Outcomes of patients with esophageal and gastric cancer in Sri Lanka: A retrospective survival analysis

Introduction

Esophageal carcinoma is the fourth most common cancer among males and sixth most common cancer among females in Sri Lanka. Gastric cancer is less common, but its incidence is gradually rising. We conducted a retrospective analysis of survival of esophageal and gastric cancer patients treated at National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka.

Methodology

Patients with esophageal and gastric cancer treated in three selected oncology units of the National Cancer Institute, Maharagama during 2015 and 2016 were included in the study. Data on clinical and pathological factors were extracted from clinical records. Overall survival (OS), defined as time to death or loss to follow-up, was the primary endpoint. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival were performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazard model, respectively.

Results

The study population comprised 374 patients with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range 55-70). Majority (64%) were male and had squamous cell carcinoma (58%). In the sample, 20% were gastric cancers, while 71% were esophageal cancers, and 9% had gastro-esophageal junction tumors. The 2-year OS was 19% in patients treated with curative intent (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-26 months) with those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by radical surgery having the highest survival (P < 0.001, hazard ratio 0.25 [95% CI 0.11-0.56]). Median OS was 2 months (95% CI 1-2 months) in patients treated with palliative intent.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the outcome of patients with esophageal and gastric cancer is poor in Sri Lanka. Early detection and greater utilization of multimodality treatment could improve outcomes of these patients.

Lung Cancer Survival in Sri Lanka

Nuradh JosephIntroduction  Lung cancer is the second commonest cancer among males in Sri Lanka. Real-world survival data are scarce, and we conducted a retrospective survival analysis among patients treated for lung cancer. Methods  All patients with primary lung cancer treated at three selected units during 2015-2016 were included in the study. Data on clinicopathological and treatment delivered were extracted from clinic records. Overall survival was considered the primary end-point. Results  The study population comprised 349 patients. The median age was 61 years and majority of patients (74%) were males. Adenocarcinoma (56%) was the commonest histological subtype, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (26%), whereas 6% of patients had small cell lung cancer. Only 10% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer were treated with curative intent, whereas 67% presented with systemic metastases. The median overall survival was 12 months in patients treated with curative intent and there was no significant difference between radical surgery and radiotherapy. The median overall survival was 3 months in those treated palliatively. On multivariate analysis, female gender and first-line treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors was associated with superior survival. Conclusion  More than 90% of lung cancer patients in Sri Lanka are treated with palliative intent. Further work is needed to identify patient and care pathway barriers to ensure diagnosis at an earlier stage.

Temozolomide hypersensitivity – A story of success

Aims

Background:

Temozolomide is an oral chemotherapy drug widely used in the treatment of glial tumours. This is generally well tolerated however, immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions have been described, necessitating treatment interruption that could significantly impact survival.

Method

Case description:

We report a case of a 39-year-old young woman with WHO grade 2 IDH1mutant diffuse astrocytoma (MGMT promoter methylated) of the left temporal lobe. She had tumour resection in 2012 followed by radical radiotherapy. Afterwards, she had close surveillance with regular brain imaging. The tumour started to progress in early 2020. We agreed to commence on temozolomide to control tumour growth.

She developed an itchy rash with easy bruising towards the end of the first cycle. It responded to a course of prednisolone. We proceeded with the second cycle and she developed a worsening rash on the third day. However she did not have signs or symptoms of anaphylaxis. This episode was again managed by a course of steroids and oral antibiotics. Since Temozolomide was the optimal treatment to control the disease progression at this stage, we agreed to persevere with temozolomide using a rapid desensitisation protocol.

Results

On the first day of third cycle, she was brought to the day chemotherapy unit and given prednisolone 30mg, fexofenadine 180mg and ondansetron 8mg, 30 minutes before the treatment. Our protocol was as follows; 5mg, 10mg, 20mg, 30mg, 50mg and 90mg of temozolomide at an interval of 30 minutes between the doses. She was advised to follow the same regime for the next four days of the third cycle. On days 6 -28, she has been advised to take fexofenadine 180mg once daily. Although there was a minor rash appeared on days 6/7, they subsided gradually. She tolerated the treatment without sinister symptoms or signs. We proceeded with the next 4 chemotherapy cycles adhering to the same protocol. The intensity of the rash gradually improved, and she became almost completely asymptomatic by the 7th cycle. It was also encouraging to see the radiological response of the tumour with the treatment.

Conclusion

Although the published literature is minimal, rapid desensitisation is shown to be a safe and effective method to counteract temozolomide hypersensitivity. In an era where there is still a paucity of systemic treatment options for primary brain tumours, adopting rapid desensitisation to induce tolerability to temozolomide, a drug which has shown to improve survival, would be a valuable addition in managing our patients. Further, our experience suggests that this protocol is safe, effective, and does not necessitate inpatient admission.