Switching of gene expression: analysis of the factors that spatially and temporally regulate plant gene expression.
GENETIC ENGINEERING 1997;
19:183-99. [PMID:
9193109 DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4615-5925-2_10]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
In this chapter, we have reviewed the present research and understanding of several families of transcription factors in plants. From this information, it appears there is good conservation between the types of transcription factors in plants and animals. However, there are several types of factors which have been isolated in plants that remain to be documented in animals (e.g., HD-Zip and GT). These as well as the presence of two types of TATA-binding proteins (TBPs) in plants suggest that although transcription in eukaryotes is highly conserved, fundamental differences may exist. Despite the differences, the modes of regulating transcription are well conserved. Figure 3 summarizes these modes of regulation. In recent years, the role of chromatin structure as well as subcellular localization have been the focus of a vast amount of research in mammals, Drosophila and yeast. However, very little research in these areas has been done in plants. Isolation of genes such as Curly leaf suggest a conservation of genes that influence the formation of heterochromatin-like structures. Whether or not this gene influences chromatin/heterochromatin structure in plants, however, remains to be tested. The study of nuclear localization of factors such as COP1 and KN1 is now leading to models for regulating nuclear transport as well as intercellular transport of transcription factors. Further study of the inter- and intracellular movement of these and other transcription factors may provide information on new modes of regulating transcription. In addition to understanding the role chromatin structure and subcellular localization of transcription factors may have on transcription initiation, the biological role of many plant transcription factors remains to be identified. Several approaches may be taken to understand the mechanisms by which transcription factors influence biochemical and physiological processes in the plant. These steps include 1) identification of the DNA-binding sites of the factors as well as the promoter regions which contain these sites. Presently, this approach is limiting in that not many non-coding regions have been sequenced and characterized in detail. Furthermore, the presence of a putative binding site within a promoter does not necessarily indicate that the factor will bind to the site in vivo. 2) Analysis of the binding affinity for a particular factor to a binding site in comparison to other related factors, via in vitro competition assays and quantitative titrations. This will provide information on how strongly these factors are binding to the sites, but without knowledge of all the factors present in a single cell it is difficult to recreate the in vivo conditions. 3) Generation of transgenic plants or microinjection of DNA/RNA to express a particular factor ectopically, reduce expression of the factor via antisense expression, and creation of dominant negative mutants by overexpression of key dimerization domains may provide information concerning what biological pathways these factors influence. 4) Isolation of mutations in particular transcription factors has been extremely informative in floral development. However, this approach usually entails isolation of a mutant due to a phenotype and eventual mutated locus. The cloning of the locus may or may not involve a transcription factor. 5) Many plant transcription factors have been isolated via sequence similarity to other previously identified and/or characterized transcription factors. However, the biological role of may of these factors is not known. In addition to ectopic expression of these factors by creating transgenic plants, isolation of a loss-of-function mutation may provide valuable information concerning the role of this factor in vivo. Many loss-of-function mutations in MADS box genes have led to a better understanding of how the MADS domain proteins interact with one another as well as how they influence floral development. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
Collapse