Molecular detection of Mansonella mariae incriminates Simulium oyapockense as a potentially important bridge vector for Amazon-region zoonoses

OBJECTIVE

To assess the emergent zoonotic disease risk posed by the voracious human-biting blackfly species Simulium oyapockense in the peripheral regions of an expanding urban centre situated deep in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest.

METHODS

We performed nine human landing catches at three periurban sites surrounding the Brazilian Amazon town of São Gabriel da Cachoeira. Using the detection of non-human primate filarial parasites as an indicator of the zoonotic disease threat posed by a biting insect, we screened 3328 S. oyapockense blackflies for the presence of zoonotic filarial DNA with an ITS-1 PCR assay and Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Between 98 and 100% of the biting insects captured during our nine collections were identified as S. oyapockense; at our three collection sites and during our three seasonally-distinct collections this species was captured at rates between 28 and 294 blackflies per hour. PCR screening of the march-collected S. oyapockense detected infectious-stage (L3) Mansonella mariae parasites (which are only known to infect non-human primates) in >0.15% of the tested head samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that residents of the periurban regions of São Gabriel da Cachoeira are routinely exposed to the bites of S. oyapockense blackflies which have previously fed on non-human primates.

Deep Sequencing Reveals Occult Mansonellosis Coinfections in Residents From the Brazilian Amazon Village of São Gabriel da Cachoeira

Mansonella ozzardi and Mansonella perstans infections both cause mansonellosis but are usually treated differently. Using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay and deep sequencing, we reveal the presence of mansonellosis coinfections that were undetectable by standard diagnostic methods. Our results confirm mansonellosis coinfections and have important implications for the disease's treatment and diagnosis.

Blackflies in the ointment: O. volvulus vector biting can be significantly reduced by the skin-application of mineral oil during human landing catches

Background

Standard human landing catches (sHLCs) have historically been a key component of Onchocerca volvulus transmission monitoring, but expose health-workers to potentially hazardous vector bites. Novel human-bait-free trapping methods have been developed, but do not always work where they are needed and may not generate O. volvulus surveillance data that is directly comparable with historic data.

Methodology

Simuliid sHLCs and mineral-oil protected HLCs (mopHLCs) were performed in a rural village of Amazonas state, Brazil. A four-hour direct comparisons of sHLCs and mopHLCs was carried-out using six vector collectors, each of whom used one leg for a sHLC and one for a mopHLC. Two-person collection teams then exclusively performed either mopHLCs or sHLCs for a further set of 12 four-hour collections. Following the completion of all collections, simuliid-bite mark estimates were made from legs used exclusively in sHLCs and legs used exclusively in mopHLCs.

Principal findings

All of the 1669 captured simuliids were identified as the O. volvulus vector Simulium oyapockense. Overall, mopHLC simuliids captured per hour (S/H) rates were lower than those obtained with sHLC trapping (15.5 S/H versus 20 S/H). Direct comparisons of simuliid capture rates found that vector-collectors captured simuliids significantly more efficiently (x¯: 20.5 S/H) with mopHLC trapping than with sHLC trapping (x¯: 16.4 S/H): P-value = 0.002. MopHLCs performed in isolation were, however, observed to capture vectors less efficiently (x¯: 13.4 S/H) than sHLCs performed under similar conditions (x¯: 19.98 S/H). All six vector collectors had significantly higher simuliid capture per counted bite mark (SC/CBM) rates using mopHLCs than they were observe to have using sHLCs (x¯: 21 SC/CBM versus x¯: 1 SC/CBM; p-value = 0.03125).

Conclusions

Vector collectors captured significantly more simuliids per counted bite mark with mopHLCs than with sHLCs. Further investigations into the utility of mopHLCs for onchocerciasis xenomonitoring and beyond are merited.

Standard human landing catches (sHLCs) have historically been used to obtain key Onchocerca volvulus transmission data that has helped with the design and monitoring of the WHO´s onchocerciasis control programmes. To avoid the health risks associated with sHLCs, alternative human-bait-free blackfly trapping methods, most of which immobilize and suffocate blackflies with a viscous liquid substance, have been developed. Questions, however, have be raised as to whether these human-bait-free trapping methods generate O. volvulus transmission data that is directly comparable with historic sHLC data. In this study, we have combined sHLCs with mineral oil vector capture and shown that the skin application of mineral oil can significantly reduce (and possibly eliminate) simuliid biting during HLCs. In direct comparisons, we have shown that mineral oil protected human landing catches (mopHLCs) were more efficient at capturing the O. volvulus vector Simulium oyapockense than sHLCs. We have also shown that mopHLCs, performed in isolation of vector collectors using exposed skin for their trapping, are less efficient than HLCs, but still function well. We believe that mopHLCs represent a promising alternative to sHLCs that merit further testing for their utility in the epidemiological monitoring of onchocerciasis and, indeed, other vector borne diseases as well.