[Digital health applications and date protection]

Digital health applications represent a new form of care. The basis for the approval of digital health applications is the Digital Healthcare Act. In order to be included in the directory, the digital health applications must undergo an extensive evaluation process by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices. The focus is on proving added value for care, but also on the technical aspects. This strictly differentiates the digital health applications from the health apps. Cutting-edge apps enable a simple output of collected data to make doctor-patient interactions efficient. Appropriate remuneration and education could increase the acceptance by the medical profession and thus accelerate implementation; however, such instruments and incentives are not currently provided for in the system.

Quality of psoriasis care in Germany - results from the nationwide health care studies PsoHealth 2004-2017

BACKGROUND

In the study series PsoHealth first data from 2004/05 showed a poor quality of health care for psoriasis in Germany. Most patients lacked sufficient care and only a minor proportion received systemic drugs. Since 2007, a national psoriasis programme has been conducted.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To analyse the quality of health care for psoriasis in the most recent PsoHealth4 survey 2016/17, (2) to compare health care quality indicators with prior assessments since 2004/05.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The recent cross-sectional PsoHealth4 survey was conducted 2016/17, and three preceding studies were performed in 2004/05, 2007 and 2013/14, each including at least 1500 patients. The common set of quality indicators included disease severity (PASI and proportion of patients with PASI > 20, indicating high severity), quality of life (DLQI and proportion of patients with DLQI > 10, indicating strong impairments in quality of life), systemic therapy and inpatient treatment of the last five years.

RESULTS

Between December 2015 and December 2017, n = 1827 patients from 93 dermatological centres were included in the most recent survey (mean age: 50.8 ± 14.6 years, 45.2% female). 7.3% showed a PASI > 20, compared to 17.8% in 2004/05. 21.4% reported a DLQI > 10, compared to 34.0% in 2004/05. 57.6% of all participants stated to have received a systemic therapy at least once within the last five years, compared to 32.9% in 2004/05. 18.0% received inpatient hospital treatment at least once within the last five years, compared to 26.9% in 2004/05.

CONCLUSION

A remarkable improvement in the health care quality for psoriasis patients in Germany within the past 12 years can be assumed. Major determinants could be the innovation shift which included programmes such as the S3 guideline, a consensus on treatment goals, national health care goals for psoriasis and higher utilisation of innovative drugs.

Zertifizierung: „Teledermatologie (DDA)“

Telemedizin (E-Health) ist die Verwendung von Telekommunikationstechnologien zum Austausch medizinischer Informationen für Diagnostik, Konsultation, Therapie und Lehre. Das Fachgebiet der Dermatologie eignet sich aufgrund seiner morphologisch-bildbasierten Diagnostik in besonderer Weise für telemedizinische Anwendungen, die als „Teledermatologie“ bezeichnet werden. Diese bieten ein erhebliches Potenzial sowohl für Diagnostik, Prävention, Therapiebegleitung und Nachsorge von Krankheiten der Haut und für den Austausch (Teledermatologisches Konsil) mit anderen Ärzten und Angehörigen der Gesundheitsberufe. Spezifische Fortbildungsangebote für Dermatologen in der Teledermatologie fehlten bisher.

Die Deutsche Dermatologische Akademie (DDA) hat daher mit dem Zertifikat „Teledermatologie (DDA)“ ein wichtiges Fortbildungsangebot auf diesem zukunftsträchtigen Teilgebiet der Dermatologie geschaffen.

Die Fortbildungsinhalte für die Zertifizierung „Teledermatologie (DDA)“ werden flexibel in von der DDA zertifizierten Modulen vermittelt, die insgesamt mindestens 8 Stunden umfassen sollten; diese können im Rahmen dermatologischer Fortbildungsveranstaltungen angeboten werden.

Die Module sollen interaktiv gestaltet sein; bestimmend sind die praxisorientierte Präsentation des Wissens und die kollegiale Diskussion mit ausgewiesenen Experten. Zum Erhalt des Zertifikats ist einmal alle 5 Jahre die Teilnahme an einem Qualitätszirkel (2 Stunden) vorgesehen, in dem aktuelle Entwicklungen komprimiert dargestellt und anhand von Falldiskussionen thematisiert werden.

Patient-reported health outcomes in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer and actinic keratosis: results from a large-scale observational study analysing effects of diagnoses and disease progression

BACKGROUND

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and actinic keratosis (AK) are very common among fair-skinned individuals. A disease continuum from AK to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been frequently postulated. AK and NMSC may influence quality of life (QL) of patients, and it can be suspected that disease progression entails a QL reduction. The purpose of this study was to document QL in patients with NMSC and AK using the health-outcome questionnaire EQ-5D-5L.

METHODS

The study was designed as a non-interventional, prospective, cross-sectional study. Patients with AK, SCC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or multiple diagnoses were enrolled in this study in 29 dermatological centres across Germany. Patients were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L (compromising EQ Index and EQ VAS), and the dermatologists provided diagnosis, disease history and treatment data.

RESULTS

A total of 1184 patients were enrolled and diagnosed as follows: 73% AK, 49% BCC and 17% SCC. 66% had a single diagnosis, 28% two different diagnoses and 6% three different diagnoses. QL was strongly associated with patients' diagnosis. Patients with a single AK diagnosis had significantly higher mean EQ VAS (78) than patients with BCC (74), SCC (72), and BCC plus SCC (69), P < 0.050. When the effects of disease progression were calculated, patients with AK plus SCC reported significantly less mean EQ VAS (71) than patients with a single AK diagnosis (78), P < 0.011.

CONCLUSIONS

While rarely being imminently life-threatening, NMSC and AK have an impact on QL as quantified by the EQ-5D-5L. This impact is associated with diagnosis (AK vs. NMSC) and clinical progression (AK vs. AK plus SCC). Both lead to a clear decline in QL. This shows that disease progression is perceived and judged as detrimental by patients and that AK and NMSC should be diligently treated to preserve and restore QL.

The German National Program on Psoriasis Health Care 2005-2015: results and experiences

In 2005, the first national psoriasis survey in Germany revealed large deficits in health care particularly in patients with moderate to severe disease. The consecutive goal was to improve health care for psoriasis countrywide. For this, a large-scale national program was initiated starting with a comprehensive analysis of structures and processes of care for psoriasis. Patient burden, economic impact and barriers to care were systematically analyzed. In order to optimize routine care, a S3 guideline, a set of outcomes measures and treatment goals, were developed. Implementation was enforced by the German Psoriasis Networks (PsoNet) connecting the most dedicated dermatologists. The annual National Conference on Health Care in Psoriasis established in 2009 consented National Health Care Goals in Psoriasis 2010-2015 and defined a set of quality indicators, which are monitored on a regular basis. Currently 28 regional networks including more than 800 dermatologists are active. Between 2005 and 2014 7 out of 8 quality indicators have markedly improved, and regional disparities were resolved. e.g., mean PASI (Psoriasis Area Severity Index) dropped from 11.4 to 8.1 and DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) from 8.6 to 5.9. A decade of experience indicates that a coordinated nationwide psoriasis program based on goal orientation can contribute to better quality of care and optimized outcomes.

Nickel sensitivity in atopics, psoriatics and healthy subjects

A prospective study of 552 persons was performed to study nickel allergy in atopics, with and without dermatitis, psoriatics and healthy adults. We found no statistically-significant difference in the frequency of nickel allergy between persons with atopic dermatitis, atopics without dermatitis and healthy controls. More females than men gave a history of metal intolerance and gave allergic patch test reactions. A poor correlation between history and patch test reaction was not specific for atopics. Psoriatics had a significantly lower frequency of allergic patch test reactions to nickel than healthy controls or atopics with and without dermatitis. Psoriatics should not be used as controls for atopics in studies of contact dermatitis.