Concordance of three approaches for operationalizing outcome definitions for multidrug-resistant TB

BACKGROUND: The WHO provides standardized outcome definitions for rifampicin-resistant (RR) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB. However, operationalizing these definitions can be challenging in some clinical settings, and incorrect classification may generate bias in reporting and research. Outcomes calculated by algorithms can increase standardization and be adapted to suit the research question. We evaluated concordance between clinician-assigned treatment outcomes and outcomes calculated based on one of two standardized algorithms, one which identified failure at its earliest possible recurrence (i.e., failure-dominant algorithm), and one which calculated the outcome based on culture results at the end of treatment, regardless of early occurrence of failure (i.e., success-dominant algorithm).METHODS: Among 2,525 patients enrolled in the multi-country endTB observational study, we calculated the frequencies of concordance using cross-tabulations of clinician-assigned and algorithm-assigned outcomes. We summarized the common discrepancies.RESULTS: Treatment success calculated by algorithms had high concordance with treatment success assigned by clinicians (95.8 and 97.7% for failure-dominant and success-dominant algorithms, respectively). The frequency and pattern of the most common discrepancies varied by country.CONCLUSION: High concordance was found between clinician-assigned and algorithm-assigned outcomes. Heterogeneity in discrepancies across settings suggests that using algorithms to calculate outcomes may minimize bias.

Barriers to the treatment of childhood tuberculous infection and tuberculosis disease: a qualitative study

SETTING

In 2012, Peru's National TB Program (NTP) reported approximately 2400 incident cases of tuberculosis (TB) disease in children aged <15 years. Peru's TB burden is concentrated in the Lima metropolitan area, particularly in poor districts such as El Agustino and La Victoria, where this study was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To identify barriers to the treatment of childhood tuberculous infection and TB disease in Lima from the perspective of front-line providers and patients' families.

DESIGN

We conducted 10 semi-structured focus groups with 53 purposefully sampled primary care providers, community health workers, and parents/guardians of pediatric TB patients. We also completed nine in-depth interviews with National TB Program administrators and pulmonologists specializing in TB. Two authors performed inductive thematic analysis and identified emerging themes.

RESULTS

Four main treatment barriers emerged from the data: 1) dosing errors, 2) time- and labor-intensive preparation and administration of medications, 3) provider concern that isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) generates isoniazid resistance, and 4) poor adherence to IPT.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the urgent need for child-friendly formulations, provider and parent/guardian education about IPT, and strategies to promote adherence to IPT, including support and supervision by health workers and/or regimens with fewer doses.