Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: taking stock, moving forward

To evaluate and improve the use of cancer trial end points that reflect the patient's own perspective, the National Cancer Institute organized an international conference, Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in Cancer Trials (PROACT), in 2006. The 13 preceding articles in this special issue of the Journal were commissioned in preparation for or in response to the PROACT conference, which was cosponsored by the American Cancer Society. Drawing from these articles and also commentary from the conference itself, this concluding report takes stock of what has been learned to date about the successes and challenges in patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment in phase III, phase II, and symptom management trials in cancer and identifies ways to improve the scientific soundness, feasibility, and policy relevance of PROs in trials. Building on this synthesis of lessons learned, this article discusses specific administrative policies and management procedures to improve PRO data collection, analysis, and dissemination of findings; opportunities afforded by recent methodologic and technologic advances in PRO data collection and analysis to enhance the scientific soundness and cost efficiency of PRO use in trials; and the importance of better understanding the usefulness of PRO data to the full spectrum of cancer decision makers, including patients and families, health providers, public and private payers, regulatory agencies, and standards-setting organizations.

Effects of sorafenib on symptoms and quality of life: results from a large randomized placebo-controlled study in renal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the current study was to determine the impact of treatment with sorafenib versus placebo on renal cancer symptoms and quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Symptoms were measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI) and QOL by the FACT-General (FACT-G). The FACT-G and FKSI were administered at baseline and day 1 of each cycle. Statistical analyses used a random coefficient model over 5 cycles for total score and individual items, using Memorial Sloan Kettering Risk Score (MSK) and treatment as factors and baseline score and treatment time as covariates. FKSI correlation to survival was based on a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment, age, and MSK.

RESULTS

At baseline and over time, there were no differences in mean scores for either the FACT-G or FKSI between the sorafenib and placebo groups. FKSI single-item analysis showed that sorafenib-treated patients reported significantly fewer symptoms and concerns versus placebo (eg, cough (P < 0.0001), fevers (P = 0.0015), shortness of breath (P < or = 0.0312), ability to enjoy life (P = 0.0119), and worry that condition will get worse (P = 0.0004). Only concern about treatment side effects favored placebo (P < 0.0001). Baseline FKSI total score predicted overall survival (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib shows clinical benefit without adversely impacting overall QOL and has a positive impact on some individual symptoms and concerns. These findings are consistent with other clinical results from this trial of advanced renal cell carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib, which included significantly greater progression-free survival and low risk for treatment limited toxicities.

Validation of a patient-administered questionnaire to measure the severity and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI): the UTI Symptom Assessment questionnaire

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a self-administered questionnaire to assess the 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' of the most frequently reported signs and symptoms of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The UTI Symptoms Assessment questionnaire (UTISA) is a 14-item instrument asking about the severity and bothersomeness of seven key uUTI symptoms. It was developed after comprehensive literature and data review and administration in draft form to a sample of 30 women with uUTI. The final questionnaire was completed by 276 women with uUTI who participated in a noncomparative clinical trial of ciprofloxacin. The women completed the questionnaire in electronic format at baseline (before the first dose of ciprofloxacin once-daily), at 3-h and 8-h intervals until all UTI symptoms were resolved, and at the test-of-cure visit. Baseline scores on the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) were used to assess convergent and divergent validity; responses to the Global Rating of Change (GRC) were used to assess both responsiveness and the 'minimally important difference'. Discriminant validity and responsiveness were assessed by comparing UTISA scores with a clinical evaluation of UTI symptoms performed by the investigator at baseline and at the test-of-cure visit.

RESULTS

The UTISA was found to comprise three four-item domains named 'urination regularity', 'problems with urination', and 'pain associated with UTI'. Two questions asking about haematuria loaded on a fourth factor. The three domains were homogeneous (with high inter-item correlations) and internally consistent. Convergent validity was shown by high correlations between similar UTISA and KHQ domains (all r(s) > 0.40), and divergent validity by small correlations between unlike domains (all r(s) < 0.15). In general, the UTISA domains showed excellent discriminant validity, with scores on selected domains discriminating between women with different clinical evaluations. The responsiveness of the UTISA was also excellent, with high correlations between changes in domain scores and the clinical evaluation and GRC items. Symptom improvement was highest in the first 3 h, leading to greater responsiveness and minimally important difference during this period. However, the UTISA could detect even small subsequent changes.

CONCLUSION

The three-domain UTISA has excellent psychometric properties and it is likely to prove an excellent tool for assessing uUTI outcome from a patient's perspective, both in research and clinical settings.

Counseling patients about prescribed medication: 12-year trends

OBJECTIVES

The authors determined patients' report of prescription drug counseling activities after withdrawal of the pilot program to require patient package inserts in 1980 and implementation of Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 counseling requirements in 1993.

METHODS

Four cross-sectional national telephone surveys were conducted in the fall of 1982, 1984, 1992, and 1994. Telephone households were chosen by random-digit dialing. Subjects had obtained a new prescription for themselves or for a family member at a retail pharmacy during the previous 4 weeks. Verbal counseling rates at physician offices and pharmacies for five information categories and the distribution of written information at those locations were determined.

RESULTS

Spontaneous verbal counseling at the physician's office has increased slightly, with the largest increases focused on the delivery of side effect and precautionary information. Slightly larger increases in pharmacy-delivered information regarding directions for use and precautions have occurred. Patient questioning has remained at single digit levels at both sites. The percentage of patients receiving any written information has increased from 5% to 15% at the physician's office and from 16% to 59% at the pharmacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate small increases in verbal counseling but larger increases in the delivery of written information provided at the pharmacy. In light of Healthy People: 2000 goals for patient counseling and legislation encouraging private-sector initiatives, these data should help to refocus attention on the continuing need for effective patient education interventions.

Volume expansion with albumin decreases mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVES

Albumin and nonprotein colloids (starches, dextran, and others) are used frequently as blood volume expanders in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The objective of this study was to determine differences between colloids with regard to patient characteristics and mortality rates.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Discharge data collected in the Solucient Clinical Pathways Database from 19,578 patients undergoing CABG surgery were analyzed.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients receiving albumin and nonprotein colloids were compared with regard to baseline patient characteristics. A multiple regression model was developed to determine if albumin use was independently associated with mortality rates.

RESULTS

Albumin was used in 8,084 cases (41.3%). The use of albumin and nonprotein colloids was not related to patient characteristics. Mortality was lower in the albumin group compared to the nonprotein colloid group (2.47% vs 3.03%, p = 0.02). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, albumin use was associated with 25% lower odds of mortality compared to nonprotein colloid use (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.96).

CONCLUSION

Colloid administration in CABG surgery was unrelated to patient characteristics. Albumin use appears to be associated with lower incidence of mortality after CABG surgery compared to nonprotein colloid use.

Economic evaluation of sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A double-blind, randomized phase III trial of sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma demonstrated that sorafenib significantly prolonged overall survival compared to placebo (median overall survival = 10.7 months vs 7.9 months, P < 0.001). Sorafenib is the first and only systemic agent demonstrating survival benefit in these patients. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus best supportive care in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the USA.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed following time-to-progression and survival using phase III trial data. Health effects are expressed as life-years gained. Resource utilization included drugs, physician visits, laboratory tests, scans, and hospitalizations. Unit costs, expressed in 2007 $US, came from diagnosis-related groupings, fee schedules, and the Red Book. Costs and effects were evaluated over a patient's lifetime and discounted at 3%.

RESULTS

Results are presented as incremental cost/life-year gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Life-years gained were increased for sorafenib compared to best supportive care (mean ± standard deviation: 1.58 ± 0.17 vs 1.05 ± 0.10 life-years gained/sorafenib patient and best supportive care, respectively). Lifetime total costs were $US40,639 ± $US3052 for sorafenib and $US7, 804 ± $US1349 for best supportive care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $US62,473/life-year gained.

CONCLUSIONS

  The economic evaluation indicates that sorafenib is cost-effective compared to best supportive care, with a cost-effectiveness ratio within the established threshold that US society is willing to pay (i.e. $US50,000-$US100,000) and significantly lower than alternative thresholds suggested in recent years ($US183,000-$US264,000/life-year gained, or $US300,000/quality-adjusted life-year) in oncology.

The Treatment Satisfaction Scale: A Multidimensional Instrument for the Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction for Erectile Dysfunction Patients and Their Partners

BACKGROUND

The development of the Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) was previously reported (Kubin et al., 2004).

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the psychometric validation process and psychometric properties (e.g., reliability, validity, and responsiveness) of TSS.

METHODS

Initial patient and partner questionnaires were administered in a multi-national clinical trial. On the basis of exploratory analyses, iterative psychometric testing, and consideration of face validity and interpretability, the number of items was reduced, and six scales were constructed: "Satisfaction with Medication," "Ease with Erection," "Satisfaction with Erectile Function," "Pleasure from Sexual Activity," "Satisfaction with Orgasm," and either "Sexual Confidence" (for patients) or "Confidence in Completion" (for partners).

RESULTS

Multi-item scales had good internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity with the IIEF. All patient scales and most partner scales were valid in relation to clinical criteria, and all tested scales were responsive to change over time.

CONCLUSION

The TSS is brief, culturally valid, and the most comprehensive multidimensional measure of satisfaction with ED treatment for patients and their partners, and addresses some of the shortcomings of existing measures.

Current Status of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Industry-Sponsored Oncology Clinical Trials and Product Labels

Assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials is of interest to clinicians, patients, regulators, and industry. The use and impact of PROs is a growing area of methodologic research, particularly as they relate to tumor types, biomarkers, and various patient populations and cultures. Both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products in recent guidance have acknowledged the need to account for treatment-related impact on patient symptoms and/or health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Clinical research likely reflects the informative value of PROs. A search of www.clinicaltrials.gov , the FDA Web site, and product package inserts was conducted to assess the inclusion of symptom assessment and HRQOL within industry-sponsored clinical trials in cancer and approved cancer therapies and their respective product labels. Overall, there were 2,704 industry-sponsored oncology trials, of which 322 (12%) included a PRO measure. Of the 70 FDA new or revised labels, only six package inserts include PRO data. Symptoms were assessed uniformly across the phases of clinical trials, whereas HRQOL assessment increased in the later phases of clinical trials. Collecting PRO data can enhance our understanding of cancer burden and the impact of interventions on patients' lives.

The burden of illness associated with renal cell carcinoma in the United States

BACKGROUND

There were over 36,000 new cases of kidney cancer reported in the United States in 2004, the most common type being renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Available treatments for localized RCC frequently lead to cure; however RCC patients with advanced disease have limited treatment options and low survival rates. Data on the economic burden of RCC are limited.

METHODS

A prevalence-based model was used to estimate the aggregate annual societal cost burden of RCC in the U.S., including costs of treatment and lost productivity. Key parameters in the model include: the annual number of patients treated for RCC by age group and cancer stage; utilization of cancer treatments; unit costs; work-days missed; and wage rates. Multiplying stratum-specific distributions of treatment by annual quantities of treatments and unit costs yields estimates of RCC-related health-care costs. Multiplying stratum-specific estimates of annual workdays missed by average wage rates yields estimates of RCC-related lost productivity.

RESULTS

The annual prevalence of RCC in the U.S. was estimated to be 109,500 cases. The associated annual burden (inflated to 2005 U.S.$) was approximately $4.4 billion ($40,176 per patient). Health-care costs and lost productivity accounted for 92.4% ($4.1 billion) and 7.6% ($334 million), respectively. Reflecting its higher prevalence, the total cost associated with localized RCC accounted for the greatest share (78.2%), followed by regional, distant, and unstaged RCC, at 18.3%, 2.8%, and 0.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The economic burden of RCC in the U.S. is substantial. Interventions to reduce the prevalence of RCC have the potential to yield considerable economic benefits.

Validation of a patient-administered questionnaire to measure the activity impairment experienced by women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection: the Activity Impairment Assessment (AIA)

BACKGROUND

To validate a questionnaire to assess the activity impairment associated with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI).

METHODS

The Activity Impairment Assessment (AIA) assesses the amount of time an individual's work or regular activities have been impaired as a result of their UTI. The measure was completed by 276 women with uUTI who had participated in a prospective, open-label, non-comparative multi-centre clinical trial of CIPRO XR (extended-release ciprofloxacin). Baseline scores on the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and clinical symptom evaluations were collected for validation purposes.

RESULTS

An exploratory factor analysis showed that all items loaded > 0.84 on a single component. This uni-dimensional structure was supported by Rasch analysis. The AIA was found to have excellent levels of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93), convergent validity (all rs > .70) and divergent validity (rs = .078). The AIA displayed excellent discriminant validity in relation to clinical evaluations, and was found to be responsive to change across all clinical evaluations.

CONCLUSION

The unidimensional AIA shows high levels of internal reliability, convergent and divergent validity, discriminant validity and responsiveness. It is an excellent tool for measuring activity impairment in UTI.

Aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole or clopidogrel compared with aspirin monotherapy for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this health economic analysis was to asses the cost-effectiveness of a fixed combination of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole (ASA/ER-DP) or clopidogrel compared with ASA monotherapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND

The second European Stroke Prevention Study (ASA/ESPS-2), a large-scale clinical trial, demonstrated that a new therapy--a fixed combination of ASA/ER-DP--is more effective than ASA monotherapy for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We used data from ESPS-2 to create a health economic model that estimates the incremental cost and cost-effectiveness of ASA/ER-DP during the 2-year time frame after an ischemic stroke. The model was developed from a payor perspective. The analysis used direct cost estimates for stroke from a Medicare claims database analysis. Efficacy data were obtained from clinical trials to determine the incremental cost per stroke averted for ASA/ER-DP or clopidogrel versus ASA. Sensitivity analyses also were conducted to test the reliability and robustness of the model.

RESULTS

The results of the analysis demonstrated that ASA/ER-DP was cost-effective compared with ASA monotherapy for the secondary prevention of stroke, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of $28,472. The model remained robust over a range of assumptions and cost estimates. Clopidogrel, however, was not cost-effective compared with ASA (cost per stroke averted, $161,316) in either the base-case analysis or any of the sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

ASA/ER-DP thus offers a cost-effective alternative to ASA monotherapy for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke.

Potential health care cost savings associated with early treatment of multiple sclerosis using disease-modifying therapy

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have shown that treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), such as interferon, at the time of clinically isolated syndrome can delay the onset of multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess health care utilization and expenditures associated with treating patients early with DMTs rather than delaying until patients meet the full diagnostic criteria of MS.

METHODS

A retrospective study used insurance claims data (2000-2008) of enrolled patients before documented MS (1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification 340 coding). Treatment cohorts were early DMT (DMT claim before the first documented MS; N = 227) and delayed DMT (DMT started after documented MS; N = 3724). Comparisons during 1 year of follow-up were adjusted for confounding using multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Adjusted annual per-patient expenditures (including patient out of pocket) for early versus delayed were as follows: total ($28,280 vs $29,102; P = 0.44), excluding DMT cost ($15,214 vs $17,630; P < 0.01), and MS-related ($9365 vs $13,661; P < 0.01). Hospitalizations were 10.1% versus 16.5% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis indicated that early DMT treatment was associated with fewer hospitalizations than delayed treatment, and there was no statistically significant difference in annual health care expenditures. This suggests that the drug costs of early therapy were offset by savings in other medical expenditures.

Early Conceptual and Linguistic Development of a Patient and Partner Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) for Erectile Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To describe the early development of a pluri-language self-report questionnaire to assess male patients and their female partners' satisfaction with drug treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS

This first development phase proceeded in several parts. Item generation followed literature review, hypothesized characteristics of the drug and in-depth interviews with patients and their partners. Perceptions and feelings related to ED and patients' expectations of treatment were explored. Items were generated simultaneously in 5 languages (American English, Canadian French, English, French and German). Content and face validity were empirically assessed by interviews with a few patients and partners in each country. Conceptual equivalence between languages was ascertained.

RESULTS

The final content domains included satisfaction with: sexual spontaneity, quality of erection, quality of ejaculation, sexual pleasure, orgasm, confidence, reliability of treatment, side effects, convenience, overall satisfaction, conformity to treatment expectations and intent to continue use of drug. Cognitive debriefing with patients and partners found few issues with comprehension, however some words were considered problematic. The simultaneous development for the different languages allowed adaptation of the content at this stage and ensured consistency of all language versions. The final questionnaire consisted of 4 modules: unmedicated patient, medicated patient, unmedicated partner, and medicated partner modules. The questionnaire was then linguistically validated into 15 additional languages for further psychometric validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) is a multi-facetted measure of patients' and partners' satisfaction with their sexual life relating to erectile dysfunction and intended for prospective use. Its simultaneous development for a variety of countries and languages has fostered true item equivalence across language versions. However, further work is needed to validate the TSS psychometrically, including identification of domains, test responsiveness and determination of appropriate scoring prior to its clinical use.

Mobility of heavy metals in sandy soil after application of composts produced from maize straw, sewage sludge and biochar

Studies on the availability of heavy metals in composted organic materials and in soil amended with these materials are of practical significance. They are used in the assessment of the purity of the soil environment and of the biological value of plants intended for human and animal consumption. Composting of organic materials has a significant effect on changes in mobile forms of heavy metals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of the addition of biochar and sewage sludge on (i) the contents of water soluble forms of Cu, Cd, Pb, and Zn in composts; and (ii) the contents of mobile forms of these elements in sandy soil after the addition of composts. Addition of sewage sludge and biochar to maize straw did not increase the heavy metal forms extracted with water in total content of heavy metals. The content of Cd and Cu extracted with water in composts produced from maize straw and sewage sludge, and produced from maize straw, sewage sludge and biochar was higher than the one determined in compost produced from maize straw. The content of Pb and Zn extracted with water in compost produced from maize straw, sewage sludge and biochar was lower than in compost produced from maize straw. The addition of sewage sludge and biochar to maize straw had an immobilizing effect on mobile forms of the studied elements compared to compost produced from maize straw and sewage sludge. The addition of composts to soil decreased the contents of mobile forms of Cu, Cd, and Pb extracted with 1 M NH₄NO₃ compared to the contents in the control soil. However, the content of Zn extracted with NH₄NO₃ increased in treatments with 0.5% dose of compost produced from maize straw and sewage sludge and 0.5% dose of compost produced from maize straw, sewage sludge and biochar. In none of the analyzed cases, the application of the composts produced did not exceed the acceptable content of studied elements in the soil.

A comparison of quality of life and symptoms in kidney cancer patients receiving sorafenib versus placebo

4534

Background: Results from the Phase III TARGETs study showed that sorafenib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Overall survival was longer with sorafenib than placebo with a hazard ratio of 0.72. The impact of sorafenib treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and symptoms was also evaluated. Methods: HRQL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Symptoms were measured by the FACT-Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI), in which patients used a Likert scale (0–4) to respond to each of 15 items. FACT-G and FKSI were administered at baseline, at Day 1 of each cycle, and at end-of-treatment visit. Statistical analyses used a random coefficient model over five cycles, using MSKCC risk and treatment as factors and baseline score and relative days as covariates, adjusted for multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. Results: A total of 903 patients were randomized. The FACT-G completion rates at baseline, and Cycles 2, 3, 4, and 5 were; 96%, 91%, 95%, 99%, and 100%, respectively. The FKSI completion rates were; 94%, 89%, 94%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. The completion rate within each patient reported outcome (PRO) measure, across all visits, was 93%. At baseline, there was no between-treatment difference in score for either FACT-G or FKSI. There was no treatment difference after adjusting for multiple comparisons in mean FACT-G total score (p = 0.96) or its domains (physical well-being [p = 0.92]; emotional well-being [p = 0.46]); social well-being [p = 0.75]; functional well-being [p = 0.94]), and no difference in total score of FKSI over time. FKSI single-item analysis showed that sorafenib-treated patients had significantly less symptoms vs placebo (e.g. cough [p < 0.0001], fevers [p = 0.0015], ‘worry that condition will worsen’ [p = 0.0004], shortness of breath [p ≤ 0.0312], and ‘ability to enjoy life’ [p = 0.0119]). Only ‘concern about treatment side-effects’ favored placebo patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Sorafenib demonstrates clinical benefit without adversely impacting overall HRQL, and has a positive impact on individual symptoms.

[Table: see text]

Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus best supportive care in advanced renal cell carcinoma

4604

Background: Results from the Phase III TARGETs study showed that sorafenib plus best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with BSC alone (p < 0.000001) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In addition, at a planned interim analysis, overall survival was numerically longer with sorafenib than BSC with a hazard ratio of 0.72. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sorafenib + BSC versus BSC alone in advanced RCC from a US payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model was developed to project the lifetime survival and costs associated with sorafenib + BSC and BSC alone. The model tracked patients with advanced RCC through three disease states - PFS, progression, and death. Transition probabilities between disease states varied for each 3-month period and were obtained from the TARGETs study. Life-years gained were used as a measure of treatment effectiveness. Resource utilization included drug, administration, physician visits, monitoring, and adverse events. Costs and survival benefits were discounted annually at 3%. All costs were adjusted to 2004 US dollars. Scenario sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: The lifetime per patient costs were $85,571 and $36,634 for sorafenib + BSC and BSC alone, respectively. The life-years gained were higher for sorafenib relative to BSC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sorafenib + BSC versus BSC alone was $75,354 per life-year gained. The key drivers of the model results were survival after progression and PFS probabilities for both treatment groups. Sensitivity analyses showed that the model results were robust to variance in sorafenib and BSC treatment costs. Conclusions: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was within the established threshold that society is willing to pay (i.e., $50,000-$100,000). Therefore, sorafenib + BSC appears to be cost-effective in the management of advanced RCC.

[Table: see text]

Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalised adults with COVID-19 in a Global Health Research Network: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine age, gender, and temporal differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of adult patients hospitalised with COVID-19.

DESIGN

A cohort study using deidentified electronic medical records from a Global Research Network.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

67 456 adult patients hospitalised with COVID-19 from the USA; 7306 from Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific between February 2020 and January 2021.

RESULTS

In the US cohort, compared with patients 18-34 years old, patients ≥65 had a greater risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.73, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.90), acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)/respiratory failure (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.76 to 1.96), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV, aHR 1.93, 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.15), and all-cause mortality (aHR 5.6, 95% CI 4.36 to 7.18). Men appeared to be at a greater risk for ICU admission (aHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.39), ARDS/respiratory failure (aHR 1.24, 95% CI1.21 to 1.27), IMV (aHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.45), and all-cause mortality (aHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.24) compared with women. Moreover, we observed a greater risk of adverse outcomes during the early pandemic (ie, February-April 2020) compared with later periods. In the ex-US cohort, the age and gender trends were similar; for the temporal trend, the highest proportion of patients with all-cause mortality were also in February-April 2020; however, the highest percentages of patients with IMV and ARDS/respiratory failure were in August-October 2020 followed by February-April 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided valuable information on the temporal trends of characteristics and outcomes of hospitalised adult COVID-19 patients in both USA and ex-USA. It also described the population at a potentially greater risk for worse clinical outcomes by identifying the age and gender differences. Together, the information could inform the prevention and treatment strategies of COVID-19. Furthermore, it can be used to raise public awareness of COVID-19's impact on vulnerable populations.

Anti-tumor effects of peptide analogs targeting neuropeptide hormone receptors on mouse pheochromocytoma cells

Pheochromocytoma is a rare but potentially lethal chromaffin cell tumor with currently no effective treatment. Peptide hormone receptors are frequently overexpressed on endocrine tumor cells and can be specifically targeted by various anti-tumor peptide analogs. The present study carried out on mouse pheochromocytoma cells (MPCs) and a more aggressive mouse tumor tissue-derived (MTT) cell line revealed that these cells are characterized by pronounced expression of the somatostatin receptor 2 (sst2), growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor and the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) receptor. We further demonstrated significant anti-tumor effects mediated by cytotoxic somatostatin analogs, AN-162 and AN-238, by LHRH antagonist, Cetrorelix, by the cytotoxic LHRH analog, AN-152, and by recently developed GHRH antagonist, MIA-602, on MPC and for AN-152 and MIA-602 on MTT cells. Studies of novel anti-tumor compounds on these mouse cell lines serve as an important basis for mouse models of metastatic pheochromocytoma, which we are currently establishing.

Can the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis adapt to changing needs? A psychometric validation in patients with clinically isolated syndrome and early relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Background: The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) is widely used in clinical trial programmes; however, it was developed before the rise in trials targeted at early stage multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FAMS within two clinically distinct populations, CIS and early relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS), and discern the appropriateness of the FAMS within these populations.

Methods: Secondary analysis was conducted on FAMS data from two clinical trials assessing interferon beta–1b in early RRMS and CIS. The statistical analysis assessed the scale acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the FAMS. Item response theory (IRT) was also conducted on the early RRMS sample in order to assess how well the FAMS discriminated amongst individuals with less severe MS.

Results: Results from both trials demonstrated an improvement in the FAMS psychometric properties with increased baseline disease severity. However, high ceiling effects were evident amongst less severe patients, and there was an overall lack of responsiveness to improvement and poor construct validity. IRT also demonstrated its lack of discrimination/sensitivity in early RRMS.

Conclusions: In trials involving patients with early stage RRMS and CIS, modifications to the FAMS based on a qualitative assessment of its content validity in these populations would be required in order to potentially improve the FAMS psychometric properties and sensitivity.

Health-related quality of life measures in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving sorafenib

17085

Background: A multicenter, international, single-arm Phase II study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sorafenib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQL) and symptoms were assessed. Methods: HRQL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire that was self-administered at baseline, at every other cycle during the study treatment period, and at the end-of-treatment (EOT) visit. Patients responded to each item on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Five subscale scores and an overall function score were calculated, with higher scores reflecting better function and symptom response. A change of two points, the minimum important difference (MID), in each of the five domains (physical well-being [PWB], emotional well-being [EWB], social well-being [SWB], lung cancer symptoms [LCS], and functional well-being [FWB]) was determined to be clinically meaningful. The total score of the treatment outcome index (TOI) was also assessed. Results: A total of 52 patients were evaluated. Data were collected at baseline, Cycle 2, Cycle 4, and EOT for 50/52 (96%), 42/52 (81%), 21/52 (40%), and 20/52 (38%) of patients, respectively. The mean total FACT-L scores were 99.3, 106.5, and 83.7 at Cycles 2, 4, and EOT, respectively. The mean changes from baseline in the total FACT-L score were -4.6, -0.2, and -14.6 at Cycles 2, 4, and EOT, respectively. The mean change from baseline in the each subscale scores were: -0.6, -1.0, -5.8 for PWB; -0.4, -0.8, -0.6 for SWB; -0.0, 2.1, -1.1 for EWB; -0.7, 0.9, -3.9 for FWB; -0.5, -1.0, -3.6 for LCS; and -2.6, -1.0, -13.2 for TOI, at Cycles 2, 4, and EOT, respectively. An improvement greater than the MID was observed in EWB at Cycle 4. Decreases below MID were observed for EWB at Cycle 2 and EOT, and all other subscales of the FACT-L at Cycles 2, 4, and EOT. Conclusions: These findings are encouraging and suggest that sorafenib did not adversely impact patient-reported outcomes in function and symptom response during the treatment period. As there is no comparator arm, interpretation of results is limited.

[Table: see text]

Do practice guidelines augment drug utilisation review?

Drug utilisation review (DUR) or drug use evaluation (DUE) studies or programmes are intended to detect and/or correct inappropriate drug use. Appropriateness can be assessed at 3 levels: (i) whether any medication is warranted, or whether either no therapy or nondrug therapy is preferred (level 1); (ii) assuming drug therapy is indicated, which of several alternative drugs is the preferred choice? (level 2); and (iii) appropriateness of the drug regimen, including dosage, duration, type and frequency of monitoring, and drug interactions (level 3). The traditional approach to DUR/DUE has been to begin the appropriateness evaluation after a drug is prescribed. However, changes in healthcare organisation provide the basis for a disease-management or health-maintenance approach to DUR/DUE, and practice guidelines afford a possible source for guiding such studies. We hypothesised that the latter approach to DUR/DUE would be more likely to result in evaluation of level 1 drug-therapy issues than the traditional DUR/DUE approach. We tested this hypothesis by reviewing 56 practice guidelines involving drug therapy and also reviewed research studies published from 1992 to 1996. We found that studies that used the traditional DUR/DUE approach were most likely to examine level 3 drug-therapy issues, never addressed level 1 issues, and typically evaluated adherence to provider- or study team-developed guidelines rather than published guidelines. In contrast, the disease- or health-management approach nearly always examined level 1 issues, seldom addressed level 3 issues, and almost always evaluated adherence to a published practice guideline. Regardless of the DUR/DUE approach, about 40% of studies evaluated level 2 issues. The guidelines themselves were much more likely to include recommendations about level 1 and level 2 issues than about level 3 issues; however, even when a guideline included level 2 or level 3 issues, studies of adherence to the guideline rarely assessed anything beyond level 1 issues. This suggests that guideline recommendations about level 2 and level 3 issues may be too imprecise for use in evaluative studies. The drug-information compendia, on the other hand, provide detailed recommendations about level 3 issues. Revision of drug compendia may be warranted to include recommendations about all levels of drug-therapy issues. The results of intervention studies to improve drug-therapy compliance with guidelines suggest that information provided at the time of prescribing, information presented by local health professionals and information provided with a large amount of provider contact may be more likely to demonstrate significant improvements in drug therapy. We conclude that practice guidelines are a useful resource for augmenting DUR/DUE but that challenges to optimising their use include whether they can be kept current, acceptable and accessible to providers.

Delphi panel study of current hypertension treatment patterns

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether, and to what extent, usual practice in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension differs from that recommended in the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-VI). The results were used as input for a clinical decision analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of a new treatment for hypertension.

METHODS

A Delphi panel survey of general practitioners and cardiologists in the United States was conducted to determine current strategies for the treatment of mild to moderate uncomplicated hypertension. The purpose of the panel survey was to reach consensus on 3 key facets of the JNC-VI guidelines and how they relate to the respondents' clinical practices: (1) the definition of mild to moderate hypertension, (2) the treatment that adult patients with uncomplicated mild to moderate hypertension should receive, and (3) the management of patient follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 20 physicians contacted for the survey, 10 responded to both rounds of the questionnaire. There was considerable variation in the responses for defining the ranges of healthy, acceptable, unacceptable, and serious blood pressure. In general, the Delphi panel respondents cited higher limits than stated in the JNC-VI guidelines. Physicians followed the guidelines approximately 60% of the time. Primary determinants of initial drug choice among the panelists were comorbid conditions and the severity of hypertension; patients' age, race, and sex were secondary determinants. Follow-up typically occurred 1 month after therapy initiation. Panelists reported titrating the dose of new therapies upward once or twice before discontinuing the drug for lack of efficacy. Once adequate blood pressure control was achieved, patient follow-up was reported to occur every 3 to 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi panel study highlights the differences between clinical practice and the JNC-VI guidelines in the treatment of hypertension. The results were used as a basis for defining a structure for a cost-effectiveness model and provided the management practice and prescribing practice patterns required by the model.

Trends in characteristics and outcomes among US adults hospitalised with COVID-19 throughout 2020: an observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the temporal patterns of patient characteristics, treatments used and outcomes associated with COVID-19 in patients who were hospitalised for the disease between January and 15 November 2020.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

COVID-19 subset of the Optum deidentified electronic health records, including more than 1.8 million patients from across the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

There were 51 510 hospitalised patients who met the COVID-19 definition, with 37 617 in the laboratory positive cohort and 13 893 in the clinical cohort.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Incident acute clinical outcomes, including in-hospital all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Respectively, 48% and 49% of the laboratory positive and clinical cohorts were women. The 50- 65 age group was the median age group for both cohorts. The use of antivirals and dexamethasone increased over time, fivefold and twofold, respectively, while the use of hydroxychloroquine declined by 98%. Among adult patients in the laboratory positive cohort, absolute age/sex standardised incidence proportion for in-hospital death changed by -0.036 per month (95% CI -0.042 to -0.031) from March to June 2020, but remained fairly flat from June to November, 2020 (0.001 (95% CI -0.001 to 0.003), 17.5% (660 deaths /3986 persons) in March and 10.2% (580/5137) in October); in the clinical cohort, the corresponding changes were -0.024 (95% CI -0.032 to -0.015) and 0.011 (95% CI 0.007 0.014), respectively (14.8% (175/1252) in March, 15.3% (189/1203) in October). Declines in the cumulative incidence of most acute clinical outcomes were observed in the laboratory positive cohort, but not for the clinical cohort.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of adverse clinical outcomes remains high among COVID-19 patients with clinical diagnosis only. Patients with COVID-19 entering the hospital are at elevated risk of adverse outcomes.

Responsiveness and Minimum Important Differences for the Erection Quality Scale

PURPOSE

We evaluated the responsiveness and treatment sensitivity of the Erection Quality Scale, and provided further psychometric validation of this scale.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An 8-week, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction was performed. The Erection Quality Scale, together with a number of other patient and partner questionnaires, was administered at a screening visit, at baseline, and weeks 4 and 8 of treatment. Erection Quality Scale responsiveness was investigated by evaluating treatment induced changes and modeling using ANCOVA. Internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and minimum important difference of the Erection Quality Scale were also assessed.

RESULTS

Efficacy evaluations demonstrated that the Erection Quality Scale was sufficiently responsive to differentiate the treatment benefits of vardenafil compared with placebo. Internal consistency for the Erection Quality Scale total score was similar across visits, with values high enough to suggest reliability of items included in the scale. Discriminant validity of the Erection Quality Scale total score was demonstrated, with a high correlation with the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (0.88, p <0.0001) and negligible correlations with clinical measures assumed to be unrelated to erection quality. All Erection Quality Scale total score comparisons substantially exceeded the 5-point minimum important difference estimate.

CONCLUSIONS

The Erection Quality Scale was responsive and internally consistent, and demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. Furthermore, this instrument provided a unique contribution to the measurement of erection quality compared to the International Index of Erectile Function. This study provides strong evidence supporting the use of the Erection Quality Scale in clinical trials.