The hospital frailty risk score as a predictor of readmission after ERCP

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The 30-day readmission rate is a nationally recognized quality measure with nearly one-fifth of patients being readmitted. This study aims to evaluate frailty, as measured by the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS), as a prognostic indicator for 30-day readmission after inpatient ERCP.

METHODS

We analyzed weighted discharge records from the 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to identify patients undergoing ERCP between 01/01/2017 and 11/30/2017. Our primary outcome was the 30-day unplanned readmission rate in frail (defined as HFRS > 5) against non-frail (HFRS < 5) patients. A mixed effects multivariable logistic regression method was employed.

RESULTS

Among 68,206 weighted hospitalized patients undergoing ERCP, 31.3% were frail. Frailty was associated with higher 30-day readmission (OR 1.23, 95% CI [1.16-1.30]). Multivariable analysis showed a greater risk of readmission with cirrhosis (OR 1.26, 95% CI [1.10-1.45]), liver transplantation (OR 1.36, 95% CI [1.08-1.71]), cancer (OR 1.58, 95% CI [1.48-1.69]), and male gender (OR 1.24, 95% CI [1.18-1.31]). Frail patients also had higher mortality rate (1.8% vs 0.6%, p < 0.01)], longer LOS during readmission (6.7 vs 5.6 days, p < 0.01), and incurred more charges from both hospitalizations ($175,620 vs $132,519, p < 0.01). Sepsis was the most common primary indication for both frail and non-frail readmissions but accounted for a greater percentage of frail readmissions (17.9% vs 12.4%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is associated with higher readmission rates, mortality, LOS, and hospital charges for admitted patients undergoing ERCP. Sepsis is the leading cause for readmission. Independent risk factors for readmission include liver transplantation, cancer, cirrhosis, and male gender.

Management of a gastric pouch staple-line leak and its adverse events with multimodal endoscopic techniques including endoscopic vacuum therapy

Video 1Management of a gastric pouch staple-line leak and its adverse events with multimodal endoscopic techniques including endoscopic vacuum therapy.

Evaluation of Esophageal Dysphagia in Elderly Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While guidelines exist for the evaluation and management of esophageal dysphagia in the general population, dysphagia disproportionately affects the elderly. In this article, we reviewed the literature on evaluating esophageal dysphagia in elderly patients and proposed a diagnostic algorithm based on this evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

In older patients, dysphagia is often well compensated for by altered eating habits and physiologic changes, underreported by patients, and missed by healthcare providers. Once identified, dysphagia should be differentiated into oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia to guide diagnostic workup. For esophageal dysphagia, this review proposes starting with endoscopy with biopsies, given its relative safety even in older patients and potential for interventional therapy. If endoscopy shows a structural or mechanical cause, then further cross-sectional imaging should be considered to assess for extrinsic compression, and same session endoscopic dilation should be considered for strictures. If biopsies and endoscopy are normal, then esophageal dysmotility is more likely, and high-resolution manometry and additional workup should be performed following the updated Chicago Classification. Even after diagnosis of the root cause, complications including malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia should also be assessed and monitored, as they both result from and can further contribute to dysphagia. The successful evaluation of esophageal dysphagia in elderly patients requires a thorough, standardized approach to collecting a history, selection of appropriate diagnostic workup, and assessment of risk of potential complications, including malnutrition and aspiration.