Perinatal Outcomes of Fetuses and Infants Diagnosed with Trisomy 13 or Trisomy 18

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal outcomes, and determine medical care use for fetuses and infants with trisomy 13 (T13) and trisomy 18 (T18).

STUDY DESIGN

This population-based retrospective cohort study included all prenatal and postnatal diagnoses of T13 or T18 in the greater Cincinnati area from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2018. Overall survival, survival to hospital discharge, medical management, and maternal, fetal, and neonatal characteristics are analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 124 pregnancies (125 fetuses) that were identified, which resulted in 72 liveborn infants. Male fetal sex and hydrops were associated with a higher rate of spontaneous loss. The median length of survival was 7 and 29 days, for infants with T13 and T18, respectively. Of the 27 infants alive at 1 month of age, 13 (48%) were alive at 1 year of age. Only trisomy type (T13), goals of care (comfort care), and extremely low birthweight were associated with a shorter length of survival. A high degree of variability existed in the use of medical services, with 28% of infants undergoing at least 1 surgical procedure and some children requiring repeated (≤29) or prolonged (>1 year) hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many infants with T13 or T18 did not survive past the first week of life, nearly 20% lived for more than 1 year with varying degrees of medical support. The length of survival for an infant cannot be easily predicted, and surviving infants have high health care use throughout their lifespans.

Experiences of reproductive genetic counselors with abortion regulations in Ohio

Since 2010, Ohio legislators have passed more than 15 legislative changes related to abortion and abortion providers, and nine procedural abortion clinics have closed. We investigated reproductive genetic counselors' perceptions, attitudes and self-reported practices regarding Ohio's current and proposed abortion regulations. We conducted five focus groups and two telephone interviews in 2019-2020, with a total of 19 reproductive genetic counselors. Participants discussed difficulties keeping current on abortion legislation and clinics' and hospitals' policies, resulting in anticipatory anxiety and leading to additional work to discuss the laws with patients. Participants articulated that practices of reproductive genetic counseling-and patient advocacy-are impeded by the legislation. Genetic counselors perceive negative impacts on patients' autonomy, particularly reflective of healthcare disparities of marginalized groups, which may contribute to frustration and anger. Ultimately, the mental and emotional burden on genetic counselors created by abortion legislation contributes to compassion fatigue and burnout. Our findings show that Ohio's abortion regulations negatively impact reproductive genetic counselors and their relationships with their patients. Repealing existing abortion regulations and preventing future restrictive legislation may ameliorate the negative effects of regulations on reproductive genetic counselors and their patients. In the event that these laws remain, innovative communication tools and proactive professional society advocacy are potential means to mitigate the negative impact on reproductive genetic counselors.

Aneuploid embryo transfer: clinical policies and provider opinions at United States fertility clinics

OBJECTIVE

To describe institutional clinical policies and individual provider opinions regarding aneuploid embryo transfer (aET).

DESIGN

A survey about clinical policies was electronically sent to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) member laboratory directors, and a separate survey about personal opinions was electronically sent to all SART members.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Patients pursuing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Current clinical policies about aET were described. Individual provider opinions about aET in the context of specific aneuploidies and mosaicism were also described.

RESULTS

A total of 48 laboratory directors and 212 individual providers responded to their respective surveys. Twelve (25%) clinics report that they do not have a policy regarding aET, but clinics performing PGT-A in >100 cycles per year were more likely to have a policy. Half of the individual providers agree that an embryo with trisomy 21 should be available for aET, but most disagreed with aET of embryos with other aneuploidies and most were either unsure about or unwilling to transfer embryos with mosaicism. Those who worked in primarily patient-facing roles held more agreeable opinions regarding aET.

CONCLUSION

There is no consensus regarding ideal clinical policies for aET. The wide range of current clinical practices and individual provider opinions regarding under what circumstances, if any, aET should be available to patients indicates that this is a divisive issue among ART providers, and there is a clear need for specific professional guidelines to address this issue.