Epidermolytic ichthyosis: Clinical spectrum and burden of disease in a large German cohort

BACKGROUND

Keratinopathic ichthyoses are a group of hereditary skin disorders caused by pathogenic variants in keratin genes such as KRT1, KRT2 and KRT10, resulting in conditions such as epidermolytic ichthyosis (EI), autosomal-recessive EI, superficial EI and epidermal nevus. Case reports highlight the diversity of clinical manifestations, but only limited information exists regarding the quality of life and burden of disease.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess the clinical spectrum, genotype-phenotype correlations and burden of disease in patients with epidermolytic ichthyosis in Germany.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study involving 48 patients diagnosed with EI. Evaluations included the severity of skin involvement using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), the modified Ichthyosis Area Severity Index (mIASI) and complications. The burden of disease was evaluated using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) or the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI).

RESULTS

Based on clinical features, mIASI and IGA, EI can be categorized into localized, intermediate and severe forms. Patients with keratin 1 mutations tended to have severe EI, while the three forms were evenly distributed in those with keratin 10 mutations. The study highlights that around half of the patients with EI experienced itch and severe pain. Quality of life was affected, with daily life restrictions of 78% due to care and therapies. Reimbursement for moisturizing ointments by health insurance was insufficient for one-quarter of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The results emphasize the need for targeted interventions and comprehensive care strategies to enhance the quality of life for affected individuals.

Personal, financial and time burden in inherited ichthyoses: A survey of 144 patients in a university-based setting

BACKGROUND

Patients with inherited ichthyosis suffer from scaling due to mutations affecting the epidermal barrier. Symptomatic treatment with ointments, bathing and mechanical scale removal can alleviate the disease, but therapy is time and cost intensive.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated costs, time and disease burden of ichthyoses. The study addresses difficulties of the healthcare situation for patients with ichthyoses and reveals potential improvements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed a questionnaire addressing time and financial effort for the treatment. Additionally, we collected data of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Pruritus Life Quality (5PLQ) questionnaires to determine the impact of ichthyosis and associated pruritus on quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

We recruited 144 patients with ichthyosis (median age: 23; 53.5% female) from the Department of Dermatology in Muenster (Germany) and the German patient support group including common, rare and syndromic subtypes. Eighty-seven percent reported applying topical therapeutics at least once per day, 66.4% several times with an overall median duration of 15 min. Highest single expenditure of time was due to balneotherapy (n = 115; median bathing time: 40 min). In 81.9%, the health insurance did not completely cover the costs for topical treatment causing additional financial burden to the patient with a median of 71 € per quarter, herein creams being the largest cost factor (50 €). Patients with Netherton syndrome showed the highest median expenditure (170 €). The QoL impairment under treatment was moderate (median DLQI: 8.5 points). Pruritus was prevalent in 79.9% and showed a distinct impact on QoL (median 5PLQ: 7.5 points) without any significant difference between the subtypes (p = 0.37).

CONCLUSION

Patients suffering from ichthyoses have a large and lifelong overall burden in mild and severe subtypes. Since continuous topical treatment is required, financial and psychosocial support needs to be considered beyond dermatological care.