Abstract P4-01-03: Withdrawn

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Citation Format: Di Cosimo S, Appierto V, Pizzamiglio S, Baselga J, Piccart M, Huober J, Izquierdo M, de la Pena L, Hilbers F, de Azambuja E, Untch M, Pusztai L, Pritchard KI, Nuciforo P, Salomon AV, Symmans FW, Apolone G, de Braud F, Verderio P, Daidone MG. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-03.

Abstract PD6-04: Lifestyle intervention study (LISA) in early breast cancer (BC): An RCT of the effects of a telephone-based weight loss intervention (with educational materials) vs educational materials alone on disease-free survival (DFS)

Background: Obesity has been associated with poor BC outcomes. We investigated whether a standardized, telephone-based weight loss lifestyle intervention in recently diagnosed BC patients would lower recurrence and death rates.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter RCT comparing mail-based educational material alone (control arm) or combined with a standardized, telephone-based lifestyle intervention (19 calls over 2 years, (intervention arm) that focused on diet (500-100 kcal/day deficit), physical activity (150-200 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week) and behavior (compliance, relapse prevention) to achieve up to 10% weight loss. 338 (of 2150 planned) T1-3, N0-3, M0 ER/PgR+ BC patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m2 receiving adjuvant letrozole were randomized Aug 2007 to Jan 2010 (enrolment ended due to funding loss). Primary outcome was DFS; secondary outcome OS. Weight loss (5.3 vs 0.7% at 6 months and 3.6 vs 0.4% at 24 months in the intervention vs control arms, respectively) has been reported (JCO 2014;32:2331). At 8 years median follow-up (May 2018), DFS and OS were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results: Mean age was 61.6 vs 60.4 years, mean BMI 31.4 vs 31.0 kg/m2 and adjuvant chemotherapy was received by 56.1 vs 57.5% in intervention vs controls arms respectively. T1/T2/T3 66.7/27.5/5.9% vs 61.7/33.5/3.6% and N0/1/2+ 62.6/28.7/8.8 vs 63.5/32.3/4.2% in intervention vs controls arms respectively. HER2+ in 8.8 vs 15.0% (intervention vs control). 20 of 171 (11.7%) in the lifestyle intervention arm vs 30 of 167 (18.0%) in the mail-based arm had DFS events, HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.41-1.24, p=0.23). DFS curves separated at 2 yrs; beyond 3-3.5 yrs separation approximated 5%. In a landmark DFS analysis of women alive at 24 months, DFS HR=0.68 (0.34-1.37, p=0.28).

Conclusions: We identified fewer DFS events in the lifestyle intervention arm. Although loss of funding reduced sample size and lowered power, these results are consistent with a potential beneficial effect of a lifestyle intervention on DFS in postmenopausal ER/PgR+ BC patients. They provide strong support for completion of ongoing RCTs (e.g. BWEL) that will provide definitive evidence regarding the effect of lifestyle based weight loss on BC outcomes.

Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Sponsored by the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group

Citation Format: Goodwin PJ, Segal R, Vallis M, Ligibel JA, Pond GR, Robidoux A, Findlay BP, Gralow JR, Mukherjee SD, Levine MN, Pritchard KI. Lifestyle intervention study (LISA) in early breast cancer (BC): An RCT of the effects of a telephone-based weight loss intervention (with educational materials) vs educational materials alone on disease-free survival (DFS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-04.

Abstract GS4-07: Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial

Background: Black race is associated with worse outcomes in localized hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer in population-based and in clinical trial cohorts, whether using self-identified race (Albain et al. JNCI 2009 [PMID: 19584328; Sparano et al. JNCI 2012 [PMID: 22250182) or genetically-identified race (Schneider et al. J Precision Oncol 2017 [PMID: 29333527]). This disparity persists after adjustment for treatment delivery parameters (Hershman et al. JCO 2009 [PMID:19307504]). We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment delivered and clinical outcomes in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) by race and ethnicity (Sparano et al. NEJM 2018 [PMID: 29860917]).

Methods: The analysis included 9719 evaluable TAILORx participants. The association between clinical outcomes and race (white, black, Asian, other/unknown) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic) was examined, including invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free interval (DRFI), relapse-free interval (RFI), and overall survival (OS). Proportional hazards models were fit including age (5 categories), tumor size (>2 cm vs. <=2 cm), histologic grade (high vs. medium vs. low vs. unknown), continuous recurrence score (RS), race, and ethnicity in the overall population and randomized treatment arms in the RS 11-25 cohort.

Results: The study population included 8189 (84%) whites, 693 (7%) blacks, 405 (4%) Asians, and 432 (4%) with other/unknown race. Regarding ethnicity, 7635 (79%) were non-Hispanic, 889 (9%) Hispanic, and 1195 (12%) unknown. There was no significant difference in RS distribution (p=0.22) in blacks compared with whites, or in median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (19.1 vs. 18.2). There was likewise no difference in Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic ethnicity for RS distribution (p=0.72) or median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (18.5 vs. 18.0). Black race (39% vs. 30%) and Hispanic ethnicity (39% vs. 30%) were both associated with younger age (</=50 years) at diagnosis. The use and type of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and duration of endocrine therapy, were similar in black (vs. white) and Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic) populations. In proportional hazards models, black race (compared with white race) was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the entire population and in those with a RS 11-25 (see table). Hispanic ethnicity was generally associated with better outcomes (compared with non-Hispanic ethnicity). For the cohort with a RS of 11-25, there was no evidence for chemotherapy benefit for any racial or ethnic group.

Race (black vs.white) and clinical outcomes in proportional hazards modelsClinical endpointEntire Population (N=693 black) Hazard ratio for eventRS 11-25 (N=471 black) Hazard ratio for eveniDFS1.33 (p=0.005)1.49 (p=0.001)DRFI1.21 (p=0.28)1.60 (p=0.02)RFI1.39 (p=0.02)1.80 (p<0.001)OS1.52 (p=0.005)1.67 (p=0.003

Conclusions: In patients eligible and selected for participation in TAILORx, black women had worse clinical outcomes despite similar 21-gene assay RS results and comparable systemic therapy. This adds to an emerging body of evidence suggesting a biologic basis or other factors contributing to racial disparities in HR-positive breast cancer that requires further evaluation.

Citation Format: Albain K, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Hayes DF, Geyer, Jr. CE, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson, Jr. JA, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge, Jr. GW. Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-07.

Cognitive effects of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a 1-year longitudinal study

PURPOSE

Evidence suggests endocrine therapy (ET) for breast cancer (BC) has adverse cognitive effects, but its specific effects on older women are unknown. This is despite the fact that older women are at increased risk of both breast cancer (BC) and cognitive decline relative to younger women. This study prospectively examined the cognitive effects of ET in a cohort of older BC patients. Our primary outcome measure was change in verbal memory, the cognitive domain most consistently affected by estrogen deprivation.

METHODS

Forty-two chemotherapy-naïve women age 60+, without dementia and recently diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive BC, completed neuropsychological tests at the time of ET initiation and after 1 year of treatment. Change in age-standardized verbal memory performance was examined using paired t tests. To assess a broader range of potential cognitive effects, we also examined changes in visual memory, processing speed, frontal executive function, and perceptual reasoning.

RESULTS

Participants exhibited significant decline from baseline to 1 year in verbal memory (p = 0.01). This decline was small to moderate in effect size (d = - 0.40). Performance on other domains did not change significantly over the year (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest potentially detrimental effects of ET on verbal memory in older women after just 1 year of treatment. Given that ET is prescribed for courses of 5 to 10 years, additional studies examining longer-term effects of treatment in older women are critical.

Abstract P2-10-01: Validation that a histone gene signature predicts anthracycline response in early breast cancer

Background: The use of anthracycline-based chemotherapies has improved overall and disease free survival in breast cancer. However, anthracyclines can have significant toxicities including cardiotoxicity and leukemia. It is, therefore, imperative to identify those patients who will benefit from adjuvant anthracycline treatment and patients who could be spared unnecessary toxicities and be considered for alternative adjuvant therapy. Previous work performed by our laboratory identified a histone gene expression signature as a predictive marker of anthracycline benefit in the BR9601 clinical trial. In this study we validate the 18 histone gene signature in the MA.5 clinical trial and examine the role of the signature in individual intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer.

Methods We analysed the CCTG MA.5 clinical trial in a prospectively planned retrospective biomarker approach to validate this signature and tested the role of intrinsic subtyping as predictive markers of anthracycline benefit. RNA was extracted from patients in the MA.5 adjuvant trial evaluating the addition of epirubicin (E) to CMF and analysed using NanoString technology. Log-rank analyses validated the predictive values of the signature on distant relapse-free survival (DRFS). Cox-regression models tested independent predictive value on DRFS in the presence of treatment, age, tumour size, nodal status, HER2, ER status and grade, and treatment by marker interactions.

Results Analysis of the MA.5 clinical cohort revealed that patients whose tumour had low histone gene signature expression experienced increased DRFS (HR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76, p=0.001) when treated with CEF compared with patients treated with CMF alone. Conversely, there was no apparent benefit of CEF vs CMF in patients with high histone gene expression signature (HR: 1.01, 95%CI 0.66-1.55, p=0.963). After multivariate analysis and adjustment for HER2, nodal status, age, grade and ER, the treatment by marker interaction for the gene signature was 0.54 (95%CI 0.31-0.94, p=0.030) for DRFS.

The predictive impact of the histone signature was independent of intrinsic subtype.

Conclusion The histone gene expression signature is an independent predictor of anthracycline benefit and could be a potential candidate diagnostic assay for patients with early breast cancer.

Citation Format: Spears M, Kornaga E, Lyttle N, Liao L, Bayani J, Quintayo M-A, Yao CQ, D'Costa A, Boutros PC, Twelves CJ, Pritchard KI, Levine MN, Nielsen TO, Shepherd L, Bartlett JMS. Validation that a histone gene signature predicts anthracycline response in early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-01.

Abstract P2-10-04: Targeted sequencing in early breast cancer: Identification of novel candidate mutations predictive of anthracycline benefit

Background The use of chemotherapies such as anthracyclines and taxanes have improved overall and disease free survival in breast cancer. For all patients, anthracyclines can have significant toxicities including cardiotoxicity and leukemia. It is therefore essential to select the subset of patients who will receive the optimal overall benefit from anthracycline therapy and to identify molecular pathways driving resistance. To fully understand the impact of mutations in the context of current breast cancer therapy, requires a comprehensive mapping of key molecular events in the context of treatment. We sequenced 101 genes, that were prioritized based on not only gene frequency, but also taking into account the importance of amino acid substitution, type of mutation and network connectivity, in 692 primary tumours to both identify driver genes and pathway cassettes and to understand their clinical significance in response to anthracycline treatment.

Methods We performed targeted sequencing in patients from the BR9601 (n=374) and CCTG MA.5 (n=703) clinical trials. The BR9601 and MA.5 clinical trials examined the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy consisting of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) with or without epirubicin. DNA was extracted, samples were sequenced using AmpliSeq Technology adapted to Illumina and somatic mutations were called using a novel mutation calling pipeline (ISOWN). A priori analyses were performed using distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) as the primary endpoint.

Results: In 692 successfully analysed samples 509 (73.6%) samples exhibited at least one single nucleotide mutation (range 0-54). 94/101 genes were mutated in at least one patient. Only variants in PIK3CA, TP53, CDH1, TLE6, MLL3 and USH2A were detected in 5% or more of samples. TSC22D1, RB1 and ZNF565 were associated with increased risk of distant relapse in multivariate analyses corrected for clinic-pathological variables. No single genes were predictive of anthracycline treatment compared to CMF in multivariate analyses corrected for clinic-pathological variables. Signaling cassettes/modules were designed based on the pathway database, Reactome. Within the signaling cassettes one module was predictive of anthracycline failure. Patients with one or more mutations in this module had an increased risk of distant relapse (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.95, p=0.034) when treated with an anthracycline containing chemotherapy regimen compared to CMF (HR 1.34 95% CI 1.05-1.72, p=0.019).

Conclusions: We successfully performed a signaling pathway-based targeted sequencing analysis within predefined signaling modules. We identified a single signaling cassette linked to anthracycline resistance in early breast cancer. However, further work to validate this study in a separate clinical trial is warranted.

Citation Format: Spears M, Kalatskaya I, Trinh QM, Liao L, Chong TM, Crozier C, Dion D, Heisler L, Timms L, Stein LD, Pritchard KI, Levine MN, Shepherd L, Twelves CJ, Bartlett JMS. Targeted sequencing in early breast cancer: Identification of novel candidate mutations predictive of anthracycline benefit [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-04.

Impact of baseline BMI and weight change in CCTG adjuvant breast cancer trials

Background

We hypothesized that increased baseline BMI and BMI change would negatively impact clinical outcomes with adjuvant breast cancer systemic therapy.

Methods

Data from chemotherapy trials MA.5 and MA.21; endocrine therapy MA.12, MA.14 and MA.27; and trastuzumab HERA/MA.24 were analyzed. The primary objective was to examine the effect of BMI change on breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) landmarked at 5 years; secondary objectives included BMI changes at 1 and 3 years; BMI changes on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS); and effects of baseline BMI. Stratified analyses included trial therapy and composite trial stratification factors.

Results

In pre-/peri-/early post-menopausal chemotherapy trials (N = 2793), baseline BMI did not impact any endpoint and increased BMI from baseline did not significantly affect BCFI (P = 0.85) after 5 years although it was associated with worse BCFI (P = 0.03) and DSS (P = 0.07) after 1 year. BMI increase by 3 and 5 years was associated with better DSS (P = 0.01; 0.01) and OS (P = 0.003; 0.05). In pre-menopausal endocrine therapy trial MA.12 (N = 672), patients with higher baseline BMI had worse BCFI (P = 0.02) after 1 year, worse DSS (P = 0.05; 0.004) after 1 and 5 years and worse OS (P = 0.01) after 5 years. Increased BMI did not impact BCFI (P = 0.90) after 5 years, although it was associated with worse BCFI (P = 0.01) after 1 year. In post-menopausal endocrine therapy trials MA.14 and MA.27 (N = 8236), baseline BMI did not significantly impact outcome for any endpoint. BMI change did not impact BCFI or DSS after 1 or 3 years, although a mean increased BMI of 0.3 was associated with better OS (P = 0.02) after 1 year. With the administration of trastuzumab (N = 1395) baseline BMI and BMI change did not significantly impact outcomes.

Conclusions

Higher baseline BMI and BMI increases negatively affected outcomes only in pre-/peri-/early post-menopausal trial patients. Otherwise, BMI increases similar to those expected in healthy women either did not impact outcome or were associated with better outcomes.

Clinical Trials numbers

CAN-NCIC-MA5; National Cancer Institute (NCI)-V90-0027; MA.12-NCT00002542; MA.14-NCT00002864; MA.21-NCT00014222; HERA, NCT00045032;CAN-NCIC-MA24; MA-27-NCT00066573.

Cognitive sequelae of endocrine therapy in women treated for breast cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Evidence suggests anti-estrogen endocrine therapy (ET) is associated with adverse cognitive effects; however, findings are based on small samples and vary in the cognitive abilities affected. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively synthesize the evidence.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched in November 2016. Fourteen studies totaling 911 BC patients on aromatase inhibitors (AIs) or tamoxifen (TAM) and 911 controls (i.e., non-cancer controls and BC controls not using ET) were included. Neuropsychological tests were categorized into six domains. Effect sizes were computed to compare (1) ET patients versus controls and (2) TAM patients versus AI patients.

RESULTS

In cross-sectional comparisons, ET patients performed worse than control groups on verbal learning/memory, visual learning/memory, frontal executive function, and processing speed, but did not differ on psychomotor efficiency or visuospatial function. Subgroup analyses revealed that verbal learning/memory was the only domain where ET patients performed worse than both non-cancer and BC controls. In other domains, ET patients and BC controls performed equivalently. Regarding change from pre-treatment performance, ET patients did not differ from controls on any domain. TAM and AI patients did not from one another differ overall; however, subgroup analyses indicated that TAM patients performed better than non-steroidal AI patients on several domains, but showed few performance differences relative to steroidal AI patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Verbal learning/memory was the only domain where ET patients performed worse than both non-cancer and BC controls, suggesting specific adverse effects on this domain. Additional studies assessing change from pre-treatment performance and differences between steroidal and non-steroidal AIs are warranted.

Palbociclib in hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: A cost-utility analysis

INTRODUCTION

The addition of palbociclib to letrozole improves progression-free survival in the first-line treatment of hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study assesses the cost-utility of palbociclib from the Canadian healthcare payer perspective.

METHODS

A probabilistic discrete event simulation (DES) model was developed and parameterised with data from the PALOMA 1 and 2 trials and other sources. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-month (QALM) gained for palbociclib was calculated. A time horizon of 15 years was used in the base case with costs and effectiveness discounted at 5% annually. Time-to- progression and time-to-death were derived from a Weibull and exponential distribution. Expected costs were based on Ontario fees and other sources. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for parameter uncertainty.

RESULTS

Compared to letrozole, the addition of palbociclib provided an additional 14.7 QALM at an incremental cost of $161,508. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $10,999/QALM gained. Assuming a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $4167/QALM, the probability of palbociclib to be cost-effective was 0%. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves derived from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at a WTP of $11,000/QALM gained, the probability of palbociclib to be cost-effective was 50%.

CONCLUSION

The addition of palbociclib to letrozole is unlikely to be cost-effective for the treatment of ABC from a Canadian healthcare perspective with its current price. While ABC patients derive a meaningful clinical benefit from palbociclib, considerations should be given to increase the WTP threshold and reduce the drug pricing, to render this strategy more affordable.

Abstract P6-09-30: Factors influencing survival among patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with Trastuzumab

Background: We have limited capability to predict survival among patients treated for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. Individual patient survival varies and further research is warranted to identify significant prognostic and predictive factors influencing overall survival (OS).

Methods: We identified HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab (T) at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (SOCC) from 1999-2013 through a Cancer Care Ontario Registry (n=256) and selected patients with pathology also available at SOCC (n=154). A retrospective chart review was completed documenting clinical, pathologic, laboratory and survival outcomes. OS was defined as date of 1st T therapy to death. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Cox proportional hazards regression models and log-rank tests were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Logarithmic transformations were performed for statistical purposes. Multivariable models were constructed including known prognostic factors: 1) number of visceral metastatic sites and 2) CNS metastasis. After adjusting for these two factors, stepwise selection was used to create an optimal model for additional factors. Analyses were two-sided and statistical significance was defined at the p=0.05 level.

Results: Cohort characteristics: mean age was 55 (SD: 13 years), ≥2 sites of visceral metastasis: 45%, CNS metastasis: 7%, ER positive: 53%. Median OS for the cohort was 24 months (95% CI: 21-33). Clinical factors recorded at metastatic presentation such as the presence of a visceral metastasis, having multiple sites of visceral metastasis and CNS metastasis were prognostic for overall survival in univariate models (p<0.05). ER/PR status was not of significance (p>0.05). Laboratory measures such as the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were of significance in univariate models (p=<0.05). The multivariable model identified older age (HR=1.18 / decade, 95% CI=1.02-1.37, p=0.030), higher PLR (HR=1.75 / log-unit, 95% CI=1.25-2.46, p=0.001), increased ALP (HR=1.87 / log-unit, 95% CI=1.41-2.49, p<0.001) and ER positivity (HR=0.63, 95% CI=0.42-0.96, p=0.032), as significant prognostic factors in addition to the presence of CNS metastasis (HR=3.19, 95% CI=1.59-6.38, p=0.001) and two or more metastatic sites (HR=2.10, 95% CI=1.19-3.70, p=0.010).

Conclusion: Our results have identified a number of prognostic factors influencing survival among patient with HER2+ breast cancer treated with T. Age, ALP, PLR and ER status were identified as significant prognostic factors after adjusting for presence of CNS metastasis and number of metastatic sites. Further study of PLR as a prognostic and predictive factor is warranted.

Citation Format: Blanchette PS, Desautels DN, Pond G, Bartlett JMS, Nofech-Mozes S, Yaffe M, Pritchard KI. Factors influencing survival among patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with Trastuzumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-30.

Abstract PD7-07: Discovery of molecular predictors of late breast cancer specific events (BCSE) in ER+, node+ breast cancer – new transcriptome expression whole gene analysis of the phase III adjuvant trial SWOG S8814

BACKGROUND: Unique genes and pathways were identified for prognosis on tamoxifen (T, 5 yrs) and prediction on CAF-T vs T in S8814 using whole transcriptome RNA-Seq from archival FFPE tissue. (Albain, et al; Cherbavaz, et al; SABCS 2015) Discovery was robust for early DFS events but sparse for late. The aims of this new analysis were to 1) utilize a new endpoint BCSE for gene discovery of late events, prognosis and prediction and 2) add intronic counts to the previous exonic results to define whole genes impacting on late BCSE.

METHODS: Charts of patients (pts) on CAF-T (212) vs T (142) were reviewed to define the BCSE endpoint (local/regional, contralateral, distant). Deaths without BC were treated as competing risks. BCSE models (including metagenes) of late prognosis and prediction used cumulative incidence functions. Consolidated intronic regions counts within genes were added to exonic regions counts. Using these “whole gene” (WG) counts, association of gene expression with time to BCSE was assessed by Cox regression. A multiple WG score (MWGS) for BCSE prognosis beyond 5 yrs (to 12.5 yrs) was constructed and evaluated for 1-3 and 4+ node (N) groups. False discovery rate was controlled at 10%.

RESULTS: More exons and WG were discovered for prognosis on T alone over 12.5 yrs with the BCSE endpoint than DFS. For prognosis of late BCSE after 5 yrs, more genes were discovered using WG (n=111) than by exons (n=9). There were significantly fewer genes for late BCSE on CAF-T (8, WG; 0, exons). The functions of WG prognostic for late BCSE were: cell cycle/proliferation-26 genes, chromosome segregation/mitotic spindle-22, DNA repair/maintenance-10, transcriptional/translational control-5, cell adhesion/migration-4, immune-3, diverse/unknown-32 and growth factor/hormone receptor signaling-9 (this group was only found by WGs, not exons). Of these 111 WG, a MWGS prognostic for late BCSE on T used 57 previously discovered genes pre-specified for this analysis. Probability of BCSE beyond 5 yrs for low vs high MWGS was 8% vs 21% in N1-3+ and 17% vs 42% in N4+. Late prognosis on T differed by low vs high risk defined in a metagene model: cumulative BCSE at year 10 was 0% vs 47% (low vs high risk, p=0.001). Prediction of 10-yr incidence of BCSE varied by risk level by treatment in a metagene model: low risk- CAF-T=47%, T=0% (p=0.045); high risk- CAF-T=35%, T=45% (p=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS: Gene discovery for prognosis of late BCSE is enhanced with a novel WG transcriptome expression approach. Use of chemotherapy (CT) before T significantly attenuated gene discovery, so that molecular tools for decisions on extending endocrine therapy (ET) may not be reliable in a setting of prior CT. Some pts on ET for 5 yrs may not require either longer ET or CT, given a N+ cohort was defined with no BCSE observed over 12.5 yrs. For prediction of CT benefit, CAF-T appeared to be inferior to T in a low risk metagene model for BCSE. In sum, these results add more evidence that ET alone may be sufficient (perhaps better) in select N+ settings. Validation in SWOG S1007 (RxPONDER) is planned.

SUPPORT: NCI CA180888, 180819, 180821, 180820, 180863; in part, Genomic Health, Inc.

Citation Format: Albain KS, Crager MR, Barlow WE, Baehner FL, Bergamaschi A, Rae JM, Ravdin PM, Tripathy D, Gralow JR, Livingston RB, Osborne CK, Ingle JN, Pritchard KI, Davidson NE, Carey LA, Cherbavaz DB, Sing AP, Shak S, Hortobagyi GN, Hayes DF. Discovery of molecular predictors of late breast cancer specific events (BCSE) in ER+, node+ breast cancer – new transcriptome expression whole gene analysis of the phase III adjuvant trial SWOG S8814 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-07.

New onset vasomotor symptoms but not musculoskeletal symptoms associate with clinical outcomes on extended adjuvant letrozole - Analyses from NCIC CTG MA.17

PURPOSE

New onset symptoms on adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for hormone receptor positive early breast cancer may associate with clinical outcomes. We performed this exploratory analysis of the association of new onset musculoskeletal (MSK) and vasomotor (VM) symptoms with clinical outcomes in the NCIC CTG MA.17 trial 5 years of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole after tamoxifen.

METHODS

Symptoms were collected at baseline, 1, 6, and every 12 months on study. Multivariate Cox Models adjusting for age, nodal status, duration of tamoxifen and prior chemotherapy were used to compare disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) based on data collected before, and after, the unblinding between women with VM or MSK symptoms and those without.

RESULTS

Data post-unblinding showed new VM symptoms on extended letrozole significantly improved DFS and DDFS when occurring 1 month (DFS HR 0.52, 95% CI, 0.28-0.96; p = 0.04; DDFS HR 0.49, 95% CI, 0.24-0.99; p = 0.046) and 6 months (DFS HR 0.43, 95% CI, 0.24-0.78; p = 0.006; DDFS HR 0.44, 95% CI, 0.22-0.85; p = 0.02) after treatment initiation. Those with new VM symptoms at 12 months also had a significantly better DFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26, 0.84; P = 0.01) and a trend in improved DDFS. Only a trend to improved OS was found for those with VM symptoms 6 month after treatment. No significant improvement was found for those with new MSK symptoms at any time point or for any endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

New onset VM symptoms with extended letrozole may be useful in predicting treatment benefit.

Abstract P5-12-02: Effect of 5 vs 2.5 mg/day letrozole on residual estrogen levels in post-menopausal women with high BMI - A prospective crossover study

Background: Some studies have suggested that women with high BMI have less benefit from aromatase inhibitors (AI) vs. tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. One possible mechanism for this observation is that complete suppression of estrogen is not achieved in these women with the standard flat dose of AI. We evaluated whether a doubling of letrozole to 5 mg/day for 4 weeks affected residual estrogen levels in this population.

Methods: Post-menopausal women with early breast cancer and BMI>25 already taking adjuvant letrozole for at least 3 months were recruited from medical oncology clinics at 4 sites in Toronto, Canada. Fasting blood samples were collected 24 hours following the last dose at baseline (routine use of own letrozole), after 28 days of monitored adherence to a provided supply of letrozole (Femara) 2.5 mg/day (Part A), and after an additional 28 days of letrozole (Femara) 5 mg/day (Part B). Symptom/quality of life questionnaires were completed at the same timepoints. Estradiol and estrone were measured using a high sensitivity liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. One interim analysis for futility and efficacy was planned after 31 eligible patients had completed the study, using estradiol and O'Brien-Fleming boundaries with an inner wedge.

Results: 36 patients were enrolled and started on study, and 31 eligible patients completed Parts A and B. The 5 non-completers withdrew because of adverse events (n=4, unlikely related to drug) or withdrawal of consent (n=1). Median age was 62 (range 48 to 77) and BMI 28.3 kg/m2 (Range 25.2 to 42.2 kg/m2). One patient had non-postmenopausal estrogen levels at Day 29 and Day 57 and one patient's blood assay was unsuccessful; both were excluded from further analyses. The predetermined stopping rule for futility was met. Estradiol levels (mean±standard deviation) changed from 2.68±0.40 pg/mL at baseline to 2.67±0.59 pg/mL at Day 29 to 2.70±0.53 pg/mL at Day 57. Mean change from Day 29 to Day 57 was 0.03±0.48 pg/mL (95% confidence interval -0.15 to 0.21 pg/mL). Four patients reported new or increased arthralgias (to NCI CTCAE Grade 2 or 3) while taking letrozole 5 mg/day in Part B. There was no association between changes in estradiol levels and either study non-completion or the development of arthralgias. Estrone results were similar.

Conclusion: Increasing letrozole from 2.5 to 5 mg/day did not further suppress estrogen levels in women with BMI>25. It is unlikely that letrozole dosing tailored to body size would improve clinical outcomes. The letrozole 5 mg/day intervention was terminated based on the results of the interim analysis for futility.

Citation Format: Cescon DW, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Townsley C, Warr D, Elser C, Rao L, Stambolic V, Sridhar S, Goodwin PJ. Effect of 5 vs 2.5 mg/day letrozole on residual estrogen levels in post-menopausal women with high BMI - A prospective crossover study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-02.

Abstract S3-02: Molecular predictors of outcome on adjuvant CAF plus tamoxifen (T) vs T in postmenopausal patients (pts) with ER+, node+ breast cancer – Transcriptome expression analysis of the phase III trial SWOG-8814

BACKGROUND: In SWOG-8814A, pts with ER+ node+ breast cancer and low 21 gene recurrence scores (RS) had good prognosis and no CAF benefit, but high RS predicted longer survival from CAF followed by T (CAF-T) vs T (Albain, Lancet Oncol 2010). The aims of SWOG-8814B were to identify novel genes and networks for 1) prognosis of early and late relapse and 2) prediction of CAF benefit, using whole transcriptome expression analysis with next generation RNA sequencing (NGS).

METHODS: Stored RNA previously extracted for SWOG-8814A (T, CAF-T arms; T, 5 yrs) was analyzed for RNA/library yield (see companion abstract Cherbavaz et al. for methods). Genes were sequenced and expression of mRNA species was related to disease-free survival (DFS) using Cox proportional hazards. Discovery analyses controlled false discovery rate (FDR) at 10%. Genes were identified for prognosis on T and prediction on CAF-T vs T. Networks of genes/pathways were explored. Early (0-5 yrs) and late (5-13+ yrs) time periods were studied. Gene Ontology, Cytoscape, pathway and hierarchical clustering were used for functional gene and metagene analyses.

RESULTS: Of 367 samples, 354 (96%; 142 T, 212 CAF-T; 141 DFS events) had sufficient RNA/library yield, with 20,101 genes sequenced. For prognosis on T, there were 2327 and 568 genes discovered in early and all-yrs follow-up, with only 9 genes prognostic after 5 yrs. Prognosis analyses for residual risk after CAF-T were uninformative. Functional mapping found that genes prognostic for worse DFS were enriched for proliferation (G2M, M-phase), cellular metabolism, DNA repair, stress response and EMT; whereas, those with better DFS involved transcription regulation/repression via zinc finger proteins. Hierarchical clustering (T arm) found significant DFS prognostic metagene signatures for ER-related genes, immune response, ECM/stroma, chromatin remodeling-transcription factor activity and TGFb pathway. All varied for early vs late DFS events. For example, low ER/high stroma expression signatures correlated with high proliferation gene expression and were strongly associated with early events (standardized [st] HR 2.94, p<0.001). Late recurrence was associated with high proliferation, both individually (stHR 1.51, p=.035) and in combination with higher ER expression (stHR 1.51, p=0.09). Fifteen genes predicted CAF benefit (9 better DFS, 6 worse), or 129 genes if FDR relaxed to 20%. Cluster analysis for CAF prediction is ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS: Unique genes, clusters and pathways were identified by NGS of archival material in ER+ N+ breast cancer, including previously unreported signatures. While ER, stroma and proliferation-related signatures were associated with early prognosis, proliferation best predicted worse DFS after 5 yrs. NGS of the primary tumor is most informative for early events in pts with only 5 years of T, with few genes selecting only for late relapse. If validated, these signatures may identify pts with excellent DFS despite positive nodes for endocrine therapy alone as well as others for whom chemotherapy and/or biologics are also required

.

SUPPORT: NCI CA 180888, 180819, 180821, 180820, 180863; in part, Genomic Health, Inc.

Citation Format: Albain KS, Crager MR, Barlow WE, Baehner FL, Bergamaschi A, Rae JM, Ravdin PM, Tripathy D, Gralow JR, Livingston RB, Osborne CK, Ingle JN, Pritchard KI, Davidson NE, Carey LA, Cherbavaz DB, Sing AP, Shak S, Hortobagyi GN, Hayes DF. Molecular predictors of outcome on adjuvant CAF plus tamoxifen (T) vs T in postmenopausal patients (pts) with ER+, node+ breast cancer – Transcriptome expression analysis of the phase III trial SWOG-8814. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S3-02.

Abstract P5-14-01: A meta-analysis of clinical benefit rates for fulvestrant 500 mg versus alternative therapies for treatment of postmenopausal, estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

Background

Fulvestrant 500 mg has demonstrated improved efficacy vs fulvestrant 250 mg (time to progression [TTP]/progression free survival [PFS] and overall survival) in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Few clinical trials have demonstrated a significant increase in clinical benefit rate (CBR) for one endocrine therapy (ET) over another for the treatment of ABC. This implies that TTP/PFS improvements have been achieved principally by prolonging time to developing acquired resistance. However, it would be beneficial to know whether CBR is also improved, indicating that more patients experience tumor remission. We performed a meta-analysis to determine if there was a difference in CBR between fulvestrant 500 mg and its comparators in randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Methods

Five RCTs evaluating fulvestrant 500 mg were included: CONFIRM, China CONFIRM, FINDER1 and FINDER2 (vs fulvestrant 250 mg) as second-line ET and FIRST (vs anastrozole) as first-line ET. CBR was calculated as the proportion of patients experiencing a best objective response of stable disease for ≥24 weeks, complete response or partial response. Peto method was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p values. Separate fixed effect (FE) models were constructed for first- and second-line data combined, and for second-line only data. For each model Tarone's test for heterogeneity assessed the assumption of constant trial effect.

Results

Unadjusted ORs for CBR from CONFIRM, FINDER1 and FINDER2, adjusted OR for China CONFIRM (as reported in the trial publications), and combined FE models are shown (Table).The OR (95% CI) of the FE model for all trials indicated that CBR was higher with fulvestrant 500 mg than with comparator treatments (OR: 1.34 [1.12-1.61]; FE p=0.001; Tarone's test p=0.91). When assessing second-line ET only, the OR was similar to the overall combined analysis.

ORs (95% CI) of CBR from individual trials and meta-analysis. nOR of CBR for fulvestrant 500 mg vs comparator (95% CI)First-lineFIRST2051.30 (0.72–2.38)Second-lineCONFIRM7361.28 (0.95–1.71)China CONFIRM2211.37 (1.04–1.80)FINDER1921.20 (0.53–2.74)FINDER2931.96 (0.84–4.54)Fixed effects modelFirst- and second-line combined13471.34 (1.12–1.61) FE p=0.001; Tarone's test p=0.91Second-line only11421.35 (1.11–1.63) FE p=0.002; Tarone's test p=0.81CBR, clinical benefit rate; CI, confidence interval; FE, fixed effects model; OR, odds ratio. Adjusted odds ratio and CI (as reported in the trial publications) are presented for China CONFIRM; unadjusted odds ratios and CIs are used for all other trials. FINDER1 and FINDER2 included fulvestrant 500 mg, 250 mg plus loading dose, and 250 mg treatment arms. Data shown for fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg.

Conclusions

These data suggest that fulvestrant 500 mg is associated with a significant improvement in CBR of approximately 34% compared with comparator ETs (i.e. more tumors are placed into remission). This finding is consistent in both second- and first-line ET settings. We await the results of the Phase 3 FALCON first-line ET RCT to see if it supports this finding of increased CBR with fulvestrant 500 mg.

Citation Format: Robertson JFR, Zefei J, Di Leo A, Ohno S, Pritchard KI, Ellis M, Bradbury I, Campbell C. A meta-analysis of clinical benefit rates for fulvestrant 500 mg versus alternative therapies for treatment of postmenopausal, estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-01.

(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography to diagnose recurrent cancer

Background:

Sometimes the diagnosis of recurrent cancer in patients with a previous malignancy can be challenging. This prospective cohort study assessed the clinical utility of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT) in the diagnosis of clinically suspected recurrence of cancer.

Methods:

Patients were eligible if cancer recurrence (non-small-cell lung (NSCL), breast, head and neck, ovarian, oesophageal, Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) was suspected clinically, and if conventional imaging was non-diagnostic. Clinicians were asked to indicate their management plan before and after ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT scanning. The primary outcome was change in planned management after ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT.

Results:

Between April 2009 and June 2011, 101 patients (age, median 65 years; 55% female) were enroled from four cancer centres in Ontario, Canada. Distribution by primary tumour type was: NSCL (55%), breast (19%), ovarian (10%), oesophageal (6%), lymphoma (6%), and head and neck (4%). Of the 99 subjects who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT, planned management changed after ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT in 52 subjects (53%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 42–63%); a major change in plan from no treatment to treatment was observed in 38 subjects (38%, 95% CI, 29–49%), and was typically associated with ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT findings that were positive for recurrent cancer (37 subjects). After 3 months, the stated post-¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT management plan was actually completed in 88 subjects (89%, 95% CI, 81–94%).

Conclusion:

In patients with suspected cancer recurrence and conventional imaging that is non-diagnostic, ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT often provides new information that leads to important changes in patient management.

Everolimus plus exemestane for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: overall survival results from BOLERO-2†

BACKGROUND

The BOLERO-2 study previously demonstrated that adding everolimus (EVE) to exemestane (EXE) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) by more than twofold in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer that recurred or progressed during/after treatment with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs). The overall survival (OS) analysis is presented here.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

BOLERO-2 is a phase III, double-blind, randomized international trial comparing EVE 10 mg/day plus EXE 25 mg/day versus placebo (PBO) + EXE 25 mg/day in postmenopausal women with HR(+) advanced breast cancer with prior exposure to NSAIs. The primary end point was PFS by local investigator assessment; OS was a key secondary end point.

RESULTS

At the time of data cutoff (3 October 2013), 410 deaths had occurred and 13 patients remained on treatment. Median OS in patients receiving EVE + EXE was 31.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 28.0-34.6 months] compared with 26.6 months (95% CI 22.6-33.1 months) in patients receiving PBO + EXE (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% CI 0.73-1.10; log-rank P = 0.14). Poststudy treatments were received by 84% of patients in the EVE + EXE arm versus 90% of patients in the PBO + EXE arm. Types of poststudy therapies were balanced across arms, except for chemotherapy (53% EVE + EXE versus 63% PBO + EXE). No new safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

In BOLERO-2, adding EVE to EXE did not confer a statistically significant improvement in the secondary end point OS despite producing a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in the primary end point, PFS (4.6-months prolongation in median PFS; P < 0.0001). Ongoing translational research should further refine the benefit of mTOR inhibition and related pathways in this treatment setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00863655.

Incidence and time course of everolimus-related adverse events in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: insights from BOLERO-2

BACKGROUND

In the BOLERO-2 trial, everolimus (EVE), an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, demonstrated significant clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile when administered with exemestane (EXE) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR(+)) advanced breast cancer. We report on the incidence, time course, severity, and resolution of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) as well as incidence of dose modifications during the extended follow-up of this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive EVE 10 mg/day or placebo (PBO), with open-label EXE 25 mg/day (n = 724). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. Safety evaluations included recording of AEs, laboratory values, dose interruptions/adjustments, and study drug discontinuations.

RESULTS

The safety population comprised 720 patients (EVE + EXE, 482; PBO + EXE, 238). The median follow-up was 18 months. Class-effect toxicities, including stomatitis, pneumonitis, and hyperglycemia, were generally of mild or moderate severity and occurred relatively early after treatment initiation (except pneumonitis); incidence tapered off thereafter. EVE dose reduction and interruption (360 and 705 events, respectively) required for AE management were independent of patient age. The median duration of dose interruption was 7 days. Discontinuation of both study drugs because of AEs was higher with EVE + EXE (9%) versus PBO + EXE (3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most EVE-associated AEs occur soon after initiation of therapy, are typically of mild or moderate severity, and are generally manageable with dose reduction and interruption. Discontinuation due to toxicity was uncommon. Understanding the time course of class-effect AEs will help inform preventive and monitoring strategies as well as patient education.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00863655.

Tumor factors predictive of response to hypofractionated radiotherapy in a randomized trial following breast conserving therapy

PURPOSE

To determine whether tumor grade, molecular subtype and hypoxia predict response to hypofractionated versus standard radiotherapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for node-negative breast cancer in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor blocks were available on 989 of 1234 patients enrolled in the Hypofractionation Whole Breast Irradiation (HWBI) Trial. A central pathology review and assessment of tumor grade using the Nottingham grading system was carried out. Tumors were classified by molecular subtype as luminal A, luminal B, HER2 enriched, basal-like or unclassified using a six-biomarker panel; ER, PR, HER-2, Ki67, CK5/6 and EGFR. Tumors were also classified as hypoxic based on the expression of HIF1α, CAIX or GLUT-1. The primary end point was local recurrence (LR).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 12 years. In the multivariable Cox model, molecular subtype was the only factor predictive of LR, the 10-year cumulative incidence was 4.5% for luminal A and basal-like, 7.9% for luminal B and 16.9% for HER-2 enriched tumors (P < 0.01). Tumor grade, molecular subtype or hypoxia did not predict response to hypofractionation.

CONCLUSIONS

In women enrolled in the HWBI trial following BCS tumor molecular subtype predicted LR. However tumor grade, molecular subtype and hypoxia did not predict response to hypofractionation suggesting that patients with node-negative breast tumors of all grades and molecular subtypes may be safely treated with hypofractionated RT regimens.

Do alternative methods of measuring tumor size, including consideration of multicentric/multifocal disease, enhance prognostic information beyond TNM staging in women with early stage breast cancer: an analysis of the NCIC CTG MA.5 and MA.12 clinical trials

The AJCC staging criteria consider tumor size to be the largest dimension of largest tumor. Some case series suggest using summation of all tumor dimensions in patients with multicentric/multifocal (MC/MF) disease. We used data from NCIC CTG MA.5 and MA.12 clinical trials to examine alternative methods of assessing tumor size on breast-cancer-free-interval (BCFI). The 710 MA.5 pre-/peri-menopausal node positive and 672 MA.12 pre-menopausal node-negative/-positive patients have 10-year median follow-up. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumors were centrally reviewed for grade, hormone receptor, and HER2 status. Continuous pathologic tumor size was: (1) largest dimension of largest tumor (cm); (2) tumor area (cm(2)); (3) volume of tumor (cm(3)); (4) with MC/MF disease, summation of (1)-(3) for up to 3 foci. We examined univariate and multivariate effects of tumor size on BCFI utilizing (un)stratified Cox regression and the Wald test statistic. In univariate analysis, larger tumor dimension was significantly associated with worse BFCI in node positive patients: p < 0.0001 for MA.5; p = 0.01 for MA.12. In MA.5 multivariate analysis, larger summation of largest tumor dimensions was associated with worse BCFI (p = 0.0003), while larger single dimension was associated with worse BCFI (p = 0.02) for MA.12. Presence of MC/MF and other tumor size measurements were not associated (p > 0.05) with BFCI. While physicians could consider the largest diameter of the largest focus of disease or the sum of the largest diameters of all foci in their T-stage determination, it appears that the current method of T-staging offers equivalent determinations of prognosis.

Endocrine therapy: is the first generation of targeted drugs the last?

Hormonal therapy for breast cancer is the first targeted therapy used in any type of cancer. It was used successfully without a known target for more than 50 years before Jensen described the oestrogen receptor (ER) in the 1960s. Subsequently, it was found that endocrine therapy was effective only in those patients whose tumours expressed the ER; more recently, it has been recognized that this therapy can also be effective in some patients whose tumours are ERα-negative but ERβ-positive. However, in spite of the ER being present, many tumours develop either primary or secondary resistance to various endocrine approaches. ER-containing tumours may also be classified by molecular markers as luminal A (highly hormone responsive) or luminal B (high degree of proliferation and less hormone responsiveness). Furthermore, the expression of ER, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) may change over time as tumours metastasize and progress. The addition of anti-HER2 agents such as trastuzumab and lapatinib to hormonal therapies has improved outcomes but it is unclear whether these approaches are additive or synergistic. Now, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are being successfully used in similar scenarios but once again it is unclear whether the effect of this combination therapy is synergistic; however, mTOR inhibitors produce little response as single agents. In particular, the addition of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus has improved disease-free and overall survival in randomized studies in metastatic disease when added either to an aromatase inhibitor or to tamoxifen. To date, however, no specific biomarkers for the use of everolimus have been reported. Further studies are needed to identify and validate targets of therapy in endocrine-responsive breast cancer.

Expression of both estrogen receptor-beta 1 (ER-β1) and its co-regulator steroid receptor RNA activator protein (SRAP) are predictive for benefit from tamoxifen therapy in patients with estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α)-negative early breast cancer (EBC)

BACKGROUND

Roles of Estrogen Receptor-beta 1 (ER-β1) and its co-regulator Steroid Receptor RNA Activator Protein (SRAP) in breast cancer remain unclear. Previously, ER-β1 and SRAP expression were found positively correlated in breast cancer and, therefore, expression of these two molecules could characterize cancers with a distinct clinical outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ER-β1 and SRAP expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tissue microarrays from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCIC-CTG-MA12), designed to determine the benefit of tamoxifen following chemotherapy in premenopausal early breast cancer (EBC). Expression was dichotomized into low and high using median IHC scores. Relationships with survival used Cox modeling.

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, ER-β1 and SRAP were not prognostic. However, high ER-β1 and SRAP significantly predicted tamoxifen responsiveness [overall survival, interaction test, P = 0.03; relapse-free survival (RFS), interaction test, P = 0.01]. Stratification by ER-α-status found predictive benefit only in ER-α-negative cases. The difference in RFS between tamoxifen and placebo was greater in patients whose tumors expressed both high SRAP and ER-β1[hazard ratio = 0.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.41; P = 0.003] versus those with low SRAP or ER-β1 (interaction test, P = 0.02). The interaction test was not significant in ER-α-positive cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that both ER-β1 and SRAP could be predictive biomarkers of tamoxifen benefit in ER-α-negative premenopausal EBC.

Endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive her2-negative advanced breast cancer after progression or recurrence on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy: a Canadian consensus statement

Approximately 22,700 Canadian women were expected to be diagnosed with breast cancer in 2012. Despite improvements in screening and adjuvant treatment options, a substantial number of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (hr+) breast cancer will continue to develop metastatic disease during or after adjuvant endocrine therapy. Guidance on the selection of endocrine therapy for patients with hr+ disease that is negative for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2-) and that has relapsed or progressed on earlier nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (nsai) therapy is of increasing clinical importance. Exemestane, fulvestrant, and tamoxifen are approved therapeutic options in this context. Four phase iii trials involving 2876 patients-efect, sofea, confirm, and bolero-2-have assessed the efficacy of various treatment options in this clinical setting. Data from those trials suggest that standard-dose fulvestrant (250 mg monthly) and exemestane are of comparable efficacy, that doubling the dose of fulvestrant from 250 mg to 500 mg monthly results in a 15% reduction in the risk of progression, and that adding everolimus to exemestane (compared with exemestane alone) results in a 57% reduction in the risk of progression, albeit with increased toxicity. Multiple treatment options are now available to women with hr+ her2- advanced breast cancer recurring or progressing on earlier nsai therapy, although current clinical trial data suggest more robust clinical efficacy with everolimus plus exemestane. Consideration should be given to the patient's age, functional status, and comorbidities during selection of an endocrine therapy, and use of a proactive everolimus safety management strategy is encouraged.

Impact of premenopausal status at breast cancer diagnosis in women entered on the placebo-controlled NCIC CTG MA17 trial of extended adjuvant letrozole

BACKGROUND

MA17 showed improved outcomes in postmenopausal women given extended letrozole (LET) after completing 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Exploratory subgroup analyses of disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS (DDFS), overall survival (OS), toxic effects and quality of life (QOL) in MA17 were performed based on menopausal status at breast cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, 877 women were premenopausal and 4289 were postmenopausal. Extended LET was significantly better than placebo (PLAC) in DFS for premenopausal [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.55; P = 0.0003] and postmenopausal women (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.51-0.89; P = 0.006), with greater DFS benefit in those premenopausal (interaction P = 0.03). In adjusted post-unblinding analysis, those who switched from PLAC to LET improved DDFS in premenopausal (HR = 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.79; P = 0.02) and postmenopausal women (HR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.94; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended LET after 5 years of tamoxifen was effective in pre- and postmenopausal women at diagnosis, and significantly better in those premenopausal. Women premenopausal at diagnosis should be considered for extended adjuvant therapy with LET if menopausal after completing tamoxifen.

Bone-targeted agents and skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: the state of the art

Most women with advanced breast cancer will develop bone metastases, which are associated with the development of skeletal-related events (sres) such as pathologic fractures and spinal cord compression. This article reviews the evolving definition and incidence of sres, the pathophysiology of bone metastases, and the key evidence for the safety and efficacy of the currently available systemic treatment options for preventing and delaying sres in the setting of breast cancer with bone metastases.The bisphosphonates are structural analogues of endogenous pyrophosphate; three of them (clodronate, pamidronate, and zoledronate) are currently approved for use in Canada in the setting of breast cancer with bone metastases. Denosumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody that binds to human rankl (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand), thereby preventing osteoclast formation, function, and survival, and reducing cancer-induced destruction of bone. Denosumab has recently been approved in Canada for reducing the risk of sres from the bone metastases associated with a variety of malignancies, including breast cancer. How to predict the patients that will benefit most from prophylactic treatment, the agents to select and the timing of switches between agents, the dosing schedules and durations of treatment to choose, the potential utility of the agents in the adjuvant setting, and the utility of additional endpoints such as markers of bone resorption are among the outstanding questions with respect to the optimal use of antiresorptive agents for patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.

Abstract P1-07-13: Prognostic relevance of statistically standardized estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in tamoxifen(TAM)-treated NCIC CTG MA.14 patients

Background: Poor inter-laboratory comparability of common clinically used breast cancer biomarkers led to a proposal of statistical standardization (SS) of laboratory results, similar to bone mineral density (BMD) z-scores. This analysis is the first utilization of SS in a trial where all women received TAM.

Methods: MA.14 allocated 667 postmenopausal women to TAM +/− Octreotide LAR (OCT) based on locally determined ER/PR, without HER2 status. At 9.8 yrs median follow-up, the secondary endpoint of relapse-free survival (RFS) had a non-significant hazard ratio (HR) for TAM-OCT to TAM of 0.87 (95% CI 0.63–1.21; p = 0.40). 299 patients who were representative of MA.14 patients by treatment and stratification factors (exact Fisher p-values=0.19–0.90) had their tumors centrally assessed for ER, PR, and HER2 by RT-PCR. Continuous values were used for SS of each biomarker. Univariate (uni) assessment used similar categorizations as those for BMD, assigning ER/PR/HER2 values by number of standard deviations (SD) about the mean (Group 1, z-score ≥1.0 SD below mean; Group 2, z-score &lt;1.0 SD below mean; Group 3, z-score ≤1.0 SD above mean; Group 4, z-score &gt;1.0 SD above mean). A log-rank statistic was used to test for differences between SS biomarker groups with K-M plots for graphical description. Multivariate (multi) effects of SS biomarkers and baseline patient characteristics on RFS were examined with exploratory (un)stratified Cox step-wise forward regression, adding a factor if likelihood ratio criterion was p ≤ 0.05. Sensitivity analyses used a prior external HER2+ cut-point of ≥1.32 SD.

Results: 292 patient samples passing internal analytical quality control were included in this analysis. Uni analyses indicated SS ER was not associated with RFS (p = 0.31). SS PR had a significant uni effect on RFS [p = 0.03; Group 4 compared to Group 1, HR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.12–0.90); Group 3 compared to Group 1, HR of 0.42 (95% CI 0.21–0.83); and Group 2 compared to Group 1 HR of 0.70 (95%CI 0.36–1.37)]. SS HER2 also had a significant uni effect on RFS [p = 0.004; Group 4 compared to Group 1, HR of 0.90 (95% CI 0.37–2.16)]; Group 3 compared to Group 1, HR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.18–0.84); and, Group 2 compared to Group 1, HR of 0.34 (95% CI 0.16–0.70)]. Multi stratified/unstratified Cox models indicated T1 tumours (p = 0.02/p = 0.0002) and higher SS PR (p = 0.02/0.01) were associated with significantly longer RFS; other unstratified results showed that N-ve patients had better RFS (p &lt; .0001), while local ER/PR status did not impact RFS (p &gt; 0.05). The HER2+ cut-point of ≥1.32 SD indicated directionally worse RFS (uni p-value=0.05; multi p-value=0.06).

Discussion: In MA.14, all women received TAM. Local ER/PR status using categorical or semi-quantitative values did not impact RFS. A statistically standardized approach using continuous centralized ER, PR, HER2 by RT-PCR demonstrated that increasing PR values were associated with better RFS. Evaluation in other trials may provide support for this methodology.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-13.

P5-14-01: Differences in Efficacy by Assessment Method: NCIC CTG Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trials MA.5, MA.12, MA.14, MA.21, MA.27 Meta-Analysis

Background: Based on recent breast cancer literature, we hypothesized that there could be substantive differences in apparent efficacy estimates using a log-normal (LN) survival model rather than with standard Kaplan-Meier (K-M) or Cox model methods. While both Cox and LN survival analyses offer greater specification by individual patient characteristics, the LN model may more robustly estimate survival under model misspecification. Methods: We recently pooled data for 5 NCIC CTG primary breast cancer trials: MA.5, MA.12, MA.14, MA.21, and MA.27. The total patient count for patients who received at least 1 dose of trial therapy is 11,253. Compilation included definition of STEEP endpoints (C Hudis, JCO, 2008) and standardized factor categorizations. The primary endpoint is Breast Cancer Free Interval (BCFI) defined as the time from randomization until recurrence: first local invasive or DCIS; regional, or distant; contralateral invasive or DCIS; or death from breast cancer. We found substantive evidence of non-proportionality for 7 factors compiled for the meta-analyses. In this work, we fit multivariate Cox and LN models with these 7 factors, lymph node status and pathologic T status. We then compare BCFI efficacy estimates for patient and tumour characteristics at 1-, 3-, and 5-years obtained with K-M, Cox, and LN models. Results: There was evidence that the Cox assumption of proportional hazards was violated for 7 factors: age, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, anthracycline use, chemotherapy use, race, and ECOG performance status. Differences between models were intrinsically affected by timing and extent of non-proportionality; there was no consistent pattern. In particular, investigations to date indicate efficacy estimates with absolute differences between K-M, Cox and LN estimates which varied by time of assessment: at 1-year 0.0 to 6.7%, at 3-years 0.4 to 18.6%, and at 5-years 0.2 to 17.0%. BCFI estimates with the K-M were inconsistently closer to those with the LN or Cox model: for K-M to Cox at 1-year 0.4 to 5.2%, at 3-years 0.4 to 15%, at 5-years 0.4 to 14.3%; for K-M to LN at 1-year 0.0 to 6.7%, at 3-years 0.5 to 18.6%, at 5-years 0.2 to 17.0%; for Cox to LN at 1-year 0.8 to 1.8%, at 3-years 1.9 to 6.0%, at 5-years 0.6 to 5.7%. K-M and Cox models have step-wise adjustments at events for K-M and Cox, rather than smooth modeling with the LN. Discussion: Even with reasonably large population subgroups, there were substantive differences in apparent survival (0.0 to 18.6%) between K-M, Cox and LN model types. The magnitude of differences in survival estimates was large enough to be clinically relevant and warrant further consideration as we evaluate new therapies and prognostic/predictive factors. We will be statistically investigating framework robustness under differing levels of model misspecification.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-01.

P2-12-28: Studies of a Malignancy-Associated Protein, Osteopontin, in NCIC CTG MA.14, a Randomized Trial of Tamoxifen Versus Combined Tamoxifen and Octreotide LAR in Adjuvant Treatment of Women with Early Breast Cancer

Background

We have shown, in women with metastatic breast cancer (BC), that high baseline plasma osteopontin (OPN) levels and increases over time are associated with poor survival. In primary BC, increased immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of OPN in tumour is associated with poorer survival and is elevated in lymph node metastases relative to primary tumour. Our current study evaluates tumour and baseline/serial plasma OPN levels after resection of primary BC.

Methods: In NCIC CTG MA.14, 667 postmenopausal women post surgery received 5 yrs Tamoxifen (T) +/− 2 yrs monthly Octreotide LAR. There were no differences in survival outcomes between arms. OPN was assayed by IHC in primary BC. OPN was measured in plasma at baseline (up to 4 mos post randomization) and serially in recurrent (18 mos time window) versus non-recurrent cases, by ELISA. Statistical Analysis: IHC and plasma OPN had Box-Cox variance stabilization transformations (power 0.5; logarithm). Descriptive characterization of both OPN measurements is provided for all patients, by baseline patient and tumour characteristics, and by recurrence status. Univariate stratified log-rank statistics and hazard ratios with 95% CI were generated for intention to treat (ITT), event free survival (EFS), relapse fee survival (RFS), overall survival, any bone RFS, and non-bone RFS. Stratified step-wise forward Cox regression was used, with factor added if p&lt;0.05.

Results: From 667 MA.14 patients, 647 patients were assessed for OPN: 462 (69%) by IHC; 387 (58%) at baseline in plasma (with 2,542 samples total from serial sampling). IHC % tumor positivity had mean 33.9% (95% CI 30.2%-37.9%), while baseline plasma OPN was mean 46.1 (44.6−47.6) ng/ml. In 80 women with recurrence, mean OPN during the recurrence window was 60.7 (52.8−69.8) ng/ml. Neither baseline IHC or plasma OPN levels were significantly associated with any of the endpoints in either univariate or multivariate analyses. Older age (p=0.02), greater nodal involvement (p=0.001), higher baseline body mass index (p&lt;0.0001), and higher tumour grade (p&lt;0.0001) were multivariately associated with shorter EFS. Baseline plasma OPN was not correlated with IHC OPN (Pearson 0.02, p=0.73).

Discussion: Mean baseline OPN plasma level 46.1 ng/ml (median 45 ng/ml) in MA.14 was similar to our previous findings in healthy women (median 47 ng/ml). In contrast, we previously showed that 63% of 158 women with a new diagnosis of metastatic BC had elevated OPN levels with median value 177 ng/ml. Our results thus far suggest that tumor and plasma levels, while associated with prognosis in metastatic BC, may not be so in primary BC following surgery. However, in MA.14, the 80 women with recurrent BC had significantly higher mean OPN in the recurrence window, 60.7 ng/ml, than at baseline. We will present further analyses exploring this finding.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-28.

P1-06-07: TIMP-1 in Combination with HER2 and TOP2A for Prediction of Benefit from Adjuvant Anthracyclines in High Risk Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose: HER2 amplification, TOP2A aberrations and absence of TIMP-1 (Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1) expression in breast carcinomas have been associated with incremental benefit from anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in several reports. In the DBCG 89D trial, we demonstrated that the predictive value of these markers improved when they were combined in a profile and the present study was undertaken to validate these findings in NCIC CTG MA.5, a similar but independent clinical trial.

Design: TIMP-1 was examined by immunohistochemistry in archival tumor tissue from 403 of 716 premenopausal high-risk patients with known HER2 and TOP2A status who were randomized to CEF or CMF in the MA.5 trial. Patients were classified according to 2 predefined marker profiles — the HT profile (HER2, TIMP-1) and the 2T profile (TOP2A, TIMP-1) and the statistical analyses were performed as closely as possible to the analytical approach used previously in the MA.5 trial and when analysing the biomarker profiles in the DBCG 89D trial.

Results: 98 (24%) patients had no TIMP-1 staining of tumor cells, 27% were HER2 amplified, and 18% were TOP2A aberrant. 44% of patients were classified as HT responsive (HER2-positive and/or TIMP-1 negative) and 37% as 2T responsive (TOP2A aberrant and/or TIMP-1 negative). There was no heterogeneity in treatment effect of CEF versus CMF according to TIMP-1. In HT responsive patients, CEF was superior to CMF with improved RFS (adjusted HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.98) and a borderline-significant improvement in OS (adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.04). A significant HT profile versus treatment interaction was detected for OS (P=0.03). In 2T responsive patients, CEF was superior to CMF with borderline significant improvement in RFS (adjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.03), and with improvement in OS (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93). A significant 2T profile versus treatment interaction was detected for OS (P=0.01).

Conclusion: In the MA.5 trial, we have validated the HT and 2T profiles as predictors of incremental benefit from anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. The proportion of patients categorized as anthracycline responsive increases from 18–27% using individual markers to 37–44% when combining TIMP-1 with either HER2 or TOP2A. Patients with responsive profiles had a 34–42% relative reduction in mortality when treated with CEF. In contrast, patients with non-responsive profiles (56-63% of patients) had no incremental benefit from CEF compared with CMF. All 3 biomarkers are easily applied in the pathology lab and as such could be used in daily clinical practice to select patients for anthracycline or non-anthracycline containing adjuvant chemotherapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-07.

P2-12-27: Simply Adding Together the Diameters of Tumor Foci in Patients with Multicentric or Multifocal Disease Does Not Add Any Additional Prognostic Information: An Analysis from NCIC CTG MA.12 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Tamoxifen after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pre-Menopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer

Background: A common clinical conundrum in breast cancer management is whether pathologic T stage in women with multicentric or multifocal disease should be taken as the diameter of the largest focus or as the sum of all foci in the breast. Most staging systems, such as the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), simply use the largest tumor focus for staging. We examine here the impact of alternate methods of estimating tumour size including measures of total tumor size, volume and surface area.

Materials & Methods: NCIC CTG MA.12 is a randomized placebo-controlled trial of tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy for pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer. Median follow up is 9.7 years. Pathologically reported patient tumor dimensions for up to 3 foci were utilized to examine the effects of tumor size on Breast-Cancer-Free-Interval (BCFI), defined as the time from randomization until recurrence (defined as first local, regional, distant, or contralateral invasive tumor or DCIS). Tumor size was estimated as 1) pathologic T stage as per AJCC criteria; 2) largest dimension of largest tumor focus (cm); 3) sum of largest dimension(s) of tumor foci (cm); 4) sum of surface area(s) of tumor foci (cm2), and 5) sum of volume of tumor foci (cm3). Step-wise forward unstratified Cox regression was used to assess the different effects of tumor size. Results: This study accrued 672 patients, 43% with T1 tumors, 51% with T2 tumors, and 6% with T3/T4 tumors; 25% were node negative and 56% had 1–3 positive lymph nodes. 75% were locally determined to have hormone receptor positive tumors. A higher number of involved lymph nodes was associated with significantly shorter BCFI (p&lt;0.0001). None of pathologic T stage (p=0.14), largest dimension of largest tumor size (p=0.14), sum of largest dimensions of tumor foci (p=0.24), sum of surface area (p=0.38), and sum of volume of foci (p=0.51) were significantly associated with BCFI. Likewise, lymphovascular invasion (p=0.08), grade (p=0.14), nor administration of anthracycline therapy (p=0.08) were associated with BCFI.

Discussion: In the MA.12 population of pre-menopausal women randomized to either tamoxifen or placebo, the sole factor significantly associated with BCFI was nodal status. No measure of tumor size in unifocal or multicentric/multifocal tumors impacted BCFI. The findings of this mature data set suggest that simply adding together the diameters of tumors in patients with multicentric or multifocal disease did not add any additional prognostic information.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-27.

P1-06-08: Effect of Treatment Emergent Symptoms on Relapse Free Survival: NCIC CTG MA.12 a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Tamoxifen after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pre-Menopausal Women in Early Breast Cancer

Background: Evidence from the ATAC trial that vasomotor or joint symptomatology by 3 months is associated with reduced recurrence after 3 months led to an interest in examining this phenomenon in other aromatase inhibitor trials. We examined here whether there is such an association in the context of a placebo-controlled tamoxifen therapy trial.

Methods: NCIC CTG MA.12 is a randomized placebo-controlled trial of tamoxifen (TAM) after adjuvant chemotherapy for pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer. Eligible patients were included if they received some protocol therapy, were alive and disease-free at 3 months: 1.) without prior grade 3/4 vasomotor or joint symptoms (N=293; only 3 patients had prior grade 1/2 vasomotor or joint symptoms); separately, 2.) all patients with/without prior vasomotor or joint symptoms (N=631). Vasomotor symptom at 3 months was adverse reporting of any grade of hot flashes and/or sweating, while joint symptom was any adverse event reporting of pain -joint, pain -muscle, pain -bone, arthritis, joint -function, or musculoskeletal —other. Exact Fisher tests were used to examine associations between baseline patient and tumour characteristics, treatment arm, and the development of symptomatology. Univariate testing of effect of symptomatology on relapse-free survival (RFS) was with a stratified Cox model, and multivariate was with stratified step-wise forward Cox modeling.

Results: MA.12 accrued 672 patients, and the median follow-up for this investigation was 9.7 years. Excluding patients with prior vasomotor or joint symptoms, 27.3% of 293 patients reported vasomotor or joint symptoms by three months, all of which was vasomotor. Meanwhile, 20.8% of all 631 patients had symptomatology by 3 months: 19.2% reported vasomotor alone, 1.1% joint alone, and 0.5% both. With no prior symptoms, 23.4% on placebo (P) and 31.7% on TAM developed symptomatology; age was the only baseline factor with significant differences at 3 months (p=0.01), with under 40 years 18% of women on TAM and 8% on P, and 50 or older, 21% on TAM and 14% on P being symptomatic. For all patients, 20.1% on P and 21.4% on TAM reported symptomatology by 3 months, and there was weak evidence that those &gt;50 on TAM had more symptoms (p=0.06). Vasomotor and joint symptoms did not exhibit significant univariate or multivariate effects on RFS (without prior symptoms, respectively, p=0.98 and p=0.90; for all patients, p=0.99 and p=0.93).

Discussion: We did not observe any association of vasomotor or joint symptoms by 3 months and relapse-free survival after 3 months in the MA.12 placebo-controlled trial of tamoxifen therapy in premenopausal women. This mirrors the results we observed in our MA.27 trial of exemestane versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women, and points to the simple metric of early symptomatology not being a universal predictor of reduced relapse.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-08.

P2-12-23: How Should We Assess Tumour Size (T Stage) in Patients with Multicentric/Multifocal Breast Cancer? Results from the NCIC CTG MA.5 Randomized Trial of CEF vs. CMF in Pre-Menopausal Women with Node Positive Breast Cancer

Background

A common clinical conundrum in breast cancer management is whether pathologic T stage in women with multicentric or multifocal disease should be taken as the diameter of the largest focus or as the sum of all foci in the breast. Most staging systems, such as the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), simply use the largest tumour focus for staging. We examine here the impact of alternate methods of estimating tumour size including measures of total tumour size, volume and surface area.

Methods: NCIC CTG MA.5 is a randomized trial of CEF versus CMF in pre-menopausal women with node positive breast cancer.

Median follow up is 10 years. Pathologically reported patient tumour dimensions for up to 3 foci were utilized to examine the effects of tumour size on Breast-Cancer-Free-Interval (BCFI). BCFI is defined as the time from randomization until recurrence: first local invasive or DCIS, regional, distant, contralateral invasive or DCIS. Tumour size was estimated as 1) pathologic T stage as per AJCC criteria; 2) largest dimension of largest tumour focus (cm); 3) sum of largest dimension(s) of tumour foci (cm); 4) sum of surface area(s) of tumour foci (cm2), and 5) sum of volume of tumour foci (cm3). Step-wise forward unstratified Cox regression was used to assess the different effects of tumour size.

Results: This study accrued 710 patients, 37% with T1 tumours, 52% with T2 tumours and 9% with T3 tumours; 61% had 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes. 59% hormone receptor positive. Higher pathologic T stage (p=0.001) and greater surface area (p=0.02) were associated with shorter BCFI, as was lymphovascular invasion (p=0.03), and # of lymph nodes involved (p&lt;0.0001). Administration of anthracycline therapy led to significantly longer BCFI (0.003). The sum of largest tumour sizes (p=0.33) and sum of tumour volume (p=0.34) were not significantly associated with BCFI. Additionally, when the less complete locally reported tumour grade data were included, higher tumour grade was associated with shorter BCFI (p&lt;0.0001).

Conclusions: Consideration of multicentric and multifocal disease was an important adjunct to standard pathologic tumour size as was estimation of tumour surface area in this chemotherapy trial of node positive premenopausal women. However, simply adding together the diameters of tumours in patients with multicentric or multifocal disease did not add any additional prognostic information in this high risk patient population.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-23.

P4-12-05: Impact of the Lifestyle Intervention Study in Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer (LISA) Weight Loss Intervention upon Physical Activity

Observational evidence shows a relationship between obesity and poor prognosis in breast cancer (BC). Physical activity (PA) is an important component of weight loss and maintenance, but most large-scale interventions in BC patients have produced only modest improvements in activity. We sought to evaluate changes in PA in women participating in LISA, a randomized trial coordinated by the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group which was designed to examine the impact of a telephone-based weight loss intervention (WLI) upon disease free survival in BC patients.

Methods: Participants were randomized 1:1 to the WLI or educational control (EC) group. Eligibility included diagnosis of Stage I-III BC, BMI ≥24 kg/m2, and treatment with letrozole. The WLI, based on the Diabetes Prevention Program, focused on weight reduction through calorie restriction and increased physical activity. Delivery involved 19 calls, mailings and a participant manual. The PA goal was 150 minutes/week. PA was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Short Form) at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. Changes in time (minutes/week) spent sitting and engaging in moderate, vigorous, and walking activities were compared between groups.

Results 338 women were randomized to WLI (n=171) or EC (n=167) from 20 centers in Canada and the USA. The study was discontinued due to loss of funding. The WLI arm lost significantly more weight than EC arm, with mean weight loss of 6.1% of body weight vs. 0.6% at 12 months (p&lt;0.001). Activity data are presented in Table 1. At baseline, participants were inactive; median vigorous activity was zero minutes/week and median time spent sitting was more than 35 hours/week. WLI participants reported significantly higher participation in vigorous, moderate and walking activities, and lower levels of sedentary behavior, compared to controls at 6 and 12 months. Higher levels of PA were significantly associated with increased weight loss at all time periods. Factors associated with increases in activity included higher baseline BMI (p=0.014), lower baseline activity (p&lt;0.001) and assignment to the WLI arm (p=0.02). Women assigned to WLI increased their PA during the intervention period (p=0.017) even after adjusting for other significant baseline factors.

Conclusion Participants in the LISA WLI reported significantly higher levels of PA compared with controls. Activity increased most in women who were heavier and less active at baseline. Further study of this WLI as a potential means to improve BC outcomes is warranted.

P4-01-04: Effects of CYP2D6 Phenotype and Drug Adherence on Tamoxifen Metabolite Levels

Background

Although the activity of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), the enzyme responsible for conversion of tamoxifen (TAM) to its most important active metabolite endoxifen, varies significantly with genotype. Routine genotype testing in patients on TAM has recently been discouraged. Conflicting results in publications regarding the prognostic utility of this test remain unexplained. Confounding factors could be lack of predicted correlation between CYP2D6 genotype and TAM active metabolites, or variability of patient compliance

Methods: Consecutive breast cancer patients on TAM were asked to enroll in a study to examine the relationship between CYP 2D6 phenotype, patient-reported treatment adherence, and TAM metabolites levels. Patients were genotyped for CYP2D6 polymorphisms using long-range PCR allele-specific amplification and single-nucleotide primer extension assay. From the genotypes, four phenotype groups were defined: Ultra rapid Metabolizer (UM), Extensive Metabolizer (EM), Intermediate Metabolizer (IM) and Poor Metabolizer (PM). Plasma was collected after at least 6 weeks of TAM (20 mg daily). The parent drug TAM, as well as 4-hydroxy N-desmethyl tamoxifen (endoxifen), 4 hydroxy tamoxifen (4OHtam) and N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (NDtam), were determined by Liquid Chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Patients also completed a questionnaire about ethinicity, side effects, concurrent medications and tamoxifen adherence. Correlation between metabolite/TAM ratio and phenotype was tested by Spearman correlation test. Relationship between metabolite levels and adherence was tested by Wilcoxon rank sum test. Chi square test was used to compare proportions.

Results: Of the 100 patients enrolled there were 62 Caucasians, 25 Asians, 4 Africans and 6 Unknown. We found a strong correlation between ratio of endoxifen/TAM and phenotype (p &lt;.0001) (Table 1) Over a 2 week period 68 never missed a TAM dose, 25 missed 1–2 times, 2 missed 3–5 times and 2 &gt; 5times (2 missing data). In EM group we found significantly lower levels of TAM (p &lt;.0001), NDtam (p=.008), 4OHtam (p=.003) in less adherent patients. A trend to decreased levels was also shown for endoxifen (p=.081). No associations were found between adherence or phenotype activity and side effects.

The role of neoadjuvant (HER)2-targeted therapies in (HER)2-overexpressing breast cancers

Women receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy for primary operable or inoperable breast cancer can potentially benefit in a number of ways, but the main advantage, which has been consistently demonstrated, is improved tumour resectability. Given the improvement in outcomes with the adjuvant use of trastuzumab in patients with early-stage breast cancer positive for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2), questions have been raised about the use of trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting. The present paper reviews the currently available data and outlines suggestions from a panel of Canadian oncologists about the use of trastuzumab and other her2-targeted agents in the neoadjuvant setting.

The panel focussed on

the use of trastuzumab and other her2-targeted agents as neoadjuvant therapy in primary operable, locally advanced, and inflammatory breast cancer; and

possible choices of chemotherapeutic regimens with trastuzumab.

The suggestions described here will continue to evolve as data from current and future trials with trastuzumab and other her2-targeted agents emerge.

Prediction of late recurrences by breast cancer index in the NCIC CTG MA.17 cohort

2

Background: The MA.17 trial demonstrated that extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole after 5-y of tamoxifen markedly reduced the risk of recurrence in women with ER+ early stage breast cancer. This trial provides an opportunity to assess the ability of biomarkers to predict late recurrences in ER+ breast cancer. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI), a continuous risk index based on the combination of HOXB13:IL17BR (H:I) and the molecular grade index (MGI), estimates the individual risk of recurrence in ER+ breast cancer patients. In this study, the prognostic utility of BCI to predict late recurrences was examined.

Methods: FFPE tumor blocks were collected from patients who experienced a breast cancer recurrence up to unblinding of MA.17. Controls were matched 2:1 for age, tumor size, nodal status and prior chemotherapy, and were disease free for longer than cases. All cases were reviewed for standard histopathology and evaluated using the real-time RT-PCR BCI assay.

Results: Patient characteristics for the case-control study were similar to that from the overall study. Characteristics for cases (N=83) and controls (N=166) were not significantly different except for treatment. A higher percentage of controls compared to cases tended to be categorized as low risk by BCI (58% vs 43%), while a lower percentage of controls than cases tended to be categorized as high risk by BCI (34% vs 24%). In univariate analysis, treatment, BCI, H:I and HOXB13, but not tumor grade or MGI, were significant predictors of late recurrence. After adjusting for standard variables (age, tumor grade and treatment), BCI (OR 2.37; P=0.03), H:I (OR 2.55; P=0.04) and HOXB13 (OR 1.35; P=0.02) remained significant predictors of recurrence. HOXB13 expression at diagnosis predicted patient benefit from extended endocrine therapy with letrozole.

Conclusions: In this case-controlled study, the data demonstrate that BCI is a significant predictor of late recurrences in ER+ patients following 5-y of tamoxifen. The prognostic performance of BCI to predict late recurrences was largely dependent on HOXB13 expression. The integration of H:I and MGI within BCI provides prognostic utility for both early and late recurrences.

The effect of trastuzumab on pCR in locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer

286

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is now standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Evidence shows that pathological complete response (pCR) predicts for disease free and overall survival. The pCR rates for LABC vary widely in the literature but prognosis still remains poor for this group of pts. Increases in pCR have been reported in clinical trials with the addition of trastuzumab (T) but these studies have predominantly included operable pts. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of T to NAT has improved the rates of pCR in HER2+ LABC pts at our center.

Methods: Pts from the LABC prospective database at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center in Toronto were included if they had confirmed HER2+ LABC [primary tumors greater than 5cm (T3) with skin or chest wall involvement (T4) or with matted axillary adenopathy (N2)]. Two cohorts of LABC pts, pre-T and post-T groups were compared for baseline characteristics and pCR. Chi square tests and p values were used for comparing proportions.

Results: 43 pts were diagnosed between Jan 2002 to Dec 31, 2006 who had HER2+ breast cancer and received NAT without T (pre-T cohort). 17 HER2+ pts were diagnosed with LABC between Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2009 who received neoadjuvant T (post-T cohort). Baseline characteristics were similar in two cohorts (Table) except more pts in pre-T cohort received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The rate of pCR in the pre-T cohort was 9.3% and in the post-T cohort 29% (p value=0.02).

Conclusions: The pCR rate dramatically improved in our LABC patients with the addition of T to NAT. The pCR rates still remain lower than in published clinical trials likely reflecting the more advanced nature of LABC in clinical practice.

[Table: see text]

NCIC-CTG MA.20: An intergroup trial of regional nodal irradiation in early breast cancer

LBA1003

Background: Randomized trials have demonstrated that locoregional radiation after mastectomy reduces locoregional recurrence and improves overall survival (OS) in women with node positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant systemic therapy. MA.20 evaluated the addition of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to whole breast irradiation (WBI) following breast conserving surgery (BCS). Methods: Women with high risk node-negative or node-positive breast cancer treated with BCS and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy were stratified by positive nodes, axillary nodes removed, chemo- and endocrine therapy and randomized to WBI (50Gy in 25 fractions +/- boost irradiation) or WBI plus RNI (45Gy in 25 fractions) to the internal mammary, supraclavicular, and high axillary lymph nodes. The primary outcome was OS. The Data Safety Monitoring Committee approved the analysis plan for the protocol specified interim analysis of relapse patterns, survival and toxicity at 5 years. Upon review of the data, they recommended release of the results. Results: Between March 2000 to March 2007, 1,832 women were randomly assigned to WBI+RNI (916) or WBI (916). Median follow-up was 62 months. Characteristics of the study population were: mean age, 53.3 years; node negative, 10%; 1-3 positive nodes, 85%; > 4 positive nodes, 5%; adjuvant chemotherapy, 91%; and adjuvant endocrine therapy, 71%. WBI+RNI in comparison to WBI alone was associated with an improvement in isolated locoregional disease free survival (DFS; HR=.59, p=.02, 5 year risk: 96.8% and 94.5% respectively), distant DFS (HR=.64, p=.002, 5 year risk: 92.4% and 87.0% respectively), DFS (HR=.68, p=.003, 5 year risk: 89.7% and 84.0% respectively) and OS (HR=.76, p=.07, 5 year risk: 92.3% and 90.7% respectively). WBI+RNI in comparison to WBI was associated with an increase in grade 2 or greater pneumonitis (1.3% and 0.2% respectively, p=.01), and lymphedema (7.3% and 4.1% respectively, p=.004). Conclusions: The majority of women with node positive breast cancer are now managed by BCS followed by WBI and adjuvant systemic therapy. Results from MA.20 demonstrate that additional RNI reduces the risk of locoregional and distant recurrence, and improves DFS with a trend in improved OS.