Outcomes with Bridging Radiation Therapy Prior to CAR-T Cell Therapy in Pts with Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Select patient (pts) with relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell lymphoma may benefit from bridging radiation (bRT) prior to anti-CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CART). Here, we examined pt and treatment factors associated with outcome after bRT and CART.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed adults with DLBCL who received bRT prior to axicabtagene ciloleucel 11/2017-12/2022. Clinical/treatment characteristics, response, and toxicity were extracted. Progression free survival (PFS), disease specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were modeled using Kaplan-Meier for events distributed over time, or binary logistic regression for disease response. Fisher's Exact Test or Mann-Whitney U methods were used.

RESULTS

Among 40 pts, 11 (28%) had limited stage disease at apheresis, and 14 (35%) received bRT in addition to bridging systemic therapy. Thirty-two (80%) pts received bRT post-leukapheresis. bRT was delivered with a median dose of 30 Gy (range: 4-46) in 10 fractions (range: 2-23). Eighteen (45%) pts received <30 Gy. Twenty-two pts (55%) received bRT comprehensively to all sites of disease, including 9 pts who had limited stage. Eleven pts had bulky disease (≥ 10 cm) at the time of bRT. After CART, 4 pts (10%) experienced Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), 16 (40%) had Grade ≥2 CRS, and 16 (38%) had Grade ≥3 neurotoxicity. Twenty-three pts (57.5%) had CR at 30 days post-CART infusion. Nine had PR (22.5%), of whom 2 pts eventually developed CR at three months and 1 at nine months. Eight pts (20%) had either PD or SD. Of 23 pts who experienced CR, 11 relapsed-6 at three months and 5 at six months. At a median follow up of 9.6 months (95% CI: 6.6-16.2), 22 pts relapsed: 6 (27.3%) in-field, 10 (5.5%) out-of-field, 4 (18.2%) both, and 2 (9.1%) unknown. The median PFS was 8.87 months and median OS was 22 months. PFS at 1 year was 70% (53-82) and at 2 years was 42% (27-57). OS at 1 and 2 years was 72.5% (56-84) and 51% (34-65), respectively. Seventeen pts (42.5%) remain alive at last follow-up, 13 (76.5%) of whom have no evidence of disease (NED). On univariate analysis, OS and PFS at 1 year were 67% (43-83) and 49% (27-68) for those who received RT comprehensively (n = 22), and 41.9% (19-64) and 33.3% (14-54) for those who did not (n = 18; both p≤0.03). Disease bulk (≥10 cm) was associated with significant decrement in DSS (p = 0.03), but not PFS (p = 0.16) or OS (p = 0.24). Among pts treated comprehensively with bRT (n = 22), there was no association of tumor bulk with OS, PFS, or DSS (p>0.2). IPI ≥3 was associated with worse DSS (p = 0.045) and trended towards worse PFS (p = 0.054), but not OS (p = 0.23). There was no difference in PFS, OS, or DSS between pts who received bRT or chemoRT (p>0.3).

CONCLUSION

bRT and CART is a good treatment strategy for select pts with aggressive B cell lymphoma. When feasible, and with a caveat that other variables influence patient disposition, bRT for CART is associated with improved outcomes after comprehensive RT to all sites of disease.

Outcomes and Toxicities in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) involving the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is rare and long-term outcomes are not well defined. Combined modality therapy (CMT) with radiotherapy (RT) in addition to systemic therapy in this setting is not commonly pursued. We aim to characterize outcomes in patients with GI DLBCL treated with systemic therapy, with or without RT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients diagnosed with DLBCL of the GI tract (with or without mesenteric involvement) treated at a single institution from 1988-2022 were retrospectively reviewed on an IRB-approved protocol. Clinical and treatment data were collected including adverse events (AE; acute vs late defined as before or 4 weeks after therapy end). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to estimate survival.

RESULTS

Of 207 patients, 62% were male and median age at diagnosis was 63 (IQR 52-73). Gastric involvement was most common (n = 130, 63%), followed by small intestines (n = 48, 23%) and colon/rectum (n = 24, 12%). Most presented with early-stage disease (n = 124, 60%), with a median IPI score of 1. All patients received chemotherapy. Of 182 treated with CHOP/EPOCH, 36 (20%) were treated in the pre-rituximab era while 146 (80%) received rituximab. 66 patients (32%) were treated with RT, 89% as part of first line CMT. 50 cases (76%) received consolidative RT, while 10 (15%) targeted residual gross disease and 4 (6%) targeted distant sites. Median dose and fractionation were 36Gy (IQR 30.6-39.6) in 18 fractions (IQR 17-22). Over half (n = 132, 64%) developed grade 3+ acute chemotherapy AEs, and the most common were anemia (n = 64), febrile neutropenia (n = 40), and neutropenia (n = 20). Grade 3+ late chemotherapy AEs occurred in 14 patients (7%). Acute grade 3+ radiation AEs were uncommon (n = 2, 3%; colitis, emesis). No grade 3+ late radiation AEs were noted. Median follow-up was 46 months (IQR 16-97). 169 (81.6%) had a complete response (CR), with 154 (91%) after first line chemotherapy, 9 (5%) after second line, and 6 (4%) after RT. CR was defined by PET (62%), endoscopy (22%), CT (9%), or other methods (7%). The 5-year progression-free survival for those treated with one line of chemotherapy with or without RT was 95%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Improved OS was associated with early-stage disease (p = 0.003), low IPI (p = 0.001), fewer chemotherapy lines (p<0.001), and CR (p<0.001). OS did not differ by gender, age, immunophenotype, GI site, SUVmax, or RT. Patients with early stage DLBCL treated with RT in the post-rituximab era received fewer chemotherapy cycles compared to those treated without RT (p = 0.02; median of 4 (IQR 3-6) vs 6 cycles (IQR 4-6)), with no OS difference.

CONCLUSION

GI DLBCL patients have favorable outcomes after CMT with minimal late toxicity. CMT with RT to the GI tract is well tolerated with no OS difference compared to chemotherapy alone, and may mitigate risks from additional chemotherapy cycles for selected early-stage patients.

Characterization of Lymphopenia during Bridging Radiation Therapy Prior to CAR-T Cell Therapy in Patients with Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Bridging RT (bRT) may be used as a strategy for disease control in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell lymphoma treated with anti-CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART). The correlation of treatment-related lymphopenia with adverse outcomes in patients has been widely documented in several malignancies. Here, we assessed lymphocyte kinetics during bRT and impact on clinical outcome.

MATERIALS/METHODS

After IRB-approval, records were retrospectively reviewed for adults with DLBCL who received bRT for axicabtagene ciloleucel 11/2017-12/2022. Clinical/treatment characteristics, lab values, and outcomes were extracted. ALC Δ RT was computed by subtracting pre-RT ALC from post-RT ALC count. Survival was modeled using Kaplan-Meier for events distributed over time, or binary logistic regression for disease response. Fisher's Exact Test or Mann-Whitney U methods were used.

RESULTS

Forty patients met inclusion criteria. Fourteen (35%) received bRT with systemic therapy. Thirty-two (80%) patients received bRT that started post-leukapheresis. bRT was delivered with a median dose of 30 Gy (range: 4-46) in 10 fractions (range: 2-23). Twenty-three patients (57.5%) had CR at 30 days post-CART infusion. Nine had PR (22.5%), and 8 patients (20%) had PD or SD. Median PFS was 8.9 months and median OS was 22 months. The pre-RT ALC mean ± SD was 0.74 ± 0.49 K/µL, and post-RT was 0.43 ± 0.35 K/µL. The absolute ALC Δ RT was 0.31 ± 0.43 K/µL, and ratio post-RT/pre-RT was 0.74 ± 0.64. Stratifying by receipt of bRT alone or with systemic therapy, there was no statistically significant difference in ALC count post-RT (chemoRT: 0.33 ± 0.23 vs. RT: 0.48 ± 0.4, p = 0.2), but there was a lower ALC count pre-RT in the chemoRT group (0.5 ± 0.3 vs. 0.87 ± 0.52 for RT alone, p = 0.02). Post-RT ALC was not significantly associated with CR/PR vs. PD/SD, or with DSS, PFS, or OS. A greater drop in ALC Δ RT trended towards association with improved 90-day response (p = 0.066), without correlation with DSS, OS, or response at 30 days. Median dose per fraction was lower among patients that got pre-leukapheresis RT (2.25 vs. 2.5, p = 0.04), but total dose of bRT or number of fractions was not significantly different. Otherwise, the groups were similar in terms of stage, disease bulk, or comprehensive vs. focal bRT. The average decrease in ALC post-RT for patients who received bRT prior to apheresis was 0.215 K/µL, compared to 0.268 K/µL for patients who received bRT post-apheresis (p = 0.75). Treatment with pre-leukapheresis bRT or ALC Δ RT among these patients were not associated with worse DFS, PFS, or OS (p>0.15).

CONCLUSION

Post-bRT ALC and reduction in ALC during bRT is not associated with worse treatment response or survival outcomes after CAR-T cell treatment in aggressive B cell lymphoma. Pre-leukapheresis bRT did not appear to substantially impact ALC, and ALC Δ RT among these patients were not associated with worse outcomes.

Hygroscopic growth and CCN activity of secondary organic aerosol produced from dark ozonolysis of γ-terpinene

The hygroscopic growth factor (GF) and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) particles produced during dark ozonolysis of γ-terpinene under different reaction conditions were investigated. The SOA particles were produced in the presence or absence of cyclohexane, an OH scavenger; 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, an anthropogenic volatile organic compound; and (NH₄)₂SO₄ seed particles. A hygroscopicity tandem differential mobility analyzer was used to determine the GFs of the SOA particles at RHs ≤ 93%. For some experiments, a CCN counter was used for size-resolved measurement of CCN activation at supersaturation (S) in the range of 0.1 to 1%. The single hygroscopicity parameter κ was derived from both the GF and CCN measurements. Under subsaturated conditions, all the SOA (except those in the presence of the (NH₄)₂SO₄ seeds) showed small GF values. These GFs demonstrated that SOA mass loading affected the GF. A decrease in the SOA mass loading led to increased GF and corresponding κ_GFvalues. However, in a supersaturation regime, the SOA mass loading and the size of the particles did not significantly alter the CCN activity of the SOA. Our CCN measurements showed higher κ_CCN values (κ_CCN = 0.20-0.24) than those observed in most monoterpene ozonolysis studies (κ_CCN = 0.1-0.14). This difference may have been due to the presence of the two endocyclic double bonds in the γ-terpinene structure, which may have affected the SOA chemical composition, in contrast to monoterpenes that contain an exocyclic double bond. Our comparisons of sub- and supersaturated conditions showed a larger range of κ values than other experiments. Average κ_CCN/κ_GF ratios of ~7 and 14 were obtained in the unseeded SOA experiments at low and high SOA mass loadings, respectively. The average κ_CCN of 0.23 indicated that the SOA produced during ozonolysis of γ-terpinene exhibited fairly high CCN activity.

A phase I/II trial of pixantrone (BBR2778), methylprednisolone, cisplatin, and cytosine arabinoside (PSHAP) in relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of pixantrone (BBR2778) when substituted for etoposide in the ESHAP regimen in patients with aggressive relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Nineteen patients received protocol therapy, consisting of pixantrone 80 mg/m2 over 1 h on day 1, methylprednisolone 500 mg on days 1 - 5, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 - 4, and cytarabine 2000 mg/m2 on day 5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days, in the outpatient setting. Dose limiting toxicity, consisting of bone marrow suppression, occurred at the first dose level (80 mg/m2), which was defined as the recommended dose. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were mainly hematologic. Only one patient had grade 4 febrile neutropenia. No significant decreases in ejection fraction greater than 20% occurred. Overall response rate was 58%, with 37% complete and 21% partial responses. Six of the 11 responders (55%) underwent stem cell transplant. Median time to progression and overall median survival were 5.7 months and 14.5 months, respectively. There is no significant interaction between pixantrone and the combined drugs. The recommended dose of pixantrone in combination with methylprednisolone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (PSHAP) is 80 mg/m2. PSHAP is an active salvage regimen and should be further evaluated as a pretransplant cytoreductive regimen.

Lenalidomide and rituximab for untreated indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

8548

Background: Despite advances in therapy and a better understanding of the natural history of indolent non-Hodgkins lymphomas (NHL), the optimal treatment for newly diagnosed patients (pts) has not been determined. While several combination chemotherapy regimens have response rates approaching 90%, toxicity is common with genotoxic drugs and secondary malignancies is a concern. Lenalidomide has been shown to have single agent activity in indolent NHL, and is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndrome. Rituximab is effective as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy for indolent NHL. The aim of this phase II, single arm study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with untreated, stage III, or IV indolent NHL. Methods: Pts with indolent NHL who were previously untreated, with measurable disease (>1.5 cm), were eligible for enrollment. Pts received 20mg of lenalidomide orally once daily on days 1–21 and rituximab 375mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of each 28 day cycle. Pts could receive up to 6 cycles of therapy. Response was assessed after 3 cycles and at the end of therapy using the International Working Group Response Criteria. Results: At time of this report 17 pts have been enrolled and 14 are eligible for safety evaluation. The median age was 55 (33–77) years and 53% were male. Therapy was well tolerated with the following grade 3 adverse events (AE) reported; myalgia (1 pt), rash (1 pt), peripheral neuropathy (1pt). There were no grade 4 AEs. There have been no reported grade 3/4 hematologic AEs. There has been no tumor flare observed. In the 5 pts eligible for response assessment, 4 pts (80%) attained a complete response (CR), 1 patient (20%) had stable disease (SD). After 3 cycles, one patient had unconfirmed stable disease who also was previously treated with combination chemotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma. Updates for response will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab has activity and is well tolerated with minimal toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed indolent lymphoma.

[Table: see text]