[Beta-blockers in cardiac insufficiency: should they always be considered in the therapeutic strategy? Arguments against].
Rev Esp Cardiol 1997;
50:304-7. [PMID:
9281008]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The evidence supporting the use of beta-adrenergic blockers in the treatment of heart failure secondary to systolic dysfunction is reviewed. Up to date, seven controlled trials of carvedilol in patients with heart failure have been published. It has been concluded that the use of the non-selective, third generation beta-adrenergic blockers, with alpha-adrenergic (vasodilator) and antioxidant properties, carvedilol, is only justified in patients with mild or moderate heart failure without contraindications to beta-adrenergic blockers. There are not data to support the use of carvedilol in patients with severe or unstable heart failure. It seems logical to wait for the results of the ongoing trials (BEST Trial, CIBIS II Trial, COMET Trial, and MERIT Trial) to more precisely define the role that beta-adrenergic blockers should play in the treatment of patients with heart failure. The information presently available suggests that carvedilol should be considered a therapeutic agent for the prevention of progressive clinical heart failure rather than for the treatment of refractory heart failure.
Collapse