Buffered 2% articaine versus non-buffered 4% articaine in maxillary infiltration: randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

This randomized, triple-blind, crossover clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, onset, length of pulp and soft tissue anesthesia, and pain during injection of 2% buffered articaine and 4% non-buffered articaine solutions.

METHODS

Each volunteer received two maxillary supraperiosteal anesthesia infiltrations in canine area. The infiltrations were performed at two different sessions using a different local anesthetic solution for each session, and the anesthetic injection speed was always 1 mL/min. The assessment of the onset and length of pulpal and soft tissue anesthesia was performed with the pulp electrical test "pulp tester" and the esthesiometer kit, respectively. Volunteers marked pain during injection on a visual analog scale (VAS). The anesthetics solutions pH was evaluated through the pH meter equipment.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two anesthetic solutions (onset of soft tissue anesthesia, p = 0.5386; length of soft tissue anesthesia, p = 0.718; onset of pulpal anesthesia, p = 0.747; length of pulpal anesthesia, p = 0.375), except for pain during the injection which was lower when buffered 2% articaine was used (p = 0.001) and the pH. The pH analysis revealed that the solutions differed from one another (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The 2% buffered articaine solution provided the same anesthetic properties then 4% unbuffered articaine with a great reduction in pain during injection.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The possibility of use 2% buffered articaine solution instead of 4% articaine maintaining the same anesthetic properties with a great reduction in pain during injection and half of the anesthetic salt concentration.

Effect of glucosamine sulphate on the temporomandibular joint of ovariectomised rats

Glycosamine is an amino-monosaccharide present in connective and cartilage tissues that contribute to the maintenance, resistance, flexibility, and elasticity of these tissues. This study aimed to determine the in vivo effects of glucosamine sulphate (GS) on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of ovariectomised rats (OVX).Thirty-two rats were distributed into four groups as follows: G1, sham-OVX+saline solution; G2, sham-OVX+glucosamine sulphate (80mg/kg) - oral administration; G3, OVX+saline solution; G4, OVX+glucosamine sulphate (80mg/kg) - oral administration. Animals were treated for seven days. The TMJ was removed and stained with toluidine blue. The thickness of the cartilage layers and cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α levels were determined by histomorphometry and immunoassay, respectively. The administration of GS to OVX females did not change the thickness of condylar cartilage when compared with the other groups (p>0.05). There was an increase in the total cartilage thickness in sham-OVX females. IL-1β and TNF-α levels were significantly lower in sham-OVX females than in OVX females, indicating that ovariectomy acts as potent cytokine inducer. IL-6 levels were significantly higher in sham-OVX females. GS did not affect cytokine production in OVX females (p>0.05). In conclusion, the administration of GS did not affect cytokine levels, but did induce an increase in the total thickness of the TMJ condylar cartilage in sham-OVX rats.

Comparison of two vasoconstrictors on glycemic levels in diabetic patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate glycemic levels in diabetic patients before, during, and after extractions using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (Lido/Epi) and 3% prilocaine with 0.03 IU/mL felypressin (Prilo/Fely).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate changes in body parameters and glycemic levels in diabetic patients undergoing two anesthetic protocols during dental extractions. During surgery, we evaluated blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), saturation (SpO2), and capillary glycemic levels (Gly). These parameters were measured at the following surgical moments: basal, 30 min after medication, incision, tooth removal, suture, and 30 and 60 min after anesthesia.

RESULTS

Data analysis showed no differences between the groups considering age, weight, and time spent in surgery. Increased systolic BP and decreased diastolic BP were observed in the lido/epi group. No difference was observed in the prilo/fely group among the surgical moments or between the groups regarding BP. No difference was observed in HR and SpO2 between the groups at any surgical moment. However, differences were found when compared the differences in glycemic and basal levels in both groups with greater decreases in blood glucose values for the lido/epi group. In anxiety level evaluation, there was no difference between the different surgical moments.

CONCLUSION

Thus, both lido/epi and prilo/fely (maximum 3.6 mL) can be safely used in controlled diabetic patients CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of lidocaine associated with epinephrine did not increase glycemic levels but leads to decrease over time when associated with an anxiety reduction protocol, offering some advantage over prilocaine plus felypressin for diabetic patients.

Effects of auriculotherapy and midazolam for anxiety control in patients submitted to third molar extraction

Anxiety is common and still represents a barrier to appropriate professional care for patients requiring dental treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of auriculotherapy and midazolam for the control of anxiety in patients submitted to third molar extractions. This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover clinical trial. Thirty healthy volunteers requiring bilateral third molar extraction received midazolam 15mg (oral) and sham auriculotherapy during one session, and a placebo tablet (oral) and auriculotherapy during the other; the sessions were randomized. The level of anxiety was assessed through questionnaires and physical parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation (SpO₂)) at three time points: baseline, on the day of surgery, and at follow-up. No significant differences between the protocols were observed for blood pressure and SpO₂. Auriculotherapy induced a lower heart rate than midazolam during some periods. Auriculotherapy induced more events remembered after surgery than midazolam (P<0.0001). More undesirable effects were observed with midazolam (P<0.0001). However, patient preference for auriculotherapy (53.3%) was not higher than preference for midazolam (46.7%). Auriculotherapy showed an anxiolytic effect equivalent to the midazolam effect, without the undesirable effects usually attributed to the benzodiazepine.

[Critical analysis of respiratory infectious disease investigations related to children attending day care centers]

OBJECTIVE: Social-economic and cultural changes are increasingly leading families to share the children's care and education with daycare centers. Nevertheless, this practice is being widely criticized. Medical literature, for example, points to the high risk of illnesses in these environments. Searching to assess theoretical- methodological aspects underlying disease/daycare research, a bibliography review was done. METHOD: The last five years production was reviewed, through Current Contents, Med-Line and Lilacs, using creche / daycare center as keywords. RESULTS: 665 papers were obtained and organized in subgroups. Selecting the group of papers on respiratory infectious diseases, 34 papers were obtained, being 22 of them empirical, and 12 theoretical or review article, etc. The empirical studies used large populations; data were collected by interviews, medical reports and laboratory analyses; 50% were cross-sectional. Disease/daycare relation was obtained mainly by quantitative analysis, based on a multivariate model and logistic regression. Seventy per cent concluded that attending daycare implies an illness high risk, especially for youngers than 2 years. The papers with a preventive character, and-in more subtler ways - 50% of the others point alternative solutions for this clinical and social problem (vaccination, immunity stimulation, environmental organization). CONCLUSION: The structure and the discussion of the majority of the studies seem to be guided by implicit assumptions, based on conceptions of an ideal situation of care (at house, by the mother). The results are legitimized by large populations and sophisticated statistic systems. Nevertheless, they express a prediction risk, which highlights static aspects, not the dynamic ones, of health/ disease processes. At last, they treat a social problem on clinical individual assumptions.