1
|
“Stifflammation” in hypertension is a predictor of future cardiovascular hospitalizations. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Introduction
Hypertension is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, inflammation and arterial stiffness.
Purpose
We sought to investigate the role of inflammation and arterial stiffness in the prognosis of cardiovascular hospitalizations in hypertensive patients over an extended follow-up.
Methods
One hundred and seventy-three patients (mean age 52.5±13.2 years, 57% males) untreated hypertensives at baseline without cardiovascular disease, were included in the study. Arterial stiffness was assessed with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured in venous blood samples. Other markers of subclinical organ damage [left ventricular mass index (LVMI) by echocardiography and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)] were also evaluated in all patients.
Results
During 13.6±0.4 years of follow-up, forty-four patients (25.4%) patients were admitted in hospital due to cardiovascular causes. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, only higher hsCRP (Odds Ratio [OR] = 3.34, 95% Confidence intervals [CI]: 1.22–9.51, P=0.02) and increased PWV (OR = 1.48, 95% Confidence intervals [CI]: 1.03–2.12, P=0.036) were associated with higher risk of cardiovascular hospitalizations, which was independent of age, gender, systolic blood pressure, LVMI and presence of diabetes. In further analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the ability of hsCRP and PWV to discriminate subjects with cardiovascular hospitalization. The area under the curve (AUC) and 95% CIs of the ROC curves were AUC=0.69 (95% CI: 0.59–0.78, p<0.001) for hsCRP and AUC=0.74 (95% CI: 0.65–0.83, P<0.001) for PWV (Figure).
Conclusions
Our study shows the independent complimentary prognostic role of inflammation and arterial stiffness in the prognosis of hypertensives even in studies with extended follow-up.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None. ROC curves for the prediction of outcome
Collapse
|
2
|
Aortic stiffness and incident diabetes: the hard, bittersweet truth. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Introduction
Aortic stiffness increases with advancing age and is a major risk factor for age-related morbidity and mortality. Aortic stiffness and glycaemic dysregulation are related; however, temporal relationships between aortic stiffness and incidence of diabetes have not been fully delineated.
Purpose
We sought to investigate the role of arterial stiffness in the prediction of incident diabetes.
Methods
376 untreated hypertensive patients (mean age 52.6±12.5 years, 201 males) without known cardiovascular disease and without known history of diabetes, were included in the study. Markers of subclinical organ damage [carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)] were evaluated in all patients. eGFR was estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood glucose were measured in venous blood samples. Patients were prospectively followed-up, for incidence of diabetes as defined by the American Diabetes Association criteria.
Results
During a median 13.5 years follow-up, forty-six patients (12.2%) patients were diagnosed with diabetes. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, only higher PWV (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.271, 95% Confidence intervals [CI]: 1.002–1.612, P=0.048) was associated with higher risk of incident diabetes, which was independent of age, sex, pulse pressure, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose and eGFR. In further analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the ability of PWV to discriminate subjects with diabetes. The area under the curve (AUC) and 95% CIs of the ROC curve was AUC=0.66 (95% CI: 0.58–0.74, P=0.001) for PWV (Figure 1).
Conclusions
In our cohort, higher aortic stiffness was associated with higher risk of incident diabetes.
Figure 1. ROC curve for the prediction of diabetes
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
Collapse
|
3
|
P3833Low heart rate variability is associated with future arrhythmic events in hypertension. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Introduction
Cardiac autonomic dysfunction and target organ damage are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and arrhythmias.
Purpose
The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of heart rate variability (HRV) and markers of target organ damage in the prognosis of future arrhythmic events.
Methods
We studied 292 untreated at baseline hypertensives (mean age 53±13, 153 males). Cardiac autonomic function was evaluated by analysis of short-term HRV measures over 24-h using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and the standard deviation of the measurements. Echocardiography was also performed and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was estimated with the Demereux formula. Aortic stiffness was assessed with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and wave reflections with aortic augmentation index corrected for heart rate (Alx@75). Patients were followed up for a median period of 13 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of atrial/ventricular tachycardias, symptomatic multiple premature ventricular contractions, second and third-degree heart blocks and pacemaker/defibrillator placement.
Results
In comparison without events, patients with the primary endpoint (n=37, 13%) had lower 24-h daytime HRV (9.6 beats per minute vs. 11.1 beats per minute, p=0.005), higher systolic blood pressure (168 mmHg vs. 163 mmHg, p=0.003), higher cfPWV (8.4 m/s vs. 7.7 m/s, p=0.005), higher LVMI (133 g/m2 vs. 122 g/m2, p=0.002) and higher AIx@75 (29.0% vs. 26.3%, p=0.043). In further analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the ability of HRV, cfPWV, LVMI and AIx@75 to discriminate subjects with arrhythmic events. The area under the curve (AUC) and 95% CIs of the ROC curves were AUC=0.35 (95% CI: 0.26–0.44, p=0.003) for HRV, AUC=0.64 (95% CI: 0.54–0.73, P<0.006) for cfPWV, AUC=0.67 (95% CI: 0.58–0.75, P=0.001) for LVMI and AUC=0.55 (95% CI: 0.47–0.64, P=0.298) for AIx@75 (Figure). In Cox regression analysis, only HRV was associated with increased risk of arrhythmic events (Hazard ratio per 1 unit =0.87, 95% Confidence intervals 0.76 to 0.995, p=0.043) when adjusted for age, gender, cfPWV, LVMI and AIx@75.
ROC curves of HRV & target organ damage
Conclusions
Low heart rate variability is associated with increased risk of future arrhythmic events suggesting an early sympathovagal imbalance that could lead to future events in hypertension.
Collapse
|