Aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients

Background

Concomitant replacement of the aortic root and aortic valve is a widely used treatment strategy in elective patients with aortic valve stenosis and root aneurysm. It is also a strategy frequently employed in patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), involving the aortic root. Although more patients have undergone valve sparing procedures over the past decades, the classic ‘modified Bentall technique’ remains a valid option, particularly for patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). We aimed to compare the results of elective and emergency modified Bentall procedures in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients undergoing either elective or emergency modified Bentall procedures between 2000 and 2018 and identified 827 elective cases (44% BAV) and 258 emergency cases (15% BAV). Analysis of intra- and postoperative outcomes and early mortality was performed. Due to inequality of the groups, a matching analysis was performed.

Results

We found BAV patients to be significantly younger (elective: 58±18 vs. 65±14, P<0.001; emergency: 49±17 vs. 62±19, P<0.001) and healthier at time of surgery. In the AADA cohort, malperfusion rate was not different between bicuspid and tricuspid patients, however bicuspid AADA patients presented more often with an entry in the aortic root. After matching, procedure times and early outcomes did not differ between the groups, except for significantly higher rates of respiratory failure in elective TAV patients (10% vs. 5%, P=0.033). The 30-day mortality was 2% in elective cases and 22% in emergency AADA surgery. A subgroup analysis of elective patients with aortic diameter <55 mm also showed excellent outcomes.

Conclusions

After adjustment for preoperative inequalities, no differences in early mortality and outcomes were found between bicuspid and tricuspid patients receiving elective or emergency modified Bentall surgery.

Management of aortic root in type A dissection: Bentall approach

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the results of the modified Bentall procedure in a high-risk group of patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).

METHODS

ATAAD patients undergoing a modified Bentall between 1996 and 2018 (n = 314) were analyzed. Mechanical composite conduits were used in 45%, and biological ones using either a bioprosthesis implanted into an aortic graft (33%) or xeno-/homograft root conduits (22%) in the rest. Preoperative malperfusion was present in 34% of patients and cardiopulmonary resuscitation required in 9%.

RESULTS

Concomitant arch procedures consisted of hemiarch in 56% and total arch/elephant trunk in 34%, while concomitant coronary artery surgery was required in 20%. The average cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 126 ± 43 and 210 ± 76 min, respectively, while the average circulatory arrest times were 29 ± 17 min. A total of 69 patients (22%) suffered permanent neurologic deficit, while myocardial infarction occurred in 18 cases (6%) and low cardiac output syndrome in 47 (15%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 17% due to intractable low cardiac output syndrome (n = 29), major brain injury (n = 16), multiorgan failure (n = 6), and sepsis (n = 2). The independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were critical preoperative state (odds ratio [OR], 5.6; p < .001), coronary malperfusion (OR, 3.6; p = .002), coronary artery disease (OR, 2.6; p = .033), and prior cerebrovascular accident (OR, 5.6; p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Bentall operation, along with necessary concomitant procedures, can be performed with good early results in high-risk ATAAD patients presenting.