1
|
Wittmann L, Eigenfeld M, Büchner K, Meiler J, Habisch H, Madl T, Kerpes R, Becker T, Berensmeier S, Schwaminger SP. Millifluidic magnetophoresis-based chip for age-specific fractionation: evaluating the impact of age on metabolomics and gene expression in yeast. Lab Chip 2024. [PMID: 38739033 DOI: 10.1039/d4lc00185k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
A novel millifluidic process introduces age-based fractionation of S. pastorianus var. carlsbergensis yeast culture through magnetophoresis. Saccharomyces yeast is a model organism for aging research used in various industries. Traditional age-based cell separation methods were labor-intensive, but techniques like magnetic labeling have eased the process by being non-invasive and scalable. Our approach introduces an age-specific fractionation using a 3D-printed millfluidic chip in a two-step process, ensuring efficient cell deflection in the magnetic field and counteracting magnetic induced convection. Among various channel designs, the pinch-shaped channel proved most effective for age differentiation based on magnetically labeled bud scar numbers. Metabolomic analyses revealed changes in certain amino acids and increased NAD+ levels, suggesting metabolic shifts in aging cells. Gene expression studies further underlined these age-related metabolic changes. This innovative platform offers a high-throughput, non-invasive method for age-specific yeast cell fractionation, with potential applications in industries ranging from food and beverages to pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Wittmann
- TUM School of Engineering and Design, Chair of Bioseparation Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany.
| | - M Eigenfeld
- TUM School of Life Science, Chair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Steig 20, 85354 Freising, Germany.
- Otto-Loewi Research Center, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstr. 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - K Büchner
- TUM School of Life Science, Chair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Steig 20, 85354 Freising, Germany.
| | - J Meiler
- TUM School of Engineering and Design, Chair of Bioseparation Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany.
| | - H Habisch
- Otto-Loewi Research Center, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstr. 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - T Madl
- Otto-Loewi Research Center, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstr. 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed-Graz, Mozartgasse 12/II, 8010 Graz, Austria.
| | - R Kerpes
- TUM School of Life Science, Chair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Steig 20, 85354 Freising, Germany.
| | - T Becker
- Otto-Loewi Research Center, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstr. 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
- Munich Institute of Integrated Materials, Energy and Process Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenberstr. 4a, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - S Berensmeier
- TUM School of Engineering and Design, Chair of Bioseparation Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany.
- Munich Institute of Integrated Materials, Energy and Process Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenberstr. 4a, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - S P Schwaminger
- TUM School of Engineering and Design, Chair of Bioseparation Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany.
- Otto-Loewi Research Center, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstr. 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed-Graz, Mozartgasse 12/II, 8010 Graz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lambert M, Schöttle D, Ruppelt F, Rohenkohl A, Sengutta M, Luedecke D, Nawara LA, Galling B, Falk AL, Wittmann L, Niehaus V, Sarikaya G, Rietschel L, Gagern C, Schulte-Markwort M, Unger HP, Ott S, Romer G, Daubmann A, Wegscheider K, Correll CU, Schimmelmann BG, Wiedemann K, Bock T, Gallinat J, Karow A. Early detection and integrated care for adolescents and young adults with psychotic disorders: the ACCESS III study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2017; 136:188-200. [PMID: 28589683 DOI: 10.1111/acps.12762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to investigate whether a combined intervention composed of early detection plus integrated care (EDIC) enhances outcomes in patients with early psychosis compared to standard care (SC). METHODS ACCESS III is a prospective non-randomized historical control design 1-year study examining the efficacy of EDIC (n = 120) vs. SC (n = 105) in patients aged 12-29 years. Primary outcome was the rate of ≥6 months combined symptomatic and functional remission. Additional outcomes comprised the reduction of DUP and course of psychopathology, functioning, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. RESULTS In observed cases, 48.9% in the EDIC and 15.2% in the SC group reached the primary endpoint. Remission was predicted by EDIC (OR = 6.8, CI: 3.15-14.53, P < 0.001); younger age predicted non-remission (OR = 1.1, CI: 1.01-1.19, P = 0.038). Linear regressions indicated a reduction of DUP in EDIC (P < 0.001), but not in SC (P = 0.41). MMRMs showed significantly larger improvements in PANSS positive (P < 0.001) and GAF (P < 0.01) scores in EDIC vs. SC, and in EDIC over time in CGI-Severity (P < 0.001) and numerically in Q-LES-Q-18 (P = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS EDIC lead to significantly higher proportions of patients achieving combined remission. Moderating variables included a reduction of DUP and EDIC, offering psychotherapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lambert
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - D Schöttle
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - F Ruppelt
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Rohenkohl
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - M Sengutta
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - D Luedecke
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - L A Nawara
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - B Galling
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| | - A-L Falk
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - L Wittmann
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - V Niehaus
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - G Sarikaya
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - L Rietschel
- University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - C Gagern
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - M Schulte-Markwort
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H-P Unger
- Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Asklepios Hospital Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Ott
- Center for Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Asklepios Hospital Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - G Romer
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany
| | - A Daubmann
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - K Wegscheider
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C U Correll
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| | - B G Schimmelmann
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, UKE, Hamburg, Germany.,University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - K Wiedemann
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Bock
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Gallinat
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Karow
- Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kraemer B, Schumacher S, Winkel B, Imboden C, Wittmann L. The “building block” effect of prior trauma for psychological outcome in victims of a natural disaster. Eur Psychiatry 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundWith increasing numbers of previous traumatic experiences, a rising risk of psychiatric morbidity and in particular post-traumatic stress disorder following an acute trauma has been reported. This dose-effect relationship was called the building block effect. Most results are derived from studies on riot and prosecution victims. We investigated victims of a natural disaster with respect to the building block effect due to prior traumatization.MethodsWe assessed tourists who had been affected by the Indian Ocean Tsunami 2004 using the Post-traumatic Diagnostic Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Post-traumatic Growth Inventory. Outcome variables were related to the numbers or prior civil trauma according to the trauma history scale of the PDS.ResultsWe found a building block effect for the development of anxiety (P = 0.018) and by trend with PTSD symptoms (P = 0.06), but not with depressive symptoms (P = 0.436). Prior traumatization and the actual Tsunami exposure significantly explained variance of personal posttraumatic growth (P = 0.013). Prior interpersonal traumata emerged as a strong risk factor for the development of posttraumatic psychiatric morbidity.ConclusionsWe suggest that an increasing number of trauma is closely associated with anxiety but not with depressive disorders in the aftermath of natural disasters. For clinical practice, it is necessary to ask victims of natural disasters about prior traumatization, in particular about prior interpersonal trauma.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
Collapse
|
6
|
Jenewein J, Moergeli H, Fauchère JC, Bucher HU, Kraemer B, Wittmann L, Schnyder U, Büchi S. Parents' mental health after the birth of an extremely preterm child: a comparison between bereaved and non-bereaved parents. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 29:53-60. [PMID: 18266165 DOI: 10.1080/01674820701640181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of extremely preterm birth (24-26 weeks of gestation) on the mental health of parents two to six years after delivery, and to examine potential differences in post-traumatic growth between parents whose newborn infant died and those whose child survived. METHOD A total of 54 parents who had lost their newborn and 38 parents whose preterm child survived were assessed by questionnaires with regard to depression and anxiety (HADS) and post-traumatic growth (PTGI). RESULTS Neither group of parents had clinically relevant levels of depression and anxiety. Mothers showed higher levels of anxiety than fathers. Bereaved parents with no other, living child reported higher levels of depression than bereaved parents with one or more children. Mothers reported higher post-traumatic growth compared to fathers. In particular, bereaved mothers experienced the value and quality of their close social relationships more positively compared to the non-bereaved parents. CONCLUSION In the long term, bereaved and non-bereaved parents cope reasonably well with an extremely preterm birth of a child. Post-traumatic growth appears to be positively related to bereavement, particularly in mothers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Jenewein
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pegios W, Bentas W, Wittmann L, Mack MG, Zangos S, Söllner O, Binder J, Fellbaum C, Jonas D, Vogl TJ. Kernspintomographisches Staging des Prostatakarzinoms mittels kombinierter Endorektal-Body-Phased-Array-Spule und histopathologische Korrelation. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2003; 175:1660-6. [PMID: 14661137 DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-45325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluation of the diagnostic value of the combined endorectal body-phased array technique regarding the staging of prostate cancers, especially in the differentiation between stages T2 and T3. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-two patients with biopsy-proven or clinically suspected prostate cancer were examined on a 1.5 T scanner (Siemens, Symphony) prior to radical prostatectomy. T (2)-weighted TSE (axial, coronal) and T (2)-weighted FSE (axial) sequences were obtained with and without fat suppression. After application of 0.2 mmol/kg body-weight Gd-DTPA, T (1)-weighted GRE sequences were obtained using dynamic MRI. All images were prospectively interpreted by two observers. The MR images were correlated with the histopathological findings of wide-area sections of prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS For the detection of extracapsular growth and seminal vesicle infiltration (T2 versus T3) the accuracy was between 94 % and 97 % (sensitivity 100 %, specificity between 87 % and 93 %, observer 1 and 2). In two cases with a histologically proven stadium pT2b, observer 1 had diagnosed stadium pT3a. The results of observer 2 were marginally better in only one case, which was histologically proven to be pT2b and overstaged as pT3a. MRI did not lead to under-staging of a single tumor with regard to the differentiation between T2 and T3. Overall, the staging of the tumor stages (T1 - T4) was correct in 25 of 33 cases (75 %). The dynamic MRI showed no improvement regarding sensitivity (100 %) and specificity (62 %) and achieved a staging accuracy of only 75 %. CONCLUSION MRI performed with a combination of a pelvic phased-array coil (PPA) and integrated endorectal coil plays a significant role in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer. However, differentiation between capsular infiltration (T2) and penetration (T3) as well as evaluation of the seminal bladder (T3b) seem to be difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Pegios
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Kantonspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|