Estimating survival in patients with melanoma brain metastases: prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase

Patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have poor prognosis, albeit advances in locoregional and systemic treatments. The melanoma-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) effectively stratifies survival for patients with MBM. Nevertheless, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a well known prognostic factor for patients with melanoma, is not represented in the GPA scores and might add prognostic information for patients with MBM. In this study, 150 consecutive patients with MBM were retrospectively analyzed with the aim of evaluating independent prognostic factors for MBM patients, including LDH. Furthermore, we implemented a disease-specific prognostic score and estimated survival according to treatment modalities. On the basis of multivariable Cox regression analyses, six prognostic factors (age, BRAF status, number of MBM, number of extracranial metastatic sites, performance status, and LDH level) resulted statistically significant in terms of survival and were combined in a prognostic score to stratify patients in distinct prognostic groups ( P  < 0.0001). Among treatment modalities, a multimodal approach with stereotactic radiosurgery or neurosurgery associated with systemic therapy showed the best outcome (median overall survival: 12.32 months, 95% confidence interval, 7.92-25.30). This is the first study to demonstrate that LDH has independent prognostic value for patients with MBM and might be used to improve prognostic stratification, albeit external validation is mandatory. Survival of patients with MBM is affected by both disease-specific risk factors and treatment modalities, with locoregional treatments associated with better outcomes.

Preoperative treatments in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: current evidence and new perspectives

Surgery is the only curative treatment for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but less than 20% of patients present a resectable disease at diagnosis. Treatment strategies and disease definition for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) vary in the different cancer centres. Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) is the standard of care for both BRPC and LAPC patients, however literature data are still controversial concerning the type, dose and duration of the different CT regimens, as well as regarding the integration of radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) in the therapeutic algorithm. In this unsettled debate, we aimed at focusing on the therapeutic regimens currently in use and relative literature data, to report international trials comparing the available therapeutic options or explore the introduction of new pharmacological agents, and to analyse possible new scenarios in microenvironment evaluation before and after neoadjuvant therapies or in patients' selection at a molecular level.

BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis summarizes the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) of BRAFi and MEKi.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline/PubMed was conducted to identify suitable articles published in English up to 31 December 2021. The primary outcomes were profiles for all-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs, and the analysis of single side effects belonging to both categories.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of treatment-related all-grade Aes was 99% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.97-1.00) and 97% for Trametinib (95% CI: 0.92-0.99; I² = 66%) and Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.94-0.99; I² = 0%). In combined therapies, the rate was 98% for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.96-0.99; I² = 77%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.96-1.00). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 69% of cases for Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.50-0.84; I² = 71%), 68% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.61-0.74), and 72% for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.65-0.79; I² = 84%). The most common grade 1-2 AEs were pyrexia (43%) and fatigue (28%) for Dabrafenib + Trametinib and diarrhea for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (52%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (34%). The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were pyrexia, rash, and hypertension for Dabrafenib + Trametinib (6%), rash and hypertension for Encorafenib + Binimetinib (6%), and increased AST and ALT for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides comprehensive data on treatment-related adverse events of BRAFi and MEKi combination therapies, showing related toxicity profiles to offer a helpful tool for clinicians in the choice of therapy.

An Integrated Pharmacological Counselling Approach to Guide Decision-Making in the Treatment with CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Metastatic Breast Cancer

A wide inter-individual variability in the therapeutic response to cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDKis) has been reported. We herein present a case series of five patients treated with either palbociclib or ribociclib referred to our clinical pharmacological counselling, including therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), pharmacogenetics, and drug–drug interaction analysis to support clinicians in the management of CDKis treatment for metastatic breast cancer. Patients’ plasma samples for TDM analysis were collected at steady state and analyzed by an LC-MS/MS method for minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) evaluation. Under and overexposure to the drug were defined based on the mean Cmin values observed in population pharmacokinetic studies. Polymorphisms in selected genes encoding for proteins involved in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination were analyzed (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ABCB1, SLCO1B1, and ABCG2). Three of the five reported cases presented a CDKi plasma level above the population mean value and were referred for toxicity. One of them presented a low function ABCB1 haplotype (ABCB1-rs1128503, rs1045642, and rs2032582), possibly causative of both increased drug oral absorption and plasmatic concentration. Two patients showed underexposure to CDKis, and one of them was referred for early progression. In one patient, a CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype was found to be potentially responsible for more efficient drug metabolism and lower drug plasma concentration. This intensified pharmacological approach in clinical practice has been shown to be potentially effective in supporting prescribing oncologists with dose and drug selection and could be ultimately useful for increasing both the safety and efficacy profiles of CDKi treatment.

Multidisciplinary Team Meeting Proposal and Final Therapeutic Choice in Early Breast Cancer: Is There an Agreement?

Background

A multidisciplinary team meeting (MDM) approach in breast cancer (BC) management is a standard of care. One of the roles of MDMs is to identify the best diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients (pts) with new diagnosis of early BC. The purpose of this study was to define whether there was an agreement between the planned program (i.e., MDMs-based decision) and that actually applied. In addition, the study explored factors associated with discordance.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of a consecutive series of 291 patients with new diagnosis of early BC, discussed at MDMs at the University Hospital of Udine (Italy), from January 2017 to June 2018. The association between clinico-biological factors and discordance between what was decided during the MDMs and what was consequently applied by the oncologist was explored through uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

The median age was 62 years (range 27–88 years). Among invasive early BC patients, the most frequent phenotype was luminal A (38%), followed by luminal B (33%), HER2-positive (12%), and triple-negative (5%). In situ carcinoma (DCIS) represented 12% of cases. The median time from MDM discussion to first oncologic examination was 2 weeks. The rate of discordance between MDM-based decision and final choice, during a face-to-face consultation with the oncologist, was 15.8% (46/291). The most frequent reason for changing the MDM-based program was clinical decision (87%). Follow-up was preferred to the chemotherapy (CT) proposed within the MDMs in 15% of cases, and to the endocrine therapy (ET) in 39% of cases (among these, 44.5% had a diagnosis of DCIS). Therapeutic change from sequential CT-ET to ET alone was chosen in 16/46 pts (35%): among these patients, seven had a luminal B disease and six had an HER2-positive disease. On univariate analysis, factors associated with discordance were values of Ki-67 14%–30% (OR 3.91; 95% CI 1.19–12.9), age >70 years (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.28–4.63), housewife/retired status (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.14–4.85), polypharmacy (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.02–3.72), postmenopausal status (OR 4.15; 95% CI 1.58–10.9), and high Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.09–1.57). The association with marital status, educational level, alcohol and smoke habits, presence of a caregiver, parity, grading, histotype and phenotype, and stage was not statistically significant. On multivariate analysis, only Ki-67 value maintained its statistical significance.

Conclusion

The results of our study could be useful for enhancing the role of MDMs in the clinical decision-making process in early BC.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review

Historically, metastatic melanoma was considered a highly lethal disease. However, recent advances in drug development have allowed a significative improvement in prognosis. In particular, BRAF/MEK inhibitors and anti-PD1 antibodies have completely revolutionized the management of this disease. Nonetheless, not all patients derive a benefit or a durable benefit from these therapies. To overtake this challenges, new clinically active compounds are being tested in the context of clinical trials. CDK4/6 inhibitors are drugs already available in clinical practice and preliminary evidence showed a promising activity also in melanoma. Herein we review the available literature to depict a comprehensive landscape about CDK4/6 inhibitors in melanoma. We present the molecular and genetic background that might justify the usage of these drugs, the preclinical evidence, the clinical available data, and the most promising ongoing clinical trials.

Refining neutropenia risk assessment in patients treated with first-line endocrine therapy (ET) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) through a cell-free DNA workflow (cfDNA)

1027

Background: The combination of ET and CDK4/6i is the current standard of care for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative MBC (luminal MBC), with neutropenia being the main dose limiting toxicity. We previously observed the potential association between leucocyte count (WBC) and different fractions of cell free circulating DNA (cfDNA) (Bortot et al 2020). The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a cfDNA-based workflow as a new tool to assess the risk of treatment induced neutropenia. Methods: The study analyzed a prospective cohort 83 luminal MBC patients (pts) treated with first line ET and CDK4/6i in the CRO-2018-56 multicenter study from 2018 to 2021. cfDNA was characterized through droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) based on different ACTB DNA fragments lengths: short (s), medium (m) and long (l). Blood samples were collected before treatment start (BL) and at the first clinical evaluation after 3 months (E1). Associations between clinical characteristics, neutropenia and cfDNA were explored through Kruskal Wallis, time to G3 neutropenia (NG3) (TTN) was analyzed through log-rank and Cox regression. Results: Neutropenia was G3 in 44 out of 83 pts (53%) and G4 in 2 pts (2%). Median TTN was 1.8 months, 60% of NG3 occurred within 3.7 months. Overall, 74 pts (89%) resolved toxicity within 7 days, 10 pts (12%) reduced CDK4/6i dose after NG3. BL neutrophils count (Neu) and WBC were significantly lower in pts that developed NG3 (P = 0.0013 and P = 0.0020 respectively). De novo metastatic pts had numerically higher Neu (median 4825 vs 3895), but only a numerically lower risk of NG3 was observed (HR 0.53 P = 0.064). Although bone involvement was not associated with risk of developing NG3, the total number of metastatic lesions was associated with higher NG3 (P = 0.0016). In particular, > 5 metastatic lesions were associated with higher NG3 risk (p = 0.013). E1 ACTB_m was significantly lower with respect to BL in pts that experienced NG3 (median 100% vs 16%, P = 0.0136 in NG3 no vs yes) with a consistent impact on the risk of NG3 (HR: 2.81, P = 0.025). No associations were observed for the other ACTB fragment length fractions. BL Neu and ACTB_m dichotomized at the median were then combined to describe 4 distinct TTN risk groups (P = 0.0006). Interestingly, pts with low BL Neu and low E1 ACTB_m had a median TTN of 0.9 months, while pts with high BL Neu and high E1 ACTB_m have not experienced NG3 after a median follow-up of 16.1 months. Conclusions: The present study proofed the concept of using cfDNA to provide clinically meaningful data not only about tumor biology, but also for a comprehensive patient assessment. Based on these results, a prospective study focused on a multiparametric neutropenia risk assessment will be started.

Impact of 12 months of immunotherapy for metastatic cancer patients on oncology workload

279

Background: In the last years, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in clinical practice translated into major changes in oncology workload. We conducted a study aimed to estimate the shift in workload generated, within 1 year of first consultation, by any new metastatic cancer patient receiving ICI at the Oncology Department of the Academic Hospital of Udine, Italy. Methods: We collected from our electronic accountability system data all new cases of metastatic cancer between 01.01.2017 and 31.12.2018, leading to at least a second clinical episode (treatment sessions, unplanned presentations, hospitalizations, re-evaluations, follow-up, and inpatient oncology advices) during the following year. Patients (pts) were divided into those receiving ICI (anti-CTLA4/PD1/PDL1) versus pts receiving other treatments. Mean number per patient and standard deviation were calculated for clinical episodes, and the mean numbers in each group were compared using Student’s t-test (significance p<0.05). Follow-up continued until 31.12.2019. Results: 969 pts were included: 115 were treated with ICI, 854 received other treatments. In the first group a greater number of treatment sessions, re-evaluations and unplanned presentations was generated, with a statistically significant increased workload. On the other hand, pts receiving other treatments generated a greater workload in terms of follow-up. In detail, data are reported in Table. Conclusions: ICI have transformed the oncology landscape, leading to longer lasting treatment period with emerging toxicities. Estimating the workload generated by ICI is crucial for the implementation of more sustainable systems and for planning clinical activities. Mean number of clinical episodes in the first year of treatment with ICI for metastatic disease. Mean number per patient is represented by mean value and standard deviation (SD). Total number of clinical episodes is shown (N=). Data are reported for ICI versus other treatments group. [Table: see text]

Management of immune-related adverse events: A single-center retrospective analysis in a real-world scenario

e15163

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), anti CTLA-4 and anti PD-1/PD-L1 agents, have demonstrated an improvement in survival outcome in several malignancies. Therapy with ICI is characterized by immune-related adverse events (irAEs) as a result of exuberant immune system activation. Despite good tolerance for ICI, the potentially severe and life-threatening irAEs underscore the importance of investigating optimal management strategies. Methods: A retrospective series of 130 consecutive patients (pts) treated with ICI from Jan 2012 to Dec 2017 was analyzed. Adverse events with a potential immunological etiology were defined as irAEs and graded according to CTCAE v.4.0. The aim of the study was to evaluate irAEs management in an academic hospital center. Results: Pts with a diagnosis of NSCLC n = 64 (49%), melanoma n = 55 (42%), kidney n = 9 (7%) and others n = 2 (2%) were investigated. Baseline ECOG PS was ≤ 1 in 96% of the pts. ICI represented first line treatment for 27% pts, second line for 57% and third or further line for the remaining 16%. 18% were treated with ipilimumab and 82% with anti PD-1/PD-L1 agents (nivolumab 60%, pembrolizumab 21%, atezolizumab 1%). Overall, 50 (38% of pts) developed an irAE.42% of irAEs were grade 1, 38% grade 2, 14% grade 3 and 6% grade 4. The most frequent irAEs were endocrinopathies in 17 pts (34%), followed by cutaneous toxicity in 9 pts (18%) and colitis and diarrhea in 7 pts (14%). A total of 373 unscheduled accesses were observed, 89 (24%) of them were due to irAEs: 78 were unplanned consultations in the oncology department and 11 in the emergency department. irAEs led to hospitalization in 14 pts for 118 days, cumulatively. Grade ≥ 2 colitis was the most frequent irAE associated with hospitalization, it occurred in 4 pts (29%). Colitis and diarrhea required the longest hospitalization (range 4-31 days). 48% (24 pts) required immunosuppressive treatment. Systemic steroids were the most common immunosuppressive agents used. Only one patient received infliximab as second line immunosuppressive treatment after steroid failure. Totally, irAEs required 67 specialist consultancies and additional diagnostic examinations. 15 pts required ICI discontinuation because of irAEs. Conclusions: In our center prevalence and severity of irAEs were similar to literature data. Considered the complexity of irAEs management, multidisciplinary approach and a trained hospital network plays a key role for a more efficient diagnostic and treatment work-up in pts who received ICI therapy and experienced irAEs.