Prevalence of RAS mutations and individual variation patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients requires prior confirmation of tumour wild type (WT) RAS mutation status (exons 2/3/4 for KRAS or NRAS). This retrospective pooled analysis aims to robustly estimate RAS mutation prevalence and individual variation patterns in mCRC patients.

METHOD

Individual patient data from five randomised, controlled panitumumab studies (three phase III, one phase II and one phase Ib/II) were pooled for this analysis. The phase III studies included mCRC patients independent of RAS mutation status; the phase II and Ib/II studies included mCRC patients with confirmed WT KRAS exon 2 status. Four studies conducted RAS testing using Sanger sequencing; one study used a combination of next-generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing. In order to assign overall RAS status, the mutation status of all exons 2/3/4 KRAS or NRAS was required to be known.

RESULTS

Data from 3196 mCRC patients from 36 countries were included in the analysis. The overall unadjusted RAS mutation prevalence in mCRC patients was 55.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): [53.9-57.9%]), with the following distribution observed: KRAS exon 2 (prevalence 42.6% [40.7-44.5%]); KRAS exon 3 (3.8% [2.9-4.9%]); KRAS exon 4 (6.2% [5.0-7.6%]); NRAS exon 2 (2.9% [2.1-3.9%]); NRAS exon 3 (4.2% [3.2-5.4%]); NRAS exon 4 (0.3% [0.1-0.7%]). Differences in RAS mutation prevalence estimates were observed by study (p=0.001), gender (p=0.030), and by country (p=0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides robust estimates of overall RAS mutation prevalence and individual variation patterns in mCRC patients.

Exploratory RAS analysis of the phase Ib/II 20060447 trial of rilotumumab (R) or ganitumab (G) plus panitumumab (pmab) versus pmab alone in patients (pts) with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

694

Background: Pmab, R, and G are fully human monoclonal antibodies that target EGFR, HGF, and IGF-1R, respectively. In part 2 of this 3-part study in previously treated pts with wild-type (WT) KRAS mCRC, pmab+R met the pre-specified criterion for improvement in objective response rate (ORR) whereas pmab+G did not. We report an exploratory analysis of the treatment effect of pmab, R, and G in pts with activating RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2. Methods: Part 2 was a phase II, randomized, double-blinded trial of pmab+R or pmab+G vs. pmab+placebo, administered Q2W until disease progression or intolerance. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Mutations in KRAS exon 3 (codons 59/61) and exon 4 (codons 117/146); NRAS exon 2 (codons 12/13), exon 3 (codons 59/61), and exon 4 (codons 117/146); and BRAF exon 15 (codon 600) were detected by bidirectional Sanger sequencing. Results: Of 142 pts randomized, 92 (65%) were evaluable for RAS. Of 92 evaluable pts, 79 (86%) were WT RAS (WT in KRAS and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4) and 13 (14%) had RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 (mutant in any KRAS exon 3 or 4 or NRAS exon 2, 3, or 4). None of the pts with RAS mutations had an objective response (Table). Of 93 pts evaluable for BRAF, 7 (8%) had V600E mutations (all 7 were WT RAS). Two pts with BRAF V600E tumors had a partial response and were in the pmab+R arm (n=3). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: In this small, retrospective study, ORR, PFS and OS were similar between the arms of R or G plus pmab vs pmab alone in pts with WT RAS mCRC tumors. Our findings indicate that RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 impact ORR, PFS, and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT00788957. [Table: see text]

Prevalence of RAS mutations among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by country and region in randomized clinical trials: A pooled analysis

520

Background: Global mCRC treatment guidelines for EGFR inhibitors require prior confirmation of wild-type RAS status (KRAS exons 2, 3, 4 and NRAS 2, 3, 4). The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of RAS mutations among mCRC patients by country, demographic characteristics, and clinical risk factors. A secondary aim was to estimate BRAF and KRASexon 2 mutation prevalence. Methods: Data from 5 published Amgen-sponsored randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were merged in a retrospective pooled analysis. There were 3 phase III, 1 phase II, and 1 phase Ib/II studies. For 4 out of 5 RCTs, RAStesting was conducted in a U.S. laboratory (Transgenomic Inc.) using Sanger sequencing on DNA extracted from tumor samples. For the remaining trial, a combination of next-generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing was used. Results: A total of 3,196 patients from 36 countries were included. The overall unadjusted prevalence of RAS mutations among mCRC subjects was 55.9% (95% CI, 53.9%, 57.9%); KRAS exon 2 mutation prevalence was 42.6% (40.7%, 44.5%). The prevalence by exon is given in the table below. BRAFmutation prevalence was 8.1% (6.7%, 9.6%). There were no statistically significant differences in RAS mutation prevalence by gender, age, or clinical factors such as performance status, tumour site, biopsy origin, or metastasis characteristics. Statistically significant differences in RAS mutation prevalence estimates were observed by country and by region with rates for Central West Europe being significantly lower than Eastern Europe (49.4% [44.4%, 54.3%] and 61.5%; [55.3%; 67.4%] respectively). Statistically significant RASmutation prevalence differences were observed between studies which could be due to varying patient characteristics. Conclusions: By merging data from RCTs, the analysis provides robust estimates of RASmutation prevalence. Studies using observational data are needed to confirm these findings. [Table: see text]

Amphiregulin (AREG) expression and response to first-line panitumumab (pmab) plus FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

731

Background: Biomarker analyses have shown that patients (pts) with RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC can achieve overall survival (OS) benefits with first-line pmab plus chemotherapy. Other biomarkers may exist that could optimize pt selection. Epidermal growth factor receptor ligand (eg AREG) levels have been correlated with OS during anti-EGFR therapy. Here we investigate the relationship between AREG expression and treatment outcome in a single-arm first-line mCRC study of pmab + FOLFIRI. Methods: Qualified reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays were used to measure AREG RNA expression in archival formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tumor samples from mCRC pts in two pmab trials (STEPP and 314). The STEPP analysis was used to establish a cut-off point in AREG expression that identified the best responders. This cut-off was applied prospectively to samples previously analyzed for KRAS in the 314 trial. Using the KRASMT subgroup as a non-responding comparator, Cox proportional hazards (PH) models were used to evaluate AREG expression levels as a continuous covariate. Decision curves were used to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratio (HR) with increasing levels of baseline AREG expression. Results: In the 314 trial 100 pts had evaluable AREG levels. Among 50 KRAS WT pts, high AREG expression was associated with objective response (OR) (Table). The high AREG group had better PFS HRs (KRAS WT/KRAS MT: 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12–0.75]) compared with the low AREG group (PFS HR 0.49 [95% CI 0.21–1.1]). There was a significant biomarker-by-AREG expression interaction in the Cox PH model (p=0.03). Conclusions: Treatment decision curves based on the PH model suggest that most KRAS WT patients express AREG at levels where treatment benefit is predicted. Future analysis of samples from a RASWT population may provide further insights. Clinical trial information: NCT00508404. [Table: see text]

Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The Panitumumab Randomized trial In combination with chemotherapy for Metastatic colorectal cancer to determine Efficacy (PRIME) demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus FOLFOX4 as first-line treatment of wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the primary end point of the study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to panitumumab 6.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks + FOLFOX4 (arm 1) or FOLFOX4 (arm 2). This prespecified final descriptive analysis of efficacy and safety was planned for 30 months after the last patient was enrolled.

RESULTS

A total of 1183 patients were randomized. Median PFS for WT KRAS mCRC was 10.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.3-11.4 months] for arm 1 and 8.6 months (95% CI 7.5-9.5 months) for arm 2; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.95; P = 0.01. Median overall survival (OS) for WT KRAS mCRC was 23.9 months (95% CI 20.3-27.7 months) for arm 1 and 19.7 months (95% CI 17.6-22.7 months) for arm 2; HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.73-1.06; P = 0.17 (68% OS events). An exploratory analysis of updated survival (>80% OS events) was carried out which demonstrated improvement in OS; HR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.98; P = 0.03 for WT KRAS mCRC. The adverse event profile was consistent with the primary analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In WT KRAS mCRC, PFS was improved, objective response was higher, and there was a trend toward improved OS with panitumumab-FOLFOX4, with significant improvement in OS observed in an updated analysis of survival in patients with WT KRAS mCRC treated with panitumumab + FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 alone (P = 0.03). These data support a positive benefit-risk profile for panitumumab-FOLFOX4 for patients with previously untreated WT KRAS mCRC. KRAS testing is critical to select appropriate patients for treatment with panitumumab.

Tumor KRAS status predicts responsiveness to panitumumab in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Mutation status of the KRAS gene in tumors has been shown to be a predictive biomarker of response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This retrospective analysis examined the association between efficacy and safety of the fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody panitumumab and KRAS mutation status in Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients using data from two clinical trials with adherence to good clinical practices.

METHODS

An exploratory, integrated analysis of data from KRAS evaluable patients enrolled in a Phase 1 study (Study 20040192) and a Phase 2 study (Study 20050216) was performed. Paraffin-embedded tumor samples were analyzed for KRAS status. Primary efficacy endpoint of this analysis was objective tumor response per modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; a key secondary endpoint was progression-free survival. Safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Tumor samples with known KRAS status were available from 8 of 13 (62%) metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the Phase 1 study and 16 of 53 patients (30%) in the Phase 2 study. Overall, 14 (58%) patients had wild-type KRAS tumors and 10 (42%) patients had mutated KRAS tumors. Four (17%) patients had a partial response; all responders had tumors with wild-type KRAS. Results of all secondary efficacy endpoints also favored patients with wild-type KRAS. Treatment-related adverse events were predominantly mild to moderate and skin related, and were similar between patients with tumors with wild-type and mutated KRAS in this small patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutated KRAS status in tumors of Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with lack of response to panitumumab therapy.