China's application of the One Health approach in addressing public health threats at the human-animal-environment interface: Advances and challenges

Background

Due to emerging issues such as global climate change and zoonotic disease pandemics, the One Health approach has gained more attention since the turn of the 21st century. Although One Health thinking has deep roots and early applications in Chinese history, significant gaps exist in China's real-world implementation at the complex interface of the human-animal-environment.

Methods

We abstracted the data from the global One Health index study and analysed China's performance in selected fields based on Structure-Process-Outcome model. By comparing China to the Belt & Road and G20 countries, the advances and gaps in China's One Health performance were determined and analysed.

Findings

For the selected scientific fields, China generally performs better in ensuring food security and controlling antimicrobial resistance and worse in addressing climate change. Based on the SPO model, the "structure" indicators have the highest proportion (80.00%) of high ranking and the "outcome" indicators have the highest proportion (20.00%) of low ranking. When compared with Belt and Road countries, China scores above the median in almost all indicators (16 out of 18) under the selected scientific fields. When compared with G20 countries, China ranks highest in food security (scores 72.56 and ranks 6th), and lowest in climate change (48.74, 11th).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that while China has made significant efforts to enhance the application of the One Health approach in national policies, it still faces challenges in translating policies into practical measures. It is recommended that a holistic One Health action framework be established for China in accordance with diverse social and cultural contexts, with a particular emphasis on overcoming data barriers and mobilizing stakeholders both domestically and globally. Implementation mechanisms, with clarified stakeholder responsibilities and incentives, should be improved along with top-level design.

Tackling global health security by building an academic community for One Health action

BACKGROUND

One Health approach is crucial to tackling complex global public health threats at the interface of humans, animals, and the environment. As outlined in the One Health Joint Plan of Action, the international One Health community includes stakeholders from different sectors. Supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, an academic community for One Health action has been proposed with the aim of promoting the understanding and real-world implementation of One Health approach and contribution towards the Sustainable Development Goals for a healthy planet.

MAIN TEXT

The proposed academic community would contribute to generating high-quality scientific evidence, distilling local experiences as well as fostering an interconnected One Health culture and mindset, among various stakeholders on different levels and in all sectors. The major scope of the community covers One Health governance, zoonotic diseases, food security, antimicrobial resistance, and climate change along with the research agenda to be developed. The academic community will be supported by two committees, including a strategic consultancy committee and a scientific steering committee, composed of influential scientists selected from the One Health information database. A workplan containing activities under six objectives is proposed to provide research support, strengthen local capacity, and enhance global participation.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed academic community for One Health action is a crucial step towards enhancing communication, coordination, collaboration, and capacity building for the implementation of One Health. By bringing eminent global experts together, the academic community possesses the potential to generate scientific evidence and provide advice to local governments and international organizations, enabling the pursuit of common goals, collaborative policies, and solutions to misaligned interests.

Towards a global One Health index: a potential assessment tool for One Health performance

Background

A One Health approach has been increasingly mainstreamed by the international community, as it provides for holistic thinking in recognizing the close links and inter-dependence of the health of humans, animals and the environment. However, the dearth of real-world evidence has hampered application of a One Health approach in shaping policies and practice. This study proposes the development of a potential evaluation tool for One Health performance, in order to contribute to the scientific measurement of One Health approach and the identification of gaps where One Health capacity building is most urgently needed.

Methods

We describe five steps towards a global One Health index (GOHI), including (i) framework formulation; (ii) indicator selection; (iii) database building; (iv) weight determination; and (v) GOHI scores calculation. A cell-like framework for GOHI is proposed, which comprises an external drivers index (EDI), an intrinsic drivers index (IDI) and a core drivers index (CDI). We construct the indicator scheme for GOHI based on this framework after multiple rounds of panel discussions with our expert advisory committee. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is adopted to determine the weights for each of the indicators.

Results

The weighted indicator scheme of GOHI comprises three first-level indicators, 13 second-level indicators, and 57 third-level indicators. According to the pilot analysis based on the data from more than 200 countries/territories the GOHI scores overall are far from ideal (the highest score of 65.0 out of a maximum score of 100), and we found considerable variations among different countries/territories (31.8–65.0). The results from the pilot analysis are consistent with the results from a literature review, which suggests that a GOHI as a potential tool for the assessment of One Health performance might be feasible.

Conclusions

GOHI—subject to rigorous validation—would represent the world’s first evaluation tool that constructs the conceptual framework from a holistic perspective of One Health. Future application of GOHI might promote a common understanding of a strong One Health approach and provide reference for promoting effective measures to strengthen One Health capacity building. With further adaptations under various scenarios, GOHI, along with its technical protocols and databases, will be updated regularly to address current technical limitations, and capture new knowledge.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40249-022-00979-9.

A Whole-genome Sequencing Analysis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates in China: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Tracking the spread of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with decreased susceptibility or resistance to cephalosporins is a major priority for global surveillance programmes. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has been widely used by increasing countries in North America, Europe, and Pacific to determine the decreased susceptible or resistance determinants of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, track the spread of these determinants throughout the gonococcal population at national or regional level. However, no studies to date have examined the genomic epidemiology of gonorrhea in Asia where the antimicrobial resistant strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae appears to have emerged before disseminating the strains globally.

METHODS

We obtained clinical isolates and data from the China Gonococcal Resistance Surveillance Programme (China-GRSP) from 2012 to 2013. We sequenced the genomes of 435 clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, including 112 (25.6%) isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone (Cfx-DS). We assessed the association between antimicrobial resistance genotype and phenotype. We also compared our data with the whole genome data of the isolates from the USA and the UK in the GenBank.

FINDINGS

The most prevalent MLST STs in our gonococcal population were MLST ST7827 (n = 74), followed by ST7365 (n = 58), ST1600 (n = 38), ST7367 (n = 35), and ST7363 (n = 29). MLST ST1901 which was reported as the predominant ST in the US was not found in our population. A total of 2512 strains, including additional 2077 published NG strains, were further included for phylogenetic analysis. It generated two distinct lineages - lineage 1 and lineage 2. Analysis of MLST ST1901 in the database indicate that most of MLST ST1901 isolates in the lineage2.6 were Cfx-DS isolates while all isolates in the lineage 2.1 were sensitive to ceftriaxone (77/110 vs. 0/13; p < 0.001). ST1901/lineage 2.6 is a ceftriaxone resistant clone which cannot distinguished by MLST genotyping. In the isolates from our study, the MICs of ceftriaxone for ST7363/lineage 2.6 isolates ranged from 0.008-0.125 mg/L (mean ± SD; 0.054 ± 0.043 mg/L) while those for ST7363/lineage 2.8 isolates ranged from 0.032-0.250 mg/L (0.134 ± 0.085 mg/L). All ST7363/lineage 2.8 isolates contained penA mosaic alleles.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, current study is the first WGS-based analysis of gonococcal population at national level in Asia. China harbors the different predominant clones associated with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone from those clones circulated in other regions. The findings from the study can be not only used as baseline data for future studies in China but also contributable to our understanding on spread of N. gonorrhoeae and its resistant strains at regional and global levels.

FUNDING

The Chinese Academy Medical Sciences (CAMS) Initiative for Innovative Medicine.

[Analysis on codon usage of chloroplast genome of Eleutherococcus senticosus]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the codon usage of chloroplast genome and the influencing factor in Eleutherococcus senticosus.

METHOD

Codon of 52 genes, which were selected from the chloroplast genome sequence of E. senticosus, was multivariate statistical and correspondence analyzed using CodonW and SPSS software.

RESULT

GC content at the three position of codons by turns was 46.46%, 38.26%, 29.88%, whereas GC1 and GC2 had a significant correlation coefficient (P < 0.01). The correlation coefficient with GC12, and GC3 was 0.205 and was not significant correlated. There were 30 codons which relative synonymous codon usage was greater than 1 and 29 codons end with A and T. In the corresponding analysis, the first axis shows 10.35% variation. And there was significant correlation coefficient between ENC and GC3. The correlation coefficients with GC3 and ENC were -0.288 and 0.353, respectively. We defined 16 codons from 16 amino acids as the major preference codons in chloroplast genome of E. senticosus.

CONCLUSION

The third positions for all codon are preferred to ending with A and T. The codon usage bias is formed under effect of mutation and selection, as well as other factors. But the selection will have a far greater impact than others.