Tumor monocyte content predicts immunochemotherapy outcomes in esophageal adenocarcinoma

For inoperable esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), identifying patients likely to benefit from recently approved immunochemotherapy (ICI+CTX) treatments remains a key challenge. We address this using a uniquely designed window-of-opportunity trial (LUD2015-005), in which 35 inoperable EAC patients received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors for four weeks (ICI-4W), followed by ICI+CTX. Comprehensive biomarker profiling, including generation of a 65,000-cell single-cell RNA-sequencing atlas of esophageal cancer, as well as multi-timepoint transcriptomic profiling of EAC during ICI-4W, reveals a novel T cell inflammation signature (INCITE) whose upregulation correlates with ICI-induced tumor shrinkage. Deconvolution of pre-treatment gastro-esophageal cancer transcriptomes using our single-cell atlas identifies high tumor monocyte content (TMC) as an unexpected ICI+CTX-specific predictor of greater overall survival (OS) in LUD2015-005 patients and of ICI response in prevalent gastric cancer subtypes from independent cohorts. Tumor mutational burden is an additional independent and additive predictor of LUD2015-005 OS. TMC can improve patient selection for emerging ICI+CTX therapies in gastro-esophageal cancer.

Abstract 1247: Comprehensive molecular profiling to predict first-line immunochemotherapy outcomes in inoperable esophageal adenocarcinoma

For patients with inoperable esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), prognosis on conventional chemotherapy (CTX) remains poor. In 2021, the FDA approved two αPD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for addition to fluoropyrimidine/platinum-containing CTX in this first-line setting. As ICI+CTX enters the clinic, understanding ICI responses and predicting which patients will benefit from ICI addition are key challenges. To address these challenges, we assessed clinical and molecular profiles from the experimental LUD2015-005 trial (NCT02735239, EudraCT 2015-005298-19). Treatment consisted of an initial four-week ICI-only window with durvalumab (αPD-L1) with or without a single dose of tremelimumab (αCTLA-4), followed by 6 cycles of ICI+CTX (CapOx). 38 inoperable patients received treatment (35 EAC; 3 ESCC); median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 13.4 and 9.3 months, respectively. All patients reported at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE), with 29 (76.3%) reporting grade 3 or higher TEAEs. EAC patients with available samples (n = 33) were taken forward for biomarker analysis, using tumor and adjacent normal biopsies collected at pre-treatment (PreTx), after four weeks of ICI-only (ICI-4W), and at the end of ICI+CTX (PostTx).

Transcriptomic comparison of paired PreTx and ICI-4W EAC biopsies (n = 28) revealed ICI-induced upregulation of a novel T-cell inflammation signature (termed INCITE). Stronger INCITE upregulation correlated with greater tumor shrinkage during the ICI-only window, and tumors with minimal INCITE upregulation showed markers of ICI resistance, including Innate PD-1 Resistance (IPRES). Despite correlation with ICI-only responses, INCITE changes were not associated with overall ICI+CTX outcomes.

To find predictive biomarkers of ICI+CTX outcomes, we conducted comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic profiling of PreTx EAC biopsies (n = 33). First, we generated a novel 65,000 cell scRNA-seq dataset and designed a deconvolution workflow to resolve tumor cell composition. Unexpectedly, monocyte composition was strongly linked with greater overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.40 [0.23-0.69]; p = 0.001; FDR = 0.047). Coding tumor mutational burden (TMB) was also associated with improved OS (HR: 0.50 [0.28-0.89]; p = 0.019). Multivariate modelling suggested monocyte composition and TMB were independent and complementary predictors of outcomes. Neither factor was associated with outcomes in a TCGA cohort of EAC patients not treated with ICI, suggesting these biomarkers may be specific to ICI or ICI+CTX.

Our findings suggest monocyte composition and TMB may identify EAC patients likely to benefit from ICI+CTX. INCITE upregulation may also serve as a useful monitor of ICI efficacy. These timely findings further our understanding of ICI response and resistance and may help inform patient selection for ICI+CTX.

Citation Format: Thomas M. Carroll, Joseph A. Chadwick, Richard P. Owen, Michael J. White, Joseph Kaplinsky, Iliana Peneva, Anna Frangou, Jaeho Chang, Phil F. Xie, Andrew Roth, Bob Amess, Hantao Lou, Katy J. McCann, Georgina Berridge, Roman Fischer, Chansavath Phetsouphanh, Ayo O. Omiyale, Brittany-Amber Jacobs, David Ahern, Simon R. Lord, Stewart Norris-Bulpitt, Sam T. Dobbie, Lucinda Griffiths, Kristen Aufiero Ramirez, Toni Ricciardi, Mary J. Macri, Aileen Ryan, Ralph R. Venhaus, Benoit J. Van den Eynde, Ioannis Karydis, Benedikt M. Kessler, Benjamin Schuster-Böckler, Mark R. Middleton, Xin Lu. Comprehensive molecular profiling to predict first-line immunochemotherapy outcomes in inoperable esophageal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1247.

A Prospective, Phase 1 Trial of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, and Radiotherapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

Preclinical data suggest that radiotherapy (RT) is beneficial in combination with immune checkpoint blockade. Clinical trials have explored RT with single-agent immune checkpoint blockade, but no trials have reported RT with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a phase 1 study of patients with stage IV melanoma receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab with two different dose-fractionation schemes of RT. Patients had at least one melanoma metastasis that would benefit from palliative RT and one metastasis that would not be irradiated. Nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and extracranial RT with a dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions was administered in Cohort A, and then 27 Gy in 3 fractions was administered in Cohort B. The primary outcome was safety.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were treated (10 in each cohort). The rates of treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events in Cohort A and B were 40% and 30%, respectively. There were no grade ≥3 adverse events attributed to RT. Patients responded to treatment outside of the irradiated volume (Cohort A 5/10; Cohort B 1/9). No evaluable patients had progression of irradiated metastases. Immunologic changes were seen in the peripheral blood with increases in T-cell receptor diversity in some responding patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RT with nivolumab and ipilimumab was safe compared with historical data of nivolumab and ipilimumab alone. Immunologic effects were observed in the peripheral blood. Randomized studies are ongoing to assess whether RT increases the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab.

Abstract B209: Phase 1/2 study of mRNA vaccine therapy + durvalumab (durva) ± tremelimumab (treme) in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Vaccine therapies stimulate the immune system to attack cancer cells (active immunotherapy), whereas checkpoint inhibitors block immune inhibition (passive immunotherapy). BI 1361849 (formerly CV9202) is a cancer vaccine comprising 6 mRNA constituents, each of which encodes for one of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) associated antigens: MUC1, survivin, NY-ESO-1, 5T4, MAGE-C2, and MAGE-C1. Durvalumab (durva) is a checkpoint inhibitor that blocks programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) binding to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1). Several PD-1 and PD-L1 blocking antibodies are approved for NSCLC. Tremelimumab (treme) is an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4) blocking antibody. Targeting both the CTLA-4 and PD-1 checkpoint pathways provides the potential for additive or synergistic effects. This study combines active and passive immunotherapies to determine if the addition of a mRNA vaccine, BI 1361849, can enhance the activity of checkpoint blockade. This ongoing phase 1/2, open-label study (NCT03164772) evaluates the safety and efficacy of BI 1361849 when administered with durva (Arm A) or durva + treme (Arm B) in patients with NSCLC. In Arm A, an initial dose evaluation phase follows a 3+3 design to confirm the dose of durva (full dose 1500 mg or de-escalated 750 mg, if needed) to be given with the vaccine. Arm B uses the dose established in Arm A, with the addition of 75 mg treme. In the expansion phase, 20 patients are treated in each arm. To aid in the evaluation of immune responses, there is an additional control group (n=10), in which patients receive the checkpoint inhibitor(s) only. Study treatment is administered over 12 cycles (28 days each). Durva (x 12 doses) and treme (x 4 doses, Arm B only) are administered intravenously every 28 days. The vaccine is administered as a total of 14 doses (of the 6 components) during the 12 cycles, using a device that provides a needle-free intradermal administration. The primary endpoint is assessment of safety and tolerability, including evaluation of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival and objective response rate at 8 and 24 weeks, disease control rate, response duration, and overall survival, with tumor response evaluated by RECIST 1.1 and immune-related RECIST. Exploratory objectives include effects on tumor microenvironment and evaluation of immune responses. Enrollment opened 20 December 2017. As of 27 June 2018, 2 patients are enrolled; enrollment is ongoing.

Citation Format: Joshua Sabari, Kristen Aufiero Ramirez, Paul Schwarzenberger, Toni Ricciardi, Mary Macri, Aileen Ryan, Ralph Venhaus. Phase 1/2 study of mRNA vaccine therapy + durvalumab (durva) ± tremelimumab (treme) in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B209.