OCTA changes following loading phase with intravitreal aflibercept for DME

OBJECTIVE

To quantify changes in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters following intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME), and to assess associations between pretreatment OCTA parameters and visual outcomes.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with DME received 5 monthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept. OCTA data obtained at baseline and at 6 months were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. OCTA parameters were foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, FAZ perimeter, FAZ circularity, vessel density in the superficial vascular plexus (segmented into central, inner, outer, and full Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] map regions. Subanalysis divided patients into treatment responders (reduction of central subfield thickness >50 µm over treatment) and nonresponders. Associations between pretreatment OCTA parameters and visual acuity outcomes were analyzed using multivariable linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were included: 25 patients (86.2%) had nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, and 4 patients (13.8%) had proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Vessel density was reduced in the central (p = 0.004) and inner (p = 0.013) ETDRS map regions. This effect was significant only among treatment responders (central p = 0.002; inner p = 0.017). Pretreatment OCT and OCTA parameters were not associated with final visual acuity outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Following intravitreal aflibercept treatment for DME, there was a significant decrease in vessel density of the superficial vascular plexus at the central and inner ETDRS map regions. This was seen only among treatment responders. Observations here are likely to represent the limits of OCTA technology itself, where pretreatment vessel density may have been artifactually overestimated by suspended scattering particles in motion. Pretreatment OCTA parameters did not serve as biomarkers for visual outcome following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

Imaging Biomarkers and Their Impact on Therapeutic Decision-Making in the Management of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

These recommendations, produced by a group of Canadian retina experts, have been developed to assist both retina specialists and general ophthalmologists in the management of vision-threatening neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The recommendations are based on published evidence as well as collective experience and expertise in routine clinical practice. We provide an update on practice principles for optimal patient care, focusing on identified imaging biomarkers, in particular retinal fluid, as well as current and emerging therapeutic approaches. Algorithms for delivering high-quality care and improving long-term patient outcomes are provided, with an emphasis on timely and appropriate treatment to preserve and maintain vision. In the context of nAMD, increasing macular fluid or leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA) may indicate disease activity regardless of its location. Early elimination of intraretinal fluid (IRF) is of particular relevance as it is a prognostic indicator of worse visual outcomes. Robust referral pathways for second opinion and peer-to-peer consultations must be in place for cases not responding to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy.

Optimal Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion: Canadian Expert Consensus

Background: The availability of new therapeutic approaches, particularly intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies, has prompted significant changes to the established treatment paradigms for retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Better visual outcomes and significantly lower rates of adverse events have been noted in multiple large randomized clinical trials and have led to a new standard of care for this sight-threatening condition. Objective: To develop an expert consensus for the management of RVO and associated complications in the context of recent clinical evidence. Methods: The development of a Canadian expert consensus for optimal treatment began with a review of clinical evidence, daily practice, and existing treatment guidelines and algorithms. The expert clinicians (11 Canadian retina specialists) met on February 1, 2014, in Toronto to discuss their findings and to propose strategies for consensus. Results: The result of this expert panel is a consensus proposal for Canadian ophthalmologists and retina specialists treating patients presenting with RVO. Treatment algorithms specific to branch and central RVO (BRVO and CRVO) were also developed. Conclusions: The consensus provides guidelines to aid clinicians in managing RVO and associated complications in their daily practice. In summary, laser remains the therapy of choice when neovascularization secondary to RVO is detected. Adjunctive anti-VEGF could be considered in managing neovascularization secondary to RVO in cases of vitreous hemorrhage. Intravitreal anti-VEGF should be considered for symptomatic visual loss associated with center-involving macular edema on optical coherence tomography. Patients with BRVO and a suboptimal response to anti-VEGF could be treated with grid laser, and those with CRVO and an inadequate response to anti-VEGF may be candidates for intravitreal steroids.

Canadian expert consensus: optimal treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND

New therapeutic approaches, particularly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies, prevent, and in some cases reverse, vision damage caused by age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Unequal access to care across Canada remains a problem for many retina specialists and their patients.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a consensus concerning the management of patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

Consensus document.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten Canadian retina specialists.

METHODS

The development of a consensus among Canadian experts concerning optimal treatment of AMD began with a review of the clinical evidence, daily practices, existing guidelines, and current national and international approvals and policies. The experts met on June 29, 2010, in Quebec City to discuss their findings and to propose strategies for consensus.

RESULTS

The result of this expert panel is a consensus proposal for Canadian ophthalmologists and retina specialists who are treating patients with or at risk for developing neovascular AMD.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus provides guidelines to aid retina specialists in managing exudative AMD. Currently, ranibizumab is the only agent with sufficient Level I evidence and a Health Canada-approved indication for the treatment of wet AMD. Bevacizumab has been shown to be noninferior in preserving and improving visual acuity when compared to ranibizumab. Potential safety differences between the 2 drugs remain to be elucidated. The positioning of ranibizumab in this therapeutic area will be further defined as additional data for existing and emerging therapies become available. Until then, this agent remains the therapy of choice for individuals with neovascular AMD.

The effects of exposure to a 1.5-tesla magnetic field on intravitreous metallic foreign bodies in rabbits

BACKGROUND

The study was performed to determine (1) whether intravitreous ferromagnetic foreign bodies (FBs) are sufficiently mobile in a magnetic field to induce acute injury in vivo, and (2) whether the length of time from implantation of the intravitreous FB affects mobility.

METHODS

A 3 mm x 0.72 mm magnetic FB (MFB) and a non-magnetic metallic FB (NMFB) of similar dimensions were surgically implanted into the right and left eyes, respectively, of 20 New Zealand white rabbits. On days 0 (FB implantation) and 30, all rabbits underwent computed tomography (CT) prior to and immediately following exposure to a 1.5-tesla (T) magnetic field. Pre- and post-magnetic field CT image FB angles and distances, together with ophthalmic examinations, were used to assess FB mobility. Rabbits were killed at 31 days. The globes were processed for light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Angle measurements revealed that the MFBs developed significant angular motion and were scattered more widely than NMFBs on the day of FB implantation and 30 days later, although the angular motion and scatter of MFBs were less on day 30. There were no significant differences among distance measurements for MFBs or NMFBs on or between days 0 and 30. Throughout the 30-day study, ophthalmic examinations revealed dorso-ventral FB movement and focal vitreous degeneration and retinal hemorrhage within both MFB- and NMFB-containing globes. Mild vitreous hemorrhage was noted around a NMFB. Focal retinal degeneration was confirmed by LM ( n=1 MFB). SEM revealed intravitreous erythrocytes and spindle cells adjacent to all FBs examined.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Angle measurements show that MFBs are significantly mobile when exposed to a 1.5-T magnetic field on the same day as FB implantation and 30 days later. (2) Angular mobility of MFBs is less at 30 days. (3) Magnetic field exposure did not induce ocular injury in MFB-containing globes. (4) Intravitreous metallic FB retention induces ocular pathologic changes.