Volume should be used instead of diameter for kidney stones between 10 and 20 mm to determine the type of surgery and increase success

Aim of this study is to categorize stones between 10 and 20 mm according to stone diameter or volume and compare mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) outcomes. Files of 515 patients who underwent surgery for kidney stones with sizes 10-20 mm were reviewed. Patients were divided into RIRS or mPNL groups. An attempt was made to find the diameter and volume threshold values above which the success of the operation, complication rates and the number of auxiliary treatments deteriorated. Subgroup analysis was performed below and above the threshold value to reveal the optimal treatment methods. RIRS complications increased with volumes above 1064 mm³, number of auxiliary interventions increased with volumes above 1256 mm³, and success of the operation decreased with volumes above 1416 mm³. A subgroup analysis under and over 1064 mm³ was performed in RIRS group. Complication and auxiliary treatment rates were higher, operative success was lower in patients with a stone volume greater than 1064 mm³. In patients who underwent RIRS, for every 1000 mm³ increase in stone volume success of the operation decreased by 2.1 times, while the probability of auxiliary treatment increased by 2.8 times. In patients with kidney stones between 10 and 20 mm, it is more meaningful to use volume instead of diameter to determine the success rate. When mPNL is used instead of RIRS for volumes greater than 1064 mm³, the success rate will be higher, complication rate will be similar, and the need for auxiliary treatment will be lower.

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in the Treatment of Renal Hydatid Cysts

Background: To compare the efficacy, safety, and long-term results of laparoscopic and open approaches in patients undergoing surgery for renal hydatid cyst. Materials and Methods: The files of 36 patients who were surgically treated in our clinic and with diagnosis of renal cyst hydatid confirmed pathologically were reviewed. According to the surgical technique applied, the patients were divided into two groups as open (group 1) or laparoscopic (group 2) partial pericystectomy. Oral albendazole was given 10 mg/kg/day (in two divided doses) for 4 weeks preoperatively and for three cycles of 4 weeks at 1-week intervals after surgery in all patients. Demographic characteristics, laboratory and imaging findings, operation times, hospitalization times, complications, intraoperative bleeding amounts, and recurrence rates were statistically compared in both groups. Results: Open partial pericystectomy was performed in 21 patients in group 1, and laparoscopic transperitoneal partial pericystectomy was performed in 15 patients in group 2. Operation time and intraoperative bleeding amount in group 1 and group 2 were 119.6 ± 17.1/116.1 ± 17.6 minutes and 125.7 ± 27.8/113.9 ± 19.2 mL, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between these values (P = .557, P = .167, respectively). Hospitalization duration of both groups was 5.9 ± 1.4/3.6 ± 0.7 days, respectively. Hospitalization duration in group 2 was statistically significantly shorter (P < .001). No recurrence occurred during postoperative follow-up in either group. Conclusions: In the treatment of renal hydatid cysts, laparoscopy, which is a minimally invasive approach, can be technically applied with the same principles as open surgery and has a similar efficacy and safety profile for short- and long-term results.

A Different and Novel Alternative (ADANA) Renal Access Technique when CT or USG Guidance Is Inadequate in Case of Retro-Renal Colon

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography (USG)-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is not suitable in all cases with retro-renal colon (RRC) due to anatomical and technical restrictions. We would like to describe our novel technique that permits standard subcostal renal access with a small incision for these patients.

METHODS

This method was performed on adult patients with severe RRC and complex renal stones who were not suitable for renal access with CT or USG guidance. Time from skin incision to puncture needle insertion, incision length, stone-free rate (SFR), and complications were evaluated.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The appropriate renal calyx for renal access was identified with retrograde pyelography. The skin closest to the identified calyx was incised and retroperitoneum visualized. The RRC was swept laterally by blunt dissection to obtain a safe puncture line. The retractors were placed to keep the colon away from the incision. Then, the puncture needle was placed over Gerota's fascia. After this, the puncture needle was inserted into the targeted calyx under fluoroscopic guidance. The insertion of guidewire and the rest of the procedure such as dilatation and insertion of Amplatz sheath were performed under same maneuver.

RESULTS

A total of 1,348 patients were treated with PNL between January 2016 and November 2019. Our group consisted of 16 adult patients with a median age of 44.8 years (7 females and 9 males) who underwent PNL with our new access technique. SFR and clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIRF) rate were 72.5 and 14.2%, respectively. The median access time was 22.2 min (range: 15-30 min). The median skin incision length was 3.7 (range: 3.0-4.5) cm. The average skin incision length was 3.7 cm. The SFR and CIRF rate were 72.5 and 14.2%, respectively. We did not observe any complication related to our access technique.

CONCLUSION

Our novel access technique created a safe anatomical route for standard subcostal renal access with acceptable incision length and very low complication rate.