%). The analysis will be by ‘intention to treat’ analysis. Discussion Little is known about the underlying reasons why and how models of midwifery continuity of care are associated with fewer preterm births, better maternal and infant outcomes and more positive experiences; nor how these models of care can be implemented successfully in the health services. This will be the first study to provide direct evidence regarding the effectiveness, implementation and evaluation of a midwifery continuity of care model and rapid access to specialist obstetric services for women at increased risk of preterm birth. Trial registration ISRCTN37733900. Retrospectively registered on 21 August 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Fernandez Turienzo
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - D Bick
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7A, UK
| | - M Bollard
- Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, Lewisham High Street, London, SE13 6HL, UK
| | - L Brigante
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, London, SE1 8WA, UK
| | - A Briley
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - K Coxon
- Department of Midwifery, Kingston University and St. George's, University of London, Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
| | - P Cross
- Department of Public Health, London Borough of Lewisham, Laurence House, London, SE6 4RU, UK
| | - A Healey
- Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Centre, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - M Mehta
- Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, Lewisham High Street, London, SE13 6HL, UK
| | - A Melaugh
- Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Centre, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - J Moulla
- Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, Lewisham High Street, London, SE13 6HL, UK
| | - P T Seed
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - A H Shennan
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - C Singh
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - R M Tribe
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - J Sandall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chevalier A, Coxon K, Chevalier AJ, Clarke E, Rogers K, Brown J, Boufous S, Ivers R, Keay L. Predictors of older drivers' involvement in rapid deceleration events. Accid Anal Prev 2017; 98:312-319. [PMID: 27810673 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Revised: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Rapid deceleration occurs when substantial force slows the speed of a vehicle. Rapid deceleration events (RDEs) have been proposed as a surrogate safety measure. As there is concern about crash involvement of older drivers and the effect of age-related declining visual and cognitive function on driving performance, we examined the relationship between RDEs and older driver's vision, cognitive function and driving confidence, using naturalistic driving measures. Participants aged 75 to 94 years had their vehicle instrumented for 12 months. To minimise the chance of identifying false positives, accelerometer data was processed to identify RDEs with a substantial deceleration of >750 milli-g (7.35m/s2). We examined the incidence of RDEs amongst older drivers, and how this behaviour is affected by differences in age; sex; visual function, cognitive function; driving confidence; and declines over the 12 months. Almost two-thirds (64%) of participants were involved in at least one RDE, and 22% of these participants experienced a meaningful decline in contrast sensitivity during the 12 months. We conducted regression modelling to examine associations between RDEs and predictive measures adjusted for (i) duration of monitoring and (ii) distance driven. We found the rate of RDEs per distance increased with age; although, this did not remain in the multivariate model. In the multivariate model, we found older drivers who experienced a decline in contrast sensitivity over the 12 months and those with lower baseline driving confidence were at increased risk of involvement in RDEs adjusted for distance driven. In other studies, contrast sensitivity has been associated with increased crash involvement for older drivers. These findings lend support for the use of RDEs as a surrogate safety measure, and demonstrate an association between a surrogate safety measure and a decline in contrast sensitivity of older drivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Chevalier
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - K Coxon
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia; School of Science and Health, The University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
| | - A J Chevalier
- Safer Roads Consulting, 53 Lachlan St, Thirroul, NSW, 2515, Australia.
| | - E Clarke
- Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Level 10, Kolling Building 6, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - K Rogers
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - J Brown
- Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Margarete Ainsworth Building, Barker St, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
| | - S Boufous
- Transport and Road Safety Research (TARS), Level 1, West Wing, Old Main Building, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - R Ivers
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - L Keay
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sandall J, Cookson G, Dodwell M, Gibson R, Murrells T, Bewley S, Coxon K, Bick D. PP21 Organisational Influences on Variation in Rates of Caesarean Section Among English NHS Trusts after Accounting for Maternal and Clinical Risk: A Cross-Sectional Study. Br J Soc Med 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-203126.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
6
|
Abstract
This paper provides a European overview of alternative approaches to integrated care for older people, drawing from a wider European project entitled PROCARE. It discusses the structural complexities that create the challenges in integrated care, compares and contrasts approaches to integrated care through a structure and process framework, and considers the place of person‐centred seamless care in European health and social care models.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pons PT, Dinerman N, Rosen P, Dernocoeur K, Coxon K, Marlin R. The field instructor program: quality control of prehospital care, the first step. J Emerg Med 1985; 2:421-7. [PMID: 4086778 DOI: 10.1016/0736-4679(85)90251-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Orientation and evaluation of the new paramedic employee are areas that are frequently overlooked or not performed in a consistent manner. In order to evaluate skills of new employees in a standardized fashion and provide a formal structured orientation, the field instructor program was instituted. Since 1978, 78 people have gone through the program. Sixty-nine (88.5%) successfully completed the course. All of those released in "poor standing" were subsequently dismissed from the paramedic division because of poor medical performance. This program has provided orientation of new paramedics and identified those with serious deficiencies in their practice.
Collapse
|