Increased Frequency of the HLA-DRB1*04:04-DQA1*03-DQB1*03:02 Haplotype Among HLA-DQB1*06:02-Positive Children With Type 1 Diabetes

HLA-DR/DQ haplotypes largely define genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes (T1D). The DQB1*06:02-positive haplotype (DR15-DQ602) common in individuals of European ancestry is very rare among children with T1D. Among 4,490 children with T1D in the Finnish Pediatric Diabetes Register, 57 (1.3%) case patients with DQB1*06:02 were identified, in comparison with 26.1% of affected family-based association control participants. There were no differences between DQB1*06:02-positive and -negative children with T1D regarding sex, age, islet autoantibody distribution, or autoantibody levels, but significant differences were seen in the frequency of second class II HLA haplotypes. The most prevalent haplotype present with DQB1*06:02 was DRB1*04:04-DQA1*03-DQB1*03:02, which was found in 27 (47.4%) of 57 children, compared with only 797 (18.0%) of 4,433 among DQB1*06:02-negative case patients (P < 0.001 by χ2 test). The other common risk-associated haplotypes, DRB1*04:01-DQA1*03-DQB1*03:02 and (DR3)-DQA1*05-DQB1*02, were less prevalent in DQB1*06:02-positive versus DQB1*06:02-negative children (P < 0.001). HLA-B allele frequencies did not differ by DQB1*06:02 haplotype between children with T1D and control participants or by DRB1*04:04-DQA1*03-DQB1*03:02 haplotype between DQB1*06:02-positive and -negative children with T1D. The increased frequency of the DRB1*04:04 allele among DQB1*06:02-positive case patients may indicate a preferential ability of the DR404 molecule to present islet antigen epitopes despite competition by DQ602.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

CXADR polymorphism rs6517774 modifies islet autoimmunity characteristics and exhibits sex disparity

Enteroviral infections have been linked to the development of islet autoimmunity (IA) and type 1 diabetes (T1D), and the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CXADR) is one of the ligands used by adenoviruses and enteroviruses for cell internalization. Two CXADR single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs6517774 and rs2824404, were previously associated with an increased susceptibility to IA in the international TEDDY study (The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young). This study aimed to replicate the results by genotyping 2886 children enrolled in the Finnish Diabetes Prediction and Prevention study (DIPP). In our preliminary analysis of the SNPs' allelic distributions, we could not find any association with IA susceptibility. However, a stratified analysis revealed a sex disparity, since the allelic distribution of rs6517774 was different when comparing autoantibody positive females with males; a difference not seen in healthy subjects. By using HLA risk groups and sex as covariates, a Cox regression survival analysis found that the rs6517774 (A/G) SNP was associated with a lower age at seroconversion in females (Female*rs6517774-AA; HR = 1.53, p = 0.002), while introducing a protective effect in males. Accordingly, we propose that rs6517774 alters IA characteristics by modifying the age at seroconversion in a sex-dependent manner. In light of this observation, rs6517774 now joins a limited set on SNPs found to introduce sex-dependent risk effects on the age at IA initiation.

Tri-SNP polymorphism in the intron of HLA-DRA1 affects type 1 diabetes susceptibility in the Finnish population

Genes in the HLA class II region include the most important inherited risk factors for type 1 diabetes (T1D) although also polymorphisms outside the HLA region modulate the predisposition to T1D. This study set out to confirm a recent observation in which a novel expression quantitative trait locus was formed by three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the intron of HLA-DRA1 in DR3-DQ2 haplotypes. The SNPs significantly increased the risk for T1D in DR3-DQ2 homozygous individuals and we intended to further explore this association, in the Finnish population, by comparing two DR3-DQ2 positive genotypes. Cohorts with DR3-DQ2/DR3-DQ2 (N = 570) and DR3-DQ2/DR1-DQ5 (N = 1035) genotypes were studied using TaqMan analysis that typed for rs3135394, rs9268645 and rs3129877. The tri-SNP haplotype was significantly more common in cases than controls in the DR3-DQ2/DR3-DQ2 cohort (OR = 1.70 CI 95% = 1.15-2.51P = 0.007). However, no significant associations could be observed in the DR3-DQ2/DR1-DQ5 cohort.

Technology and everyday functioning in people with intellectual disabilities: a Rasch analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ)

BACKGROUND

As people with intellectual disabilities (ID) today live integrated in society and use different technological artefacts and services in their everyday life, more in-depth evaluation methods are crucial to detect strengths and limitations of their everyday technology use. The Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ) was originally designed to investigate the extent to which older adults with cognitive limitations can use the everyday technology that is of relevance to them. The purpose of this study was to explore and evaluate evidence of the validity of ETUQ among adult persons with ID.

METHODS

The original 93-item ETUQ was used to interview 120 adult participants with ID, recruited from a region in northern Sweden. A Rasch model was used to analyse the psychometric properties of the rating scale, scale validity, person response validity and person separation.

RESULTS

The ETUQ rating scale displayed sound psychometric properties when used with this sample. The goodness-of-fit statistics showed that 15 (16%) of the 93 items demonstrated higher values than expected. A step-by-step removal process of items not demonstrating fit to the model resulted in an ETUQ version with 46 items (49%) that met all the criteria for scale validity. Fifteen participants (12%), primarily with mild ID, still demonstrated a higher number of unexpected responses included in ETUQ.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the ETUQ generates a valid measure of perceived difficulty in using everyday technology including adult persons with ID.

The use of everyday technology by people with dementia living alone: mapping out the difficulties

While the technological development available to society is taking quantum leaps, we have little knowledge of how people with mild dementia manage to cope with familiar technology at home, such as television and electronic household machines, or new technology, such as remote controls, cell phones and computers. As this technology represents a potential problem area, the aim of this qualitative, exploratory study was to identify and characterize difficulties with and hindrances to using everyday technology, as they appeared in data, for persons with early stage dementia. Eight participants with dementia were included in an extensive data collection consisting of repeated interviews and observations made in the home; the data were analyzed adopting a constant comparative approach. The results exhibit a taxonomy of difficulties in four domains, encompassing conditions that interfere with the use of the technology, deficiencies in knowledge and in the communication between users and their technology, and limitations in the use of instructions. Typically, difficulties appeared in complex combinations. They arose when familiar technology was being used, and not only when new technology was to be used. This raised concerns about the need these people have for support in home and in society. Further research is needed to validate the findings.

Comparing motor and process ability of persons with suspected dementia in home and clinic settings

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating functional level of persons with diagnosed or suspected dementia is an important part of occupational therapy. The importance of the environment is often highlighted. We investigated the ability of clients with suspected dementia to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) in the clinic versus in their homes.

METHOD

We used the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) to measure the motor and process skill ability of 19 clients with suspected dementia.

RESULTS

Using two-tailed paired t-tests, we found no overall difference in IADL motor or process performance between the clinic and home setting. However, of the 19 clients, 6 had motor ability measures, whereas 5 had process ability measures that differed significantly between the two settings.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that if we want to know how a person with suspected dementia performs in IADLs in a specific environment we should test him or her in that environment.