Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial Exploring Optimal Sequencing of Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Prostate Radiation Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Two phase 3 randomized controlled trials (OTT-0101, RTOG-9413) and a meta-analysis have shown an impact of sequencing of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy on oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). However, the impact of sequencing strategy on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) is unclear. Here, we present the patient-reported HR-QoL outcomes from the OTT-0101 study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this trial, patients with PCa with Gleason score ≤7, clinical stage T1b to T3a, and prostate-specific antigen level <30 ng/mL were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant and concurrent ADT for 6 months, starting 4 months before or concurrent with prostate radiation therapy, or concurrent and adjuvant ADT for 6 months, starting simultaneously with prostate radiation therapy. HR-QoL was assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaires. Time until definitive deterioration was defined as time from random allocation to the first deterioration of at least 10 points with no further improvement of ≥10 points or if the patient experienced progression, died, or dropped out after deterioration, resulting in missing data. Stratified log-rank tests were applied for between-group comparisons of time-to-event estimates.

RESULTS

Overall, 393 patients (194 and 199 in the 2 arms, respectively) were evaluable, except 214 (101 and 113 in the 2 arms, respectively) for sexual function. Five-year rates of freedom from definitive deterioration of urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, and sexual activity were 33.5%, 33.1%, and 38.5% in the neoadjuvant group and 34.1%, 35.4%, and 36.7% in the adjuvant group, respectively, with no significant between-group differences. The adjuvant approach was associated with a reduced risk of definitive deterioration of sexual function (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.94; P = .02). With respect to clinical relevance, the mean change in score for sexual function showed only a small to moderate difference favoring the adjuvant group at and beyond 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, no differences were found in the bowel or urinary symptoms between the adjuvant and neoadjuvant approach. Considering a significant likelihood of type I and type II errors and because of a lack of a persistent and clinically meaningful between-group difference in mean score changes over time, our findings do not confer a clear and conclusive picture of the impact of sequencing strategy on sexual function.

Prostate Radiotherapy With Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Improves Metastasis-Free Survival Compared to Neoadjuvant ADT: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

There remains a lack of clarity regarding the influence of sequencing of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy (RT) on outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). Herein, we evaluate the optimal sequencing of ADT with prostate-directed RT in localized PCa.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1966-2018), Embase (1982-2018), ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference proceedings (1990-2018) were searched to identify randomized trials evaluating the sequencing, but not duration, of ADT with RT. Two randomized phase III trials were identified, and individual patient data were obtained: Ottawa 0101 and NRG Oncology's Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. Ottawa 0101 randomly assigned patients to neoadjuvant or concurrent versus concurrent or adjuvant short-term ADT. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413, a 2 × 2 factorial trial, included a random assignment of neoadjuvant or concurrent versus adjuvant short-term ADT. The neoadjuvant or concurrent ADT arms of both trials were combined into the neoadjuvant group, and the arms receiving adjuvant ADT were combined into the adjuvant group. The primary end point of this meta-analysis was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 14.9 years. Overall, 1,065 patients were included (531 neoadjuvant and 534 adjuvant). PFS was significantly improved in the adjuvant group (15-year PFS, 29% v 36%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.47], P = .01). Biochemical failure (subdistribution HR [sHR], 1.37 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.68], P = .002), distant metastasis (sHR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.95], P = .04), and metastasis-free survival (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.37], P = .050) were all significantly improved in the adjuvant group. There were no differences in late grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal (2% v 3%, P = .33) or genitourinary toxicity (5% v 5%, P = .76) between groups.

CONCLUSION

The sequencing of ADT with prostate-directed RT has significant association with long-term PFS and MFS in localized PCa. Our findings favor use of an adjuvant over a neoadjuvant approach, without any increase in long-term toxicity.

Impact of Treating Physician on Radiation Therapy Related Severe Toxicities in Men with Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

The impact of treating physician on radiation therapy (RT) related toxicity is unclear. We carried out a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled study to determine whether the risk of RT-related late toxicities in patients with prostate cancer varies depending on the treating radiation oncologist.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized controlled study in which patients with prostate cancer with Gleason score ≤7, clinical stage T1b-T3a, and prostate-specific antigen <30 ng/mL were randomized to receive androgen suppression for 6 months, starting either 4 months before or concurrently with definitive prostate radiation therapy. Incidence of late RT-related toxicity was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. We applied multivariable semiparametric shared frailty models with gamma distribution to determine the between-physician variation in the hazard of late RT-related grade ≥3 gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or overall toxicity. Patient level covariables included age, risk group, year of enrollment, and treatment regimen. Frailty variance, a measure of unexplained heterogeneity, was estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was suggested when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the frailty variance was >0. The Commenges-Andersen test was used for P value estimation.

RESULTS

Overall, 426 patients were treated by 9 radiation oncologists. On log-rank test, there was a significant difference in the cumulative incidence of overall grade ≥3 toxicities (P = .001) and grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity (P = .01) among the physician-based clusters. The frailty variance for overall late grade ≥3 toxicity was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.02-1.39; P = .01). The frailty variance for the grade ≥3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.00-4.20; P = .11) and 0.11 (95% CI, 0.00-1.13; P = .31), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the hazard of overall RT-related late grade ≥3 toxicity varied significantly depending on treating radiation oncologist. Further studies are required to explore the underlying processes that lead to such variations in clinical trials involving radiation therapy in prostate cancer.

Impact of Sequencing of Androgen Suppression and Radiation Therapy on Testosterone Recovery in Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

We performed a secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized trial to determine the influence of sequencing of radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on posttreatment testosterone recovery and implications of testosterone recovery on subsequent relapse.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with localized prostate cancer with Gleason score ≤7, clinical stage T1b to T3a, and prostate-specific antigen <30 ng/mL were randomized to neoadjuvant and concurrent ADT for 6 months starting 4 months before prostate radiation therapy (NHT arm) or concurrent and adjuvant ADT for 6 months starting simultaneously with radiation therapy (CAHT arm). Full testosterone recovery (FTR) was defined as recovery of testosterone to >10.5 nmol/L in patients with baseline ≥10.5 nmol/L or to baseline level in patients with baseline <10.5 nmol/L. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) since ADT initiation to supracastrate testosterone level (>1.7 nmol/L), and to FTR was compared between the arms using a truncation time point of 36 months.

RESULTS

The adjusted difference in RMST to supracastrate testosterone between the CAHT and NHT arm was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-2.5; P = .005). No difference was noted in RMST to FTR between the arms (18.7 vs 18.5 months, adjusted difference: 0.5; 95% CI, -1.4 to 2.4; P = .61). There was no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect (interaction P = .76) on risk of relapse over subgroups stratified by testosterone recovery to supracastrate level at 15 months after start of ADT. Based on a multistate Markov model, no independent effect of time to FTR on risk of subsequent relapse was observed (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients should be counseled that an additional 12 months on average is needed for FTR to occur after treatment with prostate radiation therapy and 6 months of ADT. This is independent of the sequencing of ADT and radiation therapy. Furthermore, recovery of testosterone does not appear to affect the risk of subsequent relapse.

Short-term adjuvant versus neoadjuvant hormone therapy in localized prostate cancer: A pooled individual patient analysis of two phase III trials

5584

Background: The timing of systemic therapy in relation to radiotherapy (RT) is important in most malignancies. In contrast, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has largely been investigated in relation to its duration rather than its sequencing with RT. Herein, we conduct the first combined individual patient analysis of two phase III randomized trials to determine the optimal timing of ADT with RT in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Individual patient data was obtained from the Malone et al trial (JCO 2019), which randomized patients to receive neoadjuvant/concurrent or concurrent/adjuvant ADT for 6 months with prostate only RT. This was combined with the prostate only RT arms of RTOG 9413 that randomized patients to 4 months of neoadjuvant/concurrent or adjuvant ADT. The neoadjuvant/concurrent arms of both trials were combined into the “neoadjuvant” group, and the concurrent/adjuvant (Malone) and adjuvant arm (RTOG 9413) were combined in the “adjuvant” group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cumulative incidence of distant metastasis (DM), PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and biochemical failure (BF) were calculated using the Fine-Gray method with non-PCa deaths as competing events. Late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity are also reported. Results: The median follow-up was 14.9 years (yrs) and 1065 patients were included (n=531 neoadjuvant, 534 adjuvant). Groups were well balanced for all baseline characteristics. Adjuvant ADT was superior to neoadjuvant ADT in terms of BF (15yr: 33% vs 43%, HR: 1.37 (95%CI: 1.12-1.68), p=0.002), DM (15yr: 12% vs 18%, HR: 1.40 (95%CI: 1.00-1.95), p=0.04), and PFS (15yr: 36% vs 29%, HR: 1.25 (95%CI: 1.07-1.47), p=0.01). Adjuvant ADT yielded lower PCSM (15yr: 15% vs 20%, HR: 1.29 (95%CI: 0.95-1.75), p=0.10), but did not reach statistical significance. This approached statistical significance in high risk PCa (HR 1.39 (95%CI 1.00-1.93), p=0.053). OS was not significantly different between arms (15yr: 39% vs 34%, HR: 1.11 (95%CI: 0.95-1.30), p=0.20). There was no significant difference in either late grade ≥3 GI (p=0.21) or GU (p=0.98) toxicity. Conclusions: We demonstrate for the first time that sequencing of ADT with RT significantly impacts long-term oncologic outcomes in localized PCa, favoring an adjuvant rather than neoadjuvant approach, without increasing late toxicity. This data has important implications to ongoing and future clinical trial design. Clinical trial information: NCT00769548 .

Quality of life outcomes from a phase III trial exploring optimal sequencing of androgen deprivation therapy with external beam radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer

315

Background: Dose-escalated prostate radiotherapy (PRT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard curative treatment for localized prostate cancer (LPCa). The optimal sequencing of these therapies is unclear. We report the patient-reported health related quality of life (HR-QoL) outcomes from a phase III study exploring optimal sequencing of PRT with ADT in LPCa. Methods: Newly diagnosed LPCa patients with Gleason score ≤7, clinical stage T1b-T3a, and PSA < 30 ng/mL were randomized to receive PRT (76 Gy/38 fractions) with 6 months (mos) of ADT starting 4 mos prior to RT (NAHT arm) or concurrently with RT (CAHT arm). HR-QoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and PR25 at baseline, q2 mos while on ADT, q4 mos for year 1 and 2 after ADT, q6 mos from year 3 to 5 and annually thereafter. Linear mixed modelling was applied to compare change in score (relative to baseline) over time. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to identify between-group difference in absolute scores, at 18, 36 and 60 mos. The statistical and clinical significance was set at p≤0.01 and 10-point threshold, respectively. Results: Overall 432 men were enrolled in the study and 393 (194 in NAHT and 199 in CAHT arm) were eligible for HR-QoL evaluation. There was a significant difference in the change in score of sleep disturbance due to urinary bother (least-squared mean: 3.9 vs. 7.6, P = 0.001) between the two arms. Although there were statistically significant differences in absolute scores of global QoL (18, 60 mos), cognitive (18, 60 mos), social and emotional functions (60 mo), sexual intimacy (18 mo) and fatigue (60 mo) favoring NAHT, the only clinically meaningful difference was noted in ejaculatory dysfunction at 18 (mean: 52.5 vs. 64.6), 36 (60.2 vs. 49.2) & 60 mos (61.4 vs. 50.9), respectively. Conclusions: We did not find any notable difference between the two arms with respect to score change over time in any of the HR-QoL metrics except sleep disturbance due to urinary bother. Clinically meaningful difference was noted only in the late absolute ejaculatory dysfunction score which favored the NAHT arm. Based on these findings, both NAHT and CAHT with PRT are reasonable standards of care for LPCa. Clinical trial information: DC-990-0082.

Treatment de-escalation for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with radiotherapy vs. trans-oral surgery (ORATOR2): study protocol for a randomized phase II trial

Background

Patients with human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) have substantially better treatment response and overall survival (OS) than patients with HPV-negative disease. Treatment options for HPV+ OPC can involve either a primary radiotherapy (RT) approach (± concomitant chemotherapy) or a primary surgical approach (± adjuvant radiation) with transoral surgery (TOS). These two treatment paradigms have different spectrums of toxicity. The goals of this study are to assess the OS of two de-escalation approaches (primary radiotherapy and primary TOS) compared to historical control, and to compare survival, toxicity and quality of life (QOL) profiles between the two approaches.

Methods

This is a multicenter phase II study randomizing one hundred and forty patients with T1–2 N0–2 HPV+ OPC in a 1:1 ratio between de-escalated primary radiotherapy (60 Gy) ± concomitant chemotherapy and TOS ± de-escalated adjuvant radiotherapy (50–60 Gy based on risk factors). Patients will be stratified based on smoking status (< 10 vs. ≥ 10 pack-years). The primary endpoint is OS of each arm compared to historical control; we hypothesize that a 2-year OS of 85% or greater will be achieved. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, QOL and toxicity.

Discussion

This study will provide an assessment of two de-escalation approaches to the treatment of HPV+ OPC on oncologic outcomes, QOL and toxicity. Results will inform the design of future definitive phase III trials.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03210103. Date of registration: July 6, 2017, Current version: 1.3 on March 15, 2019.

Sequencing of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy With External-Beam Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Dose-escalated radiotherapy (RT) with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer (LPCa). The optimal sequencing of these therapies is unclear. Our phase III trial compared neoadjuvant versus concurrent initiation of ADT in combination with dose-escalated prostate RT (PRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed LPCa with Gleason score ≤ 7, clinical stage T1b to T3a, and prostate-specific antigen < 30 ng/mL were randomly allocated to neoadjuvant and concurrent ADT for 6 months starting 4 months before RT (neoadjuvant group) or concurrent and adjuvant ADT for 6 months starting simultaneously with RT (concurrent group). The primary end point was biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). Stratified log-rank test was used to compare bRFS and overall survival (OS). Incidence of grade ≥ 3 late RT-related toxicities was compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

Overall, 432 patients were randomly assigned to the neoadjuvant (n = 215) or concurrent group (n = 217). At 10 years, bRFS rates for the two groups were 80.5% and 87.4%, respectively. Ten-year OS rates were 76.4% and 73.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in bRFS (P = .10) or OS (P = .70) between the two groups. Relative to the neoadjuvant group, the hazard ratio for the concurrent group was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.41 to 1.07) for bRFS and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.30) for OS. No significant difference was observed in the 3-year incidence of late RT-related grade ≥ 3 GI (2.5% v 3.9%) or genitourinary toxicity (2.9% v 2.9%).

CONCLUSION

In our study, there was no statistically significant difference in bRFS between the two treatment groups. Similarly, no difference was seen in OS or late RT-related toxicities. On the basis of these results, both neoadjuvant and concurrent initiations of short-term ADT with dose-escalated PRT are reasonable standards of care for LPCa.

Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with concurrent neck dissection has supplanted radiotherapy in the USA as the most common treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), yet no randomised trials have compared these modalities. We aimed to evaluate differences in quality of life (QOL) 1 year after treatment.

METHODS

The ORATOR trial was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, international, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2, randomised study. Patients were enrolled at six hospitals in Canada and Australia. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged 18 years or older, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores of 0-2, and with T1-T2, N0-2 (≤4 cm) OPSCC tumour types to radiotherapy (70 Gy, with chemotherapy if N1-2) or TORS plus neck dissection (with or without adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, based on pathology). Following stratification by p16 status, patients were randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomisation list with permuted blocks of four. The primary endpoint was swallowing-related QOL at 1 year as established using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) score, powered to detect a 10-point improvement (a clinically meaningful change) in the TORS plus neck dissection group. All analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01590355) and is active, but not currently recruiting.

FINDINGS

68 patients were randomly assigned (34 per group) between Aug 10, 2012, and June 9, 2017. Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 20-33) for the radiotherapy group and 29 months (23-43) for the TORS plus neck dissection group. MDADI total scores at 1 year were mean 86·9 (SD 11·4) in the radiotherapy group versus 80·1 (13·0) in the TORS plus neck dissection group (p=0·042). There were more cases of neutropenia (six [18%] of 34 patients vs none of 34), hearing loss (13 [38%] vs five [15%]), and tinnitus (12 [35%] vs two [6%]) reported in the radiotherapy group than in the TORS plus neck dissection group, and more cases of trismus in the TORS plus neck dissection group (nine [26%] vs one [3%]). The most common adverse events in the radiotherapy group were dysphagia (n=6), hearing loss (n=6), and mucositis (n=4), all grade 3, and in the TORS plus neck dissection group, dysphagia (n=9, all grade 3) and there was one death caused by bleeding after TORS.

INTERPRETATION

Patients treated with radiotherapy showed superior swallowing-related QOL scores 1 year after treatment, although the difference did not represent a clinically meaningful change. Toxicity patterns differed between the groups. Patients with OPSCC should be informed about both treatment options.

FUNDING

Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute Grant (#701842), Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Clinician-Scientist research grant, and the Wolfe Surgical Research Professorship in the Biology of Head and Neck Cancers grant.

A phase II randomized trial for early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: Radiotherapy versus trans-oral robotic surgery (ORATOR)

6006

Background: The incidence of OPSCC has risen rapidly, due to an epidemic of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Radiation therapy (RT) has historically been the standard treatment, but transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has surpassed RT in the US as the most common approach, based on assumptions of reduced toxicity or improved quality of life (QOL). No randomized trials have previously compared these treatments. Methods: The ORATOR trial (NCT01590355) enrolled patients with T1-T2 N0-2(≤4 cm) OPSCC amenable to TORS. We randomly assigned patients, stratified by p16 status, to RT (70 Gy/35 fractions, with chemotherapy if N1-2) vs. TORS (± adjuvant [chemo]RT based on pathology). The primary endpoint was a definitive comparison of swallowing QOL at 1-year using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), powered to detect a 10-point improvement (a clinically-meaningful change [CMC]) in the TORS arm. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), other QOL outcomes [including EORTC scales, the Voice Handicap Index-10, Neck Dissection Impairment Index, and Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire], overall- and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). All analyses were pre-specified and intention-to-treat. Results: Between 2012 and 2017, 68 patients were randomized (n = 34 in each arm), in Canada and Australia. Median age was 59 years; 87% were male. Primary tumor sites were palatine tonsil (74%) or base of tongue (26%). Arms were well-balanced for baseline factors, including p16 status (88% in each arm). Median follow-up was 27 months. MDADI scores at 1-year were statistically superior in the RT arm (mean ± SD: 86.9 ± 11.4 vs. 80.1 ± 13.0 in the TORS arm; p = 0.042), but not meeting the definition of a CMC. For the other QOL metrics, outcomes were similar at 1-year. Feeding tube rates at 1-year were 3% (n = 1) vs. 0% respectively. Rates of treatment-related grade ≥2 AEs were similar (91% vs. 100%, p = 0.24), with more neutropenia, constipation and tinnitus in the RT arm and more trismus in the TORS arm (all p < 0.05). There was one TORS bleeding-related death. OS and PFS were similar. Conclusions: RT had superior swallowing QOL scores at 1 year compared to TORS, but the difference was not a CMC. Toxicities differed between the arms. This study provides the first level 1 evidence to inform patients of the QOL impact of both approaches. Clinical trial information: NCT01590355.

Risk factors for loco-regional recurrence after radical cystectomy of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic-review and framework for adjuvant radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Radical cystectomy (RC) associated with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the most common local therapy in the management of non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Loco-regional recurrence (LRR), however, remains a common and important therapeutic challenge associated with poor oncologic outcomes. We aimed to systematically review evidence regarding factors associated with LRR and to propose a framework for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in patients with MIBC.

METHODS

We performed this systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the PubMed database for articles related to MIBC and associated treatments, published between January 1980 and June 2015. Articles identified by searching references from candidate articles were also included. We retrieved 1383 publications from PubMed and 34 from other sources. After an initial screening, a review of titles and abstracts, and a final comprehensive full text analysis of papers assessed for eligibility, a final consensus on 32 studies was obtained.

RESULTS

LRR is associated with specific patient-, tumor-, center- or treatment-related variables. LRR varies widely, occurring in as many as 43% of the cases and is strongly related to survival outcomes. While perioperative treatment does not impact on LRR, pathological factors such as pT, pN, positive margins status, extent of PLND, number of lymph nodes removed and/or invaded are correlated with LRR. Patients with pT3-T4a and/or positive lymph-nodes and/or limited pelvic lymph-node dissection and/or positive surgical margins have been distributed in LRR risk groups with accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

LRR patterns are well-known and for selected patients, adjuvant treatments could target this event. Intrinsic tumor subtype may guide future criteria to define a personalized treatment strategy. Prospective trials evaluating safety and efficacy of adjuvant RT are ongoing in several countries.

Radiotherapy with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates. The role of radiotherapy as an adjunct to radical cystectomy is not well-defined. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy preoperatively or postoperatively for patients with MIBC receiving cystectomy compared to cystectomy alone. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcome was adverse effects.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched on August 30, 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer. A control group receiving cystectomy alone and an intervention group with radiotherapy and cystectomy were required. The Jadad score was used to assess for bias. Fifteen studies representing 10 RCTs met eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 996 patients were randomized in seven trials included in a meta-analysis of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Insufficient data were available to complete a pooled analysis for adjuvant radiotherapy. There was a non-statistically significant improvement in overall survival for patients who received neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and cystectomy. At three years and five years, the odds ratios were 1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-2.09) and 1.26 (95% CI 0.76-2.09), respectively, in favour of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Subgroup analyses including higher doses of radiotherapy showed greater effect on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that radiotherapy prior to cystectomy may improve overall survival. This review was limited by old studies, heterogeneous patient populations, and radiotherapy treatment techniques that may not meet current standards. There is a need for current RCTs to further evaluate this effect.

Raman micro-spectroscopy applied to treatment resistant and sensitive human ovarian cancer cells

Despite the many advances intended to enhance the response to treatment, the survival rate of patients with ovarian cancer has only marginally improved in the past few decades. One major cause for this, is the lack of diagnostics for platinum-resistant disease. The goal of this study was to determine whether Raman micro-spectroscopy in conjunction with multivariate statistical analysis could discriminate between chemically fixed cisplatin-resistant (A2780cp) and cisplatin-sensitive (A2780s) human ovarian carcinoma cells. Raman spectra collected from individual cells were pre-processed and subsequently analyzed with Principal Component Analysis - Linear Discriminant Analysis (PCA-LDA). Statistically significant differences (P <  0.0001) were observed between the Raman spectra of A2780s and A2780cp cells. A diagnostic accuracy of 82% was obtained using the PCA-LDA classifier model for the discrimination between the A2780s and A2780cp cells. The loading plot analysis suggests that relative increases in proteins and glutathione in the cisplatin-resistant cells compared to the cisplatin-sensitive cells are most likely the major source of discrimination between the two types of cells. These results support the potential application of Raman spectroscopy in the identification of chemo-resistant tumors prior to treatment.

Radiovaccination Hypothesis

The details of patients who have entered remission from metastatic melanoma following palliative radiotherapy are reported. We review the relevant immune physiology and radiotherapy particulars and propose the hypothesis that radiovaccination with high fractional dose to skin metastases can stimulate the development of a robust systemic anti-tumoral immune response capable of causing remission of metastatic disease.

Quality indicators in the management of bladder cancer: A modified Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Survival in patients with bladder cancer has only moderately improved over the past 2 decades. A potential reason for this is nonadherence to clinical guidelines and best practice, leading to wide variations in care. Common quality indicators (QIs) are needed to quantify adherence to best practice and provide data for benchmarking and quality improvement.

OBJECTIVE

To produce an evidence- and consensus-based list of QIs for the management of bladder cancer.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was used to develop the indicator list. Candidate indicators were extracted from the literature and rated by a 27-member Canadian expert panel in several rounds until consensus was reached on the final list of indicators. In rounds with numeric ratings, a frequency analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 86 indicators were rated, 52 extracted from the literature and 34 suggested by the panel. After iterative rounds of ratings and discussion, a final list of 60 QIs spanning several disciplines and phases of the cancer care continuum was developed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to comprehensively produce common QIs representing structure, process, and outcome measures in bladder cancer management. Though developed in Canada, these indicators can be used in other countries with slight modifications to track performance and improve care.

Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015

This initiative was undertaken in response to concerns regarding the variation in management and in outcomes of patients with bladder cancer throughout centres and geographical areas in Canada. Population-based data have also revealed that real-life survival is lower than expected based on data from clinical trials and/or academic centres. To address these perceived shortcomings and attempt to streamline and unify treatment approaches to bladder cancer in Canada, a multidisciplinary panel of expert clinicians was convened last fall for a two-day working group consensus meeting. The panelists included urologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, patient representatives, a genitourinary pathologist, and an enterostomal therapy nurse. The following recommendations and summaries of supporting evidence represent the results of the presentations, debates, and discussions. Methodology

Development and validation of contouring guidelines for post-cystectomy adjuvant radiation of bladder cancer

409

Background: Several organizations are developing clinical trials to evaluate adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for bladder cancer patients at elevated risk of locoregional failure (LF). However, the clinical target volumes (CTVs) & organs at risk (OARs) for this treatment have not been defined in detail. Our purpose was to define multi-institutional consensus CTVs & OARs for male & female bladder cancer patients undergoing adjuvant RT in clinical trials. Methods: We convened a multi-disciplinary group of bladder cancer specialists from 9 centers in 3 countries. 5 radiation oncologists (ROs) & 7 urologists participated in the development of the proposed contours. The group proposed initial language for the CTVs & OARs and contoured them on CT scans of a male & female cystectomy patient with input from ≥ 1 urologist at each center. Using the binomial maximum-likelihood estimates method, we generated 95% level initial contours. We evaluated the contours for level of agreement using the Landis & Koch interpretation of the K statistic. Based on the initial contouring, the group updated its descriptions of the CTVs & OARs. To determine if the revised language produced consistent contours, the cystectomy bed (CB) contour was redrawn on the CT sets by an additional 5 ROs. Results: The group proposed that patients at elevated risk for LF with R0 resections should be treated to the pelvic nodes alone (internal/external iliac, distal common iliac & presacral) whereas patients with ≥ R1 resections should be treated to the pelvic nodes & CB. The group proposed the rectum, bowel space, bone marrow & urinary diversion as OARs. The level of agreement for the initial CTVs & OARs from the group varied substantially (Table). Consensus language to describe CTV & OAR structures where the initial contours varied was successfully developed. Contours & feedback from the validation group are being analyzed. Conclusions: Initial descriptions of CTVs & OARs have been successfully developed. External validation & feedback are pending. The results will be applicable to clinical trials of adjuvant RT in bladder cancer. [Table: see text]

Modified Kegel exercise regimen following definitive and adjuvant prostate cancer radiotherapy

e629

Background: 5-15% of patients treated with curative radiotherapy for prostate cancer experience some degree of urinary or fecal leakage. We hypothesized that a regimen of postradiotherapy perineal exercises would reduce this problem of sphincter dysfunction Methods: Upon completion of either conformal- or intensity-modulated radiotherapy to 76 Gy in 38 fractions (definitive) or 66 Gy in 33 fractions (postprostatectomy) patients were advised to commence a life-long program of daily perineal strengthening exercises. This consisted of a modified Kegel regimen for 5 minutes at a time, four times daily, and continued indefinitely. Patients have been monitored in regard to compliance and sphincter dysfunction at scheduled cancer clinic followup visits as well as by telephone survey. Results: 530 patients have been engaged in this postradiotherapy sphincter conditioning program. Parameters being analyzed are compliance with the regimen, frequency of exercise performance, urinary and fecal incontinence rates Conclusions: Pending the final tabulation of results the practical feasibility of such a prophylactic perineal exercise regimen as well as its impact on post radiotherapy sphincter integrity will be ascertained.

Relationship between testosterone, estradiol and circulating PCSK9: Cross-sectional and interventional studies in humans

BACKGROUND

Circulating PCSK9 levels are higher in women than men, in postmenopausal than premenopausal women, and in pregnant than non-pregnant women, suggesting that sex hormones may be related to PCSK9 levels. We have examined the relationship between serum estradiol (E2) and testosterone (T) and PCSK9, and the impact of E2 replacement therapy in women and T replacement and ablation therapy in men on circulating PCSK9.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study to examine the correlation between serum T (in males) and E2 (in females) and serum PCSK9. We also conducted interventional studies to examine the effect of hormonal therapy on serum PCSK9 levels.

RESULTS

In men, (1) serum T does not correlate with circulating PCSK9 or with LDLC in the basal state, (2) T replacement therapy does not have any effect on circulating PCSK9, and (3) T ablation therapy has mixed results. In women, (1) E2 correlates inversely with circulating PCSK9 and directly with serum LDLC, but (2) E2 replacement therapy does not have any effect on circulating PCSK9.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate differences between men and women in the relationship of their major sex hormones with circulating PCSK9. In men, circulating PCSK9 is not related to or affected by T except for a possible effect during T ablation therapy. In women, E2 is inversely related to circulating PCSK9 but the lack of effect of E2 therapy on circulating PCSK9 suggests that the E2-related differences in PCSK9 levels may be the result of differences in receptor-mediated PCSK9 clearance through E2-induced changes rather than production of PCSK9. The studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00848276.

A systematic review of expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) quality of life after surgery or radiation treatment

INTRODUCTION

The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) is a validated and widely adopted instrument that measures patient quality of life. This study aims to describe and compare patient quality of life in the bowel, urinary, and sexual domains across different prostate cancer treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of English articles published prior to 2012 was conducted. Peer reviewed articles reporting longitudinal EPIC data in a statistically analyzable form with clearly defined time points were included. Articles were assessed by content experts to ensure optimal treatment quality. Screening of studies and extraction of data were completed using a predefined data abstraction tool. Data on bowel, urinary, and sexual domains were documented. Scores in each domain range from a low of 0 to a high of 100.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles, representing 8302 patients, were included. All treatments were associated with short term or long term reductions in urinary, bowel, and sexual domains. Surgery patients had better post-treatment bowel quality of life; however, average declines were small regardless of treatment. Post-treatment urinary incontinence scores were lower for surgery patients; while radiation patients had worse urinary irritation. Average urinary bother and function were similar between treatment groups at 18 months post-treatment. Surgery patients had better baseline sexual function. A greater decline in sexual function was observed in surgery patients compared to radiation patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate cancer treatments have different impacts on patient quality of life and function. The magnitude of difference between treatment-related adverse effects may be important to patients when choosing therapy.

Spontaneous regression of metastatic melanoma after inoculation with tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccine

Spontaneous regression of metastatic melanoma is an exceedingly rare event, with only 76 well-documented cases in the literature since 1866. Here, we present the case of a patient who developed metastatic melanoma despite interferon therapy and who then achieved spontaneous regression shortly after a reaction to tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccination. A common theme among these cases is the development of febrile illness before remission of the malignant disease. A brief overview of proposed mechanisms for these miraculous recoveries is presented, including a highlight on the potential role of the herv-k-mel viral marker, a nona- or decapeptide that appears in most melanomas, with homologies to peptides in pathogenic microorganisms.

Pilot study on quality of life and sexual function in men-who-have-sex-with-men treated for prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

There is limited data on post-treatment quality of life (QoL) for men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) with prostate cancer (PCa). QoL in MSM may not be reflected by assessment tools designed for the heterosexual population.

AIMS

Our goals were to evaluate post-treatment QoL in PCa patients who are MSM, and to investigate the utility of current QoL assessment tool.

METHODS

PCa patients treated with surgery and/or radiation were recruited from the local MSM community. Each participant completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ), and a questionnaire focused on insertive and receptive roles of anal intercourse.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Response scores were calculated based on questionnaire design and compared by treatment modality.

RESULTS

Seven participants treated with surgery (mean age 58) and eight participants treated with radiation (mean age 67) were recruited. No participant in the surgical group received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) while two in radiation group were treated with ADT. The sample size of this study did not permit formal statistical analysis, although potential differences in Urinary and Bowel Domains from EPIC and Ejaculation Scale from MSHQ were observed. More participants from the radiation group seemed to be able to maintain both insertive and receptive anal intercourse roles after treatment compared to participants who received surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

While the two validated assessment tools suggested similar QoL scores including sexual function for both surgical and radiation groups, post-treatment sexual function related to anal intercourse may be better in the radiation group, as compared to the surgical group. Larger studies in PCa patients from MSM community are warranted to verify these data.

Early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: radiotherapy vs. trans-oral robotic surgery (ORATOR)--study protocol for a randomized phase II trial

Background

The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has markedly increased over the last three decades due to newly found associations with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Primary radiotherapy (RT) is the treatment of choice for OPSCC at most centers, and over the last decade, the addition of concurrent chemotherapy has led to a significant improvement in survival, but at the cost of increased acute and late toxicity. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has emerged as a promising alternative treatment, with preliminary case series demonstrating encouraging oncologic, functional, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes. However, comparisons of TORS and RT in a non-randomized fashion are susceptible to bias. The goal of this randomized phase II study is to compare QOL, functional outcomes, toxicity profiles, and survival following primary RT (± chemotherapy) vs. TORS (± adjuvant [chemo] RT) in patients with OPSCC.

Methods/Design

The target patient population comprises OPSCC patients who would be unlikely to require chemotherapy post-resection: Tumor stage T1-T2 with likely negative margins at surgery; Nodal stage N0-2, ≤3 cm in size, with no evidence of extranodal extension on imaging. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between Arm 1 (RT ± chemotherapy) and Arm 2 (TORS ± adjuvant [chemo] RT). In Arm 1, patients with N0 disease will receive RT alone, whereas N1-2 patients will receive concurrent chemoradiation. In Arm 2, patients will undergo TORS along with selective neck dissections, which may be staged. Pathologic high-risk features will be used to determine the requirement for adjuvant radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is QOL score using the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), with secondary endpoints including survival, toxicity, other QOL outcomes, and swallowing function. A sample of 68 patients is required.

Discussion

This study, if successful, will provide a much-needed randomized comparison of the conventional strategy of primary RT vs. the novel strategy of primary TORS. The trial is designed to provide a definitive QOL comparison between the two arms, and to inform the design of an eventual phase III trial for survival outcomes.

Trial registration

NCT01590355

Effects of radiation and total androgen blockade on serum hemoglobin, testosterone, and erythropoietin in patients with localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the incidence, time of onset, and extent of hemoglobin, testosterone, and erythropoietin changes in patients with localized prostate cancer receiving either radiation alone or radiation combined with total androgen blockade (tab).

METHODS

The study enrolled 35 patients (median age: 69 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer who received 3-dimensional conformal radiation with or without tab. Patients were generally treated with radiation alone (group 1), radiation plus short-term (≤6 months) tab (group 2), or radiation plus long-term (≥2 years) tab (group 3). Serum hemoglobin, testosterone, and erythropoietin in these patients were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean baseline serum hemoglobin for group 1 (n = 20), group 2 (n = 6), and group 3 (n = 9) was 149 g/L, 153 g/L, and 143 g/L respectively. We observed no significant decline in serum hemoglobin, testosterone, or erythropoietin among patients treated with radiotherapy alone. A significant drop in serum testosterone was noted in the group 2 and 3 patients within 1 month (p < 0.001), reaching a plateau at approximately 6 months. That change was followed by a significant decline (p < 0.001) in serum hemoglobin at 3-6 months (137 g/L in group 2 and 129 g/L in group 3). We observed a small but statistically significant increase in serum erythropoietin (p < 0.001) of 8 U/L in group 2 and 4 U/L in group 3 after 6 months of tab. No immediate recovery in serum hemoglobin, testosterone, or erythropoietin was observed upon completion of tab.

CONCLUSIONS

Although conformal radiotherapy alone for localized prostate cancer had no effect on serum hemoglobin, testosterone, or erythropoietin, tab led to a significant decline in testosterone, which was followed by decline in hemoglobin that was not a result of a deficiency of erythropoietin.