Definitive results of a prospective non-randomized phase 2 study on stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt) for medically inoperable lung and liver oligometastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report mature results for local control and survival in oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on lung and/or liver lesions in a phase II trial.

METHODS

This is a prospective non-randomized phase II trial (NCT02581670) which enrolled patients from 2015 to 2021. Eligibility criteria included: age > 18 years, ECOG 0-2, diagnosis of breast cancer, maximum of 4 lung/liver lesions (with a maximum diameter < 5 cm), metastatic disease confined to the lungs and liver or extrapulmonary or extrahepatic disease stable or responding to systemic therapy. The primary end-points were local control (LC) and treatment-related toxicities. The secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), time to next systemic therapy (TTNS), poly-progression free survival (PPFS).

RESULTS

The study included 64 patients with a total of 90 lesions treated with SBRT. LC at 1 and 2 years was 94.9 %, 91 % at 3 years. Median local control was not reached. Median OS was 16.5 months, OS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 87.5 %, 60.9 % and 51.9 %, respectively. Median DMFS was 8.3 months, DMFS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 38.1 %, 20.6 % and 16 % respectively. At univariate analysis, local response to SBRT was found to be statistically linked with better OS, DMFS and STFS.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is a safe and valid option in oligometastatic breast cancer patients, with very high rates of local control. An optimal selection of patients is likely needed to improve survival outcomes and reduce the rate of distant progression.

Prospective phase II trial on ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for medically inoperable thoracic nodes metastases

BACKGROUND

Oligometastases in mediastinal nodes are increasingly prevalent, posing challenges for treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) due to proximity to organs at risk (OARs). We report the results of a single prospective observational phase II trial on ablative SBRT for medically inoperable thoracic nodes metastases (NCT02970955).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since 2017, patients with < 3 nodal metastases were evaluated by the tumor board and included if deemed inoperable. SBRT was delivered using risk adaptive approach based on number, site and size of metastatic nodes (50 Gy/5fractions, 60 Gy/8fractions, 70 Gy/10 fractions). Planning target volume (PTV) partial underdosage was allowed. The primary end point was local control (LC) at 12 months. Secondary end points were: acute and late toxicities, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and time to next systemic therapy (TTNS).

RESULTS

Between 03/2017-11/2021, 32 patients (41 nodal metastases) were included. NSCLC (13pts), breast (5pts) and colorectal cancer (4pts) were the most represented primary tumour. In 66 % cases, partial PTV undercoverage was necessary. LC at 1 and 2 years was 93.5 % and 82.3 %, respectively. Treatment was well-tolerated with no acute or late toxicity ≥ G3. Median OS was 59.7 months. OS at 1 and 2 years was 96.9 % and 83.8 % respectively. Median PFS was 12.2 months. PFS at 1 and 2 years was 53.1 % and 31.3 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This trial supported the feasibility and safety of ablative SBRT for thoracic nodes metastases thanks to risk adaptive approach allowing to delay of new systemic therapies. Larger studies are needed to confirm these observations.

P15.14.B Radionecrosis versus progression in brain tumors: results of a promising MRI tools

Background

Distinguish between radiation necrosis (RN) and tumor progression, in patients with irradiated primary or metastatic brain tumors, is a diagnostic challenge. Also the use of new MRI sequences, like diffusion, perfusion-weighted and spectroscopy, or PET with new amino acid tracers, is not always able to differentiate these two entities.To overcome this crucial problem, encouraging results have been obtained using the analysis of delayed contrast extravasation MRI to calculate high resolution maps, called “treatment response assessment maps” (TRAMs). Aim of this exploratory analysis is to assess TRAM ability in differentiate between radiation effect and tumor progression in a small cohort of brain tumor patients treated with radiation therapy (RT).

Material and Methods

Thirty-four patients irradiated for primary and metastatic brain tumors were evaluated. 12 patients have primary brain tumors, 22 patients have brain metastases from different solid tumors. Distinguish by histological subtypes and type of treatment, the 12 patients with primary brain tumors were: 8 glioblastoma, 2 anaplastic astrocitoma, 1 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma WHO grade II, and 1 anaplastic xanthoastrocytoma WHO grade III, treated with surgery followed by RT and concomitant and\or adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. Among brain metastatic patients, primary tumor was: 18 non-small cell lung cancer, 2 malignant melanoma, 1 breast cancer and 1 renal cell carcinoma. All of them were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery at the dose of 20-24Gy in 1fraction, or with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy at the dose of 27-30Gy in 3fractions. All images were uploaded and elaborate into the image workstation ([Brainlab AG, Olof-Palme-Straße 9, 81829 Munich]). TRAMs were calculated by subtracting T1 MRI images acquired 5 minutes after contrast injection from the T1 MRI images acquired 60-105 minutes later. On TRAMs, radiation effects appeared as red areas whereas persistent tumoral lesion appeared as blue areas.

Results

From February 2021, 34 patients have been evaluated, in a prospective study, with this novel MRI modality. During their follow-up, 13patients (38%) showed a clinicoradiologic suspicion of a persistent tumoral lesion or progressive disease, and 21 (62%) a suspicion of RN. For 14patients a brain MET-PET has been performed. TRAMs analysis have shown a fair agreement with clinicoradiologic diagnosis, perfusion-weighted MRI, and PET imaging. Moreover, 7 patients underwent surgical resection, with histopathological confirm of persistent disease in 4 and radionecrosis in 3.

Conclusion

These preliminary results show the ability of TRAMs evaluation in distinguish between RN and progressive disease. The recruitment of new patients continues, and further evaluations are ongoing to evaluate sensitivity and positive predictive value of TRAMs analysis.

JS09.7.A Reirradiation for recurrent high grade glioma (HGG) patients: results of a single arm prospective phase 2 study

Background

Standard of care for recurrent high grade glioma (HGG) is missing. Several treatment options have been investigated including re-irradiation (re-RT). Results are promising but provided by retrospective studies. We designed a single arm prospective phase II study aiming to evaluate efficacy, and toxicity of re-irradiation.

Material and Methods

Adults patients with good performance status, HGG diagnosis reclassified according to the new 2021 fifth edition WHO CNS classification, an interval time (IT) from previous RT ≥ 6 months were included. Outcome was evaluated by MRI imaging at 1 month, and every 3 months thereafter. Toxicities were evaluated in terms of radionecrosis occurrence, and neurocognitive status.

Results

Ninety recurrent HGG patients were treated, 11 oligodendroglioma grade 3, 18 astrocytoma grade 3 and 4, and 61 glioblastoma grade 4. The median age was 54 years, and majority had KPS 90-100. The median IT between first-RT and re-RT was 24 months. Re-surgery has been performed in 56.6%, and chemotherapy in 53.3%. The median follow up time was 64 months; median overall survival (OS) time,1,2,3-year OS rates were 17 months (95%CI 14-19), 66.7%±4.9, 32.6%±5.0, and 22.2 ± 4.7. Prognostic factors impacting on survival were age (p = 0.0154), IT between first RT and re-RT (p = 0.0051), glioma grade (p = 0.0090), and IDH status (p = 0.0001). Radionecrosis grade 2-3 occurred in 9 (10%) patients; neurocognitive functions remained stable until disease progression.

Conclusion

Re-RT proved to be a safe and feasible treatment option with low toxicity. Younger patients with grade 3 IDH mutated gliomas, and a longer IT had the better outcome.

PL2.2 Pembrolizumab (PEM) in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG)patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR): an observational study

BACKGROUND

Pem, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, demonstrated to be activein various neoplasms with MMRd. No data exists about its efficacy in MMRdglioma patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MMRd HGG relapsed after receiving RT and CT weretreated with Pem. MMR status was analyzed by immunohistochemistry,including the MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 markers. MMR deficiency wasdefined as presence of a weak (wMMRd) or absent (aMMRd) signal atimmunohistochemistry for at least one MMR protein. Other inclusion criteriawere: ECOG PS 0–2, histologically confirmed gliomas, dexamethasone ≤4 mg.Pem was administrated at 200 mg every 3 weeks until progression disease orunacceptable toxicity. Tumor response was evaluated by brain MRI every 10 weeksaccording to the RANO criteria. OS and PFS were evaluated by Kaplan-Meiercurves. CTCAE v4.0 was used for toxicity.

RESULTS

among 167 glioma patients, we found 22 MMRd gliomas. 12 PTS were treated with Pem: 8 wMMRd and 4 aMMRd. According to Bethesda criteria, allPTS had microsatellite stability. Tumor histologies included 5 anaplasticastrocytoma, 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 6 glioblastoma (GBM). MSH2deficiency was found in 6 cases, MSH6 deficiency in 9 cases, PMS2 and MLH1deficiency in 2 cases. Median number of prior line of chemotherapy was 1 (range 1–5). Stable disease (SD) was reported in 4 PTS (33%); 8 PTS showedprogressive disease (PD). PTS with anaplastic gliomas showed a statisticallysignificant association with SD (p=0.03, OR=3); all GBM PTS reported PD; status of MMRd (weak/absent), IDH (mutated/wild-type), MSH2 and MLH6(deficient/proficient) were not associated with SD. Median follow up was 14.7 ms. OS was 5.6 ms (95% CI 0.1–13.8), PFS 2.4 ms (95% CI 1.8–2.9). OS was 2.8 ms and 5.6 ms (p=0.9), PFS was 1.8 ms and 3.1 ms (p=0.5) in PTS with wMMRd and aMMRd. PTS reporting SD and PD had PFS of 7.4 ms (95% CI 4.6–10.2) and 1.8 ms (95% CI 0.2–3.4), p=0.002; OS was “not reached” and 2.8 ms in PTS having SD vs PD (p=0.04). Grade ≥3 adverse eventswere reported in 8% of PTS.

CONCLUSION

a subgroup of recurrent MMRd HGG might benefit from Pem,especially anaplastic gliomas. There was a trend for a longer PFS and OS in PTS with aMMRd. Analyses for identifying additional molecular predictive factors is ongoing.

Cognitive Rehabilitation in Patients with Gliomas and Other Brain Tumors: State of the Art

Disease prognosis is very poor in patients with brain tumors. Cognitive deficits due to disease or due to its treatment have an important weight on the quality of life of patients and caregivers. Studies often take into account quality of life as a fundamental element in the management of disease and interventions have been developed for cognitive rehabilitation of neuropsychological deficits with the aim of improving the quality of life and daily-life autonomy of patients. In this literature review, we will consider the published studies of cognitive rehabilitation over the past 20 years.