Short midline catheters: High success rates for antibiotic therapy in children with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

Short midline catheter use in paediatric populations appears to be increasing, however data on success rates and efficacy are sparse. This study aims to describe the success rate when midline venous catheters are employed as a single device for intravenous antibiotic therapy in paediatric patients with cystic fibrosis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in a single institution, retrieving electronic medical record data from July 2017 through March 2020. The primary outcome was device success, defined as a catheter that remained functional until the end of antibiotic therapy. Reasons for device failure were categorized in a standard fashion.

RESULTS

Primary outcome data were available for 116 catheter insertions, involving 49 patients and 55 proceduralists. The success rate was 84% (n = 98). Median age at insertion was 15 years (range 4-19) and median weight 52 kg (13-81). Soft, polyether block amide, Arrow^® Seldinger Arterial Catheters were employed. Only 16 patients (14%) required general anaesthesia. Median time to failure was 6 days, and median time to successful completion of treatment was 13 days. Six of 18 failures occurred within 48 h and were likely insertion complications. The most common reasons for device failure were occlusion, extravasation, phlebitis and dislodgement. More than half of patients (56%) received antibiotic therapy at home.

CONCLUSION

There is a high single device success rate when inserting short midlines for 13-day intravenous pulmonary antibiotic therapy in children with cystic fibrosis. These results should be confirmed with a prospective study.

Outcomes Of Non-Cystic Fibrosis Related Bronchiectasis Post Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is a recognised treatment for end-stage lung disease due to bronchiectasis. Non-CF bronchiectasis and CF are often combined into one cohort, however outcomes for non-CF bronchiectasis patients varies between centres, and in comparison to those for CF.

AIMS

To compare lung transplantation mortality and morbidity of bronchiectasis (non-CF) patients to those with CF and other indications.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing lung transplantation between 01 January 2008-31 December 2013. Time to and cause of lung allograft loss was censored on 01 April 2018. A case-note review was conducted on a sub-group of 78 patients, to analyse hospital admissions as a marker of morbidity.

RESULTS

341 patients underwent lung transplantation, 22 (6%) had bronchiectasis compared to 69 (20%) with CF. The 5-year survival for the bronchiectasis group was 32%, compared to CF 69%, obstructive lung disease (OLD) 64%, pulmonary hypertension 62% and ILD 55% (p = 0.008). Lung allograft loss due to CLAD with predominant infection was significantly higher in the bronchiectasis group at 2 years. The rate of acute admissions was 2.24 higher in the bronchiectasis group when compared to OLD (p = 0.01). Patients with bronchiectasis spent 45.81 days in hospital per person year after transplantation compared with 18.21 days for CF.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchiectasis patients in this study had a lower 5-year survival and poorer outcomes in comparison to other indications including CF. Bronchiectasis should be considered a separate entity to CF in survival analysis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.