Optimal hippocampal targeting in responsive neurostimulation for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify features of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) lead configuration and contact placement associated with greater seizure reduction in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE).

METHODS

A single-center series of patients with MTLE treated with RNS were retrospectively analyzed to assess the relationship between anatomical targeting and seizure reduction. Targeting was determined according to both the preoperatively conceived lead configuration and the actual placement of RNS contacts. Three lead configurations were used: 1) single bilateral, with 1 depth lead in each hippocampus; 2) single unilateral, with 1 hippocampal depth lead and another implant outside the mesial temporal lobe; and 3) dual unilateral, with 2 leads in 1 hippocampus. Contact placement on postoperative imaging was measured according to the number of hippocampal contacts per targeted hippocampus (contact density) and per patient (contact count), distribution throughout the hippocampus, and proximity to the anteromedial hippocampus.

RESULTS

Dual unilateral lead placement resulted in significantly higher hippocampal contact density compared with the single hippocampal approaches, but only showed a nonsignificant trend toward a higher rate of response. However, those patients with more than 4 contacts in a single hippocampus, achievable only with dual unilateral leads, had a significantly higher rate of response. The higher likelihood of response was poorly explained by more widespread hippocampal coverage, but well correlated with proximity to the anteromedial hippocampus.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual unilateral hippocampal implantation increased RNS contact density in patients with unilateral MTLE, which contributed to improved outcomes, not by stimulating more of the hippocampus, but instead by being more likely to stimulate a latent subtarget in the anterior hippocampus. It remains to be explored whether a single electrode targeted selectively to this region would also result in improved outcomes.

Distinct Biomarkers of ANT Stimulation and Seizure Freedom in an Epilepsy Patient with Ambulatory Hippocampal Electrocorticography

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) of the hippocampus are the predominant approaches to brain stimulation for treating mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). Both are similarly effective at reducing seizures in drug-resistant patients, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. In rare cases where it is clinically indicated to use RNS and DBS simultaneously, ambulatory electrophysiology from RNS may provide the opportunity to measure the effects of ANT DBS in the putative seizure onset zone and identify biomarkers associated with clinical improvement. Here, one such patient became seizure free, allowing us to identify and compare the changes in hippocampal electrophysiology associated with ANT stimulation and seizure freedom.

METHODS

Ambulatory electrocorticography and clinical history were retrospectively analyzed for a patient treated with RNS and DBS for MTLE. DBS artifacts were used to identify ANT stimulation periods on RNS recordings and measure peri-stimulus electrographic changes. Clinical history was used to determine the chronic electrographic changes associated with seizure freedom.

RESULTS

ANT stimulation acutely suppressed hippocampal gamma (25-90Hz) power, with minimal theta (4-8Hz) suppression and without clear effects on seizure frequency. Eventually, the patient became seizure free alongside the emergence of chronic gamma increase and theta suppression, which started at the same time as clobazam was introduced. Both seizure freedom and the associated electrophysiology persisted after inadvertent DBS discontinuation, further implicating the clobazam relationship. Unexpectedly, RNS detections and long episodes increased, although they were not considered to be electrographic seizures, and the patient remained clinically seizure free.

CONCLUSION

ANT stimulation and seizure freedom were associated with distinct, dissimilar spectral changes in RNS-derived electrophysiology. The time course of these changes supported a new medication as the most likely cause of clinical improvement. Broadly, this work showcases the use of RNS recordings to interpret the effects of multimodal therapy. Specifically, it lends additional credence to hippocampal theta suppression as a biomarker previously associated with seizure reduction in RNS patients.

A multicenter retrospective study of patients treated in the thalamus with responsive neurostimulation

Introduction

For drug resistant epilepsy patients who are either not candidates for resective surgery or have already failed resective surgery, neuromodulation is a promising option. Neuromodulatory approaches include responsive neurostimulation (RNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and vagal nerve stimulation (VNS). Thalamocortical circuits are involved in both generalized and focal onset seizures. This paper explores the use of RNS in the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CMN) and in the anterior thalamic nucleus (ANT) of patients with drug resistant epilepsy.

Methods

This is a retrospective multicenter study from seven different epilepsy centers in the United States. Patients that had unilateral or bilateral thalamic RNS leads implanted in the CMN or ANT for at least 6 months were included. Primary objectives were to describe the implant location and determine changes in the frequency of disabling seizures at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and > 2 years. Secondary objectives included documenting seizure free periods, anti-seizure medication regimen changes, stimulation side effects, and serious adverse events. In addition, the global clinical impression scale was completed.

Results

Twelve patients had at least one lead placed in the CMN, and 13 had at least one lead placed in the ANT. The median baseline seizure frequency was 15 per month. Overall, the median seizure reduction was 33% at 6 months, 55% at 1 year, 65% at 2 years, and 74% at >2 years. Seizure free intervals of at least 3 months occurred in nine patients. Most patients (60%, 15/25) did not have a change in anti-seizure medications post RNS placement. Two serious adverse events were recorded, one related to RNS implantation. Lastly, overall functioning seemed to improve with 88% showing improvement on the global clinical impression scale.

Discussion

Meaningful seizure reduction was observed in patients who suffer from drug resistant epilepsy with unilateral or bilateral RNS in either the ANT or CMN of the thalamus. Most patients remained on their pre-operative anti-seizure medication regimen. The device was well tolerated with few side effects. There were rare serious adverse events. Most patients showed an improvement in global clinical impression scores.