Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Although colonoscopy is a well-established procedure, various technical difficulties may cause failure. This report describes experience with cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC), a technique in which a mucosectomy cap is attached to the end of colonoscope in order to improve the success rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2003 to May 2005, CAC was used in consecutive patients with difficult colonoscopy procedures, which were defined firstly as failure to pass through the sigmoid colon after 20 min of examination, or secondly as failure to reach the cecum at the end of the procedure. Patients with prior colonic surgery, poor bowel preparation, distal colonic stricture, or obstructing tumors were excluded. The results with the CAC method were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients met the criteria for difficult colonoscopy during the study period. When CAC was used to repeat the procedure, cecal and terminal ileal intubation could then be achieved in 94 and 70 patients, respectively. In the remaining six patients in whom cecal intubation failed, one failure was due to a tumor obstruction at the splenic flexure.

CONCLUSIONS

CAC can be used as a rescue method to improve the success rate of colonoscopy when failure is encountered.

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing ascites and predicting peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Preoperative diagnosis of peritoneal metastases (PM) is difficult in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

AIMS

To assess the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in diagnosing ascites and its predictability for the presence of PM in GC patients.

SUBJECTS

Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GC from 1998 to 2004 were studied.

METHODS

All patients underwent EUS, ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT) scan for preoperative staging and the presence of ascites. The results were compared with operative findings. The diagnosis of PM was confirmed by histopathology or peritoneal fluid cytology.

RESULTS

A total of 301 patients were recruited and in 250 patients the presence of ascites (n = 93) and PM (n = 71) were confirmed. EUS was more sensitive (87.1%) than combined US and CT scan examinations (16.1%) and operative findings (laparoscopy or laparotomy) (40.9%) in diagnosing ascites. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for predicting the presence of PM were 73%, 84%, 64%, 89%, and 81% by EUS; 18%, 99%, 87%, 75%, and 76% by combining US and CT scan; and 77%, 94%, 83%, 91%, and 89% by operative findings, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, EUS detected ascites was the only significant independent predictor for the presence of PM (p<0.001; odds ratio 4.7 (95% confidence interval 2.0-11.2)).

CONCLUSION

EUS is a sensitive method for diagnosing ascites which is an important predictive factor for the presence of PM in GC patients.