Large Abdominal Wall Defects: A Safe and Reliable Technique for Midline Reconstruction-The Bonheiden Experience

This retrospective study reveals the results of our approach to the treatment of complex ventral hernias. A single-center, single-surgeon retrospective chart review on 68 consecutive patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction for incisional herniation on the midline between January 2012 and December 2016 is presented. The Bonheiden technique is based on anterior component separation in combination with preperitoneal retromuscular mesh reinforcement of the midline. Data of 68 consecutive cases of incisional midline abdominal wall defects treated electively with the mesh reinforced anterior component separation technique were analyzed. Demographics, patient characteristics, and hernia properties were evaluated. Postoperative complications included 28% of wound infections/dehiscence, 25% seromas, and 7% hematomas. No recurrences have been seen. We conclude this technique to be safe and reliable for large midline defects in patients suffering with several comorbidities.

Long-Term Outcome After Laparoscopic Repair of Primary, Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Using a Self-Adhering Mesh

Following our previous study about a lightweight self-adhering mesh (Adhesix®, Cousin Biotech, Wervicq-Sud, France; distributed by Davol Inc., subsidiary of C.R. Bard, Inc.), we report the long-term results with the use of this mesh in patients treated for a primary, unilateral inguinal hernia without any other hernias. Prospectively collected data of 100 patients between February 2011 and February 2014 were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 2.7 years (range 1-4), and mean length of hospital stay was 0.6 days (range 0.5-1). At the time of the last follow-up visit, two patients (2%) had a recurrent inguinal hernia. Compared to preoperative values, patients reported a significant reduction in their pain sensation (visual analogue scale, VAS) after one month (4.61 vs. 1.32; P<0.001). A difference in VAS scores remained significant at the last follow-up visit (1.31 vs. 0.28; P<0.001). Patients reported high quality of life scores. Only one patient (1%) developed a clinically significant seroma that required an evacuating puncture. Two patients (2%) had superficial wound infections. Neither mesh infections nor mortalities occurred. This study, with a long follow-up, confirms our previous results: use of the Adhesix® mesh is safe, feasible, and efficient in laparoscopic hernia repair.

A Modified Fisherman's Knot for Laparoscopic Suturing

Suturing is an essential surgical technique, because there is no resection without the need for reconstruction. Therefore, every surgeon should master a set of suturing techniques so he can adapt his approach to the specificity of the situation. The development of laparoscopic surgery poses a new challenge as not all open techniques are amendable for laparoscopic use. We would like to propose a modified fisherman's knot, which has been optimised in our center for laparoscopic use. The technique can be used with every monofilament non-braided wire. The needle is placed through the tissue to be sutured and both wires are externalised through the trocar. First, a simple knot is placed by crossing the left over the right wire. Next, the left is turned around the right wire four times proximal to the starting knot and crossed to the left wire where an additional two turns are made moving away from the trocar. The knot is closed gently, making sure not to lock the knot. Then the instrument of Drouard is used to gently glide the knot over the right wire back through the trocar into the abdomen. After making sure that adequate pressure has been delivered to the knot, to firmly close the tissue, the wire must be cut at a length of at least 3 mm. A new wire should be used for every knot and in this manner several knots can be delivered to make sure the tissue is adequately closed. In our center, no known complications due to loosening or failure of these knots have occurred since we incorporated this knotting technique into our daily practice more than 20 years ago.

Initial Experience with a New Macroporous Partially Absorbable Mesh: Introducing Ultrapro® Advanced™

INTRODUCTION

The Ultrapro® Advanced™ mesh (Ethicon, Sommerville, NJ) is a new mesh design, using the best characteristics from the previous platform, while adding new, advanced features. Our centre, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium, was chosen as one of the first clinical testing sites. The aim of this study was to present our preliminary data on complication rate and patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 1, 2015 until January 31, 2016, we treated 57 patients, implementing 67 Ultrapro® Advanced™ meshes. One patient was excluded due to postoperative cerebral haemorrhage with aphasia. Only patients with more than one-month follow-up were included for further analysis, resulting in a population of 41 patients with 51 meshes. Of them, 35 were male and only 6 were female, with an average age of 61.4 years and an average BMI of 25.9. The indications were uni- and bilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (n = 23 and 10 respectively), open inguinal hernia repair (n = 3), and open incisional hernia repair (n = 5). Quality of life was measured preoperatively and at four weeks postoperatively, using the hernia specific Carolina Comfort Scale (CCS) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was complication rate. Only two patients (4.8%) mentioned a mild scrotal hematoma and two patients (4.8%) demonstrated a seroma. There were no superficial wound infections nor early recurrent hernias. Our secondary endpoint was quality of life, measured by the CCS questionnaire, which differentiates between a symptomatic and an asymptomatic group. A total of 13 patients were asymptomatic, whilst 28 patients reported some sort of discomfort, ranging from mild (n = 25) to moderate and/or daily symptoms (n = 3). No patients were disabled by their symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The Ultrapro® Advanced™ is a sequel of the classic Ultrapro® mesh with similar characteristics: it is a "lightweight", macroporous, partially absorbable mesh built out of thin filaments, while maintaining sufficient strength. Its improvement is due to incorporation of evidence-based characteristics such as an increased mesh elasticity. Furthermore, the surgical manipulation is improved thanks to the increased mesh memory. Our prospective cohort study shows good initial and short-term results after implementation of the Ultrapro® Advanced™. However, further prospective research is mandatory on the long-term outcomes.

Comparison of Recurrence Rates in Obese and Non-Obese Patients Undergoing Ventral Hernia Repair with Lighter-Weight, Partially Absorbable Mesh

Lighter-weight, large pore meshes with absorbable layers are designed for intra-abdominal placement in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. This retrospective review of 86 patients who underwent ventral hernia repair with PROCEED™ Surgical Mesh (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ) represents an evaluation of a cohort of patients implanted with this mesh. All patients implanted with PROCEED Mesh for ventral hernia repair between October 2006 and December 2007 were contacted and asked to participate in an evaluation of their hernia repair. Patients were evaluated for pain, recurrence of their hernia and other potential complications. Eight patients underwent open repair; all others were performed laparoscopically. One patient continued to have pain at 1 year. Twelve developed seromas early on and 5 required drainage by a single puncture each. None persisted. There were 4 recurrences with none in patients with a Body Mass Index 3 32. One case of abdominal wall cellulitis responded to antibiotics. There were no wound infections, mesh infections, bowel obstructions or enteric fistulas. This study demonstrates the utility of a lighter-weight, large pore, partially absorbable mesh for intraperitoneal use in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and indicates this mesh is strong enough for use in obese patients.

ULTRAPRO® Hernia System: Toward an Ideal Solution? The Bonheiden Experience with a Partially Absorbable and Macroporous Bilayer Device

In 1998, Gilbert introduced the Prolene Hernia System (PHS), a bilayer polypropylene mesh device composed of an onlay patch, a connector, and an underlay patch. The overall concept of its design was to include the best features of all currently available techniques while eliminating their undesirable features. This device is now available in a lightweight version, the Ultrapro® Hernia System (UHS; Johnson & Johnson, Somerville, NJ). We present the Bonheiden experience. From 2006 until 2009, we used 890 UHS devices in 712 patients. All patients were requested to join a prospective analysis with follow-up at one week and one month. Follow-ups at one and two years were organized using a telephone questionnaire. We were able to monitor 668 UHS implants in 526 patients. Bilateral primary hernias were repaired simultaneously in 142 patients and 6 hernias were a recurrence of a previous nonmesh repair. There were 472 men and 54 women in our cohort, with an average age of 57.5 years and average BMI of 24.79. No recurrences have occurred to date. Superficial wound infection presented in 3 patients. They were treated with antibiotics and no mesh needed to be removed. Seromas are much more common after this bilayer technique and are not considered a true complication. Whereas ecchymosis is very common, large hematomas were seen in 5 patients. One patient presented with a DVT of the iliac vein. She was treated with anticoagulation for three months, stockings, and early mobilization. The Ultrapro Hernia System is a good alternative to other preperitoneal hernia repairs, feasible in a day hospital under locoregional or general anesthesia. It has a very low recurrence rate but carries a more extensive dissection. We think the price paid for this extensive dissection is more than acceptable and is comparable to the Lichtenstein experience.