Abstract P6-18-12: EMBRACA: Efficacy and safety of talazoparib or physician's choice of therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation: A regional analysis

Background: Talazoparib (TAL) prevents DNA damage repair by inhibiting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes and trapping PARP on DNA, resulting in cell death in BRCA1/2-mutated cells.

Methods: EMBRACA is an open-label, randomized, 2-arm phase 3 trial in which efficacy and safety of TAL (1 mg/d) were compared with physician's choice of therapy (PCT; capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine) in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC) and a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm). Outcomes were assessed by region of the world (North America [NA]; Europe [EU]; rest of world [ROW]). Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 24 wks were assessed; safety was also assessed.

Results: 431 pts were randomized 2:1. Pt characteristics were well balanced, although a higher percentage of pts in ROW had more severe disease (eg, triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC], Disease-free interval [DFI]<12 mo, more distant metastases, more disease sites) and were on average younger than pts in NA/EU. TAL provided improvement in PFS, ORR, and CBR in all regions vs PCT. The most common toxicities with TAL included anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and nausea for all regions. Alopecia was less frequent with TAL in EU/ROW. Serious adverse events for pts receiving TAL were more frequent in EU than NA/ROW. Incidences of adverse events associated with permanent treatment discontinuation in pts receiving TAL were low in all regions and generally lower than for PCT.

Table 1CategoryNA* (N=156)EU* (N=190)ROW* (N=85)Mean age, years49.049.244.2Race, %   White76.971.152.9Black5.8-3.5Asian5.8-42.4Not reported-27.4-TNBC, %424447BRCA1**, %414748BRCA2**, %595352DFI<12 mo, %313444Distant metastases, %949397≥3 disease sites, %474049PFS, (hazard ratio [HR]; [95% CI]); P value0.46 [0.29-0.74] P=.00090.52 [0.33-0.80]; P<.0030.57 [0.31-1.07] ;P=.08ORR (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]); P value5.54 [2.4-16.1];P<.00013.75 [1.57-9.87]; P=.0016.7 [1.61-28.39]; P=.001CBR (OR [95% CI]); P value4.71 [2.20-10.57]; P<.00013.39 [1.56-7.36]; P=.00075.70 [1.70-17.13]; P=.002Hematologic AEs, %   Anemia50.558.642.6Neutropenia31.332.346.3Thrombocytopenia28.322.635.2Nonhematologic AEs, %   Fatigue59.643.650.0Nausea47.545.957.4Headache32.330.837.0Alopecia34.320.320.4Serious adverse events, %25.340.622.2Treatment discontinuation, n/N, (%)   TAL7/99 (7.1)12/133 (9.0)3/54 (5.6)PCT7/43 (16.3)3/54 (5.6)2/29 (6.9)AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval; *NA (United States); EU (Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, Russia, Ukraine, Israel); ROW (Brazil, Korea, Australia, Taiwan).**Central laboratory.

Conclusions: In pts with gBRCAm ABC, TAL demonstrated significant improvements in clinical outcomes compared with PCT regardless of the region of the world in which they lived. However, slight differences among the regions in baseline characteristics were noted, possibly due to regional variation in diagnosis and detection of gBRCAm ABC as well as different treatment paradigms for metastatic breast cancer.

Funding: Medivation LLC, acquired by Pfizer.

Citation Format: Mina L, Lee K-H, Gonçalves A, Woodward N, Hurvitz SA, Diab S, Yerushalmi R, Goodwin A, Moreira Costa Zorzetto M, Kim S-B, Czibere A, Tudor IC, Gauthier E, Litton JK, Ettl J. EMBRACA: Efficacy and safety of talazoparib or physician's choice of therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation: A regional analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-12.

MRS Shimming: An Important Point Which Should not be Ignored

BACKGROUND

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a well-known device for analyzing the biological fluids metabolically. Obtaining accurate and reliable information via MRS needs a homogeneous magnetic field in order to provide well-defined peaks and uniform water suppression. There are lots of reasons which can disturb the magnetic field homogeneity which can be corrected by a process known as shimming. This study is intended to recall the importance of shimming and also the significant role of quality control (QC) in achieving an accurate quantification.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

An acrylic cylindrical quality control phantom was designed as an analog of brain MRS test phantoms in order to control the accuracy of the obtained signal of a 1.5 T Siemens MRI system which belonged to one of Shiraz hospitals. The signal of NAA, Cho, Cr, the combination of these metabolites and also the distilled water, which was used in this study, was evaluated using separate phantoms. A QC test was performed using Siemens QC phantom and a standard test phantom.

RESULTS

The spectrum of our home- made phantom had a significant difference with the expected spectrum. The results of checking the spectrum of metabolites separately also confirmed that there was a systemic problem that affects all the signals originated from all metabolites and even the pure distilled water. The MRS system could not pass QC tests, and peak broadening was common in all spectra. The complex spectrum of standard test phantom was not produced successfully by the MRS system.

DISCUSSION

By a simple check of the water peak characteristics, lots of information can be obtained, one of which is the status of shimming that has a considerable effect on the accuracy of the spectrum. Thus, performing an automatic or manual shimming is not a criterion of the spectrum accuracy, and performing a periodic quality control using a test phantom by a specialist is necessary.

CONCLUSION

Briefly, the quality control of MRS and all the other clinical device must be taken seriously. Sometimes QC can be the boundary of a right or a wrong decision for the patient.

Factors underlying metastatic breast cancer patients' perceptions of symptom importance: a qualitative analysis

The symptom literature in cancer has primarily examined symptom severity, frequency and distress. Assessing cancer patients' perceptions of symptom importance-how important it is for them to see improvement in a symptom following an intervention-and factors influencing these judgments would also inform patient-centred care, but this analysis has not been undertaken. This qualitative study aimed to identify factors underlying perceptions of symptom importance among 25 symptomatic metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Participants were recruited from a cancer centre in the Midwestern USA. Semi-structured interviews focused on patients' rationale for considering common symptoms (i.e., anxiety, sadness, sleep problems, pain or fatigue) to be important. Thematic analyses revealed five interrelated factors underlying MBC patients' perceptions of symptom importance: activity restriction, concentration difficulties, exacerbation of other physical symptoms, symptom-related long-term health concerns and negative impact on their relationships with others. Patients most frequently stated that a physical or psychological symptom was important because of the resulting activity restriction. Additionally, some patients considered pain to be important because it signalled potential long-term health concerns, such as worsening metastatic disease. Findings suggest that clinicians should take into account MBC patients' perceptions of symptom importance and factors underlying these judgments when making shared treatment decisions.

Weight reduction in a normal population

Weight loss of more than 2 kg under the guidance of a trained nurse was achieved over a 12-month period in 38% of overweight hospital and transport workers. Males over 50 were the subgroup most successful in losing weight. Weight loss achieved by older males with an "off-hand" as compared with an "energetic" approach was similar up until nine months, after which the "energetic" approach was more effective. Females on an "energetic" diet were successful up until nine months only. The "off-hand" approach is acceptable to more people and is less time-consuming. It should therefore be seriously considered by a public health authority which seeks to promote weight reduction in the general community.