Lung ultrasound: a useful tool in the assessment of the dyspnoeic patient in the emergency department. Fact or fiction?

Patients with respiratory distress present a frequent and challenging dilemma for emergency physicians (EPs). The accurate diagnosis and treatment of the underlying pathology is vitally important in these sick patients to ensure the best outcome and minimise harm from unnecessary treatments. Within the last decade, studies have shown lung ultrasonography (LU) to be valuable in the accurate diagnosis of a variety of lung pathologies, including cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, haemothorax and pneumonia. However, despite advances in techniques and the evidence for the use of LU in the diagnosis of respiratory pathology, it remains poorly understood and rarely used by EPs. This clinical review article provides an overview of LU and its relevance as a diagnostic aid to the detection of respiratory pathology in the Emergency Department (ED).

An unusual cause of perianal fistula

Anal pain is a common presentation in colorectal clinic. Accurate diagnosis often requires examination under anaesthesia as pain prevents careful assessment. This report intends to highlight a rare cause of a superficial perianal fistula caused by an ingested foreign body.

A 36-year-old Afro-Caribbean gentleman underwent examination under anaesthesia of rectum. He had a 2-week history of perianal pain and discharge. Intra-operatively, a piece of bone from a pork spare rib was found embedded within the superficial subcutaneous fistula. There was an associated abscess cavity adjacent to the fistula, which was curetted. The fistula was laid open and the bone was removed. The cavity was successfully left to heal by secondary intention.

Ingested foreign body is a very unusual cause of perianal sepsis and subsequent fistula formation. Incision and drainage of the abscess along with removal of foreign body is the key to immediate pain relief and cure.

Comparison of the errors in basic life support performance after training using the 2000 and 2005 ERC guidelines

The importance of immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation after cardiac arrest is established. The 2005 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines were altered to try to improve survival after cardiac arrest. This observational study compares the errors in basic life support (BLS) performance after training using the 2000 or 2005 guidelines. First-year healthcare students at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, were taught adult BLS in a standardised 8-h course: an historical group with previous ERC guidelines (Old), the other with 2005 ERC guidelines (New). 2537 (Old 1773; New 764) students were trained and assessed in BLS. There was no difference in overall error rate between Old and New (5.53% vs. 6.70% (p>0.05)) or adherence to the sequence of the respective BLS algorithm. The New group ("hands in centre of the chest") had significantly more erroneous hand positions compared to the Old group (5.23% vs. 1.64%, p<0.001). The 2005 ERC guidelines do not significantly improve correct BLS performance. Removal of hand placement measurement results in a significant increase in hand position errors. The clinical benefit of an increased number of compressions impaired by worsened hand positioning is unknown and requires further study.

An evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training

BACKGROUND

Studies show that acquisition and retention of BLS skills is poor, and this may contribute to low survival from cardiac arrest. Feedback from instructors during BLS training is often lacking. This study investigates the effects of continuous feedback from a manikin on chest compression and ventilation techniques during training compared to instructor feedback alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective randomised controlled trial. First-year healthcare students at the University of Birmingham were randomised to receive training in standard or feedback groups. The standard group were taught by an instructor using a conventional manikin. The feedback group used a 'Skillreporter' manikin, which provides continuous feedback on ventilation volume and chest compression depth and rate in addition to instructor feedback. Skill acquisition was tested immediately after training and 6 weeks later.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight participants were recruited (conventional n=49; Skillreporter n=49) and were tested after training. Sixty-six students returned (Skillreporter n=34; conventional n=32) for testing 6 weeks later. The Skillreporter group achieved better compression depth (39.96mm versus 36.71mm, P<0.05), and more correct compressions (58.0% versus 40.4%, P<0.05) at initial testing. The Skillreporter group also achieved more correct compressions at week 6 (43.1% versus 26.5%, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that objective feedback during training improves the performance of BLS skills significantly when tested immediately after training and at re-testing 6 weeks later. However, CPR performance declined substantially over time in both groups.