Quality improvement program reduces venous thromboembolism in infants and children with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA)

PURPOSE

Patients with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) treated with the Foker process are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). An institutional quality improvement program to decrease VTE risk factor exposure and utilize prophylactic anticoagulation was implemented. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a VTE risk-reduction program in patients with LGEA.

METHODS

Implementation and evaluation of a VTE risk-reduction program in patients with LGEA from 2012 to 2015 was performed. Symptomatic VTE with radiographic confirmation were defined as events. Post-program characteristics were evaluated and compared to a historical cohort.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were identified. Two developed VTE (7 %) post-program implementation; compared to 13/40 (33 %) VTE incidence in the historical cohort (p = 0.018). Baseline demographics were similar, including age, esophageal atresia type and gap length. Post-protocol patients had fewer paralysis episodes (p = 0.004), paralysis days (p = 0.003), central venous catheters (p = 0.003), thoracotomies (p < 0.001), ventilator hours (p = 0.02), and decreased hospital (p < 0.001) and ICU stay (p < 0.001). All patients in the VTE risk-reduction program were exposed to prophylactic anticoagulation. No bleeding complications and/or thrombosis-related mortality occurred.

CONCLUSION

VTE risk-reduction program implementation decreased symptomatic VTE incidence with associated decreases in ICU and hospital length of stay. Prophylactic anticoagulation can be utilized safely in a complicated pediatric surgical population.

Pediatric heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: prevalence, thrombotic risk, and application of the 4Ts scoring system

OBJECTIVE

To characterize heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) at a single pediatric center including the prevalence and the accuracy of the 4Ts scoring system as a predictor of HIT.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 155 consecutive patients <21 years old with sufficient data for 4Ts scoring. The 4Ts scoring system is a validated pretest tool in adults that predicts the likelihood of HIT using clinical features. Hospital-wide exposure to unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin was determined by querying the hospital pharmacy database.

RESULTS

The majority of patients with suspected HIT (61.2%) were on surgical services. Prediction of HIT risk using initial 4Ts scoring found 3 (2%) had high risk 4Ts scores, 114 (73%) had intermediate risk 4Ts scores, and the remaining 38 (25%) had low risk 4Ts scores. HIT was confirmed in 0/38 patients with low risk 4Ts scores, 2/114 patients with intermediate-risk 4Ts scores, and all 3 patients with high-risk 4Ts scores presented with HIT with thrombosis. Of 12 positive HIT screening tests, results were falsely positive in 66.6% of patients with intermediate risk 4Ts scores and 100% of patients with low risk 4Ts scores. The prevalence of HIT was 0.058% and HIT with thrombosis was 0.046% in pediatric patients on unfractionated heparin.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HIT appears significantly lower in pediatric patients compared with adults. Application of the 4Ts system as a pretest tool may reduce laboratory evaluation for HIT in heparin-exposed children with low risk 4Ts scores, decreasing unnecessary further testing, intervention, and cost.

Observational Cohort Study of Pediatric Inpatients With Central Venous Catheters at “Intermediate Risk” of Thrombosis and Eligible for Anticoagulant Prophylaxis

The risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among hospitalized children is rising.The optimal approach to DVT prophylaxis in children is unclear. This study set out to ascertain the prevalence of DVT among pediatric inpatients who neither have contraindications to nor absolute indications for prophylactic therapy. A prospective surveillance of at-risk children plus a retrospective chart review were conducted. Patients were considered to be at risk after the first 2 days of their admission. Of 1,637patients reviewed, 198 patients met criteria; among these, 84% did not receive prophylaxis. Of 2,354 observed days at risk for nonprophylaxed patients (including days at risk prior to initiating prophylaxis among prophlyaxed patients), there were 9 DVT events, for a rate 3.82/1,000 days observed. A total of 31 patients received prophylaxis. Three of these patients experienced a DVT. One patient had a bleeding event, hematuria. These results describe patients who may be eligible for prophylaxis and should be screened for further risk factors.