A Comparative Analysis of Effect of HIV Infection on Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

There is paucity of data on management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive cervical cancer and its clinical outcomes in Indian women. The primary objective of this study was to compare disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) for cervical cancer. The secondary endpoints were toxicity and various factors affecting DFS and OS.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer on histopathology and treated with RT with or without concomitant chemotherapy (CT) at an institution between 2015 and 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. On the basis of HIV serology test, 70 patients were included in each arm, Arm A had HIV-negative patients and Arm B had HIV-positive patients. In both the arms, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in adjuvant or radical setting was given with a total dose of 46-50 Gy to whole pelvis and iliac nodes; 2 Gy/fraction daily as 5 fractions/week by conventional four-field box technique or conformal 3-dimensional radiotherapy (3DCRT) or Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Concurrent cisplatin was administered as weekly 40mg/m2 to patients with ECOG< = 2, creatinine clearance >40mL/min in radical and adjuvant patients as indicated. CD4 counts ≥200 cells/mm3 was a prerequisite for concurrent cisplatin in Arm B. Intracavitary or interstitial brachytherapy was delivered as indicated. Statistical analysis was done using statistical software. Kaplan-Meier method used for all survival analysis. Log rank test was used to calculate statistical significance for various prognostic factors followed by Cox regression test for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median age was 46.5 years (range: 30-76). In Arm A, 62 patients (88.57%) and 5 patients (7.14%) received radical and adjuvant RT. In Arm B 61 patients (87.14%) and 2 patients (2.85%) were given radical and adjuvant RT. 66 patients (94.28%) in Arm A and 52 patients (74.28%) in Arm B received concurrent cisplatin. At a median follow up of 33.8 months (range: 1.2 to 85.4), 2-year DFS was 88.9% for Arm-A and 86.5% for Arm-B (p = 0.134) and 2-year OS was 91.4% and 82.9% for Arm-A and Arm-B (p = 0.001), respectively. Grade III/IV skin toxicity was seen in and 4 patients (5.71%) in Arm A and 12 patients (17.14%) in Arm B (p = 0.34). Grade III/IV gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 2(2.85%) patients and 4(5.7%) patients in Arm A and Arm B respectively (p = 0.40). 14(20%) patients in Arm A and 27(38.5%) patients in Arm B had Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity (p = 0.016). On multivariate analysis, anemia (Hb≤12 gm/dl) and OTT ≥56 days were associated with unfavorable DFS (p = 0.03 and p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01) in Arm B.

CONCLUSION

In view of comparable DFS outcomes in both the arms, HIV-positive cervical cancer patients can be managed with the standard treatment protocol as HIV-negative patients. HIV-positive patients are more likely to experience poorer DFS and OS. However, results need to be validated on prospective study.

Correlation of Dose Volume Parameters with Dysphagia and Pharyngeal Constrictor Muscle Thickness in Dysphagia Optimized IMRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Reduced radiation dose to the pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCM) using dysphagia optimized intensity-modulated RT (DO-IMRT) is associated with improved swallowing outcomes in oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs). Purpose was to evaluate the relationship between dose of radiation delivered and acute dysphagia in patients with OPC treated with IMRT, after delineation of PCM.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Twenty-five patients with newly diagnosed OPC who underwent definitive IMRT with concurrent cisplatin were included in the study. PCM mean dose < 50 Gy was used as the dose constraint. Target volume was divided into high, intermediate and low risk areas receiving doses in the range of 60-66 Gy, 54-58 Gy, 51-56 Gy in 30-33 fractions over 6-6.5 weeks, respectively. PCM dose-volume parameters were collected and logistic regression was used to analyze these data relative to percent weight loss during RT and duration of feeding tube use. Thickness of constrictor muscle in pre-treatment and 3 months post-therapy CT scan were assessed. Weekly assessment of dysphagia was based on RTOG toxicity gradings. Aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between dysphagia grades with dose-volume parameters and PCM thickness.

RESULTS

Median age was 55.0 years (mean 54.3) with 24 males and stage II:III-16:9 patients. Dmean to PCM was 49.86 Gy (range 48.22 -57.63) with median Dmax of 70.24 Gy. For patients with dysphagia (grade ≥1), V50 ranged from 48.2-57.23%, while in those with no dysphagia, it ranged from 47.92-52.18 % (Mean 51.36%). Nine patients needed feeding tube after RT end. Median feeding tube duration was 64 days. The correlation between Dmean ≥ 50 Gy and dysphagia at 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th month was found statistically significant (p < 0.01). Table 1 shows the Pearson correlation and P-value of the dosimetric parameters with dysphagia. The correlation of V50 was found statistically significant with grade of dysphagia at 3rd and 6th month post-treatment (p<0.001). The mean thickness range and median thickness of constrictors before and 3 months after treatment were 1.8-3.2 mm, 2.4 mm, and 2.8-6.2 mm,4.1 mm, respectively. The increase in thickness of constrictor muscle correlated significantly (p<0.05) with dysphagia grades and also with V50, V60 and Dmean (p<0.001) but no statistical significance was seen with Dmax (p = 0.232). With a median follow-up of 18 months (range 7-24), 1-year actuarial local control was 92%.

CONCLUSION

DO-IMRT may prove beneficial in the OPC by preventing dysphagia and aspiration post therapy and hence improving the quality of life of patients. Dmean ≥ 50Gy, V50 > 51.4% and V60 > 35.5% are the parameters correlating significantly with dysphagia (p<0.001) and change in mean thickness of PCM (p<0.001).