Colonic response to laxative ingestion as assessed by MRI differs in constipated irritable bowel syndrome compared to functional constipation

BACKGROUND

Functional constipation (FC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) share many symptoms but underlying mechanisms may be different. We have developed a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique to measure intestinal volumes, transit, and motility in response to a laxative, Moviprep(®) . We aim to use these biomarkers to study the pathophysiology in IBS-C and FC.

METHODS

Twenty-four FC and 24 IBS-C were studied. Transit was assessed using the weighted average position score (WAPS) of five MRI marker pills, taken 24 h before MRI scanning. Following baseline scan, participants ingested 1 L of Moviprep(®) followed by hourly scans. Magnetic resonance imaging parameters and bowel symptoms were scored from 0 to 4 h.

KEY RESULTS

Weighted average position score for FC was 3.6 (2.5-4.2), significantly greater than IBS-C at 2.0 (1.5-3.2), p = 0.01, indicating slower transit for FC. Functional constipation showed greater fasting small bowel water content, 83 (63-142) mL vs 39 (15-70) mL in IBS-C, p < 0.01 and greater ascending colon volume (AC), 314 (101) mL vs 226 (71) mL in IBS-C, p < 0.01. FC motility index was lower at 0.055 (0.044) compared to IBS-C, 0.107 (0.070), p < 0.01. Time to first bowel movement following ingestion of Moviprep(®) was greater for FC, being 295 (116-526) min, compared to IBS-C at 84 (49-111) min, p < 0.01, and correlated with AC volume 2 h after Moviprep(®) , r = 0.44, p < 0.01. Using a cut-off >230 min distinguishes FC from IBS-C with low sensitivity of 55% but high specificity of 95%.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

Our objective MRI biomarkers allow a distinction between FC and IBS-C.

Colon wall motility: comparison of novel quantitative semi-automatic measurements using cine MRI

BACKGROUND

Recently, cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown promise for visualizing movement of the colonic wall, although assessment of data has been subjective and observer dependent. This study aimed to develop an objective and semi-automatic imaging metric of ascending colonic wall movement, using image registration techniques.

METHODS

Cine balanced turbo field echo MRI images of ascending colonic motility were acquired over 2 min from 23 healthy volunteers (HVs) at baseline and following two different macrogol stimulus drinks (11 HVs drank 1 L and 12 HVs drank 2 L). Motility metrics derived from large scale geometric and small scale pixel movement parameters following image registration were developed using the post ingestion data and compared to observer grading of wall motion. Inter and intra-observer variability in the highest correlating metric was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis calculated from two separate observations on a subset of data.

KEY RESULTS

All the metrics tested showed significant correlation with the observer rating scores. Line analysis (LA) produced the highest correlation coefficient of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.55-0.86), p < 0.001 (Spearman Rho). Bland-Altman analysis of the inter- and intra-observer variability for the LA metric, showed almost zero bias and small limits of agreement between observations (-0.039 to 0.052 intra-observer and -0.051 to 0.054 inter-observer, range of measurement 0-0.353).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The LA index of colonic motility derived from cine MRI registered data provides a quick, accurate and non-invasive method to detect wall motion within the ascending colon following a colonic stimulus in the form of a macrogol drink.

Endoscopic evaluation of the gastro-duodenal tolerance of short-term analgesic treatment with 25 mg diclofenac-K liquid capsules

BACKGROUND

Diclofenac-potassium (diclofenac--K) 25 mg liquid capsule is absorbed more quickly than the tablet formulation. It offers potential for rapid pain relief, but may alter gastro-duodenal tolerability.

AIM

To evaluate the gastro-duodenal tolerance of diclofenac-K 25 mg liquid capsules vs. diclofenac-K 12.5 mg tablets, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 500 mg tablets and ibuprofen 200 mg liquid capsules.

METHODS

In an endoscopist-blinded, randomised, parallel-group study, volunteers received 15 doses of diclofenac-K 25 mg liquid capsules (n = 36), diclofenac-K 2 × 12.5 mg tablets (n = 36), ibuprofen 2 × 200 mg liquid capsules (n = 24) or ASA 2 × 500 mg tablets (n = 36) over 5 days. The primary outcome was the incidence of erosive gastro-duodenal lesions at Day 6. Secondary outcomes included modified Lanza score and change in gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis.

RESULTS

The lowest incidence of erosive gastro-duodenal lesions was with diclofenac-K liquid capsules (53%), compared to 61% with diclofenac-K tablets (P = 0.52), 75% with ibuprofen (P = 0.08) and 94% with ASA (P = 0.001). Results were similar for the Lanza scores, although diclofenac-K liquid capsules were significantly superior to ibuprofen liquid capsules (P = 0.04). Diclofenac-K liquid capsules inhibited prostaglandin synthesis by 52% compared to 64% for diclofenac-K tablets (P = 0.10), 50% for ibuprofen (P = 0.85) and 79% for ASA (P = 0.002). With respect to safety, adverse events were most frequent in the ASA group, predominantly gastrointestinal events.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucosal injury with diclofenac-K liquid 25 mg liquid capsules was similar to diclofenac-K 25 mg tablets, significantly lower than ASA 1 g tablets and showed some superiority over ibuprofen 400 mg liquid capsules (EudraCT Number 2009-011278-14).

Narrow-band imaging with magnification in Barrett's esophagus: validation of a simplified grading system of mucosal morphology patterns against histology

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Validation of a simplified classification of mucosal morphology in prediction of histology in Barrett's esophagus using narrow-band imaging with magnification (NBI-Z) and assessing its reproducibility by endoscopists experienced in the use of NBI (NBI-experts) and by endoscopists who were new to NBI (non-NBI-experts).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective cohort study of 109 patients with Barrett's esophagus at a single tertiary referral center, mucosal patterns visualized in Barrett's esophagus on NBI-Z were classified into four easily distinguishable types: A, round pits with regular microvasculature; B, villous/ridge pits with regular microvasculature; C, absent pits with regular microvasculature; D, distorted pits with irregular microvasculature. The NBI-Z grading was compared with the final histopathological diagnosis, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated. The reproducibility of the grading was then assessed by NBI-expert and non-NBI-expert endoscopists, and interobserver and intraobserver agreement were calculated using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Per-biopsy analysis: In 903 out of 1021 distinct areas (87.9%) the NBI-Z grading corresponded to the histological diagnosis. Per-patient analysis: The PPV and NPV for type A pattern (columnar mucosa without intestinal metaplasia) were 100% and 97% respectively; for types B and C (intestinal metaplasia) they were 88% and 91% respectively, and for type D (high-grade dysplasia) 81% and 99% respectively. Inter- and intraobserver agreement: The mean kappa values in assessing the various patterns were 0.71 and 0.87 in the non-expert group; 0.78 and 0.91 in the expert group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has validated a simplified classification of the various morphologic patterns visualized in Barrett's esophagus and confirmed its reproducibility when used by NBI-expert and non-NBI-expert endoscopists.