The risk of epilepsy in children with celiac disease: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUNDAND PURPOSE

The purpose was to estimate the risk of epilepsy in a cohort of young individuals with celiac disease (CD) compared to that of matched references.

METHODS

The cohort consisted of 213 635 individuals born during 1989-2011 and residing in Friuli-Venezia Giulia (Italy). 1215 individuals affected by CD and 6075 reference individuals matched by sex and age were identified. Epilepsy was defined by means of hospital diagnosis or drug prescriptions. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of having epilepsy amongst individuals with CD, before CD diagnosis and in the entire period, compared with those of their matched references. Cox regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios for epilepsy diagnosed after CD diagnosis. Different definitions of epilepsy were used for sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty-one (2.6%) individuals with CD and 78 (1.3%) reference individuals had epilepsy [adjusted OR 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-3.10]. The risk of epilepsy was increased prior to CD (adjusted OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.33-3.94), with similar estimates after CD diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio 1.96; 95% CI 0.95-4.02). The increased risk of epilepsy was not explained by a peak in epilepsy diagnosis just around CD diagnosis. Sex stratification found a significantly higher risk of epilepsy amongst female individuals with CD. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the positive association between CD and epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

Children and youths with CD were at increased risk of epilepsy. Patients with epilepsy without a clear etiology should be screened for CD since an early diagnosis and treatment might improve the response to antiepileptic therapies.

Toward incident reporting (IR) systems: A safety culture survey within the oncology network of a northern Italian region

e17527

Background: Physicians are reluctant partners in error reporting. Insufficient evidence exists on what may affect IR in a specific cultural and organizational context. The primary endpoint of our study was to offer a critical perspective on the dominant attitudes toward IR systems among health operators of Friuli-Venezia Giulia cancer network. The survey was part of a Health Department patient safety project. Methods: A preliminary PubMed and ASCO database search was performed (keywords: incident/error reporting, attitudes, barriers, blame/safety culture, cancer, oncology, chemotherapy). Two web-based questionnaires were administered to health personnel of Oncology Units (OU) with developing and existing IR systems, respectively. Data were collected in a MySQL database and managed by PhpMyAdmin. SAS 9.1 was used for the analysis of frequency distributions. Results: Target population: 14 OU; 2 University Hospitals, 1 Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Health Care (SIRHHC) (2 OU), 10 Hospital Centers; 262 operators (83 physicians, 172 nurses, 2 pharmacists, 5 technicians). Overall response rate: 44.6%; physician/nurse 59/36%; University Hospital (n = 99)/SIRHHC (n = 55)/Hospital Center (n = 101) 73%/9%/38%. Knowledge of risk management issues: 86% (90% of untrained operators from IR-free centers). Eighty-six percent of all operators showed a favourable attitude toward voluntary IR systems. Main reasons: patient safety improvement (65%); organizational growth (38%); professional duty (20.5%). A 78.5% preference for computerized forms was recorded. On a five-point scale, IR features rating 5 in >50% of the answers were: simplicity (85%); getting a feed-back (76%); exhaustivity (66%); adoption of organization more than individual recommendations (59%). Specific training, feedback guarantee and plainness of reporting forms were suggested by 90, 64, and 51% of all operators as essential measures for system acceptance and user satisfaction. Conclusions: Logistic and organizational factors (i.e., time constraints, work overload, resource allocation to incident reporting more than investigation and learning back) should be taken in account by county health directors aiming for successful reporting systems.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Development of an information technology system to assist oncologists in daily clinical practice

16028

Background: Daily documentation and maintenance of medical record quality is a crucial issue in oncology. Computerization can offer many advantages, but needs training and motivation of operators and fitting of clinical processes and administrative rules to technological requirements. The electronic medical record (EMR) system, a software application for the entry, retrieval, and display of patients information into a digital database, could quantitatively and qualitatively improve medical recording. Methods: We developed an application system, named G2-clin, including EMR and computerized physician order-entry (CPOE). It was integrated into the hospital information system, for documentation and therapy planning to support physicians in daily clinical practice. G2-clin was developed by internal committee of oncologists, nurses and computer scientists, with an assured information technology during the learning curve and over the years. After training, staff physicians and nurses have routinely used the G2-clin starting on March 2002. Medical records collect all data concerning management of inpatient and outpatient care. Results: To date, 317 chemotherapy protocols are available in the CPOE pick list, including experimental regimens. In 2005, G2-clin registered 1550 new patients, with 7730 chemotherapy courses and was able to provide the following data: drug storage, administration and safety procedures, assessment of adverse events according CTC, specific patient safety policies, monitoring of resources and costs, data analysis for clinical research. Main benefits are improvement of the quality of patient care and safety, practice standardization, decrease in the risk of therapy ordering errors. The main drawbacks are inhibition of patient-physician interaction and visit time extension. Conclusions: According to our pilot experience, G2-clin successfully satisfied requirements of procedures standardization and allowed distribution of accurate data to all operators. Moreover it has been useful in monitoring outcomes of care, effectiveness, efficiency, adherence to clinical practice guidelines, resources and costs.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Antibiotic prescription in italian children: a population-based study in Friuli Venezia Giulia, north-east Italy

Comprehensive information on prescription patterns of antibiotics in Italy is scarce. This study describes the use of systemic antibiotics in children according to age and sex in Friuli Venezia Giulia, north-east Italy. A pharmacological prescription database was used to identify individual prescriptions provided to all 0-15-y-old resident children (n = 140,630) during 1998. Overall, 124,383 prescriptions were identified. The prescription rate was highest in the 3-6 y olds, with 1491 antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 children per year. Antibiotics were prescribed for 52% of infants, 57.2% of toddlers and 62% of preschool children. Twenty-nine percent of the prescriptions were for cephalosporins, 27% for macrolides and 24% for broad-spectrum penicillins. Prescription rates were much higher than in other countries such as Denmark, with more antibiotic courses prescribed for more children at all ages. Prescriptions from general practitioners and family paediatricians often included second-line antibiotics (e.g. cephalosporins and macrolides) or antibiotics that have not been approved for community-acquired paediatric infections (e.g. quinolones).

CONCLUSION

The development of regional guidelines for antibiotic use in children should be urgently recommended.