Liver transplantation in the era of cost constraints

BACKGROUND

The issue of containing cost has had a significant impact on organ transplantation. After our institution's 500th liver transplant, we critically examined the impact of the changing health care environment on liver transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 500 consecutive liver transplants done in the period of 1989 to 1998.

RESULTS

Comparing the first 100 liver transplants to the last 100, patient demographics did not change significantly; however, mean waiting times increased significantly, from 30.4 days to 146.7 days, and median hospital stay decreased from 20.2 days to 10.9 days. One-year patient and graft survivals were not significantly different, 93.6% versus 96.5% and 88.0% versus 95.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite transplants in patients at higher risk and discharging patients sooner after transplantation, surgical results and patient survivals remained excellent. This was accomplished through improvements and modification of immunosuppression, outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute rejection, and emphasis on close outpatient follow-up.

Race: a critical factor in organ donation, patient referral and selection, and orthotopic liver transplantation?

The influence of ethnic origin on organ donation and renal allograft survival after renal transplantation has been controversial. Several large studies have reported inferior renal allograft survival in black recipients, whereas others have reported equal survival. However, the issue of race as it relates to organ donation, patient referral, and patient selection in orthotopic liver transplantation has not been investigated. We retrospectively reviewed our results of organ donation, patient referral and selection, and orthotopic liver transplantation since 1989. Because of a concerted educational effort by this organ procurement organization, the percentage of black donors has increased from 6.1% in 1988 to 21.9% in 1996. Since the inception of the Liver Transplant Program in 1989, 844 patients have been referred to our transplant center for organ transplant evaluation. Disproportionately fewer black patients (119; 14.1%) were referred for liver transplantation than white patients (725; 85.9%) based on the prevalence of end-stage liver disease in these populations. The acceptance rate for listing for transplantation was similar between the two groups. The percentage of patient referrals who actually underwent transplantation was similar across racial lines (43% black v 42% white patients). However, it appeared that black patients were referred for liver transplantation at a later stage and were more critically ill at the time of referral. Nevertheless, the patient and graft survival were similar between black and white patients. The 1- and 3-year survival rates in white recipients was 88% and 81%, respectively, versus 96% and 84% in black recipients. Within this organ procurement organization, black donation has increased over the past 10 years. Unfortunately, there may be a selection bias at the level of referral for liver transplantation. However, once patients are referred to this center for liver transplantation, the rate of transplantation and survival is similar between white and black patients.

Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prolongs allograft survival in experimental animals, prevents acute rejection in humans, and has recently been approved for use in renal transplantation in combination with cyclosporine. Tacrolimus (Prograf) has been shown to be effective for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in liver transplantation. However, there has been limited experience with the combination of tacrolimus and MMF in liver transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective pilot study examined the results in 130 primary, consecutive, adult liver transplants under two separate immunosuppressive protocols. Patients in the study group received MMF (1 g p.o. b.i.d.), tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.), and a standard steroid taper. MMF was also tapered and then discontinued within 3 months of transplantation. A historical control received tacrolimus (0.15 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.) and the same steroid taper.

RESULTS

Pretransplant demographics, including creatinine, were not significantly different between the groups. The 6-month patient and graft survivals of 96.3% (control) versus 92.0% (study) were not significantly different. The incidence of acute rejection was 45.0% in the control group versus 26.0% in the study group (P = 0.03). The study group had a lower incidence of rejection (mean episodes/patient +/- SEM): 0.28+/-0.07 vs. 0.61+/-0.10 (P = 0.007). All of the study group members responded to high-dose steroids. In the control group, three patients required monoclonal antibody therapy and two patients required the addition of MMF. The incidence of cytomegalovirus was similar in the study group and the control group (13.8% vs. 10.0%, P = NS). Early renal function was better preserved in the tacrolimus/MMF group (mean creatinine +/- SEM): 1.09 mg/dl +/- 0.05 vs. 1.51 mg/dl +/- 0.08 at 30 days, P = 0.0001. The study design required dosing with less tacrolimus (mean mg/day +/- SEM), which was achieved at 1 week (23.2+/-0.7 vs. 13.5+/-0.5); 1 month (18.7+/-0.8 vs. 11.4+/-0.5); 3 months (14.5+/-0.6 vs. 9+/-0.5); and 6 months (11.6+/-0.6 vs. 8.2+/-0.6); P = 0.0001, for all time points.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with tacrolimus and MMF may significantly reduce the incidence of acute liver allograft rejection, allow a significant reduction in tacrolimus dosage, and decrease the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Long-term analysis will be necessary to assess any increased risk of opportunistic infections.