1
|
Silbernagel KM, Jechorek RP, Kaufer AL, Johnson RL, Aleo V, Brown B, Buen M, Buresh J, Carson M, Franklin J, Ham P, Humes L, Husby G, Hutchins J, Jechorek R, Jenkins J, Kaufer A, Kexel N, Kora L, Lam L, Lau D, Leighton S, Loftis M, Luc S, Martin J, Nacar I, Nogle J, Park J, Schultz A, Seymore D, Smith C, Smith J, Thou P, Ulmer M, Voss R, Weaver V. Evaluation of the VIDAS® Listeria (LIS) Immunoassay for the Detection of Listeria in Foods Using Demi-Fraser and Fraser Enrichment Broths, as Modification of AOAC Official Method 999.06 (AOAC Official Method 2004.06). J AOAC Int 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/88.3.750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
A multilaboratory study was conducted to compare the VIDAS® LIS immunoassay with the standard cultural methods for the detection of Listeria in foods using an enrichment modification of AOAC Official Method 999.06. The modified enrichment protocol was implemented to harmonize the VIDAS LIS assay with the VIDAS LMO2 assay. Five food types—brie cheese, vanilla ice cream, frozen green beans, frozen raw tilapia fish, and cooked roast beef—at 3 inoculation levels, were analyzed by each method. A total of 15 laboratories representing government and industry participated. In this study, 1206 test portions were tested, of which 1170 were used in the statistical analysis. There were 433 positive by the VIDAS LIS assay and 396 positive by the standard culture methods. A Chi-square analysis of each of the 5 food types, at the 3 inoculation levels tested, was performed. The resulting average Chi square analysis, 0.42, indicated that, overall, there are no statistical differences between the VIDAS LIS assay and the standard methods at the 5% level of significance.
Collapse
|
2
|
Feldsine PT, Lienau AH, Roa NH, Green ST, Braut-Taormina J, Braymen C, Chavey C, Cohen A, Deans A, Delancey S, Elems C, Forgey R, Gonzalez E, Hall V, Huang MCJ, Humes L, Johnson F, Kerdaji K, King J, Kipker L, Lau D, Nogle J, Peters C, Pinkston J, Porter M, Potter L, Rogers S, Stephens J, Skorupa G, Taylor R, Tuncan E, Vought K, Vrana D. Enumeration of Total Coliforms and E. coli in Foods by the SimPlate® Coliform and E. coli Color Indicator Method and Conventional Culture Methods: Collaborative Study. J AOAC Int 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/88.5.1318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The relative effectiveness of the SimPlate® Coliform and E. coli Color Indicator (CEc-CI) method was compared to the AOAC 3-tube Most Probable Number (MPN) methods for enumerating and confirming coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods (966.23 and 966.24). In this study, test portions were prepared and analyzed according to the conditions stated in both the AOAC methods and SimPlate directions for use. Six food types were artificially contaminated with coliform bacteria and E. coli: frozen burritos, frozen broccoli, fluid pasteurized milk, whole almond nut meats, cheese, and powdered cake mix. Method comparisons were conducted. Overall, the SimPlate method demonstrated <0.3 log difference for total coliform and E. coli counts compared to the AOAC reference methods for the majority of food types and levels analyzed. In all cases, the repeatability and reproducibility of the SimPlate CEc-CI method were not different from those of the reference methods and in certain cases, were statistically better than those of the AOAC 3-tube MPN methods. These results indicate that the SimPlate CEc-CI method and the reference culture methods are comparable for enumeration of both total coliforms and E. coli in foods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew H Lienau
- BioControl Systems, Inc., 12822 SE 32nd St, Bellevue, WA 98005
| | - Nerie H Roa
- BioControl Systems, Inc., 12822 SE 32nd St, Bellevue, WA 98005
| | - Shannon T Green
- BioControl Systems, Inc., 12822 SE 32nd St, Bellevue, WA 98005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feldsine PT, Lienau AH, Leung SC, Mui LA, Humbert F, Bohnert M, Mooijman K, Schulten S, Veld PI, Rollier P, Leuschner R, Capps K, Agin J, Allaert C, Asmundson R, Asperger H, Bohnert M, Bound A, Dixon L, Donda S, Espersen M, Foster K, Gangar V, Hammack T, Humbert F, Humes L, in’t Veld P, James L, Jost-Keating K, Kalinowski R, Kwan J, Lamb J, Leung S, Lienau A, Littell A, Mooijman K, Mui L, Ott M, Qvist S, Roberts D, Ruby R, Rude R, Santos C, Schulten S, Sellers R, Smith M, Solis D, Stecchini ML, Stegeman H, Steneryd A, Suktankar V, Wiberg C, Young V. Detection of Salmonella in Fresh Cheese, Poultry Products, and Dried Egg Products by the ISO 6579 Salmonella Culture Procedure and the AOAC Official Method: Collaborative Study. J AOAC Int 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/86.2.275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Three food types were analyzed for the presence of Salmonella by the AOAC culture method and by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 6579:2002) culture method. Paired test portions of each food type were simultaneously analyzed by both methods. A total of 21 laboratories representing federal government agencies and private industry, in the United States and Europe, participated in this interlaboratory study. Foods were artificially contaminated with Salmonella and competing microflora if naturally contaminated sources were not available. No statistical differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the AOAC and ISO culture methods for fresh cheese and dried egg products. A statistically significant difference was observed for one of the 2 lots of poultry from the first trial. The poultry meat used in this run was radiation sterilized, artificially contaminated with Salmonella and competitive flora, and then lyophilized. A second trial was conducted with 2 separate lots of raw ground chicken that were naturally contaminated. The results from the second trial showed no statistical difference between the 2 culture methods. A third trial involving 4 laboratories was conducted on 2 separate lots of naturally contaminated raw poultry. Again, no statistically significant differences occurred. It is recommended that ISO 6579:2002 culture method for Salmonella be adopted Official First Action for the analysis of fresh cheese, fresh chilled and frozen poultry, and dried egg products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew H Lienau
- BioControl Systems, Inc., 12822 SE 32nd St, Bellevue, WA 98005
| | | | - Linda A Mui
- BioControl Systems, Inc., 12822 SE 32nd St, Bellevue, WA 98005
| | - Florence Humbert
- Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments, Laboratoire d'Étude et de Recherches Avicoles et Porcines, BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France
| | - Marylène Bohnert
- Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments, Laboratoire d'Étude et de Recherches Avicoles et Porcines, BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France
| | - Kirsten Mooijman
- National Institut of Public Health and Environment, Microbiological Laboratory for Health Protection, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Schulten
- National Institut of Public Health and Environment, Microbiological Laboratory for Health Protection, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Paul In’t Veld
- Regional Inspectorate South, PO Box 2280, 5202 CG's-Hertogenbosch, Rijzertlaan 19, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Rollier
- Centre d'Étude et de Controle des Analyses en Industrie Laitière, BP 89, 39801 Poligny, France
| | - Renata Leuschner
- Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food, Control Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, Y041 1LZ York, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Capps
- Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food, Control Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, Y041 1LZ York, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Silbernagel KM, Jechorek RP, Kaufer AL, Johnson RL, Aleo V, Brown B, Buen M, Buresh J, Carson M, Franklin J, Ham P, Humes L, Husby G, Hutchins J, Jechorek R, Jenkins J, Kaufer A, Kexel N, Kora L, Lam L, Lau D, Leighton S, Loftis M, Luc S, Martin J, Nacar I, Nogle J, Park J, Schultz A, Seymore D, Smith C, Smith J, Thou P, Ulmer M, Voss R, Weaver V. Evaluation of the VIDAS Listeria (LIS) immunoassay for the detection of Listeria in foods using demi-Fraser and Fraser enrichment broths, as modification of AOAC Official Method 999.06 (AOAC Official Method 2004.06). J AOAC Int 2005; 88:750-60. [PMID: 16001849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
A multilaboratory study was conducted to compare the VIDAS LIS immunoassay with the standard cultural methods for the detection of Listeria in foods using an enrichment modification of AOAC Official Method 999.06. The modified enrichment protocol was implemented to harmonize the VIDAS LIS assay with the VIDAS LMO2 assay. Five food types--brie cheese, vanilla ice cream, frozen green beans, frozen raw tilapia fish, and cooked roast beef--at 3 inoculation levels, were analyzed by each method. A total of 15 laboratories representing government and industry participated. In this study, 1206 test portions were tested, of which 1170 were used in the statistical analysis. There were 433 positive by the VIDAS LIS assay and 396 positive by the standard culture methods. A Chi-square analysis of each of the 5 food types, at the 3 inoculation levels tested, was performed. The resulting average Chi square analysis, 0.42, indicated that, overall, there are no statistical differences between the VIDAS LIS assay and the standard methods at the 5% level of significance.
Collapse
|
5
|
Arlinger S, Gatehouse S, Bentler RA, Byrne D, Cox RM, Dirks DD, Humes L, Neuman A, Ponton C, Robinson K, Silman S, Summerfield AQ, Turner CW, Tyler RS, Willott JF. Report of the Eriksholm Workshop on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996; 17:87S-98S. [PMID: 8807279 DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199617031-00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The terminology used in studies documenting changes in auditory performance following fitting of hearing aids has been diverse. Definitions for the auditory deprivation effect and auditory acclimatization are offered as a first step in rationalization. Two statements summarize current knowledge concerning auditory deprivation effects and auditory acclimatization, as well as considering the potential implications for research, field trial and clinical practice applications. Potential areas for future research are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Arlinger
- MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Humes L, Hackett T. Comparison of frequency response and aided speech-recognition performance for hearing aids selected by three different prescriptive methods. J Am Acad Audiol 1990; 1:101-8. [PMID: 2132584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The gain and the speech-recognition performance obtained for behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids selected by different prescriptive methods was compared. The three prescriptive methods examined were the NAL-revised method, the Memphis State or COX method, and the POGO-II procedure. Twelve subjects had hearing aids and earmolds selected to match the prescription made by each method. Once selected, the instruments were fine tuned to match the obtained gain to that prescribed and then speech recognition was assessed. Subjects listened to the CUNY Nonsense Syllable Test (NST) in quiet and in noise. Results indicated that, although the prescribed frequency responses differed significantly among methods, there were no differences among the three prescriptive methods in obtained frequency responses or aided speech-recognition performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Humes
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405
| | | |
Collapse
|