Management of adverse events from the treatment of encorafenib plus cetuximab for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: insights from the BEACON CRC study

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with a 5-year relative survival of 14% in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients with BRAF V600E mutations, which occur in ∼10%-15% of patients with mCRC, have a poorer prognosis compared with those with wild-type BRAF tumours. The combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab currently represents the only chemotherapy-free targeted therapy approved in the USA and Europe for previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. As a class, BRAF inhibitors are associated with dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and renal events, as well as pyrexia and secondary skin malignancies. Adverse event (AE) profiles of specific BRAF inhibitors vary, however, and are affected by the specific agents given in combination. In patients with mCRC, commonly reported AEs of cetuximab monotherapy include infusion reactions and dermatologic toxicities. Data from the phase III BEACON CRC study indicate that the combination of encorafenib with cetuximab has a distinct safety profile. Here we review the most frequently reported AEs that occurred with this combination in BEACON CRC and best practices for managing and mitigating AEs that require more than standard supportive care.

Encorafenib Plus Cetuximab as a New Standard of Care for Previously Treated BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated Survival Results and Subgroup Analyses from the BEACON Study

BEACON CRC evaluated encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib versus investigators' choice of irinotecan or FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in patients with BRAFV600E–mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), after progression on 1-2 prior regimens. In the previously reported primary analysis, encorafenib, binimetinib plus cetuximab (ENCO/BINI/CETUX; triplet) and encorafenib plus cetuximab (ENCO/CETUX; doublet) regimens improved overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR; by blinded central review) versus standard of care. The purpose of this analysis was to report updated efficacy and safety data.

Trial in progress: Phase 1a/b study of PF-07284890 (brain-penetrant BRAF inhibitor) with/without binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors

TPS3152

Background: BRAF inhibitors have transformed treatment (Tx) for patients (pts) with BRAF V600-mutant cancers, but long-term efficacy is limited by disease progression in the brain, due to poor brain penetration. PF-07284890 is a potent, selective, highly brain-penetrant, small-molecule inhibitor of BRAF V600 mutations. This first in human study will assess the PK, safety, and preliminary clinical activity of PF-07284890, as monotherapy and in combination with binimetinib (MEK inhibitor), in pts with BRAF V600-mutated advanced solid tumors with/without brain metastases. Methods: Phase 1a/1b open-label, multicenter, dose-finding study (NCT04543188). Pts will be ≥18 y with a histologically confirmed advanced/metastatic solid tumor including primary brain tumor (PBT), confirmed BRAF V600 mutation, and presence/absence of brain involvement. Pts will have disease progression despite prior Tx without alternative Tx options. Pts with brain metastasis/PBT > 4 cm and/or symptomatic brain disease will be excluded initially, but allowed based on emerging PK. Phase 1a is a dose escalation study of PF-07284890 (monotherapy and combination). ̃35 pts will be enrolled to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of PF-07284890 (monotherapy and combination). Cohorts of 2-4 pts will be treated at each dose level of PF-07284890 until MTD/RDE determination (PF-07284890 starting dose: 50 mg QD; binimetinib 45 mg BID). Bayesian Logistic Regression Model will be used to inform dose level decisions. At least 6 pts each for monotherapy and combination will be treated at MTD/RDE. Phase 1a primary endpoints: Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities; MTD/RDE; AEs; lab abnormalities; and dose interruptions, modifications and discontinuations due to AEs. Secondary endpoints include PK parameters and overall response (RECIST; overall and intracranial; RANO for PBT). Phase 1b is a dose expansion and drug-drug interaction study to further evaluate PF-07284890 + binimetinib. Cohorts 1-4 (̃40 pts each) will enroll pts based on tumor type, brain involvement (asymptomatic/symptomatic), and prior Tx. Cohort 5 (̃20 pts) will include pts with any solid tumor including leptomeningeal metastases. Cohort 6 (̃10 pts) will assess the effect of PF-07284890 + binimetinib on CYP3A activity using midazolam as a substrate. Phase 1b primary endpoint: overall response (RECIST; overall and intracranial; RANO for PBT). Secondary endpoints: duration of response; progression-free survival; disease control rate; time to response; overall survival; AEs; lab abnormalities; and dose interruptions, modifications and discontinuations due to AEs; and PK parameters. For both Phase 1a and 1b, Tx will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. Study began enrolling pts in January 2021 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04543188.

Encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: Quality-of-life results from a randomized, three-arm, phase III study versus the choice of either irinotecan or FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (BEACON CRC)

4039

Background: In the BEACON CRC study, the triplet regimen of encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CETUX) significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR:0.52, P < 0.0001) and objective response rates (ORR, 26% vs 2%, P < 0.0001) in patients (pts) with BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) compared with current standard of care. This analysis focuses on the patient-reported quality of life (QOL) assessments from this study. Methods: The BEACON CRC study was a randomized, open-label, 3-arm, phase 3 global study which evaluated triplet (ENCO+BINI+CETUX) or doublet (ENCO+CETUX) vs. investigator’s choice of irinotecan + CETUX or FOLFIRI + CETUX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. QOL assessments (secondary endpoints in the trial) included the EORTC QOL Questionnaire (QLQ C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colon Cancer (FACT C), EuroQol 5D 5L, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). The primary assessment for the QOL variables was the time to definitive 10% deterioration. The study is ongoing. Results: 665 pts were randomly assigned to receive either triplet (n = 224), doublet (n = 220), or control (n = 221). Reduction in the risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.70) and 52% (HR 0., 9485% CI: 0.38, 0.62) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C assessments, respectively, in favor of the triplet regimen over control. For the doublet vs. control, reduction in risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 46% (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.69) and 54% (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.59) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C, respectively in favor of the doublet. Similar results were observed in EuroQol 5D 5L and PGIC assessments. There were no overall differences in QOL between triplet and doublet across the 4 instruments. Conclusions: In BEACON CRC, triplet and doublet demonstrated substantial improvement in patient-reported QOL assessments over the current standard of care in pts with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic CRC whose disease had progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224 .

Encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib for BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated survival results from a randomized, three-arm, phase III study versus choice of either irinotecan or FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (BEACON CRC)

4001

Background: BEACON CRC is a randomized, phase 3 study which evaluated the triplet of encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CETUX) and the doublet of ENCO + CETUX vs. investigator’s choice of irinotecan + CETUX or FOLFIRI + CETUX in patients (pts) with BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose disease had progressed after 1-2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR; by blinded central review) for triplet vs control. In a previous interim analysis, triplet and doublet improved OS and ORR versus standard of care. Here we report on an updated analysis. Methods: Updated analysis includes 6 months of additional follow-up and response data for all randomized pts. The study is ongoing. Results: Pts received triplet (n=224), doublet (n=220), or control (n=221). Median OS was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:8.2, 10.8) for triplet and 5.9 months (95% CI:5.1-7.1) for control (hazard ratio [HR] (95% CI): 0.60 (0.47-0.75)). Median OS for doublet was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.0-11.3) (HR vs. control: 0.61 (0.48-0.77). Confirmed ORR was 26.8% (95% CI: 21.1%-33.1%) for triplet, 19.5% (95% CI: 14.5%-25.4%) for doublet, and 1.8% (95% CI: 0.5%-4.6%) for control. Retrospective subgroup analyses suggested some pts may benefit more from triplet than doublet therapy (Table). Both triplet and doublet showed improved OS compared to control in all subgroups. Adverse events were consistent with prior analysis, with grade ≥3 adverse events in 65.8%, 57.4%, and 64.2% for triplet, doublet and control, respectively. Conclusions: The updated analysis of the BEACON CRC study confirmed that encorafenib + cetuximab with or without binimetinib improved OS and ORR in previously treated pts with BRAF V600E mCRC compared with standard chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224 . [Table: see text]

Encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: Quality-of-life results from a randomized, three-arm, phase III study versus the choice of either irinotecan or FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (BEACON CRC)

8

Background: In the BEACON CRC study, the triplet regimen of encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CETUX) significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR:0.52, P < 0.0001) and objective response rates (ORR, 26% vs 2%, P < 0.0001) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) compared with current standard of care. This analysis focuses on the patient-reported quality of life (QOL) assessments from this study. Methods: The BEACON CRC study was a randomized, open-label, 3-arm, phase 3 global study which evaluated triplet (ENCO+BINI+CETUX) or doublet (ENCO+CETUX) vs. investigator’s choice of irinotecan + CETUX or FOLFIRI + CETUX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. QOL assessments (secondary endpoints in the trial) included the EORTC QOL Questionnaire (QLQ C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colon Cancer (FACT C), EuroQol 5D 5L, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). The primary assessment for the QOL variables was the time to definitive 10% deterioration between arms. Results: 665 pts were randomly assigned to receive either triplet (n = 224), doublet (n = 220), or control (n = 221). Reduction in the risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.70) and 44% (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.71) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C assessments, respectively, in favor of the triplet regimen over control. For the doublet vs. control, reduction in risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 46% (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.69) and 43% (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.72) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C, respectively in favor of the doublet. Similar results were observed in EuroQol 5D 5L and PGIC assessments. There were no overall differences in QOL between triplet and doublet across the 4 instruments. Conclusions: In BEACON CRC, triplet and doublet demonstrated substantial improvement in patient-reported QOL assessments over the current standard of care in pts with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic CRC whose disease had progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.

Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E-Mutated Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with the BRAF V600E mutation have a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of 4 to 6 months after failure of initial therapy. Inhibition of BRAF alone has limited activity because of pathway reactivation through epidermal growth factor receptor signaling.

METHODS

In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we enrolled 665 patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer who had had disease progression after one or two previous regimens. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab (triplet-therapy group); encorafenib and cetuximab (doublet-therapy group); or the investigators' choice of either cetuximab and irinotecan or cetuximab and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) (control group). The primary end points were overall survival and objective response rate in the triplet-therapy group as compared with the control group. A secondary end point was overall survival in the doublet-therapy group as compared with the control group. We report here the results of a prespecified interim analysis.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 9.0 months in the triplet-therapy group and 5.4 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.70; P<0.001). The confirmed response rate was 26% (95% CI, 18 to 35) in the triplet-therapy group and 2% (95% CI, 0 to 7) in the control group (P<0.001). The median overall survival in the doublet-therapy group was 8.4 months (hazard ratio for death vs. control, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 58% of patients in the triplet-therapy group, in 50% in the doublet-therapy group, and in 61% in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of encorafenib, cetuximab, and binimetinib resulted in significantly longer overall survival and a higher response rate than standard therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with the BRAF V600E mutation. (Funded by Array BioPharma and others; BEACON CRC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02928224; EudraCT number, 2015-005805-35.).

Binimetinib, Encorafenib, and Cetuximab Triplet Therapy for Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Safety Lead-In Results From the Phase III BEACON Colorectal Cancer Study

PURPOSE

To determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of selective combination targeted therapy for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the safety lead-in phase of the open-label, randomized, three-arm, phase III BEACON Colorectal Cancer trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02928224; European Union Clinical Trials Register identifier: EudraCT2015-005805-35).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Before initiation of the randomized portion of the BEACON Colorectal Cancer trial, 30 patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC who had experienced treatment failure with one or two prior regimens were to be recruited to a safety lead-in of encorafenib 300 mg daily, binimetinib 45 mg twice daily, plus standard weekly cetuximab. The primary end point was safety, including the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Efficacy end points included overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Among the 30 treated patients, dose-limiting toxicities occurred in five patients and included serous retinopathy (n = 2), reversible decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (n = 1), and cetuximab-related infusion reactions (n = 2). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were fatigue (13%), anemia (10%), increased creatine phosphokinase (10%), increased AST (10%), and urinary tract infections (10%). In 29 patients with BRAF V600E-mutant tumors (one patient had a non-BRAF V600E-mutant tumor and was not included in the efficacy analysis), the confirmed overall response rate was 48% (95% CI, 29.4% to 67.5%), median progression-free survival was 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.3 months), and median overall survival was 15.3 months (95% CI, 9.6 months to not reached), with median duration of follow-up of 18.2 months (range, 16.6 to 19.8 months).

CONCLUSION

In the safety lead-in, the safety and tolerability of the encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab regimen is manageable and acceptable for initiation of the randomized portion of the study. The observed efficacy is promising compared with available therapies and, if confirmed in the randomized portion of the trial, could establish this regimen as a new standard of care for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC.

Updated results of the BEACON CRC safety lead-in: Encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CETUX) for BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

688

Background: BRAFV600E mutation occurs in 10%-–15% of patients (pts) with mCRC and confers a poor prognosis. After first-line therapy, standard second-line therapies provide limited benefit, with objective response rates (ORRs) < 10%, and overall survival (OS) of 4–6 months (mo). BEACON CRC (NCT02928224) is a 3-arm phase 3 trial of triplet therapy with the BRAF inhibitor ENCO + MEK inhibitor BINI + anti–EGFR antibody CETUX vs ENCO + CETUX vs a control arm (irinotecan/FOLFIRI + CETUX) in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC in the second or third-line setting. A safety lead-in (SLI) of the triplet therapy was conducted in 30 pts prior to initiation of the randomized part of the trial. Previously reported confirmed ORR in 29 pts with BRAFV600E mCRC was 48% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.0 mo (Van Cutsem E, et al. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:O-027). Here we present updated safety and efficacy results including mature OS. Methods: All pts in the SLI received ENCO 300 mg once daily + BINI 45 mg twice daily + CETUX standard weekly dose. Assessments included efficacy (ORR, duration of response, time to response, PFS, and OS), safety, and tolerability. Results: Among 30 pts treated, 1 had a BRAF non-V600E mutation and is not included in the efficacy analyses. At data cutoff, the median follow-up time for survival was 18.2 mo and median exposure was 7.8 mo (range 0.5–21.4 mo). The confirmed ORR and median PFS remain unchanged from the previous report (ORR, 48% [95%CI, 29.4–67.5]; PFS, 8.0 mo [95% CI, 5.6–9.3 mo]). Mature median OS is 15.3 mo (95% CI, 9.6 mo–not reached). The triplet continues to be well-tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were fatigue (13%), anemia, increases in creatine phosphokinase and/or aspartate aminotransferase, and urinary tract infections (each 10%). The rate of grade 3/4 skin toxicities continues to be lower than generally observed with CETUX in mCRC. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, triplet therapy with ENCO + BINI + CETUX continues to be well tolerated. Median PFS and now mature median OS are substantially improved over historical data for current standard-of-care options. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.

MicroRNA Profiling of Salivary Duct Carcinoma Versus Her2/Neu Overexpressing Breast Carcinoma Identify miR-10a as a Putative Breast Related Oncogene

Salivary duct carcinomas (SDC) and Her2/Neu3-overexpressing invasive breast carcinomas (HNPIBC/IBC) are histologically indistinguishable. We investigated whether common histopathologic and immunophenotypic features of SDC and IBC are mirrored by a similar microRNA (miRNA) profile. MiRNA profiling of 5 SDCs, 6 IBCs Her2/Neu3+, and 5 high-grade ductal breast carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was performed by NanoString platform. Selected miRNAs and HOXA1 gene were validated by RT-PCR. We observed similar miRNA expression profiles between IBC and SDC with the exception of 2 miRNAs, miR-10a and miR-142-3p, which were higher in IBC tumors. DCIS tumors displayed increased expression of miR-10a, miR-99a, miR-331-3p and miR-335, and decreased expression of miR-15a, miR-16 and miR-19b compared to SDC. The normal salivary gland and breast tissues also showed similar expression profiles. Interestingly, miR-10a was selectively increased in both IBC and normal breast tissue compared to SDC and normal salivary gland tissue. Moreover, our NanoString and RT-PCR data confirmed that miR-10a was upregulated in IBC and DCIS compared to SDC. Finally, we show downregulation of HOXA1, a miR-10 target, in IBC tumors compared to normal breast tissue. Taken together, our data demonstrates that, based on miRNA profiling, SDC is closely related to HNPIBC. Our results also suggest that miR-10a is differentially expressed in IBC compared to SDC and may have potential utility as a diagnostic biomarker in synchronous or metachronous malignant epithelial malignancies involving both organs. In addition, miR-10a could be playing an important role as a mammary-specific oncogene, involved in breast cancer initiation (DCIS) and progression (IBC), through mechanisms that include modulation of HOXA1 gene expression.

BEACON CRC study safety lead-in (SLI) in patients with BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Efficacy and tumor markers

627

Background: The SLI of the BEACON CRC phase 3 study assessed the safety and efficacy of the combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib (ENCO) + MEK inhibitor binimetinib (BINI) + anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (CETUX) in pts with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC after 1 or 2 prior regimens. CEA and CA19-9 are tumor markers that are widely used to monitor the effectiveness of systemic therapies for mCRC; here we report on the association of CEA and CA19-9 changes while on treatment with clinical outcomes in pts from the SLI. Methods: Pts in the SLI received the triplet of ENCO 300 mg QD + BINI 45 mg BID + CETUX 400 mg/m2 (initial dose) then 250 mg/m2 QW in 28-day cycles. Pts were evaluated for safety, radiographic response, and change in tumor markers CEA and CA19-9. Results: 30 pts were treated. The triplet was generally well tolerated, and adverse events were consistent with known BRAF, MEK, and EGFR inhibitor toxicities. The rate of severe skin toxicities (grade 3/4) was lower than generally observed for CETUX in mCRC. Of the 29 pts with a BRAFV600E mutation, the median time on study treatment was 5.6 mo (range, 1.0–9.3 mo), and 22 (76%) remained on study treatment at the time of data cutoff. The confirmed overall response rate (ORR) was 41%, with 1 complete and 11 partial responses. In addition, 9 pts had prolonged stable disease (SD) up to 9.3 mo.CEA and CA19-9 were analyzed in 28 pts. CEA and CA19-9 decreased in 96% and 82% of these pts, respectively. Among 15 pts with treatment duration ≥5.6 mo, median/mean % decreases were 97%/79% for CEA and 92%/82% for CA19-9 in confirmed responders (n=6). Respective decreases in pts with prolonged SD (n=9) were similar: 84%/68% for CEA and 89%/68% for CA19-9. Updated safety, efficacy, and tumor marker results will be provided. Conclusions: ENCO + BINI + CETUX is generally well tolerated and has encouraging clinical activity in BRAFV 600E mCRC, with a confirmed ORR of 41%. In pts with study treatment duration ≥5.6 mo, the tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 decreased markedly and to the same degree in responders vs pts with prolonged SD, providing additional evidence of the meaningful clinical activity of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.

BEACON CRC (binimetinib [BINI], encorafenib [ENCO], and cetuximab [CTX] combined to treat BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer [mCRC]): A multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-arm phase III study of ENCO plus CTX plus or minus BINI vs irinotecan (IRI)/CTX or infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/IRI (FOLFIRI)/CTX with a safety lead-in of ENCO + BINI + CTX in patients (Pts) with BRAFV600E mCRC

TPS3622

Background: BRAF mutations are found in ≈10% of mCRC cases. Pts with BRAFV600E mCRC have a poor prognosis, with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than pts with BRAFwt mCRC (Van Cutsem et al 2011; Modest et al 2012; Sorbye et al 2015). The benefits of combined BRAF + EGFR inhibition in mCRC have been demonstrated in vitro (Corcoran et al 2012; Prahallad et al 2012; Yang et al 2012), and preclinical evidence suggests that adding MEK signaling inhibition improves antitumor activity. Early clinical data indicate that BRAF + EGFR + MEK inhibition has greater activity than BRAF + EGFR inhibition in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC (Van Cutsem et al 2016). Our study will examine the combination of BINI (a MEK inhibitor) + ENCO (a selective BRAF kinase inhibitor) + CTX (an anti-EGFR antibody) and of ENCO + CTX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. Methods: BEACON CRC (NCT02928224) is enrolling pts with BRAFV600E mCRC whose disease has progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. A safety lead-in phase (≈30 pts) will determine the safety and tolerability of oral ENCO 300 mg QD + oral BINI 45 mg BID + intravenous CTX 400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 QW. In the phase 3 portion, ≈615 pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to triplet (ENCO + BINI + CTX), doublet (ENCO + CTX), or control (investigator’s choice of IRI/CTX or FOLFIRI/CTX) arms. Pts will be treated in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy, or death. The primary endpoint is OS (triplet vs control). Secondary endpoints include OS (doublet vs control), confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate according to RECIST version 1.1 (triplet or doublet vs control; triplet vs doublet), PFS (triplet or doublet vs control), duration of response, time to response, pharmacokinetics, and pt-reported outcomes. Safety will be summarized using standard adverse event reporting. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.

Phase 1b/2 trial of ribociclib+binimetinib in metastatic NRAS-mutant melanoma: Safety, efficacy, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D)

9519

Background: Simultaneous inhibition of MEK and CDK4/6 may suppress MAPK pathway activation and cell-cycle checkpoint dysregulation in NRAS-mutant melanoma, resulting in enhanced antitumor activity. Phase 1b data are reported. Methods: The phase 1b primary objective was to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/RP2D. A 28-d cycle of oral ribociclib (RIBO) once daily (QD) for 21 d + oral binimetinib (BINI) twice daily (BID) for 28 d, and a 21-d cycle of RIBO QD + BINI BID, both for 14 d per cycle, were evaluated. Secondary objectives were to evaluate efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics. Results: Based on dose escalation (van Herpen, ESMO 2015), MTD was 600mg RIBO/45mg BINI for the 21-d and 200/45 for the 28-d regimens. Due to promising activity, the 28-d cycle was selected as RP2D(unconfirmed partial response [PR] with limited follow-up occurred in 35% of pts). This finding was supported by comparable and manageable safety and the Bayesian logistic regression model.As of Jan 2017, the RP2D was received by 16 pts in phase 1b (ECOG PS 0/1/2, 63%/31%/6%; elevated lactate dehydrogenase, 44%; stage IVM1c disease, 50%; prior ipilimumab [ipi], 44%; prior anti–programmed death [PD]-1/PD-L1, 31%). Median (range) exposure was 4 (0–13) mo. Common adverse events (AEs) were increased blood creatine phosphokinase, elevated AST, peripheral edema, acneiform dermatitis, diarrhea and fatigue. Common grade 3/4 AEs were elevated AST and ALT (19%/6%), nausea (19%/0%), rash (19%/0%), vomiting (6%/6%) and neutropenia (12%/0%). Confirmed PR (cPR) occurred in 4 pts (25%; time to response, 48–168 d), stable disease in 7 pts (44%), disease progression in 3 pts (19%); 2 pts (12%) were not evaluable. Among cPR pts, 3 had prior ipi and/or anti–PD-1/PD-L1. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.7 (95% CI, 3.5–9.2) mo. Sequence analysis of synchronous non- RAS genetic alterations will be presented. Conclusions: Combined RIBO/BINI at the selected RP2D had a manageable safety profile and favorable efficacy (based on mPFS) for NRAS-mutant melanoma in phase 1b. Based on these promising data, the phase 2 expansion is underway to assess antitumor activity at the RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT01781572.

A Phase Ib Dose-Escalation Study of Encorafenib and Cetuximab with or without Alpelisib in Metastatic BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer

Preclinical evidence suggests that concomitant BRAF and EGFR inhibition leads to sustained suppression of MAPK signaling and suppressed tumor growth in BRAF^V600E colorectal cancer models. Patients with refractory BRAF^V600-mutant metastatic CRC (mCRC) were treated with a selective RAF kinase inhibitor (encorafenib) plus a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR (cetuximab), with (n = 28) or without (n = 26) a PI3Kα inhibitor (alpelisib). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or a recommended phase II dose. Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 3 patients receiving dual treatment and 2 patients receiving triple treatment. The MTD was not reached for either group and the phase II doses were selected as 200 mg encorafenib (both groups) and 300 mg alpelisib. Combinations of cetuximab and encorafenib showed promising clinical activity and tolerability in patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC; confirmed overall response rates of 19% and 18% were observed and median progression-free survival was 3.7 and 4.2 months for the dual- and triple-therapy groups, respectively.Significance: Herein, we demonstrate that dual- (encorafenib plus cetuximab) and triple- (encorafenib plus cetuximab and alpelisib) combination treatments are tolerable and provide promising clinical activity in the difficult-to-treat patient population with BRAF-mutant mCRC. Cancer Discov; 7(6); 610-9. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Sundar et al., p. 558This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 539.

Prognostic and biologic significance of DNMT3B expression in older patients with cytogenetically normal primary acute myeloid leukemia

DNMT3B encodes a DNA methyltransferase implicated in aberrant epigenetic changes contributing to leukemogenesis. We tested whether DNMT3B expression, measured by NanoString nCounter assay, associates with outcome, gene and microRNA expression and DNA methylation profiles in 210 older (⩾60 years) adults with primary, cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML). Patients were dichotomized into high versus low expressers using median cut. Outcomes were assessed in the context of known CN-AML prognosticators. Gene and microRNA expression, and DNA methylation profiles were analyzed using microarrays and MethylCap-sequencing, respectively. High DNMT3B expressers had fewer complete remissions (CR; P=0.002) and shorter disease-free (DFS; P=0.02) and overall (OS; P<0.001) survival. In multivariable analyses, high DNMT3B expression remained an independent predictor of lower CR rates (P=0.04) and shorter DFS (P=0.04) and OS (P=0.001). High DNMT3B expression associated with a gene expression profile comprising 363 genes involved in differentiation, proliferation and survival pathways, but with only four differentially expressed microRNAs (miR-133b, miR-148a, miR-122, miR-409-3p) and no differential DNA methylation regions. We conclude that high DNMT3B expression independently associates with adverse outcome in older CN-AML patients. Gene expression analyses suggest that DNMT3B is involved in the modulation of several genes, although the regulatory mechanisms remain to be investigated to devise therapeutic approaches specific for these patients.

Pluripotent stem cell miRNAs and metastasis in invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to determine whether microRNA for pluripotent stem cells are also expressed in breast cancer and are associated with metastasis and outcome.

METHODS

We studied global microRNA profiles during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells (n =26) and in breast cancer patients (n = 33) and human cell lines (n = 35). Using in situ hybridization, we then investigated MIR302 expression in 318 untreated breast cancer patients (test cohort, n = 22 and validation cohort, n = 296). In parallel, using next-generation sequencing data from breast cancer patients (n = 684), we assessed microRNA association with stem cell markers. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

In healthy tissues, the MIR302 (high)/MIR203 (low) asymmetry was exclusive for pluripotent stem cells. MIR302 was expressed in a small population of cancer cells within invasive ductal carcinoma, but not in normal breast (P < .001). Furthermore, MIR302 was expressed in the tumor cells together with stem cell markers, such as CD44 and BMI1. Conversely, MIR203 expression in 684 breast tumors negatively correlated with CD44 (Spearman correlation, Rho = -0.08, P = .04) and BMI1 (Rho = -0.11, P = .004), but positively correlated with differentiation marker CD24 (Rho = 0.15, P < .001). Primary tumors with lymph node metastasis had cancer cells showing scattered expression of MIR302 and widespread repression of MIR203. Finally, overall survival was statistically significantly shorter in patients with MIR302-positive cancer cells (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy tissues the MIR302(high)/MIR203(low) asymmetry was characteristic of embryonic and induced pluripotency. In invasive ductal carcinoma, the MIR302/MIR203 asymmetry was associated with stem cell markers, metastasis, and shorter survival.

SPARC promotes leukemic cell growth and predicts acute myeloid leukemia outcome

Aberrant expression of the secreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich (osteonectin) (SPARC) gene, which encodes a matricellular protein that participates in normal tissue remodeling, is associated with a variety of diseases including cancer, but the contribution of SPARC to malignant growth remains controversial. We previously reported that SPARC was among the most upregulated genes in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) patients with gene-expression profiles predictive of unfavorable outcome, such as mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2-R172) and overexpression of the oncogenes brain and acute leukemia, cytoplasmic (BAALC) and v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (ERG). In contrast, SPARC was downregulated in CN-AML patients harboring mutations in nucleophosmin (NPM1) that are associated with favorable prognosis. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that SPARC expression is clinically relevant in AML. Here, we found that SPARC overexpression is associated with adverse outcome in CN-AML patients and promotes aggressive leukemia growth in murine models of AML. In leukemia cells, SPARC expression was mediated by the SP1/NF-κB transactivation complex. Furthermore, secreted SPARC activated the integrin-linked kinase/AKT (ILK/AKT) pathway, likely via integrin interaction, and subsequent β-catenin signaling, which is involved in leukemia cell self-renewal. Pharmacologic inhibition of the SP1/NF-κB complex resulted in SPARC downregulation and leukemia growth inhibition. Together, our data indicate that evaluation of SPARC expression has prognosticative value and SPARC is a potential therapeutic target for AML.

Recombinant interleukin-2 in patients aged younger than 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 19808

BACKGROUND

Recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) induces cellular cytotoxicity against leukemia blasts. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) may harbor minimal residual disease that is susceptible to rIL-2-activated effector cells.

METHODS

In the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 19808 study, patients with AML in first CR were randomly assigned after all planned chemotherapy to receive a 90-day course of subcutaneously administered rIL-2 or no further therapy. The primary objective was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 treatment arms. A total of 534 patients achieved a CR, 214 of whom were randomized. Six courses of low-dose daily rIL-2 were given for the expansion of cytotoxic effector cells, each followed by 3-day high-dose boluses given to trigger cytotoxicity against minimal residual disease.

RESULTS

On the protocol-specified intention-to-treat analysis, the hazards ratio for DFS was 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.09; P = .13); the 5-year DFS rate was 42% in the observation arm and 53% in the rIL-2 treatment arm. The hazards ratio for overall survival (OS) was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.23; P = .34); the 5-year OS rate was 58% for the observation arm and 63% for the rIL-2 treatment arm. Twenty-five of the 107 patients randomized to treatment with rIL-2 either refused or were unable to initiate therapy and 30 patients did not complete their assigned therapy. However, significant toxicities were not commonly observed. The trial design did not anticipate the difficulties patients would encounter with protocol compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of immunotherapy with rIL-2 administered after intensive postremission treatment was not assessed as planned because of unexpected refusals by patients and/or their physicians to comply with protocol-directed therapy. Neither DFS nor OS was found to be significantly improved.

Epigenetics meets genetics in acute myeloid leukemia: clinical impact of a novel seven-gene score

PURPOSE

Molecular risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is largely based on genetic markers. However, epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation, deregulate gene expression and may also have prognostic impact. We evaluated the clinical relevance of integrating DNA methylation and genetic information in AML.

METHODS

Next-generation sequencing analysis of methylated DNA identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with prognostic mutations in older (≥ 60 years) cytogenetically normal (CN) patients with AML (n = 134). Genes with promoter DMRs and expression levels significantly associated with outcome were used to compute a prognostic gene expression weighted summary score that was tested and validated in four independent patient sets (n = 355).

RESULTS

In the training set, we identified seven genes (CD34, RHOC, SCRN1, F2RL1, FAM92A1, MIR155HG, and VWA8) with promoter DMRs and expression associated with overall survival (OS; P ≤ .001). Each gene had high DMR methylation and lower expression, which were associated with better outcome. A weighted summary expression score of the seven gene expression levels was computed. A low score was associated with a higher complete remission (CR) rate and longer disease-free survival and OS (P < .001 for all end points). This was validated in multivariable models and in two younger (< 60 years) and two older independent sets of patients with CN-AML. Considering the seven genes individually, the fewer the genes with high expression, the better the outcome. Younger and older patients with no genes or one gene with high expression had the best outcomes (CR rate, 94% and 87%, respectively; 3-year OS, 80% and 42%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A seven-gene score encompassing epigenetic and genetic prognostic information identifies novel AML subsets that are meaningful for treatment guidance.

A stem cell-like gene expression signature associates with inferior outcomes and a distinct microRNA expression profile in adults with primary cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is hypothesized to be sustained by self-renewing leukemia stem cells (LSCs). Recently, gene expression signatures (GES) from functionally defined AML LSC populations were reported, and expression of a 'core enriched' (CE) GES, representing 44 genes activated in LCSs, conferred shorter survival in cytogenetically normal (CN) AML. The prognostic impact of the CE GES in the context of other molecular markers, including gene mutations and microRNA (miR) expression alterations, is unknown and its clinical utility is unclear. We studied associations of the CE GES with known molecular prognosticators, miR expression profiles, and outcomes in 364 well-characterized CN-AML patients. A high CE score (CE(high)) associated with FLT3-internal tandem duplication, WT1 and RUNX1 mutations, wild-type CEBPA and TET2, and high ERG, BAALC and miR-155 expression. CE(high) patients had a lower complete remission (CR) rate (P=0.003) and shorter disease-free (DFS, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS, P<0.001) than CE(low) patients. These associations persisted in multivariable analyses adjusting for other prognosticators (CR, P=0.02; DFS, P<0.001; and OS, P<0.001). CE(high) status was accompanied by a characteristic miR expression signature. Fifteen miRs were upregulated in both younger and older CE(high) patients, including miRs relevant for stem cell function. Our results support the clinical relevance of LSCs and improve risk stratification in AML.

RUNX1 mutations are associated with poor outcome in younger and older patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia and with distinct gene and MicroRNA expression signatures

PURPOSE

To determine the association of RUNX1 mutations with therapeutic outcome in younger and older patients with primary cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) and with gene/microRNA expression signatures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Younger (< 60 years; n = 175) and older (≥ 60 years; n = 225) patients with CN-AML treated with intensive cytarabine/anthracycline-based first-line therapy on Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocols were centrally analyzed for RUNX1 mutations by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing and for established prognostic gene mutations. Gene/microRNA expression profiles were derived using microarrays.

RESULTS

RUNX1 mutations were found in 8% and 16% of younger and older patients, respectively (P = .02). They were associated with ASXL1 mutations (P < .001) and inversely associated with NPM1 (P < .001) and CEBPA (P = .06) mutations. RUNX1-mutated patients had lower complete remission rates (P = .005 in younger; P = .006 in older) and shorter disease-free survival (P = .058 in younger; P < .001 in older), overall survival (P = .003 in younger; P < .001 in older), and event-free survival (P < .001 for younger and older) than RUNX1 wild-type patients. Because RUNX1 mutations were more common in older patients and almost never coexisted with NPM1 mutations, RUNX1 mutation-associated expression signatures were derived in older, NPM1 wild-type patients and featured upregulation of genes normally expressed in primitive hematopoietic cells and B-cell progenitors, including DNTT, BAALC, BLNK, CD109, RBPMS, and FLT3, and downregulation of promoters of myelopoiesis, including CEBPA and miR-223.

CONCLUSION

RUNX1 mutations are twice as common in older than younger patients with CN-AML and negatively impact outcome in both age groups. RUNX1-mutated blasts have molecular features of primitive hematopoietic and lymphoid progenitors, potentially leading to novel therapeutic approaches.

Abstract 1307: Heritable polymorphism predisposes to high expression of BAALC in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML)

Introduction: Risk-adapted therapy of AML patients (pts) is presently based on cytogenetic and molecular findings. However, the outcome remains poor for the majority of pts. Overexpression of BAALC is implicated in leukemogenesis and poor survival of CN-AML pts, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We hypothesized that the elevated expression of BAALC might result from a genetic variant in or close to the gene (in cis). Methods and Results: BAALC and RUNX1 expression were measured in pre-therapy samples from a test set of 253 CN-AML pts (Cancer And Leukemia Group B) using Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0 arrays. Pts were grouped as high or low BAALC and high or low RUNX1 expressers using the median expression value as the cut-off and screened for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by direct sequencing of the BAALC gene. Nine informative SNPs were identified. By genotyping, marker rs62527607, a non-coding SNP in the promoter region correlated with high BAALC expression (rs62527607G&gt;T: genotypes TT/GT vs. GG: P=2.01E-04). Luciferase reporter constructs (pGL4.11) spanning the respective alleles demonstrated that the T allele (“risk allele”) of rs62527607 increased luciferase activity compared to the G allele (P=1.0E-02). The T allele of rs62527607 is predicted to create a binding site for the transcription factor RUNX1. Indeed, RUNX1-cotransfection showed an increase in luciferase activity for the T allele of rs62527607 (P=2.0E-02) but not for the G allele (P=2.7E-01). An Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay comparing the binding activity of the two alleles showed highly increased binding activity of RUNX1 to the T allele vs. the G allele. Testing of the pt samples for a potential correlation of RUNX1 and BAALC expression levels revealed a positive correlation in pts with genotypes TT/GT but not GG when restricting the analysis to the high RUNX1 expressing group (P=1.18E-04). For validation of our findings, a set of 105 CN-AML pts comprising 52 high and 53 low BAALC expressers (AML Study Group [AMLSG], quantitative Real-Time PCR [qPCR]) was genotyped for rs62527607, determined for RUNX1 expresser status (qPCR) and analyzed alone and in combination with the test set. A non-significant association of TT/GT vs. GG with high BAALC expression (31% vs. 19%; P=1.6E-01) was seen. Analyzing both sets combined resulted in a P-value of 9.3E-05 (Odds Ratio [OR]=2.59 [1.62, 4.22; 95%CI]). Combining the results of the CALGB & AMLSG series showed a highly significant association between RUNX1 and BAALC expression in pts with genotypes TT/GT belonging to the high RUNX1 expressing group (P=7.97E-05, OR=4.02 [2.05, 8.21; 95%CI]). Conclusion: We show that the risk allele of rs62527607 creates a RUNX1 binding site, thereby leading to increased transcription of BAALC. The observation that a heritable trait is involved in the leukemogenesis process might initiate a new era of personalized medicine in AML.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1307. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1307

Age-related prognostic impact of different types of DNMT3A mutations in adults with primary cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency of DNMT3A mutations, their associations with clinical and molecular characteristics and outcome, and the associated gene- and microRNA-expression signatures in primary cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred fifteen previously untreated adults were analyzed for DNMT3A mutations and established prognostic gene mutations and expression markers. Gene- and microRNA-expression profiles were derived using microarrays.

RESULTS

Younger (< 60 years; n = 181) and older (≥ 60 years; n = 234) patients had similar frequencies of DNMT3A mutations (35.3% v 33.3%). Missense mutations affecting arginine codon 882 (R882-DNMT3A) were more common (n = 92; 62%) than those affecting other codons (non-R882-DNMT3A). DNMT3A-mutated patients did not differ regarding complete remission rate, but had shorter disease-free survival (DFS; P = .03) and, by trend, overall survival (OS; P = .07) than DNMT3A-wild-type patients. In multivariable analyses, DNMT3A mutations remained associated with shorter DFS (P = .01), but not with shorter OS. When analyzed separately, the two DNMT3A mutation types had different significance by age group. Younger patients with non-R882-DNMT3A mutations had shorter DFS (P = .002) and OS (P = .02), whereas older patients with R882-DNMT3A mutations had shorter DFS (P = .005) and OS (P = .002) after adjustment for other clinical and molecular prognosticators. Gene- and microRNA-expression signatures did not accurately predict DNMT3A mutational status.

CONCLUSION

DNMT3A mutations are frequent in CN-AML, and their clinical significance seems to be age dependent. DNMT3A-R882 mutations are associated with adverse prognosis in older patients, and non-R882-DNMT3A mutations are associated with adverse prognosis in younger patients. Low accuracy of gene- and microRNA-expression signatures in predicting DNMT3A mutation status suggested that the role of these mutations in AML remains to be elucidated.

Clinical outcome and gene- and microRNA-expression profiling according to the Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) single nucleotide polymorphism rs16754 in adult de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

BACKGROUND

The alleles of the Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) polymorphism rs16754 harbor adenine (A) or guanine (G). Recently, rs16754 has been reported to affect the outcome of patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. To validate this finding, we investigated pretreatment features and outcome associated with rs16754 in a large cohort of patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Four-hundred and thirty-three intensively treated and molecularly characterized cytogenetically normal patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (18-83 years old) were analyzed for rs16754. To gain biological insights, we studied the gene- and microRNA-expression profiles for associations with rs16754.

RESULTS

Three-hundred and nine (71%) patients were homozygous for A (WT1(AA)), 112 (26%) were heterozygous (WT1(AG)) and 12 (3%) were homozygous for G (WT1(GG)). For comparison with previous studies, we grouped WT1(AG) and WT1(GG) patients and compared them with WT1(AA) patients divided into younger (<60 years) and older (≥60 years) adults. We found no independent prognostic impact of WT1(AA). However, WT1(GG) patients, who were less often Caucasian than WT1(AG) (P=0.001) or WT1(AA) (P=0.008) patients, and had TET2 mutations more often than WT1(AG) (P=0.02) patients, had, among patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplication and/or NPM1 wild-type, better disease-free (P=0.02) and overall survival (P=0.04) than WT1(AA) and WT1(AG) patients combined. Unsupervised and supervised analyses of the gene- and microRNA-expression profiles suggested that there were no distinct expression patterns associated with any rs16754 genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe the previously reported adverse impact of WT1(AA) but found favorable outcomes associated with the homozygous WT1(GG). Considering its low frequency, confirmatory studies are necessary. The biological significance of rs16754 remains questionable as no distinct expression profiles were associated with the genotypes.

Comparison of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation with chemotherapy in patients age 60-70 years with acute myelogenous leukemia in first remission

We compared the outcomes of patients age 60-70 years with acute myelogenous leukemia receiving reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in first remission (CR1) reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Research (n = 94) with the outcomes in patients treated with induction and postremission chemotherapy on Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocols (n = 96). All patients included had been in CR1 for at least 4 months. The HCT recipients were slightly younger than the chemotherapy patients (median age, 63 years vs 65 years; P < .001), but there were no significant between-group differences in the proportion with therapy-related leukemia or in different cytogenetic risk groups. Time from diagnosis to CR1 was longer for the HCT recipients (median, 44 days vs 38 days; P = .031). Allogeneic HCT was associated with significantly lower risk of relapse (32% vs 81% at 3 years; P < .001), higher nonrelapse mortality (36% vs 4% at 3 years; P < .001), and longer leukemia-free survival (32% vs 15% at 3 years; P = .001). Although overall survival was longer for HCT recipients, the difference was not statistically significant (37% vs 25% at 3 years; P = .08). Our findings suggest that reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic HCT in patients age 60-70 with acute myelogenous leukemia in CR1 reduces relapse and improves leukemia-free survival. Strategies that reduce nonrelapse mortality may yield significant improvements in overall survival.

TET2 mutations improve the new European LeukemiaNet risk classification of acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency of TET2 mutations, their associations with clinical and molecular characteristics and outcome, and the associated gene- and microRNA-expression signatures in patients with primary cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four-hundred twenty-seven patients with CN-AML were analyzed for TET2 mutations by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing and for established prognostic gene mutations. Gene- and microRNA-expression profiles were derived using microarrays.

RESULTS

TET2 mutations, found in 23% of patients, were associated with older age (P < .001) and higher pretreatment WBC (P = .04) compared with wild-type TET2 (TET2-wt). In the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) favorable-risk group (patients with CN-AML who have mutated CEBPA and/or mutated NPM1 without FLT3 internal tandem duplication [FLT3-ITD]), TET2-mutated patients had shorter event-free survival (EFS; P < .001) because of a lower complete remission (CR) rate (P = .007), and shorter disease-free survival (DFS; P = .003), and also had shorter overall survival (P = .001) compared with TET2-wt patients. TET2 mutations were not associated with outcomes in the ELN intermediate-I-risk group (CN-AML with wild-type CEBPA and wild-type NPM1 and/or FLT3-ITD). In multivariable models, TET2 mutations were associated with shorter EFS (P = .004), lower CR rate (P = .03), and shorter DFS (P = .05) only among favorable-risk CN-AML patients. We identified a TET2 mutation-associated gene-expression signature in favorable-risk but not in intermediate-I-risk patients and found distinct mutation-associated microRNA signatures in both ELN groups.

CONCLUSION

TET2 mutations improve the ELN molecular-risk classification in primary CN-AML because of their adverse prognostic impact in an otherwise favorable-risk patient subset. Our data suggest that these patients may be candidates for alternative therapies.

Prognostic significance of expression of a single microRNA, miR-181a, in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of expression levels of a single microRNA, miR-181a, in the context of established molecular markers in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML), and to gain insight into the leukemogenic role of miR-181a.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

miR-181a expression was measured in pretreatment marrow using Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center version 3.0 arrays in 187 younger (<60 years) adults with CN-AML. Presence of other molecular prognosticators was assessed centrally. A gene-expression profile associated with miR-181a expression was derived using microarrays and evaluated by Gene-Ontology analysis.

RESULTS

Higher miR-181a expression associated with a higher complete remission (CR) rate (P=.04), longer overall survival (OS; P=.01) and a trend for longer disease-free survival (DFS; P=.09). The impact of miR-181a was most striking in poor molecular risk patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) and/or NPM1 wild-type, where higher miR-181a expression associated with a higher CR rate (P=.009), and longer DFS (P<.001) and OS (P<.001). In multivariable analyses, higher miR-181a expression was significantly associated with better outcome, both in the whole patient cohort and in patients with FLT3-ITD and/or NPM1 wild-type. These results were also validated in an independent set of older (≥60 years) patients with CN-AML. A miR-181a-associated gene-expression profile was characterized by enrichment of genes usually involved in innate immunity.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, we provide the first evidence that the expression of a single microRNA, miR-181a, is associated with clinical outcome of patients with CN-AML and may refine their molecular risk classification. Targeted treatments that increase endogenous levels of miR-181a might represent novel therapeutic strategies.

IDH1 and IDH2 gene mutations identify novel molecular subsets within de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

PURPOSE To analyze the frequency and associations with prognostic markers and outcome of mutations in IDH genes encoding isocitrate dehydrogenases in adult de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS Diagnostic bone marrow or blood samples from 358 patients were analyzed for IDH1 and IDH2 mutations by DNA polymerase chain reaction amplification/sequencing. FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, WT1, and MLL mutational analyses and gene- and microRNA-expression profiling were performed centrally. Results IDH mutations were found in 33% of the patients. IDH1 mutations were detected in 49 patients (14%; 47 with R132). IDH2 mutations, previously unreported in AML, were detected in 69 patients (19%; 13 with R172 and 56 with R140). R172 IDH2 mutations were mutually exclusive with all other prognostic mutations analyzed. Younger age (< 60 years), molecular low-risk (NPM1-mutated/FLT3-internal tandem duplication-negative) IDH1-mutated patients had shorter disease-free survival than molecular low-risk IDH1/IDH2-wild-type (wt) patients (P = .046). R172 IDH2-mutated patients had lower complete remission rates than IDH1/IDH2wt patients (P = .007). Distinctive microarray gene- and microRNA-expression profiles accurately predicted R172 IDH2 mutations. The highest expressed gene and microRNAs in R172 IDH2-mutated patients compared with the IDH1/IDH2wt patients were APP (previously associated with complex karyotype AML) and miR-1 and miR-133 (involved in embryonal stem-cell differentiation), respectively. CONCLUSION IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are recurrent in CN-AML and have an unfavorable impact on outcome. The R172 IDH2 mutations, previously unreported in AML, characterize a novel subset of CN-AML patients lacking other prognostic mutations and associate with unique gene- and microRNA-expression profiles that may lead to the discovery of novel, therapeutically targetable leukemogenic mechanisms.

Abstract 2717: Higher MN1 expression is an unfavorable prognosticator in older patients (Pts) with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML): A CALGB study

In younger (&lt;60 y) adult CN-AML pts, high MN1 expression associates with adverse outcome. The prognostic impact of MN1 expression in older pts (&gt;60 y) requires further evaluation. Pre-therapy bone marrow samples from 140 older de novo CN-AML pts (median age 68 y; range 60 – 81 y) enrolled on cytarabine/daunorubicin-based protocols were studied centrally by RT-PCR. Using the median expression value for MN1, as a cutoff pts were grouped as high & low MN1 expressers. Analysis of the mutation status for FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD, NPM1, CEBPA & WT1 & gene & microRNA (miR) expression profiling using, respectively, Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0 & OSU CCC v4.0 arrays, were performed centrally. At diagnosis, higher MN1 associated with wild-type NPM1 (P&lt;.001). Median follow-up was 4.0 y for pts alive. High MN1 expressers had lower complete remission (CR; 53% v 80%, P=.001), shorter event-free (EFS; P=.004; 3y 6% v 14%) & overall survival (OS; P=.03; 3y 10% v 23%; Table) rates. In multivariable models, higher MN1 expression independently associated with a lower CR rate & shorter EFS. Comparison of age groups (60-69 y v ≥70 y) revealed that MN1 expression had a stronger prognostic impact on pts ≥70 y (n=61; Table). Gene (294 genes) & miR (21 miRs) expression signatures associated with high MN1 expression were derived. High MN1 pts had higher expression of precursor markers (CD34, PROM1, CD44, KIT, HLA-DRB1, DNTT), known adverse outcome predictors (BAALC, ERG, HGF), anti-apoptotic BCL2, & miR-101 & miR-126, which are linked to hematologic differentiation. Underexpressed were HOX genes, their co-regulators (MEIS1) & HOX-gene embedded miRs (miR-10a, miR-10b). In conclusion, higher MN1 associated with adverse outcome in older CN-AML pts independently of other established prognosticators & had a stronger impact on ≥70 y pts. The expression signatures provide novel information that may elucidate how MN1 contributes to leukemia & help design new therapeutic approaches.Table.Outcomes according to MN1 expression of all pts and, separately, those age 60-69 y and ≥70yOutcome End PointsMN1 expressionAll Pts (n=140)Pts age 60-69 y (n=79)Pts age ≥70 y (n=61)HighLowPHighLowPHighLowP% achieving CR5380.0015480.035181.03EFS, %event-free at 3 y614.00467.11627.007OS, %alive at 3 y1023.031118.44931.006 The clinical endpoints significantly associated with MN1 expression levels are denoted by bold type.Pts were enrolled on CALGB protocols [CALGB 8525, 8923, 9420, 9720 & 10201].

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2717.

Sp1/NFkappaB/HDAC/miR-29b regulatory network in KIT-driven myeloid leukemia

The biologic and clinical significance of KIT overexpression that associates with KIT gain-of-function mutations occurring in subsets of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (i.e., core binding factor AML) is unknown. Here, we show that KIT mutations lead to MYC-dependent miR-29b repression and increased levels of the miR-29b target Sp1 in KIT-driven leukemia. Sp1 enhances its own expression by participating in a NFkappaB/HDAC complex that further represses miR-29b transcription. Upregulated Sp1 then binds NFkappaB and transactivates KIT. Therefore, activated KIT ultimately induces its own transcription. Our results provide evidence that the mechanisms of Sp1/NFkappaB/HDAC/miR-29b-dependent KIT overexpression contribute to leukemia growth and can be successfully targeted by pharmacological disruption of the Sp1/NFkappaB/HDAC complex or synthetic miR-29b treatment in KIT-driven AML.

Favorable prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in older patients with cytogenetically normal de novo acute myeloid leukemia and associated gene- and microRNA-expression signatures: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

PURPOSE

To analyze the prognostic significance of NPM1 mutations, and the associated gene- and microRNA-expression signatures in older patients with de novo, cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-eight adults age >or= 60 years with de novo CN-AML, enrolled onto Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocols 9720 and 10201, were studied at diagnosis for NPM1, FLT3, CEBPA, and WT1 mutations, and gene- and microRNA-expression profiles.

RESULTS

Patients with NPM1 mutations (56%) had higher complete remission (CR) rates (84% v 48%; P < .001) and longer disease-free survival (DFS; P = .047; 3-year rates, 23% v 10%) and overall survival (OS; P < .001; 3-year rates, 35% v 8%) than NPM1 wild-type patients. In multivariable analyses, NPM1 mutations remained independent predictors for higher CR rates (P < .001) and longer DFS (P = .004) and OS (P < .001), after adjustment for other prognostic clinical and molecular variables. Unexpectedly, the prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations was mainly observed in patients >or= 70 years. Gene- and microRNA-expression profiles associated with NPM1 mutations were similar across older patient age groups and similar to those in younger (< 60 years) patients with CN-AML. These profiles were characterized by upregulation of HOX genes and their embedded microRNAs and downregulation of the prognostically adverse MN1, BAALC, and ERG genes.

CONCLUSION

NPM1 mutations have favorable prognostic impact in older patients with CN-AML, especially those age >or= 70 years. The gene- and microRNA-expression profiles suggest that NPM1 mutations constitute a marker defining a biologically homogeneous entity in CN-AML that might be treated with specific and/or targeted therapies across age groups.

NPM1 mutations as an independent prognosticator for older cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN AML)

7000

Background: In younger CN AML without FLT3-ITD, NPM1 mutations predict favorable outcome. Their prognostic impact in older [≥60 years (y)] patients (pts) requires further evaluation. Methods: Pretreatment marrow was studied in 189 older CN AML pts [median age 69 y (60 - 83 y); 162 de novo & 27 secondary (s; prior hematologic disorders) cases] enrolled on CALGB 9720 (n=106) & 10201 (n=83). Both protocols had standard-dose (100 mg/m2/d) cytarabine (AraC)/daunorubicin (DN)-based induction; consolidation was based on standard-dose AraC/DN/etoposide (1 cycle) in 9720 & intermediate-dose (2 g/m2/d) AraC (2 cycles) in 10201. Pts transplanted in 1st complete remission (CR) were excluded. Median follow-up was 3.3 y for pts alive. Analyses of NPM1 exon 12 by direct sequencing, gene & microRNA (miR) expression profiling by Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0 & OSU CCC v4.0 arrays, & other markers (FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD, WT1mut) were performed centrally. Results: In de novo CN AML, NPM1 mutated (NPM1mut) pts (54%) had more CRs (85% v 45%, P<.0001) & longer relapse-free (RFS) (P=.02; 3 y rates 23% v 10%) & overall survival (OS) (P<.0001; 3 y 34% v 7%) than NPM1 wild-type (NPM1wt) pts. In multivariable models, NPM1 mutations independently predicted favorable outcome (Table) - NPM1mut pts had 10-fold higher odds of CR & 64% reduction in relapse risk. In genome-wide analyses, miR-10 & miR-16 were upregulated in NPM1mut pts, accompanied by highly expressed HOX genes & downregulated BCL2, respectively. NPM1mut were rare in sAML pts (15%), precluding study of their impact. Conclusions: NPM1 mutations independently predict better outcome in older CN AML. Upregulation of proapoptotic microRNAs & downregulation of antiapoptotic microRNA targets may explain the impact of NPM1 mutations.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

MicroRNA 181a (miR-181a) expression as a prognosticator in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN AML)

7001

Background: We showed recently that CEBPA mutations (mut) in CN AML are associated with better outcome and a unique microRNA expression profile, including miR-181a upregulation. Here we tested if miR-181a expression can predict outcome independently. Methods: We analyzed 187 de novo CN AML adult patients (pts) aged <60 years (y; median 45) similarly treated on CALGB 9621 and 19808. Of these, 122 had molecular high risk [FLT3-ITD or NPM1 wild type (wt)] and 65 low risk (no FLT3-ITD, NPM1 mut) CN AML. FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, MLL, and WT1 mutations, and ERG and BAALC expression were analyzed centrally. miR-181a expression was measured in pretherapy marrow using OSUCCC v3.0 arrays. The mean of 2 miR-181a probe log intensities was used as a continuous variable for analyses. Results: Higher miR-181a levels (miR-181a↑) were associated with CEBPA mut, NPM1 wt, no FLT3-TKD, lower ERG expression, higher %FAB M1/M2, lower WBC and age, higher blood blasts, and lower % gum hypertrophy. miR-181a↑ tended to associate with more complete remissions (CRs; p = .07) and significantly associated with longer disease-free (DFS; p = .05) and overall (OS; p = .01) survival (median follow-up 6.5 y for pts alive). A stronger prognostic impact of miR-181a was observed in the molecular high risk group, where miR-181a↑ predicted more CRs (p = .03), and longer DFS (p = .0002) and OS (p = .0001). In multivariable analyses of the molecular high risk group, miR-181a↑independently predicted CR, and longer DFS and OS (Table). For descriptive purposes, we dichotomized pts at the median miR-181a expression value. For high v low miR-181a expressers, CR rates were 84% vs 72% and 5 y DFS and OS rates 43% vs 18% and 48% vs 19%, respectively. Conclusions: miR-181a expression is a prognostic marker in CN AML, mainly in the molecular high risk group, where it predicts outcome independently of other variables including CEBPA mutations. As miR-181a↑ confer better treatment response, novel approaches increasing miR-181a levels might benefit not only CN but also other AML pts.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Improving the molecular risk classification for younger (<60 years) de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN AML) patients (pts)

7002

Background: CN AML pts are currently stratified into Low-risk [FLT3-ITD negative (neg)/NPM1 mutated (mut)] and High-risk [FLT3-ITD positive (pos) or NPM1 wild type (wt)] groups (FLT3-ITD/NPM1-only classification). We recently showed that low ERG expression and CEBPAmut identify pts with better outcome within, respectively, the Low- and High-risk groups, and that WT1mut confers poor outcome regardless of FLT3-ITD/NPM1 status. Here, we assess if adding CEBPA and WT1 mutation and ERG expression testing improves the currently used CN AML molecular risk classification. Methods: FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA and WT1 mutations and ERG and BAALC expression were tested at diagnosis in 143 CN AML adults enrolled on CALGB treatment protocols 9621 and 19808. Pts were divided into two molecular risk groups: i) CALGB Group I that included Low-risk pts with low ERG & High-risk pts with CEBPAmut and ii) CALGB Group II that included WT1mut pts & Low-risk pts with high ERG & High- risk pts with CEBPAwt. Results: CALGB Group I (n=56) v Group II (n=87) had more complete remissions (CRs) (P=.005; 96% v 79%), and longer disease-free (DFS; P<.0001; 5 year (y) 69% v 21%) and overall (OS; P<.0001; 5 y 70% v 31%) survival [median follow-up for pts alive 6 y]. In multivariable (MV) analyses, Group I predicted higher rate of CR (P=.02), and longer DFS (P<.0001) and OS (P=.0002), after correcting for other variables (Table). In contrast, for the same cohort of pts grouped by the FLT3-ITD/NPM1-only classification, CRs were 94% v 82% and 5 y DFS 59% v 32% and OS 67% v 36% in the Low- v High-risk groups. Based on the Akaike Information Criterion, MV models for DFS and OS using the CALGB risk Groups were better than those using the FLT3-ITD/NPM1-only risk groups. Conclusions: Prognostic classification of younger de novo CN AML pts is improved by adding CEBPA and WT1 mutation and ERG expression testing. While mutational analyses are ready for use in clinical trials, quantification of ERG expression is yet to be standardized.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prognostic importance of MN1 transcript levels, and biologic insights from MN1-associated gene and microRNA expression signatures in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a cancer and leukemia group B study

PURPOSE To determine the prognostic importance of the meningioma 1 (MN1) gene expression levels in the context of other predictive molecular markers, and to derive MN1 associated gene- and microRNA-expression profiles in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS MN1 expression was measured in 119 untreated primary CN-AML adults younger than 60 years by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Patients were also tested for FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, and WT1 mutations, MLL partial tandem duplications, and BAALC and ERG expression. Gene- and microRNA-expression profiles were attained by performing genome-wide microarray assays. Patients were intensively treated on two first-line Cancer and Leukemia Group B clinical trials. Results Higher MN1 expression associated with NPM1 wild-type (P < .001), increased BAALC expression (P = .004), and less extramedullary involvement (P = .01). In multivariable analyses, higher MN1 expression associated with a lower complete remission rate (P = .005) after adjustment for WBC; shorter disease-free survival (P = .01) after adjustment for WT1 mutations, FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD), and high ERG expression; and shorter survival (P = .04) after adjustment for WT1 and NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITD, and WBC. Gene- and microRNA-expression profiles suggested that high MN1 expressers share features with high BAALC expressers and patients with wild-type NPM1. Higher MN1 expression also appears to be associated with genes and microRNAs that are active in aberrant macrophage/monocytoid function and differentiation. CONCLUSION MN1 expression independently predicts outcome in CN-AML patients. The MN1 gene- and microRNA-expression signatures suggest biologic features that could be exploited as therapeutic targets.

Prognostic significance of, and gene and microRNA expression signatures associated with, CEBPA mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia with high-risk molecular features: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in the context of established molecular markers in cytogenetically normal (CN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and gain biologic insights into leukemogenesis of the CN-AML molecular high-risk subset (FLT3 internal tandem duplication [ITD] positive and/or NPM1 wild type) that has a significantly higher incidence of CEBPA mutations than the molecular low-risk subset (FLT3-ITD negative and NPM1 mutated).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred seventy-five adults age less than 60 years with untreated primary CN-AML were screened before treatment for CEBPA, FLT3, MLL, WT1, and NPM1 mutations and BAALC and ERG expression levels. Gene and microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles were obtained for the CN-AML molecular high-risk patients.

RESULTS

CEBPA mutations predicted better event-free (P = .007), disease-free (P = .014), and overall survival (P < .001) independently of other molecular and clinical prognosticators. Among patients with CEBPA mutations, 91% were in the CN-AML molecular high-risk group. Within this group, CEBPA mutations predicted better event-free (P < .001), disease-free (P = .004), and overall survival (P = .009) independently of other molecular and clinical characteristics and were associated with unique gene and miRNA expression profiles. The major features of these profiles were upregulation of genes (eg, GATA1, ZFPM1, EPOR, and GFI1B) and miRNAs (ie, the miR-181 family) involved in erythroid differentiation and downregulation of homeobox genes.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment testing for CEBPA mutations identifies CN-AML patients with different outcomes, particularly in the molecular high-risk group, thus improving molecular risk-based classification of this large cytogenetic subset of AML. The gene and miRNA expression profiling provided insights into leukemogenesis of the CN-AML molecular high-risk group, indicating that CEBPA mutations are associated with partial erythroid differentiation.

Central review of cytogenetics is necessary for cooperative group correlative and clinical studies of adult acute leukemia: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B experience

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B has performed central review of karyotypes submitted by institutional cytogenetics laboratories from patients with acute myeloid (AML) and acute lymphoblastic (ALL) leukemia since 1986. We assessed the role of central karyotype review in maintaining accurate, high quality cytogenetic data for clinical and translational studies using two criteria: the proportion of karyotypes rejected (i.e. inadequate), and, among accepted (i.e. adequate) cases, the proportion of karyotypes whose interpretation was changed on central karyotype review. We compared the first four years during which central karyotype review was performed with a recent 4-year period and found that the proportion of rejected samples decreased significantly for both AML and ALL. However, during the latter period, central karyotype reviews still found 8% of AML and 16% of ALL karyotypes inadequate. Among adequate cases, the karyotype was revised in 26% of both AML and ALL samples. Some revisions resulted in changing the patients' assignment to particular World Health Organization diagnostic categories and/or moving patients from one prognostic group to another. Overall, when both data on rejection rates and data on karyotype revisions made in accepted cases were considered together, 32% of AML and 38% of ALL samples submitted were either rejected or revised on central karyotype review during the recent 4-year period. These data underscore the necessity of continued central karyotype review in multi-institutional cooperative group studies.

Wilms' tumor 1 gene mutations independently predict poor outcome in adults with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a cancer and leukemia group B study

PURPOSE

To analyze the prognostic impact of Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS We studied 196 adults younger than 60 years with newly diagnosed primary CN-AML, who were treated similarly on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocols 9621 and 19808, for WT1 mutations in exons 7 and 9. The patients also were assessed for the presence of FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD), FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain mutations (FLT3-TKD), MLL partial tandem duplications (MLL-PTD), NPM1 and CEBPA mutations, and for the expression levels of ERG and BAALC.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (10.7%) harbored WT1 mutations. Complete remission rates were not significantly different between patients with WT1 mutations and those with unmutated WT1 (P = .36; 76% v 84%). Patients with WT1 mutations had worse disease-free survival (DFS; P < .001; 3-year rates, 13% v 50%) and overall survival (OS; P < .001; 3-year rates, 10% v 56%) than patients with unmutated WT1. In multivariable analyses, WT1 mutations independently predicted worse DFS (P = .009; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.7) when controlling for CEBPA mutational status, ERG expression level, and FLT3-ITD/NPM1 molecular-risk group (ie, FLT3-ITD(negative)/NPM1(mutated) as low risk v FLT3-ITD(positive) and/or NPM1(wild-type) as high risk). WT1 mutations also independently predicted worse OS (P < .001; HR = 3.2) when controlling for CEBPA mutational status, FLT3-ITD/NPM1 molecular-risk group, and white blood cell count.

CONCLUSION

We report the first evidence that WT1 mutations independently predict extremely poor outcome in intensively treated, younger patients with CN-AML. Future trials should include testing for WT1 mutations as part of molecularly based risk assessment and risk-adapted treatment stratification of patients with CN-AML.

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia and RAS mutations benefit most from postremission high-dose cytarabine: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

PURPOSE

RAS mutations occur in 12% to 27% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and enhance sensitivity to cytarabine in vitro. We examined whether RAS mutations impact response to cytarabine in vivo.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred eighty-five patients with AML achieving complete remission on Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 8525 and randomly assigned to one of three doses of cytarabine postremission were screened for RAS mutations. We assessed the impact of cytarabine dose on cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of patients with (mutRAS) and without (wild-type; wtRAS) RAS mutations.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (18%) had RAS mutations. With 12.9 years median follow-up, the 10-year CIR was similar for mutRAS and wtRAS patients (65% v 73%; P = .31). However, mutRAS patients receiving high-dose cytarabine consolidation (HDAC; 3 g/m(2) every 12 hours on days 1, 3, and 5 or 400 mg/m(2)/d x 5 days) had the lowest 10-year CIR, 45%, compared with 68% for wtRAS patients receiving HDAC and 80% and 100%, respectively, for wtRAS and mutRAS patients receiving low-dose cytarabine (LDAC; 100 mg/m(2)/d x 5 days; overall comparison, P < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed an interaction of cytarabine dose and RAS status (P = .06). After adjusting for this interaction and cytogenetics (core binding factor [CBF] AML v non-CBF AML), wtRAS patients receiving HDAC had lower relapse risk than wtRAS patients receiving LDAC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; P = .04); however, mutRAS patients receiving HDAC had greater reduction in relapse risk (HR = 0.28; P = .002) compared with mutRAS patients treated with LDAC.

CONCLUSION

AML patients carrying mutRAS benefit from higher cytarabine doses more than wtRAS patients. This seems to be the first example of an activating oncogene mutation favorably modifying response to higher drug doses in AML.

MicroRNA expression in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

A role of microRNAs in cancer has recently been recognized. However, little is known about the role of microRNAs in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

METHODS

Using microRNA expression profiling, we studied samples of leukemia cells from adults under the age of 60 years who had cytogenetically normal AML and high-risk molecular features--that is, an internal tandem duplication in the fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 gene (FLT3-ITD), a wild-type nucleophosmin (NPM1), or both. A microRNA signature that was associated with event-free survival was derived from a training group of 64 patients and tested in a validation group of 55 patients. For the latter, a microRNA compound covariate predictor (called a microRNA summary value) was computed on the basis of weighted levels of the microRNAs forming the outcome signature.

RESULTS

Of 305 microRNA probes, 12 (including 5 representing microRNA-181 family members) were associated with event-free survival in the training group (P<0.005). In the validation group, the microRNA summary value was inversely associated with event-free survival (P=0.03). In multivariable analysis, the microRNA summary value remained associated with event-free survival (P=0.04) after adjustment for the allelic ratio of FLT3-ITD to wild-type FLT3 and for the white-cell count. Using results of gene-expression microarray analysis, we found that expression levels of the microRNA-181 family were inversely correlated with expression levels of predicted target genes encoding proteins involved in pathways of innate immunity mediated by toll-like receptors and interleukin-1beta.

CONCLUSIONS

A microRNA signature in molecularly defined, high-risk, cytogenetically normal AML is associated with the clinical outcome and with target genes encoding proteins involved in specific innate-immunity pathways.