Impact of Immune, Inflammatory, and Nutritional Indices on Outcome in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Definitive (Chemo)radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Systemic immune, inflammatory, and nutritional indices have been shown to be prognostic for outcome across a range of tumor sites. However, a comprehensive analysis of these markers in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy [(C)RT] has not been performed. We hypothesized that systemic immune, inflammatory, and nutritional indices may be associated with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing definitive (C)RT for cervical cancer.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive (C)RT from 1999 - 2015 were identified from a single cancer institution's retrospective clinicopathological database. Pre-treatment immune, inflammatory, and nutritional parameters were collected, and indices derived. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) = neutrophil count x platelet count / lymphocyte count(10^9/L); PLR = platelet count / lymphocyte count(10^9/L), NLR = neutrophil count / lymphocyte count (10^9/L); MLR = monocyte count / lymphocyte count (10^9/L); albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) = serum albumin level (g/L)/alkaline phosphatase level (U/L) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) = serum albumin (g/L) + 5 x lymphocyte count (10^9/L). Univariate analysis was first performed on each parameter as continuous variables for PFS and OS. For variables with statistically significant associations, ROC curves were analyzed to determine if an optimal cut point could be established for each outcome. Common cut points were then defined for each variable. PFS and OS were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression with covariates of tumor stage, histology, and age. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients were identified; median follow-up 7 years. 131 (67%) had stage I-II and 65 (33%) stage III-IV disease. 187 (95%) received CRT and 9 (5%) RT alone. Higher SII (≤700 vs >700; p = 0.01), higher PLR (≤ 250 vs >250; p<0.001) and higher NLR (≤ 5 vs >5; p = 0.003) were associated with worse PFS. Higher SII [≤700 vs >700: 5y OS 74.9 vs 55.8; p = 0.02], higher PLR [≤ 250 vs >250: 5y OS 69.9% vs 42.0%; p<0.001] and higher NLR [≤ 5 vs >5: 5y OS 65.3% vs 51.0%; p = 0.01] were associated with worse OS. MLR, AAPR and PNI were not associated with outcome on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, SII and PLR were independently associated with both PFS [SII: HR 1.647 (CI 1.029-2.639), p = 0.038; PLR: HR 2.301 (95% CI 1.507 - 3.512), p = <0.001], and OS [SII: HR 1.649 (95% CI 1.009-2.696), p = 0.046; PLR: HR 2.212 (95% CI 1.416-3.455), p<0.001]; NLR did not remain statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

SII and PLR, but not nutritional indices, were independently associated with PFS and OS in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive (C)RT. Further evaluation of these systemic immune and inflammatory indices in a validation set will be required to better define their clinical utility.

Hypomagnesemia and Survival in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Hypomagnesemia is a common side effect of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. Although there are data reporting that hypomagnesemia is associated with worse survival in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), this has not been documented in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive CRT. We hypothesized that in patients with cervical cancer undergoing definitive CRT, on-treatment hypomagnesemia would be associated with longer treatment duration and worse cancer-specific survival (CSS).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive CRT from 1999 to 2015 were identified from a single cancer center's clinicopathologic database. Lowest on-treatment magnesium value was recorded and categorized as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 grading (grade 1: <0.7 - 0.5 mmol/L, grade 2: <0.5 - 0.4 mmol/L, grade 3: <0.4-0.3 mmol/L, and grade 4 <0.3 mmol/L). Grade 0 was defined as ≥ 0.7 mmol/L. Treatment duration was defined as the number of days between the first day of radiotherapy until the last day of pelvic treatment (either brachytherapy or pelvic external beam radiotherapy boost). Prolonged treatment was considered as any treatment duration greater than 63 days. CSS for patients with either grade 0-1 or grade ≥ 2 CTCAE v5.0 magnesium toxicity was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Peto & Peto modification to the generalized Gehan-Wilcoxon was used to determine statistical significance between groups. Associations with prolonged treatment duration was explored using logistic regression. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients were identified; median follow-up was 7 (IQR 2-11) years. 125 (67%) had stage I-II disease and 61 (33%) stage III-IV. Median treatment duration was 51 (IQR 48-57) days. All patients received concurrent weekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy with RT: the majority (n = 133; 72%) received 5 or 6 cycles. 147 (79%) patients received routine IV magnesium infusion with their chemotherapy and 173 (93%) received routine IV mannitol. During treatment the highest CTCAE v5.0 magnesium toxicity score was grade 0-1 in 158 (85%) and grade ≥ 2 in 28 (15%). Magnesium grade ≥ 2 was associated with worse 5-year CSS [grade 0-1: 5yr CSS 67.2%, (95% CI 60.1-75.1); grade ≥ 2: 5yr CSS 50%, (95% CI 34.5-72.4); p = 0.039]. Magnesium status was not associated with an increase in treatment duration [OR 1.465 (95% CI 0.3177 - 6.753); p = 0.625].

CONCLUSION

On-treatment hypomagnesemia ≥ grade 2 (CTCAE v5.0) was associated with worse CSS but did not predict longer treatment duration. This is the first study that shows a detrimental survival impact of on-treatment hypomagnesemia in this patient population. These findings highlight the need to ensure adequate monitoring, support and correction of magnesium during definitive CRT.

The changing landscape of brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a Canadian practice survey

BACKGROUND

We documented changes in practice from 2009 to 2012 for cervical cancer brachytherapy in Canada.

METHODS

Centres with gynecologic brachytherapy services were sent an e-mail questionnaire querying their 2012 practice. Responses are reported and compared with practice patterns identified in a similar survey for 2009.

RESULTS

The response rate was 77% (24 of 31 centres). Almost all use high-dose-rate brachytherapy (92%); low-dose-rate brachytherapy has been completely phased out. Most continue to move patients from the site of applicator insertion to the radiation treatment simulation suite (75%) or to a diagnostic imaging department (29%), or both. In 2012, the imaging modalities used for dose specification were computed tomography [ct (75%)], magnetic resonance imaging [mri (38%)], plain radiography (21%), and cone-beam ct (8%). The number of institutions using mri guidance has markedly increased during the period of interest (9 vs. 1). Most respondents (58% vs. 14%) prescribed using guidelines from the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, but they also used point A as a reference. Commonly used high-dose radiation regimens included 30 Gy in 5 fractions and 24 Gy in 3 fractions.

CONCLUSIONS

In Canada, image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer continues to evolve. Although ct-based imaging remains the most commonly used modality, many centres have adopted mri for at least 1 brachytherapy treatment. More centres are using fewer fractions and a slightly lower biologically effective dose, but are still achieving EQD2 (2-Gy equivalent) doses of 80-90 Gy in combination with external-beam radiation therapy.